OS X 10.9.4 vs OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu Linux - Intel

Intel Sandy Bridge Linux graphics comparison of Apple Mac OS X 10.9.4 and Apple OS X Yosemite 10.10 Beta 2 versus Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Linux with various kernel and Mesa updates. Performance tests by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1408244-KH-YOSEMITE176
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
OS X 10.9.4
August 19 2014
 
OS X Yosemite Beta 2
August 22 2014
 
Ubuntu 14.04.1
August 19 2014
 
Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17
August 19 2014
 
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


OS X 10.9.4 vs OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu Linux - IntelProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsMonitorAudioNetworkOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17Intel Core i5 @ 2.30GHz (2 Cores)Apple Mac miniIntel 62 x 1024 MB DDR3-1333MHz500GB Hitachi HTS545050B9A302Intel HD 3000 288MBThunderbolt DisplayOS X 10.9.413.3.0 (x86_64)Apple LLVM 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn) + GCC 4.2.1 + Xcode 5.1.1Journaled HFS+2560x1440OS X 10.1014.0.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i5-2415M @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores)Apple Mac-8ED6AF5B48C039E1Intel 2nd Generation Core Family DRAM2048MB500GB Hitachi HTS54505Intel HD 3000 (1300MHz)Cirrus Logic CS4206Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57765 Gigabit PCIe + Broadcom BCM4331 802.11a/b/g/nUbuntu 14.043.13.0-34-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.2.2X Server 1.15.1intel 2.99.9103.1 Mesa 10.1.3GCC 4.8.2ext4Intel Core i5-2415M @ 2.90GHz (4 Cores)Intel 6 /C2003.17.0-999-generic (x86_64)intel 2.99.9143.1 Mesa 10.3.0-devel (git-a4359bc 2014-08-19 trusty-oibaf-ppa+gallium-nine)OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 14.04.1: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceGraphics Details- Ubuntu 14.04.1, Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17: SNA

OS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17Logarithmic Result OverviewPhoronix Test SuiteNexuizUrban TerrorUrban TerrorXonoticNexuizXonoticXonotic1920 x 1080 - Yes - Off2560 x 14401920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Ultra2560 x 1440 - Yes - Off1920 x 1080 - High1920 x 1080 - Low

OS X 10.9.4 vs OS X 10.10 vs. Ubuntu Linux - Intelnexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - Offnexuiz: 2560 x 1440 - Yes - Offurbanterror: 1920 x 1080urbanterror: 2560 x 1440xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - UltimateOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.1755.2910.8726.1716.7783.5333.4025.7417.8052.4610.9024.7317.1782.5734.2426.9218.636.866.8652.1348.0769.1827.5517.2910.1510.1671.2060.5366.7627.3116.449.87OpenBenchmarking.org

Nexuiz

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OffOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.171224364860SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 355.2952.466.8610.15MIN: 25 / MAX: 142MIN: 30 / MAX: 146MIN: 5 / MAX: 8MIN: 6 / MAX: 13

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OffOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.173691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 310.8710.906.8610.16MIN: 6 / MAX: 16MIN: 6 / MAX: 16MIN: 5 / MAX: 8MIN: 6 / MAX: 13

Urban Terror

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUrban Terror 4.2.013Resolution: 1920 x 1080OS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.171632486480SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 1.11, N = 6SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 326.1724.7352.1371.20

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterUrban Terror 4.2.013Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.1720406080100Min: 5 / Avg: 36.94 / Max: 99Min: 5 / Avg: 37.56 / Max: 99Min: 3 / Avg: 19.02 / Max: 92Min: 3 / Avg: 13.97 / Max: 95

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUrban Terror 4.2.013Resolution: 2560 x 1440OS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.171428425670SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 316.7717.1748.0760.53

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterUrban Terror 4.2.013Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.1720406080100Min: 6 / Avg: 28.81 / Max: 99Min: 7 / Avg: 31.55 / Max: 99Min: 4 / Avg: 20.7 / Max: 94Min: 3 / Avg: 16.38 / Max: 77

Xonotic

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.1720406080100SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 1.03, N = 5SE +/- 0.06, N = 383.5382.5769.1866.76MIN: 43 / MAX: 129MIN: 43 / MAX: 127MIN: 36 / MAX: 102MIN: 36 / MAX: 89

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17816243240SE +/- 0.56, N = 4SE +/- 0.63, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 333.4034.2427.5527.31MIN: 10 / MAX: 56MIN: 10 / MAX: 57MIN: 15 / MAX: 36MIN: 7 / MAX: 35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Ubuntu 14.04.1Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17612182430SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 325.7426.9217.2916.44MIN: 9 / MAX: 49MIN: 9 / MAX: 51MIN: 5 / MAX: 26MIN: 6 / MAX: 26

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateOS X 10.9.4OS X Yosemite Beta 2Mesa 10.3-dev + Linux 3.17510152025SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 317.8018.639.87MIN: 7 / MAX: 38MIN: 8 / MAX: 39MIN: 2 / MAX: 19