Radeon R9 Ubuntu 15.04

Running pts/openarena-1.5.2, pts/supertuxkart-1.3.0, pts/tesseract-1.1.0, pts/unigine-heaven-1.6.2, pts/unigine-tropics-1.6.2, pts/warsow-1.5.1, pts/xonotic-1.4.0, pts/gputest-1.3.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1504275-BE-RADEONR9U36
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19
April 27 2015
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Radeon R9 Ubuntu 15.04OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-5960X @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores)Gigabyte X99-UD4-CFIntel Xeon E5 v3/Core16384MB120GB OCZ VECTOR150XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MBIntel C610/X99SyncMasterIntel ConnectionUbuntu 15.043.19.0-15-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.3.2X Server 1.17.1radeon 7.5.03.3 Mesa 10.5.2 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.9.2ext42560x1600ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionRadeon R9 Ubuntu 15.04 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- GLAMOR

Radeon R9 Ubuntu 15.04openarena: 2560 x 1600supertuxkart: 2560 x 1600tesseract: 2560 x 1600unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenunigine-tropics: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenwarsow: 2560 x 1600xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Lowxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1600gputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1600gputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1600gputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1600gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19157.6374.25143.6874.01135.71193.83240.52188.05164.92127.274301629051522423491589OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19306090120150SE +/- 1.63, N = 3157.63MIN: 2 / MAX: 378

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Total Frame TimeUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.1948121620Min: 2 / Avg: 6.21 / Max: 17

SuperTuxKart

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.191632486480SE +/- 1.14, N = 374.25

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19306090120150SE +/- 0.99, N = 3143.68

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.191632486480SE +/- 1.07, N = 674.01

Unigine Tropics

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19306090120150SE +/- 0.21, N = 3135.71

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.194080120160200SE +/- 0.35, N = 3193.83

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: LowUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.1950100150200250SE +/- 1.70, N = 3240.52MIN: 123 / MAX: 482

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.194080120160200SE +/- 0.25, N = 3188.05MIN: 105 / MAX: 453

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.194080120160200SE +/- 0.09, N = 3164.92MIN: 69 / MAX: 393

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.19306090120150SE +/- 0.22, N = 3127.27MIN: 25 / MAX: 336

GpuTest

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.199K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 12.47, N = 343016

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.196001200180024003000SE +/- 4.91, N = 32905

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.1930K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 817.60, N = 3152242

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.1980160240320400SE +/- 0.67, N = 3349

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 15.04 - Mesa 10.5 + Linux 3.1930060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 31589