plat_card_5 plat_card_5
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1408010-AR-PLATCARD522 plat_card_5 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 @ 3.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Type2- Board Vendor Name1 Product, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 4GB GLS85LS1004A CS + 1000GB Seagate ST91000640NS, Graphics: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 IGP, Audio: Intel Haswell HDMI, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 Gigabit
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.11.0-15-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.20.0, Display Server: X Server 1.14.5, Display Driver: intel 2.99.904, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ecryptfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: DEADLINE. Python 2.7.3. Compiz was running on this system.
Compile Bench Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create plat_card_5 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 28.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 4.80, N = 3 5150.69
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 96.01
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 6159.67
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 100.77
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 109.80
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 102.45
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 106.38
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 73.23
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 2.50, N = 3 6200.55
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 92.79
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1700 3400 5100 6800 8500 SE +/- 1.82, N = 3 7702.27
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 97.11
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 105.77
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 97.65
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 103.65
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 72.11
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 5.53, N = 3 6217.80
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 90.60
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 1700 3400 5100 6800 8500 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 7710.96
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 93.67
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 107.49
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 94.59
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance plat_card_5 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 99.91
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance plat_card_5 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 822
plat_card_5 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 @ 3.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Type2- Board Vendor Name1 Product, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 DRAM, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 4GB GLS85LS1004A CS + 1000GB Seagate ST91000640NS, Graphics: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3 IGP, Audio: Intel Haswell HDMI, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810 10 Gigabit
OS: Ubuntu 12.04, Kernel: 3.11.0-15-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 5.20.0, Display Server: X Server 1.14.5, Display Driver: intel 2.99.904, Compiler: GCC 4.6, File-System: ecryptfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: DEADLINE. Python 2.7.3. Compiz was running on this system.
Testing initiated at 1 August 2014 11:07 by user kraus.