1080p Linux Gaming Benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Linux benchmarks for a future article by michael larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1904263-PTS-1080PLIN48
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenCL 2 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 3 Tests
Steam 11 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
HD 7950
April 24 2019
  1 Hour, 29 Minutes
R9 285
April 24 2019
  4 Hours, 59 Minutes
RX 560
April 23 2019
  4 Hours, 21 Minutes
RX 580
April 23 2019
  4 Hours, 19 Minutes
RX 590
April 24 2019
  3 Hours, 28 Minutes
GTX 950
April 25 2019
  3 Hours, 10 Minutes
GTX 960
April 25 2019
  12 Hours, 6 Minutes
GTX 970
April 26 2019
  5 Hours, 18 Minutes
GTX 1060
April 25 2019
  4 Hours, 5 Minutes
GTX 1650
April 26 2019
  4 Hours, 22 Minutes
GTX 1660
April 25 2019
  4 Hours, 3 Minutes
GTX 1660 Ti
April 25 2019
  4 Hours, 2 Minutes
RTX 2060
April 24 2019
  4 Hours, 5 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 36 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


1080p Linux Gaming BenchmarksOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENTXFX AMD Radeon HD 7950/8950 OEM / R9 280 3GBXFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz)Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz)MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 8GB (1366/2000MHz)Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X 8GB (1560/2100MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB (1201/3304MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB (1277/3505MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB (1163/3505MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (1506/4006MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB (1530/4001MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB (1500/6000MHz)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB (1365/7000MHz)Realtek ALC1220Intel I219-VUbuntu 19.045.0.9-050009-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.32.0X Server 1.20.4modesetting 1.20.4NVIDIA 430.094.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0)4.6.01.1.901.1.99GCC 8.3.0ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriversOpenGLsVulkansCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolution1080p Linux Gaming Benchmarks PerformanceSystem Logs- HD 7950: radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1 - R9 285: amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- HD 7950, R9 285, RX 560, RX 580, RX 590: GLAMOR- __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp - GTX 950, GTX 960, GTX 970, GTX 1060, GTX 1650, GTX 1660, GTX 1660 Ti, RTX 2060: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - GTX 950: GPU Compute Cores: 768- GTX 960: GPU Compute Cores: 1024- GTX 970: GPU Compute Cores: 1664- GTX 1060: GPU Compute Cores: 1280- GTX 1650: GPU Compute Cores: 896- GTX 1660: GPU Compute Cores: 1408- GTX 1660 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 1536- RTX 2060: GPU Compute Cores: 1920

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1060GTX 1660GTX 970RX 580RX 590GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285GTX 950HD 7950RX 56060120180240300SE +/- 1.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.95, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 2.65, N = 5SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 2.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 1.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3272267261257235217213211186186167157155MIN: 29.63 / MAX: 272.99MIN: 23.56 / MAX: 268.89MIN: 30.11 / MAX: 260.88MIN: 29.54 / MAX: 258.97MIN: 30.14 / MAX: 235.24MIN: 27.06 / MAX: 227MIN: 35.79 / MAX: 214.25MIN: 29.11 / MAX: 211.56MIN: 30.52 / MAX: 186.49MIN: 36.91 / MAX: 188.97MIN: 9.18 / MAX: 167.44MIN: 38.51 / MAX: 158.72MIN: 36.58 / MAX: 155.53

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

This is a benchmark of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285GTX 950HD 7950RX 56020406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 374.8766.3357.3755.7351.3050.2347.6740.1333.0732.0027.8027.6024.63MIN: 59.1 / MAX: 98.5MIN: 52.4 / MAX: 86.5MIN: 44.6 / MAX: 75.1MIN: 38.5 / MAX: 77.3MIN: 35.6 / MAX: 73.5MIN: 39.8 / MAX: 63.7MIN: 37.9 / MAX: 61MIN: 29.6 / MAX: 54.2MIN: 24.8 / MAX: 42.5MIN: 19.3 / MAX: 45.7MIN: 21.2 / MAX: 35.4MIN: 17.8 / MAX: 40.9MIN: 14.9 / MAX: 36.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra QualityRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285HD 7950RX 5601224364860SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 355.0047.8741.5340.0336.6035.8334.4728.3721.2718.9717.33MIN: 41.7 / MAX: 72.5MIN: 36.7 / MAX: 62.8MIN: 31.7 / MAX: 54.7MIN: 25.8 / MAX: 59.9MIN: 23.6 / MAX: 55MIN: 27.8 / MAX: 45.7MIN: 24.9 / MAX: 44.3MIN: 18.7 / MAX: 39.8MIN: 13.4 / MAX: 32.3MIN: 11.7 / MAX: 29.9MIN: 9.3 / MAX: 28.2

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 970GTX 1660 TiRTX 2060GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650RX 590RX 580GTX 960R9 285GTX 950RX 560HD 7950306090120150SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.71, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.84, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3144.77144.23142.93142.93142.07141.17137.00137.00136.43125.63121.30105.0098.17MIN: 143.8 / MAX: 145.3MIN: 143.2 / MAX: 145.6MIN: 142 / MAX: 143.8MIN: 142.5 / MAX: 143.6MIN: 141.4 / MAX: 143MIN: 140.9 / MAX: 141.3MIN: 136.4 / MAX: 137.5MIN: 135.7 / MAX: 138.6MIN: 136.3 / MAX: 136.6MIN: 125 / MAX: 126.3MIN: 121.2 / MAX: 121.4MIN: 104.3 / MAX: 104.9MIN: 97.8 / MAX: 98.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLRX 590RX 580GTX 970RTX 2060GTX 1060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1650R9 285GTX 960GTX 950RX 560HD 7950306090120150SE +/- 1.65, N = 7SE +/- 1.86, N = 5SE +/- 1.27, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 13SE +/- 1.38, N = 10SE +/- 0.94, N = 3SE +/- 1.87, N = 3SE +/- 1.46, N = 8SE +/- 1.64, N = 4SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 1.54, N = 4SE +/- 1.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.10, N = 3152.00152.00149.67147.45147.05146.67146.10138.64123.10121.77108.63102.0098.40MIN: 142.3 / MAX: 154.7MIN: 144.5 / MAX: 154.5MIN: 148.3 / MAX: 152.2MIN: 134.1 / MAX: 151.1MIN: 135 / MAX: 150.1MIN: 144.8 / MAX: 147.7MIN: 142.4 / MAX: 148.4MIN: 128.5 / MAX: 140.9MIN: 118.2 / MAX: 124.9MIN: 121.1 / MAX: 122.3MIN: 104 / MAX: 110.3MIN: 99.8 / MAX: 103.5MIN: 96.2 / MAX: 99.6

F1 2018

This is a benchmark of F1 2018 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960RX 560GTX 950R9 28550100150200250SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 2SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 1220618315914813313311911274666321MIN: 162 / MAX: 248MIN: 146 / MAX: 224MIN: 125 / MAX: 197MIN: 118 / MAX: 183MIN: 109 / MAX: 166MIN: 109 / MAX: 163MIN: 97 / MAX: 152MIN: 91 / MAX: 140MIN: 59 / MAX: 96MIN: 53 / MAX: 83MIN: 50 / MAX: 82MIN: 10 / MAX: 36

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960RX 560GTX 950R9 2851428425670Min: 3.77 / Avg: 4.86 / Max: 11.88Min: 4.17 / Avg: 5.44 / Max: 12.45Min: 4.81 / Avg: 6.3 / Max: 13.04Min: 5.03 / Avg: 6.71 / Max: 14.04Min: 5.77 / Avg: 7.49 / Max: 14.1Min: 6.32 / Avg: 8.31 / Max: 14.49Min: 6.76 / Avg: 8.92 / Max: 15.32Min: 10.07 / Avg: 13.42 / Max: 20.24Min: 10.73 / Avg: 15 / Max: 27.23Min: 11.84 / Avg: 15.51 / Max: 33.66Min: 35.42 / Avg: 48.65 / Max: 71.87

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra High QualityRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960RX 560R9 285306090120150121105927572676662333312MIN: 96 / MAX: 159MIN: 83 / MAX: 139MIN: 72 / MAX: 122MIN: 52 / MAX: 107MIN: 53 / MAX: 97MIN: 47 / MAX: 95MIN: 50 / MAX: 90MIN: 47 / MAX: 82MIN: 18 / MAX: 45MIN: 23 / MAX: 47MIN: 4 / MAX: 15

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra High Quality - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960RX 560R9 2851632486480Min: 6.1 / Avg: 8.2 / Max: 16.8Min: 6.99 / Avg: 9.43 / Max: 18.34Min: 8.11 / Avg: 10.89 / Max: 22.15Min: 8.97 / Avg: 13.21 / Max: 32.16Min: 10.03 / Avg: 13.78 / Max: 39.99Min: 9.97 / Avg: 14.73 / Max: 43.82Min: 10.82 / Avg: 14.99 / Max: 30.63Min: 11.73 / Avg: 16.09 / Max: 42.88Min: 21.44 / Avg: 29.77 / Max: 60.88Min: 20.83 / Avg: 29.84 / Max: 55.7Min: 73.45 / Avg: 83.15 / Max: 83.3

HITMAN

This is a benchmark of HITMAN on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraRX 590RX 580RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660R9 285GTX 1650RX 560GTX 1060HD 7950GTX 970GTX 960GTX 95020406080100SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 391.4984.2484.1875.8770.3953.5450.7243.8542.5842.5138.8630.8726.86MIN: 91.36 / MAX: 91.64MIN: 83.84 / MAX: 84.57MIN: 83.94 / MAX: 84.49MIN: 75.7 / MAX: 76MIN: 70.01 / MAX: 70.94MIN: 53.5 / MAX: 53.58MIN: 50.61 / MAX: 50.78MIN: 43.8 / MAX: 43.9MIN: 42.54 / MAX: 42.63MIN: 42.5 / MAX: 42.52MIN: 38.64 / MAX: 38.98MIN: 30.81 / MAX: 30.93MIN: 26.83 / MAX: 26.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Ultra - Total Frame TimeRX 590RTX 2060RX 580GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660R9 285GTX 1650RX 560GTX 1060HD 7950GTX 970GTX 960GTX 95020406080100Min: 3.13 / Avg: 10.93 / Max: 54.95Min: 4.8 / Avg: 11.91 / Max: 98.33Min: 3.61 / Avg: 11.93 / Max: 52.58Min: 4.34 / Avg: 13.21 / Max: 99.7Min: 4.01 / Avg: 14.28 / Max: 98.23Min: 4.01 / Avg: 18.69 / Max: 55.31Min: 5.19 / Avg: 19.76 / Max: 101.63Min: 3.97 / Avg: 22.83 / Max: 65.23Min: 4.6 / Avg: 23.51 / Max: 99.6Min: 2.88 / Avg: 23.53 / Max: 72.05Min: 5.27 / Avg: 25.66 / Max: 100.6Min: 4.97 / Avg: 32.41 / Max: 92.34Min: 4.63 / Avg: 37.25 / Max: 93.81

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: Due to the extreme demands of "Very High" 4K Texture Detail on all platforms, which can need ~6GB+ of VRAM, the "Very High" graphics preset on Linux only sets Texture Detail to "High". Nvidia ambient occlusion modes are not featured on the Linux version (HBAO+ and VXAO). See notes in install.sh for a few small tweaks including disabling the CPU governor check when testing for it's effects Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 5604080120160200SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.45, N = 3SE +/- 5.14, N = 15SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3159.57140.53119.83107.80102.8097.7389.4481.8767.6761.4750.43MIN: 88.6 / MAX: 279MIN: 81.7 / MAX: 241.2MIN: 78.3 / MAX: 178MIN: 71.9 / MAX: 156.5MIN: 69.1 / MAX: 137.3MIN: 38.4 / MAX: 143.6MIN: 15.2 / MAX: 149.8MIN: 46.2 / MAX: 120.8MIN: 43.7 / MAX: 92.1MIN: 35.6 / MAX: 95.9MIN: 15.7 / MAX: 73.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 5.08, N = 15SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3130.10113.8395.3388.1379.9776.0769.0764.0352.0348.1338.87MIN: 40.5 / MAX: 238.1MIN: 42.7 / MAX: 193.9MIN: 28.9 / MAX: 188.3MIN: 38.5 / MAX: 187MIN: 38.8 / MAX: 140.4MIN: 35.6 / MAX: 145.2MIN: 6.6 / MAX: 194.3MIN: 31.7 / MAX: 128.8MIN: 23.1 / MAX: 94.4MIN: 21.6 / MAX: 88.3MIN: 18 / MAX: 76.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 4.95, N = 15SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 2SE +/- 3.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3127.53108.3790.5787.7780.4075.4768.2559.6350.6041.5338.07MIN: 81.4 / MAX: 164.2MIN: 88.9 / MAX: 134.8MIN: 73.3 / MAX: 129.9MIN: 72.1 / MAX: 108.7MIN: 66.3 / MAX: 99.7MIN: 62.8 / MAX: 95.4MIN: 11.6 / MAX: 100.9MIN: 43.7 / MAX: 73.3MIN: 41.2 / MAX: 63.4MIN: 15.8 / MAX: 56.4MIN: 31 / MAX: 47.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3153.70135.20114.90101.6799.3094.3392.8078.8064.7758.5047.20MIN: 81.2 / MAX: 285.3MIN: 74.2 / MAX: 194MIN: 69.4 / MAX: 169MIN: 21 / MAX: 147MIN: 62.8 / MAX: 147.7MIN: 59 / MAX: 141.1MIN: 18.7 / MAX: 147.7MIN: 45.7 / MAX: 128.4MIN: 38.3 / MAX: 92.5MIN: 28.5 / MAX: 92.1MIN: 27 / MAX: 71.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3121.37105.7089.3781.0074.4771.9370.6759.1048.3344.0035.47MIN: 6.1 / MAX: 212.2MIN: 6.2 / MAX: 178.3MIN: 29.8 / MAX: 198.1MIN: 30.4 / MAX: 166.7MIN: 32.2 / MAX: 149.2MIN: 30.6 / MAX: 146.8MIN: 31.6 / MAX: 158.3MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 96.9MIN: 21.7 / MAX: 82.2MIN: 20 / MAX: 69.9MIN: 15.5 / MAX: 67.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960RX 560R9 285306090120150SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3111.9794.7779.8776.4370.3767.7066.5352.5744.2733.2030.60MIN: 74.2 / MAX: 147.7MIN: 77.9 / MAX: 118.3MIN: 52.5 / MAX: 99.7MIN: 64.7 / MAX: 98.1MIN: 59.7 / MAX: 87.8MIN: 56.7 / MAX: 87.4MIN: 56.8 / MAX: 84MIN: 42.9 / MAX: 66MIN: 37.4 / MAX: 56.9MIN: 28.2 / MAX: 44.2MIN: 14.8 / MAX: 50

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO See notes in install.sh for a few small tweaks including disabling the CPU governor check when testing for it's effects Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 560306090120150SE +/- 1.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3128.20119.20108.77106.03102.5795.7392.3075.6763.1761.2349.27MIN: 3.5 / MAX: 241.7MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 216.3MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 193.4MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 182.8MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 197MIN: 3.5 / MAX: 176.7MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 184.2MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 155.2MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 143.2MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 130.6MIN: 3.7 / MAX: 126.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 56050100150200250Min: 4.5 / Avg: 7.87 / Max: 255.1Min: 4.7 / Avg: 8.34 / Max: 257.5Min: 5.2 / Avg: 9.17 / Max: 262.7Min: 5.5 / Avg: 9.46 / Max: 253.3Min: 5.1 / Avg: 9.74 / Max: 253.1Min: 5.7 / Avg: 10.45 / Max: 282.2Min: 5.4 / Avg: 10.76 / Max: 249.4Min: 6.4 / Avg: 13.21 / Max: 268.6Min: 7.2 / Avg: 15.74 / Max: 251Min: 7.7 / Avg: 16.48 / Max: 254.8Min: 8 / Avg: 20.37 / Max: 255.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: ExtremeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 5601224364860SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 353.9044.7037.7735.2735.2332.6031.4725.0021.4320.1715.07MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 115.5MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 106.7MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 99.5MIN: 2.3 / MAX: 94MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 99.7MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 100.4MIN: 2.3 / MAX: 100.1MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 94.3MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 98.6MIN: 3.8 / MAX: 92.5MIN: 3.9 / MAX: 82.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Extreme - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 56050100150200250Min: 9.2 / Avg: 18.62 / Max: 257.4Min: 9.4 / Avg: 22.35 / Max: 250.5Min: 10 / Avg: 26.34 / Max: 255.6Min: 10.9 / Avg: 28.16 / Max: 257.7Min: 10 / Avg: 28.29 / Max: 257.7Min: 10.1 / Avg: 30.7 / Max: 252.9Min: 10.6 / Avg: 31.72 / Max: 253.2Min: 10.6 / Avg: 39.92 / Max: 262Min: 10.6 / Avg: 46.53 / Max: 254.4Min: 10.9 / Avg: 49.69 / Max: 262.3Min: 12.8 / Avg: 66.21 / Max: 254.4

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: UltraRTX 2060RX 590GTX 1660 TiRX 580GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285HD 7950GTX 960RX 560GTX 950306090120150SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3142.20137.80129.10123.93109.53103.8093.7379.2373.5768.1766.9060.1058.93MIN: 105 / MAX: 171MIN: 113.8 / MAX: 164MIN: 96.8 / MAX: 156.1MIN: 103.6 / MAX: 146.2MIN: 83.7 / MAX: 133.2MIN: 80.7 / MAX: 124.3MIN: 72 / MAX: 112MIN: 60.5 / MAX: 97MIN: 62 / MAX: 87MIN: 56 / MAX: 81.5MIN: 52.6 / MAX: 79.5MIN: 50.4 / MAX: 70.9MIN: 46.7 / MAX: 71

Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiRX 590GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285GTX 960RX 56020406080100SE +/- 1.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3109.5089.5780.6779.5072.8069.0362.2752.8743.2042.6734.80MIN: 17.9 / MAX: 257.6MIN: 12 / MAX: 217.1MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 188MIN: 4.7 / MAX: 230.5MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 181.7MIN: 12.1 / MAX: 204.4MIN: 11.9 / MAX: 214.5MIN: 12.9 / MAX: 193.9MIN: 5.9 / MAX: 173.2MIN: 11.9 / MAX: 191.5MIN: 5.7 / MAX: 159.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiRX 590GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285GTX 960RX 5604080120160200Min: 3.9 / Avg: 9.27 / Max: 54.1Min: 4.9 / Avg: 11.1 / Max: 62.8Min: 6.2 / Avg: 12.42 / Max: 61.4Min: 5.2 / Avg: 12.73 / Max: 214.5Min: 5.5 / Avg: 13.82 / Max: 64Min: 5.5 / Avg: 14.53 / Max: 68.7Min: 5.9 / Avg: 16.11 / Max: 68.7Min: 5.2 / Avg: 18.99 / Max: 77.4Min: 5.8 / Avg: 23.03 / Max: 55.8Min: 5.4 / Avg: 23.55 / Max: 53.9Min: 6.4 / Avg: 29.23 / Max: 70.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven BattleRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiRX 590GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285GTX 960RX 56020406080100SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 376.8759.0354.0053.5348.4748.0743.9035.4728.9728.8022.77MIN: 17.2 / MAX: 268.2MIN: 12.6 / MAX: 166.3MIN: 15.7 / MAX: 166.7MIN: 12.6 / MAX: 163.4MIN: 14.2 / MAX: 157MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 156.1MIN: 12.2 / MAX: 155.9MIN: 12 / MAX: 171.6MIN: 12.9 / MAX: 135.4MIN: 10.3 / MAX: 141.8MIN: 10.3 / MAX: 135.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650R9 285GTX 960RX 56020406080100Min: 6.3 / Avg: 13.14 / Max: 55.4Min: 6 / Avg: 17.01 / Max: 42.3Min: 6.7 / Avg: 18.71 / Max: 46.3Min: 6 / Avg: 18.81 / Max: 49.3Min: 6.4 / Avg: 20.53 / Max: 50.8Min: 6.6 / Avg: 20.58 / Max: 62.3Min: 7.1 / Avg: 22.21 / Max: 53.3Min: 7.8 / Avg: 28.27 / Max: 64.8Min: 7.4 / Avg: 33.81 / Max: 77.8Min: 7.3 / Avg: 34.84 / Max: 97.5Min: 8.2 / Avg: 44.26 / Max: 94.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 56020406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 392.6078.8069.0368.3761.0760.5054.9745.8038.4336.6728.57MIN: 14 / MAX: 256.7MIN: 17.6 / MAX: 216.7MIN: 16.9 / MAX: 205.5MIN: 23.7 / MAX: 209.1MIN: 10.5 / MAX: 206.3MIN: 17.3 / MAX: 241.1MIN: 17 / MAX: 241.4MIN: 14.9 / MAX: 253.2MIN: 14.4 / MAX: 260.5MIN: 15.5 / MAX: 210.3MIN: 12.3 / MAX: 182.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 5601530456075Min: 4.4 / Avg: 10.8 / Max: 71.5Min: 4.7 / Avg: 12.74 / Max: 56.3Min: 7.3 / Avg: 14.53 / Max: 56.4Min: 5.3 / Avg: 14.55 / Max: 42.2Min: 5.2 / Avg: 16.4 / Max: 44.8Min: 4.5 / Avg: 16.53 / Max: 57.9Min: 4.4 / Avg: 18.21 / Max: 58.3Min: 4.6 / Avg: 21.84 / Max: 66.9Min: 4.2 / Avg: 25.93 / Max: 56.5Min: 6.1 / Avg: 27.41 / Max: 64.1Min: 5.7 / Avg: 34.93 / Max: 80.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 5601530456075SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 367.6753.8748.0747.4744.1042.9341.1031.9026.7324.6719.77MIN: 21.6 / MAX: 212.4MIN: 15.6 / MAX: 241.7MIN: 15.2 / MAX: 251.4MIN: 18.5 / MAX: 193.8MIN: 15.4 / MAX: 265.6MIN: 17.3 / MAX: 200.5MIN: 15.1 / MAX: 251.7MIN: 12.6 / MAX: 230.3MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 276.3MIN: 11.5 / MAX: 157.9MIN: 9.3 / MAX: 160

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060RX 580GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285RX 56020406080100Min: 5.4 / Avg: 14.8 / Max: 45.9Min: 4.1 / Avg: 18.56 / Max: 62.9Min: 4 / Avg: 20.82 / Max: 62.5Min: 5.2 / Avg: 21.04 / Max: 53.2Min: 3.8 / Avg: 22.66 / Max: 64.9Min: 5 / Avg: 23.28 / Max: 58Min: 4.4 / Avg: 24.4 / Max: 64.8Min: 4.3 / Avg: 31.34 / Max: 66.7Min: 7.4 / Avg: 37.46 / Max: 70.3Min: 6.6 / Avg: 41.43 / Max: 86.7Min: 6.7 / Avg: 50.79 / Max: 107.2

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060RX 590GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285GTX 950HD 7950RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3152.51118.88101.7497.1592.0086.5379.1464.2555.1550.5748.8042.4738.24

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060RX 590GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650HD 7950RX 560GTX 960GTX 950R9 2851632486480SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 12SE +/- 0.25, N = 12SE +/- 0.03, N = 369.6758.7049.8043.2041.1038.2735.7732.4021.5017.9015.9115.388.97MAX: 82.5MAX: 69.6MAX: 59.5MAX: 50.7MAX: 52.7MAX: 44.3MAX: 47MAX: 39.8MAX: 26.3MAX: 22MAX: 24.2MAX: 22.7MAX: 11.9

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1060GTX 970RX 580GTX 1650GTX 960R9 285GTX 950HD 7950RX 560306090120150SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3135.90118.34102.55100.9099.6390.4485.8069.5363.4657.5654.7848.9442.84

X-Plane

This is a test of X-Plane, a realistic multi-platform flight simulator designed for personal computers. This is commercial closed-source software and relies upon the Steam version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterX-Plane 11Quality: Very High - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 970GTX 1060GTX 960GTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 2060GTX 950RX 580RX 590R9 285RX 560HD 7950306090120150113.86113.46113.29112.46111.92111.92111.40101.3086.6586.1580.2763.7944.47

DiRT Rally 2.0

This is a benchmark of DiRT Rally 2.0 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: UltraRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1060R9 285HD 7950RX 560GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 950GTX 9601428425670SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 9SE +/- 0.00, N = 2SE +/- 0.71, N = 9SE +/- 0.96, N = 9SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 264.6754.5949.0147.5242.3640.7217.2317.1915.8115.4912.6612.5112.50MIN: 50.52 / MAX: 83.61MIN: 41.5 / MAX: 71.01MIN: 36.9 / MAX: 64.11MIN: 39.84 / MAX: 62.02MIN: 26.19 / MAX: 55.03MIN: 30.12 / MAX: 54.27MIN: 13.71 / MAX: 24.01MIN: 13.55 / MAX: 21.98MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 25.02MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 24.67MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 14.3MIN: 12.5 / MAX: 13.78

IndigoBench

This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: SupercarRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 970GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 95048121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 316.4613.1912.089.238.717.865.724.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: BedroomRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 970GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 9500.99681.99362.99043.98724.984SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.433.613.362.752.632.171.701.43

LuxMark

LuxMark is a multi-platform OpenGL benchmark using LuxRender. LuxMark supports targeting different OpenCL devices and has multiple scenes available for rendering. LuxMark is a fully open-source OpenCL program with real-world rendering examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 9505K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 78.34, N = 3SE +/- 2.52, N = 3SE +/- 6.69, N = 3SE +/- 49.17, N = 3SE +/- 23.17, N = 3SE +/- 12.74, N = 3SE +/- 12.99, N = 3SE +/- 15.01, N = 32160016192152501240711843961066266476

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: MicrophoneRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 970GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 9503K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 71.91, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 2.19, N = 3SE +/- 13.17, N = 3SE +/- 7.33, N = 3SE +/- 5.57, N = 3SE +/- 6.17, N = 3SE +/- 4.00, N = 31379611000979379687076617041814098

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: HotelRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 970GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 95010002000300040005000SE +/- 21.17, N = 3SE +/- 2.33, N = 3SE +/- 9.82, N = 3SE +/- 5.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 4.98, N = 348533870373227542666238916471423

Darktable

Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 950GTX 960246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 32.292.973.473.734.455.037.778.31

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCLRTX 2060GTX 1060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 950GTX 970GTX 960GTX 1650246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.824.104.114.125.305.785.826.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 950GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 9600.74481.48962.23442.97923.724SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 30.841.181.191.302.853.083.243.31

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCLGTX 1660 TiRTX 2060GTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 1650GTX 970GTX 950GTX 9600.04280.08560.12840.17120.214SE +/- 0.00, N = 13SE +/- 0.00, N = 15SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 15SE +/- 0.00, N = 15SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.110.110.120.130.140.170.190.19

NAMD CUDA

NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This version of the NAMD test profile uses CUDA GPU acceleration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 9500.13490.26980.40470.53960.6745SE +/- 0.00124, N = 3SE +/- 0.00228, N = 3SE +/- 0.00078, N = 3SE +/- 0.00033, N = 3SE +/- 0.00041, N = 3SE +/- 0.00187, N = 3SE +/- 0.01997, N = 15SE +/- 0.00024, N = 30.207410.232780.249310.314250.360920.390520.525990.59974

LeelaChessZero

LeelaChessZero (lc0 / lczero) is a chess engine automated vian neural networks. This test profile can be used for OpenCL, CUDA + cuDNN, and BLAS (CPU-based) benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.20.1Backend: OpenCLRTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1660GTX 1060GTX 970GTX 1650GTX 960GTX 95030060090012001500SE +/- 14.39, N = 3SE +/- 3.05, N = 3SE +/- 5.70, N = 3SE +/- 6.20, N = 3SE +/- 3.46, N = 3SE +/- 5.90, N = 3SE +/- 4.55, N = 3SE +/- 5.34, N = 3146211511025907790642477416

GPU Fan Speed Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercentGPU Fan Speed MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 1650816243240Min: 26 / Avg: 33.21 / Max: 38

GPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsGPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 16501428425670Min: 5.38 / Avg: 48.63 / Max: 70.83

GPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 16501326395265Min: 32 / Avg: 57.75 / Max: 68

BioShock Infinite

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterBioShock InfinitePerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1660 TiRX 590RTX 20600.29030.58060.87091.16121.45151.291.171.040.960.910.781. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. RX 580: $209 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPerformance / Cost - Preset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1660RX 580GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RX 590RTX 20600.05850.1170.17550.2340.29250.260.250.240.240.240.211. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPerformance / Cost - Preset: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra QualityGTX 1660RX 580GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RX 590RTX 20600.04280.08560.12840.17120.2140.190.180.170.170.170.161. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

Dota 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDota 2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650RX 580GTX 1660RX 590GTX 1660 TiRTX 20600.19350.3870.58050.7740.96750.860.660.650.590.520.411. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 590: $234 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDota 2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650RX 580GTX 1660RX 590GTX 1660 TiRTX 20600.19130.38260.57390.76520.95650.850.730.670.650.530.421. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. RX 590: $234 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

F1 2018

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterF1 2018Performance / Cost - Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1660GTX 1650GTX 1660 TiRX 580RX 590RTX 20600.16430.32860.49290.65720.82150.730.680.660.640.630.591. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. RX 580: $209 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterF1 2018Performance / Cost - Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra High QualityGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 2060RX 590RX 5800.09450.1890.28350.3780.47250.420.380.380.350.320.321. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

HITMAN

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterHITMANPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraRX 580RX 590GTX 1660GTX 1650GTX 1660 TiRTX 20600.090.180.270.360.450.400.390.320.310.270.241. RX 580: $209 reported cost.2. RX 590: $234 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 2060RX 590RX 5800.12380.24760.37140.49520.6190.550.500.500.460.460.431. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RX 590RTX 2060RX 5800.0990.1980.2970.3960.4950.440.410.390.380.370.331. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. RX 590: $234 reported cost.5. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRX 590RTX 2060GTX 1650RX 5800.09230.18460.27690.36920.46150.410.390.380.370.360.331. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. RX 590: $234 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 2060RX 580RX 5900.1170.2340.3510.4680.5850.520.480.480.440.440.431. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. RX 580: $209 reported cost.6. RX 590: $234 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 2060RX 590RX 5800.09230.18460.27690.36920.46150.410.380.360.350.350.341. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRX 590RTX 2060GTX 1650RX 5800.0810.1620.2430.3240.4050.360.340.330.320.320.321. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. RX 590: $234 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighGTX 1660GTX 1650RX 580RX 590GTX 1660 TiRTX 20600.11250.2250.33750.450.56250.500.460.460.450.430.371. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.3. RX 580: $209 reported cost.4. RX 590: $234 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterA Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIAPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: ExtremeGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRTX 2060GTX 1650RX 590RX 5800.03830.07660.11490.15320.19150.170.160.150.150.150.151. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

Tomb Raider

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTomb RaiderPerformance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: UltraRX 590RX 580GTX 1660GTX 1650GTX 1660 TiRTX 20600.13280.26560.39840.53120.6640.590.590.500.480.460.411. RX 590: $234 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

Total War: WARHAMMER II

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1660RX 580RX 590GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 20600.0810.1620.2430.3240.4050.360.350.340.320.320.311. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. RX 590: $234 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1660RX 590RX 580RTX 2060GTX 1650GTX 1660 Ti0.0540.1080.1620.2160.270.240.230.230.220.220.211. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 590: $234 reported cost.3. RX 580: $209 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.6. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleGTX 1660RX 590RX 580GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RTX 20600.0720.1440.2160.2880.360.320.290.290.280.280.271. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 590: $234 reported cost.3. RX 580: $209 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.5. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleGTX 1660RX 580RX 590RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 16500.04950.0990.14850.1980.24750.220.210.200.190.190.191. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 580: $209 reported cost.3. RX 590: $234 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.5. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.6. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

Unigine Heaven

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RX 590RX 5800.10350.2070.31050.4140.51750.460.440.430.390.390.381. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

Unigine Superposition

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRTX 2060GTX 1650RX 590RX 5800.05180.10360.15540.20720.2590.230.210.200.200.180.171. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RX 580: $209 reported cost.

Unigine Valley

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1660RX 590GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650RX 580RTX 20600.10580.21160.31740.42320.5290.470.430.420.420.410.391. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RX 590: $234 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.5. RX 580: $209 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

X-Plane

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterX-Plane 11Performance / Cost - Quality: Very High - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 1660RX 580GTX 1660 TiRX 590RTX 20600.1530.3060.4590.6120.7650.680.510.410.400.370.321. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. RX 580: $209 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.5. RX 590: $234 reported cost.6. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

DiRT Rally 2.0

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Performance / Cost - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: UltraGTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRX 590RX 580RTX 2060GTX 16500.04950.0990.14850.1980.24750.220.200.200.200.190.081. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.3. RX 590: $234 reported cost.4. RX 580: $209 reported cost.5. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.6. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

IndigoBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s Per Dollar, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Performance / Cost - Scene: SupercarGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 16500.01350.0270.04050.0540.06750.060.050.050.051. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s Per Dollar, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Performance / Cost - Scene: BedroomGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 16500.00450.0090.01350.0180.02250.020.010.010.011. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

LuxMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1Performance / Cost - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1650GTX 1660 Ti153045607569.6361.8958.6058.041. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1Performance / Cost - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: MicrophoneGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650102030405044.7239.5339.4337.621. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1Performance / Cost - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: HotelGTX 1660GTX 1650RTX 2060GTX 1660 Ti4812162017.0414.5713.9113.871. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.3. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCLGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1650GTX 1660 Ti2004006008001000759.93799.21824.92828.631. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.4. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCLGTX 1660GTX 1650GTX 1660 TiRTX 206030060090012001500902.281002.041146.691333.181. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCLGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 1650110220330440550260.61293.16329.22531.361. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCLGTX 1650GTX 1660GTX 1660 TiRTX 206091827364522.9626.2830.6938.391. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.2. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

NAMD CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsGTX 1660GTX 1650GTX 1660 TiRTX 2060163248648054.6064.0564.9572.391. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.

LeelaChessZero

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.20.1Performance / Cost - Backend: OpenCLGTX 1660RTX 2060GTX 1660 TiGTX 16501.0532.1063.1594.2125.2654.684.194.133.911. GTX 1660: $219 reported cost.2. RTX 2060: $349 reported cost.3. GTX 1660 Ti: $279 reported cost.4. GTX 1650: $164 reported cost.

86 Results Shown

BioShock Infinite
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided:
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality
Dota 2:
  1920 x 1080 - Vulkan
  1920 x 1080 - OpenGL
F1 2018
F1 2018
F1 2018
F1 2018
HITMAN
HITMAN
Rise of the Tomb Raider:
  1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountain
  1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Prophets Tomb
  1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Geothermal Valley
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountain
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Prophets Tomb
  1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Geothermal Valley
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
A Total War Saga: THRONES OF BRITANNIA
Tomb Raider
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Unigine Heaven
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Valley
X-Plane
DiRT Rally 2.0
IndigoBench:
  Supercar
  Bedroom
LuxMark:
  GPU - Luxball HDR
  GPU - Microphone
  GPU - Hotel
Darktable:
  Boat - OpenCL
  Masskrug - OpenCL
  Server Room - OpenCL
  Server Rack - OpenCL
NAMD CUDA
LeelaChessZero
GPU Fan Speed Monitor:
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring:
    Percent
    Watts
    Celsius
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High Quality:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Vulkan:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - OpenGL:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High Quality:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra High Quality:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountain:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Prophets Tomb:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - FXAA - Geothermal Valley:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountain:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Prophets Tomb:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Geothermal Valley:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Extreme:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battle:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Skaven Battle:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - High - Fallen Gates Battle:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Fallen Gates Battle:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Very High - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - 1920 x 1080 - Ultra:
    Frames Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Supercar:
    M samples/s Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Bedroom:
    M samples/s Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - GPU - Luxball HDR:
    Score Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - GPU - Microphone:
    Score Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - GPU - Hotel:
    Score Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Boat - OpenCL:
    Seconds x Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Masskrug - OpenCL:
    Seconds x Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Server Room - OpenCL:
    Seconds x Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Server Rack - OpenCL:
    Seconds x Dollar
  Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms:
    days/ns x Dollar
  Performance / Cost - OpenCL:
    Nodes Per Second Per Dollar