Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1906204-FO-INTELCORE27 intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz - Phoronix Test Suite intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1906204-FO-INTELCORE27&rdt&grt .
intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution SAMSUNG MZNLN256 Intel Core i5-6200U Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 Intel HD 520 Intel Connection I219-V Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads) HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 16384MB 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256 Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz) Conexant CX20724 Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260 Ubuntu 18.04 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 3.28.4 modesetting 1.20.1 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8 GCC 7.4.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Disk Details - SAMSUNG MZNLN256: CFQ / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave Security Details - KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection Compiler Details - Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079, Intel Connection I219-V: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz startup-time: Only Seq Reads - xterm - Default Test Directory startup-time: Only Seq Reads - GNOME Terminal - Default Test Directory startup-time: Only Seq Reads - LibreOffice Writer - Default Test Directory cp2k: Fayalite-FIST Data mpcbench: Multi-Precision Benchmark gromacs: Water Benchmark hdparm-read: /dev/sda hint: FLOAT hint: DOUBLE hpcg: himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver hpcc: G-HPL hpcc: G-Ffte hpcc: EP-DGEMM hpcc: G-Ptrans hpcc: EP-STREAM Triad hpcc: G-Rand Access hpcc: Rand Ring Latency hpcc: Rand Ring Bandwidth hpcc: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth interbench: X - Burn interbench: X - Read interbench: Audio - X interbench: Video - X interbench: X - Video interbench: X - Write interbench: Gaming - X interbench: X - Compile interbench: X - Memload interbench: Audio - Burn interbench: Audio - Read interbench: Video - Burn interbench: Video - Read interbench: Audio - Video interbench: Audio - Write interbench: Gaming - Burn interbench: Video - Write interbench: Gaming - Write interbench: Audio - Compile interbench: Audio - Memload interbench: Video - Compile interbench: Video - Memload interbench: Gaming - Compile interbench: Gaming - Memload iozone: 1MB - 2GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 4GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 2GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 4GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 512MB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 1MB - 512MB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Write Performance j2dbench: Text Rendering j2dbench: Image Rendering j2dbench: All Rendering Tests j2dbench: Vector Graphics Rendering java-gradle-perf: Reactor java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation john-the-ripper: Blowfish john-the-ripper: Traditional DES john-the-ripper: MD5 juliagpu: CPU juliagpu: CPU+GPU jxrendermark: Simple Blit - 32x32 jxrendermark: 12pt Text LCD - 32x32 jxrendermark: Simple Blit - 128x128 jxrendermark: Simple Blit - 256x256 jxrendermark: Simple Blit - 512x512 jxrendermark: 12pt Text LCD - 128x128 jxrendermark: 12pt Text LCD - 256x256 jxrendermark: 12pt Text LCD - 512x512 jxrendermark: Put Composition - 32x32 jxrendermark: Simple Blit - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: 12pt Text LCD - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Put Composition - 128x128 jxrendermark: Put Composition - 256x256 jxrendermark: Put Composition - 512x512 jxrendermark: Rects Composition - 32x32 jxrendermark: 12pt Text Grayscale - 32x32 jxrendermark: Put Composition - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Rects Composition - 128x128 jxrendermark: Rects Composition - 256x256 jxrendermark: Rects Composition - 512x512 jxrendermark: 12pt Text Grayscale - 128x128 jxrendermark: 12pt Text Grayscale - 256x256 jxrendermark: 12pt Text Grayscale - 512x512 jxrendermark: Gradient+Temp Texture - 32x32 jxrendermark: Linear Gradient Blend - 32x32 jxrendermark: Radial Gradient Paint - 32x32 jxrendermark: Rects Composition - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: 12pt Text Grayscale - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Gradient+Temp Texture - 128x128 jxrendermark: Gradient+Temp Texture - 256x256 jxrendermark: Gradient+Temp Texture - 512x512 jxrendermark: Linear Gradient Blend - 128x128 jxrendermark: Linear Gradient Blend - 256x256 jxrendermark: Linear Gradient Blend - 512x512 jxrendermark: Radial Gradient Paint - 128x128 jxrendermark: Radial Gradient Paint - 256x256 jxrendermark: Radial Gradient Paint - 512x512 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Linear - 32x32 jxrendermark: Gradient+Temp Texture - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Linear Gradient Blend - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Radial Gradient Paint - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Bilinear - 32x32 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Linear - 128x128 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Linear - 256x256 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Linear - 512x512 jxrendermark: Transformed Texture Paint - 32x32 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Bilinear - 128x128 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Bilinear - 256x256 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Bilinear - 512x512 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Linear - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Transformed Texture Paint - 128x128 jxrendermark: Transformed Texture Paint - 256x256 jxrendermark: Transformed Texture Paint - 512x512 jxrendermark: Transformed Blit Bilinear - 1024x1024 jxrendermark: Transformed Texture Paint - 1024x1024 lammps: Rhodopsin Protein llvm-test-suite: Time To Run network-loopback: Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback luajit: Composite luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Fast Fourier Transform luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation lzbench: XZ 0 - Compression lzbench: Zstd 1 - Compression lzbench: Brotli 0 - Compression lzbench: Libdeflate 1 - Compression m-queens: Time To Solve mandelbulbgpu: CPU mandelbulbgpu: CPU+GPU mandelgpu: CPU mandelgpu: CPU+GPU mbw: Memory Copy - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 4096 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 4096 MiB mcperf: Add mcperf: Get mcperf: Set mcperf: Append mcperf: Delete mcperf: Prepend mcperf: Replace mencoder: AVI To LAVC minion: Graceful minion: Solitaire minion: Quasigroup mixbench: Integer mixbench: Double Precision mixbench: Single Precision mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_3d - f32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_all - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - f32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - f32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_3d - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_3d - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_all - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_all - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - u8s8f32s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - u8s8u8s32 mkl-dnn: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - u8s8f32s32 multichase: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride multichase: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads n-queens: Elapsed Time namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms npb: BT.A npb: EP.C npb: FT.A npb: FT.B npb: LU.A npb: LU.C npb: SP.A nginx: Static Web Page Serving node-octane: numenta-nab: Time To Completion numpy: nuttcp: 10G+ UDP - 5.20.0.41 nuttcp: TCP Transfer - Default - 5.20.0.41 nero2d: Total Time openarena: 800 x 600 openarena: 1024 x 768 openarena: 1920 x 1080 openarena: 2560 x 1440 openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance optcarrot: Optimized Benchmark osbench: Create Files osbench: Create Threads osbench: Launch Programs osbench: Create Processes osbench: Memory Allocations paraview: Many Spheres - 800 x 600 paraview: Many Spheres - 1024 x 576 paraview: Many Spheres - 1024 x 768 paraview: Many Spheres - 1280 x 800 paraview: Many Spheres - 1280 x 960 paraview: Many Spheres - 1368 x 768 paraview: Many Spheres - 1400 x 900 paraview: Many Spheres - 1440 x 810 paraview: Many Spheres - 1440 x 900 paraview: Many Spheres - 1600 x 900 paraview: Many Spheres - 1280 x 1024 paraview: Many Spheres - 1400 x 1050 paraview: Many Spheres - 1600 x 1024 paraview: Many Spheres - 1680 x 1050 paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 800 x 600 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 800 x 600 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1024 x 576 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1024 x 768 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 800 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 960 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1368 x 768 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1400 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1440 x 810 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1440 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1600 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1024 x 576 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1024 x 768 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 800 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 960 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1368 x 768 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1400 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1440 x 810 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1440 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1600 x 900 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 1024 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1400 x 1050 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1600 x 1024 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1680 x 1050 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 1024 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1400 x 1050 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1600 x 1024 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1680 x 1050 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 parboil: OpenMP LBM parboil: OpenMP CUTCP parboil: OpenMP Stencil parboil: OpenMP MRI Gridding perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter php: Zend bench php: Zend micro_bench phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite pjdfstest: polybench-c: Covariance Computation polybench-c: Correlation Computation polybench-c: 3 Matrix Multiplications pgbench: On-Disk - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: On-Disk - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: Mostly RAM - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Heavy Contention - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: Mostly RAM - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Heavy Contention - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Write postmark: Disk Transaction Performance povray: Trace Time primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation pybench: Total For Average Test Times qgears2: OpenGL - Text qgears2: OpenGL - Gears qgears2: OpenGL - Image Scaling qgears2: CPU-based Raster - Text qgears2: CPU-based Raster - Gears qgears2: XRender Extension - Text qgears2: XRender Extension - Gears qgears2: CPU-based Raster - Image Scaling qgears2: XRender Extension - Image Scaling qmlbench: Fib10 qmlbench: Canvas Text Simple qmlbench: Creation Delegates Flow qmlbench: Moving Images Animations rbenchmark: radiance: Serial radiance: SMP Parallel ramspeed: Add - Integer ramspeed: Copy - Integer ramspeed: Scale - Integer ramspeed: Triad - Integer ramspeed: Average - Integer ramspeed: Add - Floating Point ramspeed: Copy - Floating Point ramspeed: Scale - Floating Point ramspeed: Triad - Floating Point ramspeed: Average - Floating Point redis: LPOP redis: SADD redis: LPUSH redis: GET redis: SET renaissance: Scala Dotty renaissance: Twitter Finagle renaissance: Apache Spark ALS renaissance: Apache Spark Bayes renaissance: Savina Reactors.IO renaissance: Apache Spark PageRank renaissance: In-Memory Database Shootout renaissance: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree render-bench: rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD rodinia: OpenMP CFD Solver rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster rust-mandel: Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot rust-prime: Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 schbench: 2 - 2 schbench: 2 - 4 schbench: 2 - 6 schbench: 2 - 8 schbench: 4 - 2 schbench: 4 - 4 schbench: 4 - 6 schbench: 4 - 8 schbench: 6 - 2 schbench: 6 - 4 schbench: 6 - 6 schbench: 6 - 8 schbench: 8 - 2 schbench: 8 - 4 schbench: 8 - 6 schbench: 8 - 8 schbench: 16 - 2 schbench: 16 - 4 schbench: 16 - 6 schbench: 16 - 8 schbench: 2 - 16 schbench: 2 - 24 schbench: 2 - 32 schbench: 32 - 2 schbench: 32 - 4 schbench: 32 - 6 schbench: 32 - 8 schbench: 4 - 16 schbench: 4 - 24 schbench: 4 - 32 schbench: 6 - 16 schbench: 6 - 24 schbench: 6 - 32 schbench: 8 - 16 schbench: 8 - 24 schbench: 8 - 32 schbench: 16 - 16 schbench: 16 - 24 schbench: 16 - 32 schbench: 32 - 16 schbench: 32 - 24 schbench: 32 - 32 scikit-learn: scimark2: Composite scimark2: Monte Carlo scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation shoc: OpenCL - Triad shoc: OpenCL - FFT SP shoc: OpenCL - MD5 Hash shoc: OpenCL - Max SP Flops shoc: OpenCL - Bus Speed Download shoc: OpenCL - Bus Speed Readback shoc: OpenCL - Texture Read Bandwidth smallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples sockperf: Throughput sockperf: Latency Ping Pong sockperf: Latency Under Load sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertions stockfish: Total Time stream: Copy stream: Scale stream: Triad stream: Add stress-ng: Crypto stress-ng: Bsearch stress-ng: Forking stress-ng: Hsearch stress-ng: Lsearch stress-ng: Tsearch stress-ng: CPU Stress stress-ng: Semaphores stress-ng: Matrix Math stress-ng: Vector Math stress-ng: Memory Copying stress-ng: Socket Activity stress-ng: Context Switching stress-ng: Glibc C String Functions stress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting stress-ng: System V Message Passing sudokut: Total Time sunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesis svt-av1: 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode svt-hevc: 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode hmmer: Pfam Database Search mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis SAMSUNG MZNLN256 Intel Core i5-6200U Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 Intel HD 520 Intel Connection I219-V 1.86 7.85 6.00 524.51 6933.19 6254.56 6987.80 3393.89 3677.40 3726.18 254.98 264.61 285.24 255.24 271.24 279.97 6208.18 6527.39 7201.02 4076.12 2801.75 261.09 278.01 285.38 233.79 230.88 4390.42 205.94 176 4190 122.56 866.15 6447 1.09 1840.50 20.14827 3.21539 5.22681 0.31648 4.72101 0.00204 0.66375 2.70117 7551.596 30.76 1708.37 684.09 1070.06 1587.21 4189.24 1011.26 2501 9620333 80361 44.46 293.54 918.47 347.12 213.57 886.88 2103.34 1041.41 25 279 288 145 547.31 25.56 78.53 102.82 174.51 37.42 437.58 23.05 22.19 280.78 279.23 95.42 16768.23 34.68 36.09 2251.09 13427.87 77617.30 79532.53 93554.10 91265.33 931.12 39192.23 63699.73 3151.59 38981.23 63905.97 112049 2891.75 1856.49 1609.52 9.53 90.39 91.63 99.84 187.87 96.74 10.46223 2094.00 127.79 3800.46 3836.75 6925.97 5892.73 1855.80 27150 7139022 241.16 410.97 181.55 23.08 33.54 30.74 0.17173742 0.00138340 8.31 8.23 5.74 299.17 152.26 0.5950 1132.88 594.13 13687.40 11027.95 12630.26 19291.24 24754.98 55023.12 11441.74 25099.25 471.34 114.02 55.31 147.15 72.19 420.35 95.40 120.72 498.72 604.12 782.81 73.70 4006845 15.25 6.27 33.97 19.24 9.72 576.39 0.24 281417773.33 653886506.44 246 48 0.25 16.83 34 86 2.10 446 15 4.53 0.60 48.20 5.98 0.20 124.02 100.08 122.48 51.20 127.43 0.68 142.68 0.38 267.97 2.80 2211179.80 2210997.73 602304.57 602012.27 1650179.50 1650582.83 11241.69 10718.61 10260.92 11004.83 6639.58 6594.01 6504.00 6628.22 51217.83 79289.33 51305.17 53966.17 79660.00 54382.63 53288.20 22358.24 961.02 82.75 20.43 19.31 118.63 34.92 106.60 0.59 2.93 445196 55342.67 312.78 20890.87 0.07 91.69 38060.55 0.04 870.09 0.01 51056.70 14427.70 309.28 148.94 0.07 35013.44 0.04 1189.81 1521 263.20 241.20 285 383.20 19478.62 17463.91 17512.94 19751.80 18553.09 19556.43 17485.01 17498.28 19453.62 18497.15 1870222.83 1543506.42 1208131.59 1777741.40 1230756.13 2503 14675 38293 45803 16829 41963 56811 91605 34923 54848 103552 134955 39659 82517 129941 168960 55360 171093 243584 316587 93653 128192 169472 150443 328192 552619 703147 170069 243456 361301 243840 404309 568320 354816 541696 701440 715776 1040384 1374208 1313451 2069163 2688341 42.36 24905.32 17089.80 18598.14 18622.96 308.84 864.20 16327.74 8737.44 20.01 26.03 667.57 3491645.24 10584.63 3568.65 977.62 1076.78 654248.94 118156.97 24.97 1314503.67 6.24 11706.17 1555369.89 1042552.33 895154.66 279587.55 155143.98 256952.41 95895.51 19533.35 111009.44 83352.80 54373.89 15173.87 8912.70 32526.56 11500.01 8503.61 5392.88 45354.17 154396.17 3346.52 35241.23 17805.89 9935.02 110398.30 82554.46 53410.09 15246.71 17945.19 17662.90 5522.11 31971.61 14172.79 8897.58 3209.43 16740.94 10637.60 4036.64 16951.51 12015.59 5169.43 205110.25 2216.68 1828.74 2347.42 46869.12 193198.67 55114.49 15423.63 49441.50 42486.65 25935.29 8860.07 69108.10 46929.59 18621.36 9579.63 4985.11 5441.06 5.30 5.82 0.12 178.87 126.23 49.07 197.00 5.03 5.02 5.00 4.99 4.95 5.01 4.93 4.97 4.95 4.94 4.91 4.91 4.89 4.88 4.88 36.68 30.77 37.96 28.60 27.10 22.94 28.27 24.23 26.76 24.14 24.03 32.16 20.63 19.50 15.72 20.55 16.84 19.12 16.81 16.80 21.62 21.36 20.93 20.99 20.97 14.64 14.58 14.45 14.44 14.43 532.12 607.31 2389.74 293.73 179.38 280.15 186.50 1327.76 1639.15 17.17 7.15 0.99 0.02 74.00 14.76 14.15 2.14 12.39 166.07 127.38 338069 5.03 13.66 OpenBenchmarking.org
Application Start-up Time Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: xterm - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org sec, Fewer Is Better Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: xterm - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 0.4185 0.837 1.2555 1.674 2.0925 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.86
Application Start-up Time Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: GNOME Terminal - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org sec, Fewer Is Better Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: GNOME Terminal - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 7.85
Application Start-up Time Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: LibreOffice Writer - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org sec, Fewer Is Better Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: LibreOffice Writer - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.00
CP2K Molecular Dynamics Fayalite-FIST Data OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 866.15
GNU MPC Multi-Precision Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Global Score, More Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 12.02, N = 3 6447 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -mtune=skylake -march=broadwell -MT -MD -MP -MF
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2018.3 Water Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.054 0.108 0.162 0.216 0.27 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=core-avx2 -std=c++11 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -fopenmp -lrt -lpthread -lm
hdparm Timed Disk Reads Disk To Read: /dev/sda OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better hdparm Timed Disk Reads Disk To Read: /dev/sda SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.16, N = 5 524.51
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 357067.00, N = 3 281417773.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
Hierarchical INTegration Test: DOUBLE OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: DOUBLE Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 140M 280M 420M 560M 700M SE +/- 973018.35, N = 3 653886506.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 Intel Core i5-6200U 0.2453 0.4906 0.7359 0.9812 1.2265 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.09
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 15.79, N = 3 1840.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
HPC Challenge Test / Class: G-HPL OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL Intel Core i5-6200U 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: G-Ffte OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte Intel Core i5-6200U 0.7235 1.447 2.1705 2.894 3.6175 SE +/- 0.02260, N = 3 3.21539 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: G-Ffte OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte Intel Core i5-6200U 0.7235 1.447 2.1705 2.894 3.6175 SE +/- 0.02260, N = 3 3.21539 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: EP-DGEMM OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM Intel Core i5-6200U 1.176 2.352 3.528 4.704 5.88 SE +/- 0.00194, N = 3 5.22681 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: G-Ptrans OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0712 0.1424 0.2136 0.2848 0.356 SE +/- 0.00105, N = 3 0.31648 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad Intel Core i5-6200U 1.0622 2.1244 3.1866 4.2488 5.311 SE +/- 0.00198, N = 3 4.72101 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: G-Random Access OpenBenchmarking.org GUP/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 SE +/- 0.00001, N = 3 0.00204 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: Random Ring Latency OpenBenchmarking.org usecs, Fewer Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency Intel Core i5-6200U 0.1493 0.2986 0.4479 0.5972 0.7465 SE +/- 0.00226, N = 3 0.66375 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth Intel Core i5-6200U 0.6078 1.2156 1.8234 2.4312 3.039 SE +/- 0.01022, N = 3 2.70117 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
HPC Challenge Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth Intel Core i5-6200U 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 118.39, N = 3 7551.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 246 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 3.37, N = 6 48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0563 0.1126 0.1689 0.2252 0.2815 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 0.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 4.12, N = 6 34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 11.22, N = 6 86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.4725 0.945 1.4175 1.89 2.3625 2.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 33.23, N = 6 446 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 6.41, N = 6 15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1.0193 2.0386 3.0579 4.0772 5.0965 SE +/- 2.66, N = 6 4.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.135 0.27 0.405 0.54 0.675 SE +/- 0.31, N = 6 0.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.72, N = 4 48.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1.3455 2.691 4.0365 5.382 6.7275 SE +/- 3.39, N = 6 5.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 0.225 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 22.40, N = 6 124.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.65, N = 6 100.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 24.23, N = 6 122.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 5.79, N = 6 51.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 127.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.153 0.306 0.459 0.612 0.765 SE +/- 0.18, N = 6 0.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 15.46, N = 6 142.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.16, N = 6 0.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 20.40, N = 6 267.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
Interbench Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.63 1.26 1.89 2.52 3.15 2.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 79.01, N = 3 6933.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 106.11, N = 3 6254.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 90.73, N = 3 6987.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 63.95, N = 3 3393.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.34, N = 3 3677.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 27.58, N = 3 3726.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.11, N = 6 254.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.29, N = 6 264.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 285.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.69, N = 3 255.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 271.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 279.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 15.70, N = 3 6208.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 102.17, N = 4 6527.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 53.00, N = 3 7201.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 52.53, N = 3 4076.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.00, N = 3 2801.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.51, N = 4 261.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 278.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 285.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.30, N = 5 233.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.58, N = 3 230.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 202.02, N = 6 4390.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 11.95, N = 6 205.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Text Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 145.62, N = 8 11706.17
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Image Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Intel HD 520 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2417.22, N = 4 1555369.89
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Intel HD 520 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10985.61, N = 4 1042552.33
Java 2D Microbenchmark Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Intel HD 520 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4034.68, N = 4 895154.66
Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build 1.0 Gradle Build: Reactor Intel Core i5-6200U 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.13, N = 4 30.76
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 6.61, N = 4 1708.37
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Intel Core i5-6200U 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.60, N = 4 684.09
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 14.11, N = 4 1070.06
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Intel Core i5-6200U 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.39, N = 4 1587.21
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Intel Core i5-6200U 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 20.39, N = 4 4189.24
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.95, N = 4 1011.26
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Intel Core i5-6200U 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 2501 1. (CC) gcc options: -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt
John The Ripper Test: Traditional DES OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Intel Core i5-6200U 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 13370.78, N = 3 9620333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 29.79, N = 3 80361 1. (CC) gcc options: -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt
JuliaGPU OpenCL Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 435.52, N = 3 2211179.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL -lm
JuliaGPU OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 402.81, N = 3 2210997.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL -lm
JXRenderMark Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 3399.10, N = 6 279587.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1960.10, N = 6 155143.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 4598.78, N = 12 256952.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2184.73, N = 12 95895.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 480.34, N = 12 19533.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1343.95, N = 12 111009.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1062.90, N = 7 83352.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 719.16, N = 7 54373.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 96.88, N = 6 15173.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 444.11, N = 12 8912.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 407.97, N = 12 32526.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 50.02, N = 6 11500.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 111.35, N = 12 8503.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 75.87, N = 12 5392.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 472.88, N = 12 45354.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2040.63, N = 7 154396.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 100.07, N = 12 3346.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 550.99, N = 12 35241.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 275.82, N = 12 17805.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 296.41, N = 12 9935.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1249.93, N = 9 110398.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 983.43, N = 6 82554.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 779.51, N = 12 53410.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 157.48, N = 12 15246.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 220.05, N = 6 17945.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 231.90, N = 7 17662.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 294.20, N = 12 5522.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 260.78, N = 6 31971.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 137.16, N = 12 14172.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 156.36, N = 12 8897.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 79.11, N = 12 3209.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 180.90, N = 12 16740.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 244.60, N = 12 10637.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 88.90, N = 12 4036.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 129.77, N = 6 16951.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 120.93, N = 12 12015.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 181.35, N = 12 5169.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1088.84, N = 6 205110.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 64.98, N = 12 2216.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 71.29, N = 12 1828.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 48.50, N = 12 2347.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 367.15, N = 6 46869.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 3037.72, N = 12 193198.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1393.25, N = 12 55114.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1008.63, N = 12 15423.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 595.57, N = 8 49441.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 492.95, N = 12 42486.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 540.94, N = 12 25935.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 203.82, N = 12 8860.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 26356.51, N = 12 69108.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 657.34, N = 6 46929.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 336.22, N = 12 18621.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 191.89, N = 12 9579.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 144.14, N = 12 4985.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
JXRenderMark Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 148.35, N = 12 5441.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Test: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org Loop Time, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 Test: Rhodopsin Protein Intel Core i5-6200U 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 44.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lfftw -lmpich
LLVM Test Suite Time To Run OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 Time To Run Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 293.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lstdc++ -lm
Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Intel Connection I219-V 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.39
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 918.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Intel Core i5-6200U 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 347.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Intel Core i5-6200U 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 213.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.71, N = 3 886.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Intel Core i5-6200U 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.92, N = 3 2103.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 1041.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 15 30 45 60 75 69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 279 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 160 320 480 640 800 749 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 288 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 377 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 145 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 735 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
m-queens Time To Solve OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Intel Core i5-6200U 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 547.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O2 -march=native
MandelbulbGPU OpenCL Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 317.25, N = 3 602304.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
MandelbulbGPU OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 284.96, N = 3 602012.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
MandelGPU OpenCL Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 471.23, N = 3 1650179.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
MandelGPU OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 1050.79, N = 3 1650582.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 58.06, N = 3 11241.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 11.81, N = 3 10718.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 287.04, N = 6 10260.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 357.35, N = 6 11004.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 31.94, N = 3 6639.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 10.61, N = 3 6594.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 5.70, N = 3 6504.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 83.48, N = 3 6628.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Memcached mcperf Method: Add OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Add Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 260.16, N = 3 51217.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Get OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 228.09, N = 3 79289.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Set OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 179.96, N = 3 51305.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Append OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Append Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 411.03, N = 3 53966.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Delete OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Delete Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 437.05, N = 3 79660.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Prepend OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Prepend Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 101.50, N = 3 54382.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Memcached mcperf Method: Replace OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Replace Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 954.63, N = 3 53288.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Mencoder AVI To LAVC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -ffast-math -fpie -pie -lrt -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lasound -ldl -lpthread -lsndio -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lbz2 -lmad -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -ltheoradec -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -lxvidcore -rdynamic -lm -lXext -lX11 -lXss -lXv -lvdpau -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lcaca -lSDL -lGL -lEGL -lpulse -lfaac -lx264 -lmp3lame
Minion Benchmark: Graceful OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 78.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
Minion Benchmark: Solitaire OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 102.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
Minion Benchmark: Quasigroup OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Intel Core i5-6200U 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 174.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
Mixbench Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org GIOPS, More Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Integer Intel HD 520 1.1925 2.385 3.5775 4.77 5.9625 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 5.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lstdc++ -lOpenCL -lrt -O2
Mixbench Benchmark: Double Precision OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Double Precision Intel HD 520 1.3095 2.619 3.9285 5.238 6.5475 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lstdc++ -lOpenCL -lrt -O2
Mixbench Benchmark: Single Precision OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Single Precision Intel HD 520 0.027 0.054 0.081 0.108 0.135 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lstdc++ -lOpenCL -lrt -O2
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 37.42 MIN: 25.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.27, N = 3 437.58 MIN: 318.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 23.05 MIN: 16.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 22.19 MIN: 15.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 280.78 MIN: 195.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.51, N = 3 279.23 MIN: 191.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 95.42 MIN: 90.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.78, N = 3 16768.23 MIN: 16500.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 34.68 MIN: 32.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 36.09 MIN: 34.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 2251.09 MIN: 2222.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 12.47, N = 3 13427.87 MIN: 13062.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K SE +/- 21.99, N = 3 77617.30 MIN: 77433.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 39.00, N = 3 79532.53 MIN: 79292.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 65.46, N = 3 93554.10 MIN: 92705.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 70.16, N = 3 91265.33 MIN: 90323.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 931.12 MIN: 893.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 39192.23 MIN: 39142.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 16.19, N = 3 63699.73 MIN: 63667 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.45, N = 3 3151.59 MIN: 3030.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 25.75, N = 3 38981.23 MIN: 38894.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 7.34, N = 3 63905.97 MIN: 63869 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 51.73, N = 3 112049 MIN: 111062 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 2.32, N = 3 2891.75 MIN: 2768.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.98, N = 3 1856.49 MIN: 1744.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
MKL-DNN Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 1609.52 MIN: 1517.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride Intel Core i5-6200U 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 9.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 90.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 91.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 99.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads Intel Core i5-6200U 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.69, N = 3 187.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
N-Queens Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 96.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -static -fopenmp -O3 -march=native
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms Intel Core i5-6200U 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 10.46
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: BT.A Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 14.09, N = 3 2094.00 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: EP.C Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 127.79 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: FT.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.A Intel Core i5-6200U 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.56, N = 3 3800.46 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: FT.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.B Intel Core i5-6200U 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 12.19, N = 3 3836.75 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.A Intel Core i5-6200U 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 12.70, N = 3 6925.97 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.C Intel Core i5-6200U 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 2.24, N = 3 5892.73 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: SP.A Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 10.42, N = 3 1855.80 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 31.38, N = 3 22358.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Node.js Octane Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Node.js Octane Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 118.22, N = 3 27150 1. Nodejs
v8.10.0
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark Time To Completion OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 2018-11-09 Time To Completion Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 961.02
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Nanoseconds, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U 1.5M 3M 4.5M 6M 7.5M 7139022
Nuttcp Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Intel Connection I219-V 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.88, N = 6 166.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Nuttcp Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Intel Connection I219-V 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.33, N = 6 127.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Open FMM Nero2D Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Intel Core i5-6200U 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 241.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lfftw3 -llapack -lf77blas -latlas -lgfortran -lquadmath -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
OpenArena Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 178.87 MIN: 2
OpenArena Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 5.52 / Max: 14
OpenArena Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 126.23 MIN: 3
OpenArena Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 7.84 / Max: 16
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 49.07 MIN: 6
OpenArena Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 3 / Avg: 20.27 / Max: 46
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 197.00 MIN: 2
OpenArena Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 5 / Max: 13
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 410.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 4 82.75 1. ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
OSBench Test: Create Files OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Files Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 20.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OSBench Test: Create Threads OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Threads Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.30, N = 4 19.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OSBench Test: Launch Programs OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Launch Programs Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 118.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OSBench Test: Create Processes OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Processes Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 34.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OSBench Test: Memory Allocations OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 106.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 1.1318 2.2636 3.3954 4.5272 5.659 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.03
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 504.59
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 1.1295 2.259 3.3885 4.518 5.6475 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 5.02
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.93, N = 3 503.21
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 1.125 2.25 3.375 4.5 5.625 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.00
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 501.01
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 1.1228 2.2456 3.3684 4.4912 5.614 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.99
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 499.93
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 1.1138 2.2276 3.3414 4.4552 5.569 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.95
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 495.97
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 1.1273 2.2546 3.3819 4.5092 5.6365 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.01
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 501.96
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 1.1093 2.2186 3.3279 4.4372 5.5465 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.93
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 2.94, N = 3 494.32
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 1.1183 2.2366 3.3549 4.4732 5.5915 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.97
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 498.74
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 1.1138 2.2276 3.3414 4.4552 5.569 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.95
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 496.10
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 1.1115 2.223 3.3345 4.446 5.5575 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.94
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 495.22
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 1.1048 2.2096 3.3144 4.4192 5.524 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.91
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 492.47
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 1.1048 2.2096 3.3144 4.4192 5.524 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.91
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 491.74
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 1.1003 2.2006 3.3009 4.4012 5.5015 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.89
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 490.80
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 1.098 2.196 3.294 4.392 5.49 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.88
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 489.43
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 1.098 2.196 3.294 4.392 5.49 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.88
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 489.54
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 36.68
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 586.84
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 30.77
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.64, N = 3 320.66
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 37.96
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 607.32
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 28.60
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.01, N = 3 457.66
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 27.10
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 433.66
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 22.94
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 367.08
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 28.27
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 452.36
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 24.23
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 387.66
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 26.76
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 428.15
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 24.14
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.66, N = 3 386.32
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 24.03
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 384.45
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 32.16
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 335.16
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.63
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 215.04
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 19.50
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 203.27
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.72
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 163.83
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.55
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 214.18
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.84
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 175.53
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.12
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 199.22
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.81
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 175.16
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.80
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 175.01
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.62
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 345.95
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.36
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 341.83
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 20.93
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 334.93
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.99
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 335.81
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.97
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 335.61
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.64
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 152.53
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.58
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 151.91
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.45
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 150.58
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.44
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 150.44
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.43
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 150.43
Parboil Test: OpenMP LBM OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Intel Core i5-6200U 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 181.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Parboil Test: OpenMP CUTCP OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Parboil Test: OpenMP Stencil OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 33.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Parboil Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Intel Core i5-6200U 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 30.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0386 0.0772 0.1158 0.1544 0.193 SE +/- 0.00102592, N = 3 0.17173742
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0003 0.0006 0.0009 0.0012 0.0015 SE +/- 0.00000278, N = 3 0.00138340
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.1328 0.2656 0.3984 0.5312 0.664 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.59
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.6593 1.3186 1.9779 2.6372 3.2965 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.93
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 1088.59, N = 3 445196
Pjdfstest OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pjdfstest SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 176
PolyBench-C Test: Covariance Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Intel Core i5-6200U 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 8.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PolyBench-C Test: Correlation Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Intel Core i5-6200U 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 8.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PolyBench-C Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Intel Core i5-6200U 1.2915 2.583 3.8745 5.166 6.4575 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 5.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 521.30, N = 3 55342.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 312.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 212.08, N = 3 20890.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 91.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 181.31, N = 3 38060.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.71, N = 3 870.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 198.17, N = 3 51056.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 26.31, N = 3 14427.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 309.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.54, N = 6 148.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 104.05, N = 3 35013.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 34.14, N = 6 1189.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 23.67, N = 3 4190 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Intel Core i5-6200U 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 299.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lIexMath -lIlmThread -lpthread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 152.26 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.55, N = 3 1521
QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text Intel HD 520 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 532.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 6.62, N = 3 607.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.66, N = 3 2389.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.46, N = 3 293.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 179.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 280.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 186.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.94, N = 3 1327.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.68, N = 3 1639.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
Qmlbench Test: Fib10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Fib10 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 263.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
Qmlbench Test: Canvas Text Simple OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Canvas Text Simple Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50 100 150 200 250 241.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
Qmlbench Test: Creation Delegates Flow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Creation Delegates Flow Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 285 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
Qmlbench Test: Moving Images Animations OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Moving Images Animations Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80 160 240 320 400 383.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
R Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better R Benchmark Intel Core i5-6200U 0.1339 0.2678 0.4017 0.5356 0.6695 SE +/- 0.0025, N = 3 0.5950 1. R scripting front-end version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15)
Radiance Benchmark Test: Serial OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 1132.88
Radiance Benchmark Test: SMP Parallel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Intel Core i5-6200U 130 260 390 520 650 594.13
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19478.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17463.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17512.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19751.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18553.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19556.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17485.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17498.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19453.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18497.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Redis Test: LPOP OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPOP Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 83375.38, N = 6 1870222.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: SADD Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15129.58, N = 3 1543506.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPUSH Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 33761.61, N = 6 1208131.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: GET Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 79969.77, N = 6 1777741.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 38724.55, N = 6 1230756.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Renaissance Test: Scala Dotty OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Scala Dotty Intel Core i5-6200U 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 121.46, N = 8 13687.40
Renaissance Test: Twitter Finagle OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Twitter Finagle Intel Core i5-6200U 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 134.18, N = 8 11027.95
Renaissance Test: Apache Spark ALS OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS Intel Core i5-6200U 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 138.08, N = 9 12630.26
Renaissance Test: Apache Spark Bayes OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes Intel Core i5-6200U 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 243.39, N = 16 19291.24
Renaissance Test: Savina Reactors.IO OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO Intel Core i5-6200U 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 132.11, N = 8 24754.98
Renaissance Test: Apache Spark PageRank OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank Intel Core i5-6200U 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 247.88, N = 8 55023.12
Renaissance Test: In-Memory Database Shootout OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout Intel Core i5-6200U 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 139.46, N = 16 11441.74
Renaissance Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree Intel Core i5-6200U 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 291.34, N = 9 25099.25
Render Bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Render Bench Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lX11 -lXext -lXrender -lImlib2
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Intel Core i5-6200U 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 471.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia Test: OpenMP CFD Solver OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 114.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Intel Core i5-6200U 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 55.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 147.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -lutil -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm
Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Intel Core i5-6200U 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 72.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm -lutil
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1269.96, N = 6 2503 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 544.13, N = 6 14675 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 518.01, N = 6 38293 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 307.67, N = 3 45803 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 511.37, N = 6 16829 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 758.46, N = 3 41963 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1517.64, N = 6 56811 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 426.67, N = 3 91605 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 451.54, N = 3 34923 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 677.31, N = 3 54848 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 512.00, N = 3 103552 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2090.67, N = 3 134955 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 628.52, N = 3 39659 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 3429.77, N = 6 82517 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1964.82, N = 6 129941 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4534.89, N = 6 168960 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 517.31, N = 3 55360 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1516.92, N = 3 171093 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 6556.72, N = 6 243584 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 3256.11, N = 3 316587 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2121.01, N = 6 93653 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1965.75, N = 6 128192 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4011.39, N = 6 169472 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 3019.40, N = 3 150443 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 4463.51, N = 3 328192 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 9630.20, N = 3 552619 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 17612.93, N = 6 703147 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4385.83, N = 6 170069 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 3838.29, N = 6 243456 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5680.92, N = 3 361301 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 4033.52, N = 4 243840 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 2793.93, N = 3 404309 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 11279.50, N = 3 568320 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5701.39, N = 3 354816 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 10240.00, N = 3 541696 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 10965.25, N = 6 701440 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 26524.04, N = 6 715776 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 18039.07, N = 3 1040384 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 27272.51, N = 3 1374208 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 29354.67, N = 6 1313451 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 151774.78, N = 6 2069163 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 147253.59, N = 6 2688341 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Scikit-Learn OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Scikit-Learn 0.17.1 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 42.36
SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 420.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 95.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 120.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Intel Core i5-6200U 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 498.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Intel Core i5-6200U 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 604.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.99, N = 3 782.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad Intel HD 520 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP Intel HD 520 0.2228 0.4456 0.6684 0.8912 1.114 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash OpenBenchmarking.org GHash/s, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash Intel HD 520 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops Intel HD 520 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.24, N = 3 74.00 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.30, N = 6 14.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 14.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth Intel HD 520 0.4815 0.963 1.4445 1.926 2.4075 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Smallpt Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Intel Core i5-6200U 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 73.70 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3
Sockperf Test: Throughput OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Intel Connection I219-V 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 15293.72, N = 10 338069 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
Sockperf Test: Latency Ping Pong OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong Intel Connection I219-V 1.1318 2.2636 3.3954 4.5272 5.659 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 5.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
Sockperf Test: Latency Under Load OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load Intel Connection I219-V 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 1.46, N = 10 13.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
SQLite Timed SQLite Insertions OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 122.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -ldl -lpthread
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Total Time Intel Core i5-6200U 900K 1800K 2700K 3600K 4500K SE +/- 24622.41, N = 3 4006845 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
Stream Type: Copy OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 4.76, N = 5 24905.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Stream Type: Scale OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 2.27, N = 5 17089.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Stream Type: Triad OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.17, N = 5 18598.14 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Stream Type: Add OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.51, N = 5 18622.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Stress-NG Test: Crypto OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Crypto Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 308.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Bsearch OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.91, N = 3 864.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Forking OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 92.99, N = 3 16327.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Hsearch OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 8.63, N = 3 8737.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Lsearch OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Tsearch OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 26.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: CPU Stress OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 667.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Semaphores OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 11848.64, N = 3 3491645.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Matrix Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 44.88, N = 3 10584.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 1.70, N = 3 3568.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Memory Copying OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.70, N = 3 977.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Socket Activity OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 1076.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Context Switching OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 634.60, N = 3 654248.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Glibc C String Functions OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1137.66, N = 3 118156.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 24.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Stress-NG Test: System V Message Passing OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 53535.70, N = 6 1314503.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
Sudokut Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Intel Core i5-6200U 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.25
Sunflow Rendering System Global Illumination + Image Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.24
SVT-AV1 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Intel Core i5-6200U 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 6.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pie -lpthread -lm
SVT-HEVC 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 33.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -march=native -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
Timed HMMer Search Pfam Database Search OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Intel Core i5-6200U 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 19.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread -lhmmer -lsquid -lm
Timed MAFFT Alignment Multiple Sequence Alignment OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Intel Core i5-6200U 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 9.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -O3 -lm -lpthread
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Intel Core i5-6200U 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 576.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -msse -mfpmath=sse -march=native -lm -pthread -lmpi
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4