Ryzen CPU Governor Tests

Tests for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1703037-RI-RYZENCPUG38
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Ondemand
March 03 2017
 
Performance
March 03 2017
 
Schedutil
March 03 2017
 
Powersave
March 03 2017
 
Conservative
March 03 2017
 
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Ryzen CPU Governor TestsOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores)MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0AMD Device 145016384MB256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBAMD Fiji HDMI/DPDELL P2415QIntel I211 Gigabit ConnectionUbuntu 17.044.10.0-9-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.5.0X Server 1.18.4modesetting 1.18.44.5 Mesa 17.0.0- padoka PPA Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0)1.0.39GCC 6.3.0 20161229ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionRyzen CPU Governor Tests PerformanceSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic -v - Ondemand: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance- Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil- Powersave: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq powersave- Conservative: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq conservative- GLAMOR

OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservativeResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%154%207%261%PortalTesseractLAME MP3 EncodingGraphicsMagickJohn The RipperET: LegacyTimed Apache CompilationTimed Linux Kernel CompilationFFTWDarktableTensorflow

OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservativePer Watt Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%117%134%150%167%PortalMeta Performance Per WattGraphicsMagickFFTWET: LegacyTesseractJohn The RipperP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.M

Ryzen CPU Governor Testscsgo: 3840 x 2160darktable: Boat - CPU-onlydarktable: Masskrug - CPU-onlydarktable: Server Room - CPU-onlyetlegacy: Renderer2 - 3840 x 2160fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048graphics-magick: HWB Color Spacegraphics-magick: Resizingjohn-the-ripper: Blowfishencode-mp3: WAV To MP3portal: 3840 x 2160tensorflow: Cifar10tesseract: 3840 x 2160build-apache: Time To Compilebuild-linux-kernel: Time To CompileOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative134.7117.279.167.18158.5013392239232127959.40336.18106.89191.9727.2381.85138.9117.198.977.14161.3013739246235127879.34336.08104.85205.2424.8780.55133.7517.299.537.13159.4313554239221127939.29335.61105.52195.2928.0182.16105.7520.1312.809.66102.879309.30138133757216.73327.55127.74162.3440.42122.5317.229.167.1898.1313609226209127769.73106.81104.8872.5032.6483.90OpenBenchmarking.org

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersave306090120150SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3134.71138.91133.75105.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersave0.19350.3870.58050.7740.96750.810.820.860.85

MinAvgMaxOndemand63.5167.2356.7Performance69.7168.8357.1Schedutil68.4155.7335.8Powersave62.1124.7260.6Conservative63.763.763.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveSystem Power Consumption Monitor100200300400500

MinAvgMaxOndemand220023873600Performance360036003600Schedutil220024503600Powersave220022002200Conservative220022002200OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.111.324.3Performance0.010.523.4Schedutil0.010.924.2Powersave0.011.223.7Conservative0.10.20.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor816243240

CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor

MinAvgMaxOndemand220026593600Performance360036003600Schedutil220026573600Powersave220022002200Conservative220026333600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertzCPU Frequency (CPU0) MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring10002000300040005000

CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.031.7100.0Performance0.031.3100.0Schedutil0.032.0100.0Powersave0.032.6100.0Conservative0.031.6100.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercentCPU Usage (Summary) MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring20406080100

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative510152025SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 317.2717.1917.2920.1317.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 39.168.979.5312.809.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 37.187.147.139.667.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

MinAvgMaxOndemand100.3131.3154.3Performance67.7121.6153.5Schedutil94.8136.3153.3Powersave60.985.096.6Conservative67.3128.7151.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxOndemand60.7114.7148.4Performance112.5126.2143.5Schedutil107.5125.3148.2Powersave60.876.788.3Conservative62.5112.5144.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxOndemand86.3120.5148.7Performance69.6118.1151.0Schedutil72.5110.5150.4Powersave60.776.089.0Conservative62.4112.1153.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxOndemand220032893600Performance360036003600Schedutil220032503600Powersave220022002200Conservative220034443600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.188.699.9Performance0.080.499.9Schedutil0.387.999.8Powersave0.088.199.9Conservative1.686.699.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxOndemand220033203600Performance360036003600Schedutil220031333600Powersave220022002200Conservative220029603600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.066.599.1Performance0.067.599.0Schedutil0.169.699.1Powersave0.064.999.8Conservative0.366.499.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxOndemand220030403600Performance360036003600Schedutil220033203600Powersave220022002200Conservative220032503600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.366.699.0Performance0.165.899.3Schedutil0.170.599.9Powersave0.161.7100.0Conservative0.171.299.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.2.1CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative4080120160200SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3158.50161.30159.43102.8798.13

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative0.2520.5040.7561.0081.261.101.121.100.991.05

MinAvgMaxOndemand62.9144.4202.4Performance70.6144.2222.2Schedutil70.5145.6203.0Powersave62.1103.5145.2Conservative63.193.6104.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75System Power Consumption Monitor60120180240300

MinAvgMaxOndemand220022783600Performance360036003600Schedutil220022743600Powersave220022002200Conservative220023503600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.37.18.2Performance0.06.57.9Schedutil0.06.68.0Powersave0.66.87.8Conservative0.95.27.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215

FFTW

FFTW is a C subroutine library for computing the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) in one or more dimensions. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterFFTW 3.3.4Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 91.53, N = 5SE +/- 75.22, N = 5SE +/- 52.93, N = 5SE +/- 22.16, N = 5SE +/- 59.96, N = 513392.0013739.0013554.009309.3013609.001. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops Per Watt, More Is BetterFFTW 3.3.4Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative4080120160200166.65168.93166.36139.49165.35

MinAvgMaxOndemand60.580.485.8Performance69.181.386.9Schedutil72.181.586.1Powersave61.266.767.3Conservative62.082.388.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterFFTW 3.3.4System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxSchedutil220022973600Performance360036003600Powersave220022002200Conservative220022002200OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterFFTW 3.3.4CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.06.36.6Performance0.06.37.3Schedutil0.06.36.6Powersave0.06.26.9Conservative0.16.36.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterFFTW 3.3.4CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215

GraphicsMagick

This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests to stress the system's CPU. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19Operation: HWB Color SpaceOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative50100150200250SE +/- 0.88, N = 32392462391382261. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19Operation: HWB Color SpaceOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative0.65481.30961.96442.61923.2742.852.912.882.092.71

MinAvgMaxOndemand60.983.985.3Performance77.484.685.2Schedutil66.783.184.9Powersave65.666.066.3Conservative62.983.587.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19Operation: ResizingOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative50100150200250SE +/- 3.76, N = 32322352211332091. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljbig -lwebp -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19Operation: ResizingOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative0.59631.19261.78892.38522.98152.652.642.521.972.44

MinAvgMaxOndemand60.987.691.4Performance68.489.090.2Schedutil68.287.790.4Powersave60.867.469.0Conservative62.785.691.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxOndemand220025593600Performance360036003600Schedutil220022543600Powersave220022002200Conservative220022483600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.511.814.7Performance0.110.913.7Schedutil5.513.915.3Powersave0.110.614.8Conservative0.113.316.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025

MinAvgMaxOndemand220027863600Performance360036003600Schedutil220023003600Powersave220022002200Conservative220025193600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand2.316.521.7Performance0.315.619.0Schedutil0.319.926.9Powersave0.114.822.7Conservative0.018.624.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.19CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor816243240

John The Ripper

This is a benchmark of John The Ripper, which is a password cracker. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0Test: BlowfishOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 7.86, N = 3SE +/- 29.35, N = 3SE +/- 6.67, N = 3SE +/- 21.87, N = 3SE +/- 4.00, N = 31279512787127937572127761. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -lcrypt

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S Per Watt, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0Test: BlowfishOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative2040608010095.9195.1196.6091.5293.02

MinAvgMaxOndemand60.8133.4177.5Performance67.1134.4175.1Schedutil68.7132.4178.2Powersave63.682.791.0Conservative79.9137.4180.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxOndemand220032003600Performance360036003600Schedutil220033743600Powersave220022002200Conservative220032133600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.473.5100.0Performance0.073.2100.0Schedutil0.573.6100.0Powersave0.174.3100.0Conservative0.174.0100.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

LAME MP3 Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3WAV To MP3OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 5SE +/- 0.02, N = 5SE +/- 0.04, N = 5SE +/- 0.02, N = 5SE +/- 0.17, N = 59.409.349.2916.739.731. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3WAV To MP3OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

MinAvgMaxOndemand61.478.283.2Performance69.178.883.6Schedutil67.580.183.4Powersave61.164.165.0Conservative82.984.184.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxSchedutil220025503600Performance360036003600Powersave220022002200Conservative220022002200OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.15.66.8Performance0.15.86.4Schedutil0.05.26.4Powersave0.06.06.5Conservative0.15.86.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215

Meta Performance Per Watt

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattPerformance Per WattOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative4008001200160020001849.221873.431859.331213.391954.44

Portal

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative70140210280350SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3336.18336.08335.61327.55106.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative0.42530.85061.27591.70122.12651.701.571.611.891.13

MinAvgMaxOndemand65.4198.3351.7Performance70.3214.0359.4Schedutil66.9208.6360.5Powersave60.7173.8346.0Conservative61.394.4103.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortalSystem Power Consumption Monitor100200300400500

MinAvgMaxSchedutil220023173600Performance360036003600Powersave220022002200Conservative220022002200OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterPortalCPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.15.815.1Performance0.04.913.5Schedutil0.15.715.8Powersave0.07.516.2Conservative0.03.517.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortalCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025

System Power Consumption Monitor

MinAvgMaxOndemand59.7117.4356.7Performance64.0120.0359.4Schedutil61.7116.7360.5Powersave58.987.8346.0Conservative60.5101.3180.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring100200300400500

Tensorflow

This is a benchmark of the Tensorflow deep learning framework using the CIFAR10 data set. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Build: Cifar10OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative306090120150SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3106.89104.85105.52127.74104.88

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Build: Cifar10OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

MinAvgMaxOndemand77.8129.5133.2Performance64.0132.7136.5Schedutil66.8130.7135.8Powersave61.086.488.3Conservative62.9133.0138.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxOndemand220034323600Performance360036003600Schedutil220034343600Powersave220022002200Conservative220035363600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.180.888.1Performance0.081.388.6Schedutil0.081.588.8Powersave0.081.689.2Conservative0.081.088.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative50100150200250SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.03, N = 3SE +/- 2.64, N = 3SE +/- 1.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3191.97205.24195.29162.3472.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160OndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative0.1710.3420.5130.6840.8550.740.710.750.710.76

MinAvgMaxOndemand62.2258.0317.5Performance92.6287.8327.7Schedutil69.0259.5320.2Powersave69.2227.1275.2Conservative62.995.3100.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption Monitor80160240320400

MinAvgMaxOndemand220023503600Performance360036003600Schedutil220022002200Powersave220022002200Conservative220022002200OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.15.613.9Performance1.55.122.7Schedutil0.05.121.7Powersave2.46.525.5Conservative0.04.022.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor816243240

Timed Apache Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the Apache HTTP Server. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.7Time To CompileOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative918273645SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 327.2324.8728.0140.4232.64

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.7Time To CompileOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

MinAvgMaxOndemand67.590.5133.2Performance71.7103.9140.5Schedutil66.285.8123.6Powersave60.869.985.7Conservative62.488.0133.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.7System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxOndemand220025293600Performance360036003600Schedutil220023653600Powersave220022002200Conservative220025403600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.7CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.126.2100.0Performance1.025.2100.0Schedutil2.626.1100.0Powersave0.325.399.5Conservative0.128.0100.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.7CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9Time To CompileOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative306090120150SE +/- 1.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 1.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.23, N = 381.8580.5582.16122.5383.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9Time To CompileOndemandPerformanceSchedutilPowersaveConservative

MinAvgMaxOndemand67.7148.9167.8Performance71.3151.4168.3Schedutil68.1147.1167.3Powersave65.990.395.8Conservative63.5143.5169.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxOndemand220032593600Performance360036003600Schedutil220032653600Powersave220022002200Conservative220032833600OpenBenchmarking.orgMegahertz, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9CPU Frequency (CPU0) Monitor10002000300040005000

MinAvgMaxOndemand0.381.1100.0Performance0.083.8100.0Schedutil0.080.6100.0Powersave0.184.6100.0Conservative0.178.6100.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.9CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor20406080100

79 Results Shown

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive:
  3840 x 2160
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
Darktable
Darktable
Darktable
Darktable
Darktable
Darktable:
  Server Room - CPU-only
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
ET: Legacy
ET: Legacy:
  Renderer2 - 3840 x 2160
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
FFTW
FFTW:
  Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
GraphicsMagick
GraphicsMagick:
  HWB Color Space
  System Power Consumption Monitor
GraphicsMagick
GraphicsMagick:
  Resizing
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
John The Ripper
John The Ripper:
  Blowfish
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
LAME MP3 Encoding
LAME MP3 Encoding:
  WAV To MP3
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  Performance Per Watt
Portal
Portal:
  3840 x 2160
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
Tensorflow
Tensorflow:
  Cifar10
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
Tesseract
Tesseract:
  3840 x 2160
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
Timed Apache Compilation
Timed Apache Compilation:
  Time To Compile
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation:
  Time To Compile
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CPU Freq (CPU0) Monitor
  CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor