Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Linux Intel Skylake Summer 2016

Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1606245-HA-WINLINTEL21
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10 Pro x64
June 23 2016
 
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
June 23 2016
 
Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-dev
June 23 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Linux Intel Skylake Summer 2016ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUbuntu 16.04 LTSWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devIntel Core i5-6600K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores)MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0Intel Sky Lake15360MB256GB TS256GSSD370SIntel Sky Lake (1150MHz)Realtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.4.0-24-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 11.2.0GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160Intel Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3 Intel (4 Cores)238GBWindows NT10.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores)MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0Intel Sky Lake15360MB256GB TS256GSSD370SIntel Sky Lake (1150MHz)Realtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160622Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3intel 2.99.9174.3 Mesa 12.1.0-devel- padoka PPA (git-6b0ac95)GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-dev: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceGraphics Details- Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-dev: SNA

Ubuntu 16.04 LTSWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%193%286%379%472%XonoticGpuTestUnigine ValleyUnigine Heaven

Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 16.04 Linux Intel Skylake Summer 2016unigine-heaven: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultragputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 LTSWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-dev13.0910.6029.2224.36377721669533810115.9718.45144.05110.041306865281629982878112826614.5313.4638.5430.6957282201399037101OpenBenchmarking.org

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS48121620SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 314.5315.9713.09
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS48121620Min: 14.53 / Avg: 14.53 / Max: 14.54Min: 15.89 / Avg: 15.97 / Max: 16.05Min: 13.07 / Avg: 13.09 / Max: 13.14

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS510152025SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 613.4618.4510.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS510152025Min: 13.46 / Avg: 13.46 / Max: 13.47Min: 18.45 / Avg: 18.45 / Max: 18.47Min: 10.09 / Avg: 10.6 / Max: 11.54

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS306090120150SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 338.54144.0529.22MIN: 23 / MAX: 47MIN: 95 / MAX: 186MIN: 17 / MAX: 38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS306090120150Min: 38.5 / Avg: 38.54 / Max: 38.56Min: 143.85 / Avg: 144.05 / Max: 144.37Min: 29.21 / Avg: 29.22 / Max: 29.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS20406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 330.69110.0424.36MIN: 15 / MAX: 41MIN: 55 / MAX: 159MIN: 12 / MAX: 33
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS20406080100Min: 30.66 / Avg: 30.69 / Max: 30.72Min: 109.41 / Avg: 110.04 / Max: 110.37Min: 24.33 / Avg: 24.36 / Max: 24.4

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x6430060090012001500SE +/- 0.58, N = 31306

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3572886523777
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS15003000450060007500Min: 5725 / Avg: 5727.67 / Max: 5730Min: 8651 / Avg: 8651.67 / Max: 8652Min: 3776 / Avg: 3777 / Max: 3778

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS2004006008001000SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3220816216
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS140280420560700Min: 220 / Avg: 220 / Max: 220Min: 815 / Avg: 815.67 / Max: 816Min: 216 / Avg: 216 / Max: 216

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x646001200180024003000SE +/- 0.00, N = 32998

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 5.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 4.16, N = 313990287816953
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS5K10K15K20K25KMin: 13981 / Avg: 13990.33 / Max: 14000Min: 28780 / Avg: 28781 / Max: 28782Min: 6947 / Avg: 6953 / Max: 6961

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 33712838
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS20406080100Min: 37 / Avg: 37 / Max: 37Min: 128 / Avg: 128 / Max: 128Min: 38 / Avg: 38 / Max: 38

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS60120180240300SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3101266101
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.04 LTS50100150200250Min: 101 / Avg: 101 / Max: 101Min: 266 / Avg: 266 / Max: 266Min: 101 / Avg: 101 / Max: 101

Tomb Raider

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1600 x 900 - Quality: LowUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64153045607530.768.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: LowUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64112233445522.648.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: NormalUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6481624324016.932.5

Shadow of Mordor

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of MordorResolution: 1280 x 720 - Quality: LowestUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6491827364526.2738.74

The Talos Principle

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterThe Talos PrincipleResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: LowUbuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-dev - OpenGLWindows 10 Pro x64 - OpenGLWindows 10 Pro x64 - D3D11132639526553.046.057.4

Metro Last Light Redux

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMetro Last Light ReduxResolution: 1920 x 1080Ubuntu 16.04 + Linux 4.7 Git + Mesa 12.1-devWindows 10 Pro x644812162016.217.8