test1

Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 testing with a HP 158A (J61 v03.96 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2306111-NE-TEST1610505&grw.

test1ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolutionfirst testIntel Xeon E5-2687W 0 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)HP 158A (J61 v03.96 BIOS)Intel Xeon E5/Core64GB500GB Seagate FireCuda SE SSD ZP500GM30033 + 2 x 1000GB Hitachi HDS72101 + 0GB Compact Flash + 0GB SM/xD-Picture + 0GB SD/MMC + 0GB MS/MS-Pro/HG + 0GB SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO + 4GB USB DISK 2.0 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZEX-75ZNVIDIA Quadro 4000Realtek ALC262Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574LUbuntu 22.045.15.0-71-generic (x86_64)nouveau1.3.224GCC 11.3.0ext41680x1050OpenBenchmarking.org- Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-xKiWfi/gcc-11-11.3.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-xKiWfi/gcc-11-11.3.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - NONE / relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096- Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq schedutil - CPU Microcode: 0x71a- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04)- Python 3.10.6- itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX unsupported + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + mmio_stale_data: Unknown: No mitigations + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

test1blogbench: Readblogbench: Writemcperf: Add - 1mcperf: Add - 4mcperf: Get - 1mcperf: Get - 4mcperf: Set - 1mcperf: Set - 4mcperf: Add - 16mcperf: Add - 32mcperf: Add - 64mcperf: Get - 16mcperf: Get - 32mcperf: Get - 64mcperf: Set - 16mcperf: Set - 32mcperf: Set - 64mcperf: Add - 128mcperf: Add - 256mcperf: Get - 128mcperf: Get - 256mcperf: Set - 128mcperf: Set - 256mcperf: Append - 1mcperf: Append - 4mcperf: Delete - 1mcperf: Delete - 4mcperf: Append - 16mcperf: Append - 32mcperf: Append - 64mcperf: Delete - 16mcperf: Delete - 32mcperf: Delete - 64mcperf: Prepend - 1mcperf: Prepend - 4mcperf: Replace - 1mcperf: Replace - 4mcperf: Append - 128mcperf: Append - 256mcperf: Delete - 128mcperf: Delete - 256mcperf: Prepend - 16mcperf: Prepend - 32mcperf: Prepend - 64mcperf: Replace - 16mcperf: Replace - 32mcperf: Replace - 64mcperf: Prepend - 128mcperf: Prepend - 256mcperf: Replace - 128mcperf: Replace - 256nginx: 20nginx: 100nginx: 200nginx: 500nginx: 1000openssl: SHA256openssl: SHA512openssl: RSA4096openssl: RSA4096openssl: ChaCha20openssl: AES-128-GCMopenssl: AES-256-GCMopenssl: ChaCha20-Poly1305node-express-loadtest: couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 30couchdb: 100 - 3000 - 30couchdb: 300 - 1000 - 30couchdb: 300 - 3000 - 30hbase: 10000 - Increment - 1hbase: 10000 - Increment - 1hbase: 10000 - Increment - 4hbase: 10000 - Increment - 4hbase: 10000000 - Scan - 128hbase: 10000000 - Scan - 128hbase: 10000000 - Scan - 256hbase: 10000000 - Scan - 256hbase: 10000 - Increment - 16hbase: 10000 - Increment - 16hbase: 10000 - Increment - 32hbase: 10000 - Increment - 32hbase: 10000 - Increment - 64hbase: 10000 - Increment - 64hbase: 10000 - Increment - 128hbase: 10000 - Increment - 128hbase: 10000 - Increment - 256hbase: 10000 - Increment - 256hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 1hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 4hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 128hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 128hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 256hbase: 10000 - Rand Read - 256hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 16hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 16hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 32hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 32hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 64hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 64hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 1000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 16hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 32hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 64hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 2000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 128hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 128hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 256hbase: 10000 - Rand Write - 256hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 128hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 10000000 - Increment - 256hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 1hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 4hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 2000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 2000000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 2000000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 2000000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 2000000 - Rand Write - 4hbase: 10000 - Seq Read - 1hbase: 10000 - Seq Read - 1hbase: 10000 - Seq Read - 4hbase: 10000 - Seq Read - 4hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 128hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 128hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 256hbase: 1000000 - Rand Read - 256hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 16hbase: 1000000 - Rand Write - 16hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 16hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 32hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 10000000 - Rand Read - 64hbase: 10000000 - Rand Write - 1hbase: 10000000 - Rand Write - 1spark: 1000000 - 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 1000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 1000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 1000000 - 100 - Group By Test Timespark: 1000000 - 100 - Repartition Test Timespark: 1000000 - 100 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 1000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 1000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 1000000 - 500 - Group By Test Timespark: 1000000 - 500 - Repartition Test Timespark: 1000000 - 500 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 1000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 1000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 1000000 - 1000 - Group By Test Timespark: 1000000 - 1000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 1000000 - 1000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 1000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 1000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 1000000 - 2000 - Group By Test Timespark: 1000000 - 2000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 1000000 - 2000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 1000000 - 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 10000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 10000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 10000000 - 100 - Group By Test Timespark: 10000000 - 100 - Repartition Test Timespark: 10000000 - 100 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 10000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 10000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 10000000 - 500 - Group By Test Timespark: 10000000 - 500 - Repartition Test Timespark: 10000000 - 500 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 20000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 20000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 20000000 - 100 - Group By Test Timespark: 20000000 - 100 - Repartition Test Timespark: 20000000 - 100 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 20000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 20000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 20000000 - 500 - Group By Test Timespark: 20000000 - 500 - Repartition Test Timespark: 20000000 - 500 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 40000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 40000000 - 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 40000000 - 100 - Group By Test Timespark: 40000000 - 100 - Repartition Test Timespark: 40000000 - 100 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 40000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 40000000 - 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 40000000 - 500 - Group By Test Timespark: 40000000 - 500 - Repartition Test Timespark: 40000000 - 500 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 10000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 10000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 10000000 - 1000 - Group By Test Timespark: 10000000 - 1000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 10000000 - 1000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 10000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 10000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 10000000 - 2000 - Group By Test Timespark: 10000000 - 2000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 10000000 - 2000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 10000000 - 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 20000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 20000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 20000000 - 1000 - Group By Test Timespark: 20000000 - 1000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 20000000 - 1000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 20000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 20000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 20000000 - 2000 - Group By Test Timespark: 20000000 - 2000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 20000000 - 2000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 20000000 - 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 40000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 40000000 - 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 40000000 - 1000 - Group By Test Timespark: 40000000 - 1000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 40000000 - 1000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timespark: 40000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkspark: 40000000 - 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframespark: 40000000 - 2000 - Group By Test Timespark: 40000000 - 2000 - Repartition Test Timespark: 40000000 - 2000 - Inner Join Test Timespark: 40000000 - 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timeclickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cacheclickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Runclickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Runcockroach: MoVR - 128cockroach: MoVR - 256cockroach: MoVR - 512cockroach: MoVR - 1024cockroach: KV, 10% Reads - 128cockroach: KV, 10% Reads - 256cockroach: KV, 10% Reads - 512cockroach: KV, 50% Reads - 128cockroach: KV, 50% Reads - 256cockroach: KV, 50% Reads - 512cockroach: KV, 60% Reads - 128cockroach: KV, 60% Reads - 256cockroach: KV, 60% Reads - 512cockroach: KV, 95% Reads - 128cockroach: KV, 95% Reads - 256cockroach: KV, 95% Reads - 512cockroach: KV, 10% Reads - 1024cockroach: KV, 50% Reads - 1024cockroach: KV, 60% Reads - 1024cockroach: KV, 95% Reads - 1024dragonflydb: 50 - 1:1dragonflydb: 50 - 1:5dragonflydb: 50 - 5:1dragonflydb: 200 - 1:1dragonflydb: 200 - 1:5dragonflydb: 200 - 5:1etcd: PUT - 50 - 100etcd: PUT - 50 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: PUT - 100 - 100etcd: PUT - 100 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: PUT - 50 - 1000etcd: PUT - 50 - 1000 - Average Latencyetcd: PUT - 500 - 100etcd: PUT - 500 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: PUT - 100 - 1000etcd: PUT - 100 - 1000 - Average Latencyetcd: PUT - 500 - 1000etcd: PUT - 500 - 1000 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 50 - 100etcd: RANGE - 50 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 100 - 100etcd: RANGE - 100 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 50 - 1000etcd: RANGE - 50 - 1000 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 500 - 100etcd: RANGE - 500 - 100 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 100 - 1000etcd: RANGE - 100 - 1000 - Average Latencyetcd: RANGE - 500 - 1000etcd: RANGE - 500 - 1000 - Average Latencymemcached: 1:1memcached: 1:5memcached: 5:1memcached: 1:10memcached: 1:100memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:5memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 5:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:5memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 5:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 10:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:10memtier-benchmark: Redis - 500 - 1:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 500 - 1:5memtier-benchmark: Redis - 500 - 5:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 10:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:10memtier-benchmark: Redis - 500 - 10:1memtier-benchmark: Redis - 500 - 1:10redis: GET - 50redis: SET - 50redis: GET - 500redis: LPOP - 50redis: SADD - 50redis: SET - 500redis: GET - 1000redis: LPOP - 500redis: LPUSH - 50redis: SADD - 500redis: SET - 1000redis: LPOP - 1000redis: LPUSH - 500redis: SADD - 1000redis: LPUSH - 1000sqlite: 1rocksdb: Rand Fillrocksdb: Rand Readrocksdb: Update Randrocksdb: Seq Fillrocksdb: Rand Fill Syncrocksdb: Read While Writingrocksdb: Read Rand Write Randleveldb: Hot Readleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Fill Syncleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Overwriteleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Fillleveldb: Rand Readleveldb: Seek Randleveldb: Rand Deleteleveldb: Seq Fillleveldb: Seq Fillsqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000cassandra: Readscassandra: Writescassandra: Mixed 1:1cassandra: Mixed 1:3pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencymysqlslap: 1mysqlslap: 64mysqlslap: 128mysqlslap: 256mysqlslap: 512mysqlslap: 1024mysqlslap: 2048mysqlslap: 4096mysqlslap: 8192ebizzy: node-web-tooling: simdjson: Kostyasimdjson: TopTweetsimdjson: LargeRandsimdjson: PartialTweetssimdjson: DistinctUserIDperl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpreterfirst test25239751410615779.616581.155918.160136.916630.515947.216245.016283.916520.660166.463039.064432.717005.516907.916781.016497.616330.064574.563686.116265.516518.817324.417755.056086.359130.217801.117435.717484.963781.163930.563758.616713.617242.117224.017909.417684.717774.063626.363780.517705.217583.617594.417597.617422.917544.717666.518219.618383.717660.519938.7521607.3221432.7921083.8420757.50173599471719346302201030.867524.411382583570123499006631059181344778078160432896153.117553.079307.2471051.280153864666655912618735421415132115325022631293141077326621933323153927407964727198949512383318136873847818351288777485782232781483377568394356414471488962666875630375525322309903278319481401720485082329484541314151017318612006373973388475393883144198105165339184187136312312034097323167900174157267545912961553831475101632422197331857401530521837617045866711594162832749257025211350136318560905686638396148703201079914626951475631029824714846738047496494473235561357469617918521211848838682758371100413917446517167557133689586715747471336585275467060490642623215.50315.74785218117.575.944.233.072.885.72314.6817.516.584.293.353.116.28316.4617.497.084.653.873.386.97315.5117.387.885.225.024.1526.04313.6617.5913.7817.6520.9822.7025.26315.1917.4313.9517.9520.2920.2647.87313.7117.4522.1534.7942.1242.3543.21313.1617.4120.8632.8036.8038.6683.01311.1117.4153.3962.8673.5174.8383.45315.8617.4746.4461.1774.2074.8324.73314.4817.5113.9817.6920.4619.7525.37314.8317.4414.6018.1721.0120.0543.94316.5317.4921.3231.9138.5738.2044.18315.8617.5121.3631.7038.2337.7583.97317.0217.5045.4759.9173.7774.5584.67313.8717.4945.6961.6972.9077.28101.53105.89105.85222.3222.3222.4221.920381.820551.920507.523607.723615.823129.724503.724501.923851.528483.427734.926998.919503.821683.522337.825176.61631362.411776973.311481465.771522099.101614367.641451171.9236108.39072.939911.28472.552166.004119.140886.60342.450943.880619.646730.415521.143309.84302.340690.77932.452109.058119.140917.10272.451125.874619.546688.472021.11057792.69846003.131217382.94828721.26812848.491149781.621211011.461020230.351044301.761134006.80990773.911017334.251126537.901053730.571139301.72994801.73965268.451094712.35948097.391116053.521946029.571359544.041787013.882045504.991550769.621352814.851651781.711996977.37944905.891551051.311326122.031072509.421071480.501492782.571043912.2913.76635921921643621214340437598817514037957691499.67511599.19918.197.47617.0103.6759.66513.30083.16017.2102.93895.55541200497994030439579241870.04214490.6902310370.2172348370.4262351901.063117942.4022291982.1812288393.497227070.044100699.3852190554.566635393.4903701373.6082623140.01513880.7212197530.227210230.0482274617.8872241880.4462217591.127224032.2352212572.2602110613.79113240.7551870590.267257513.8841925625.2062210911.3081720729.0571380657.9441899720.5271857971.34582366.0851756292.8471526115.2451120189.482101989.8631435466.9691297019.2771056447.6351005079.9911000999.91425499444633954124154013533592066785.611.4620.631.841.970.203605520.00196531OpenBenchmarking.org

BlogBench

Test: Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: Readfirst test500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 9262.31, N = 325239751. (CC) gcc options: -O2

BlogBench

Test: Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: Writefirst test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 143.48, N = 3141061. (CC) gcc options: -O2

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 1first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 291.99, N = 1215779.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 4first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 235.90, N = 916581.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 1first test12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 595.33, N = 1555918.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 4first test13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 1290.15, N = 1260136.91. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 1first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 532.39, N = 916630.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 4first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 186.88, N = 415947.21. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 16first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 157.51, N = 316245.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 32first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 66.84, N = 316283.91. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 64first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 156.53, N = 316520.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 16first test13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 1238.28, N = 960166.41. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 32first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 819.56, N = 363039.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 64first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 87.07, N = 364432.71. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 16first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 83.92, N = 317005.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 32first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 357.98, N = 316907.91. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 64first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 97.41, N = 316781.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 128first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 68.90, N = 316497.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Add - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Add - Connections: 256first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 159.91, N = 316330.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 128first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 49.97, N = 364574.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Get - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Get - Connections: 256first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 679.57, N = 363686.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 128first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 209.12, N = 316265.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Set - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Set - Connections: 256first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 147.31, N = 316518.81. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 1first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 607.02, N = 917324.41. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 4first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 173.54, N = 317755.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 1first test12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 351.58, N = 356086.31. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 4first test13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 1187.69, N = 1259130.21. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 16first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 226.99, N = 317801.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 32first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 61.95, N = 317435.71. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 64first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 110.25, N = 317484.91. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 16first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 699.61, N = 363781.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 32first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 791.39, N = 363930.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 64first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 694.22, N = 363758.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 1first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 145.51, N = 316713.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 4first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 164.18, N = 917242.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 1first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 435.66, N = 1217224.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 4first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 404.16, N = 917909.41. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 128first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 153.68, N = 317684.71. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Append - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Append - Connections: 256first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 127.15, N = 317774.01. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 128first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 452.67, N = 363626.31. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Delete - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Delete - Connections: 256first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 602.16, N = 363780.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 16first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 188.52, N = 517705.21. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 32first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 217.66, N = 317583.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 64first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 37.89, N = 317594.41. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 16first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 110.88, N = 317597.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 32first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 470.30, N = 317422.91. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 64first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 103.02, N = 317544.71. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 128first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 249.97, N = 317666.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Prepend - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Prepend - Connections: 256first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 195.32, N = 318219.61. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 128first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 203.71, N = 318383.71. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

Memcached mcperf

Method: Replace - Connections: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterMemcached mcperf 1.6.9Method: Replace - Connections: 256first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 124.18, N = 317660.51. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic

nginx

Connections: 20

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.23.2Connections: 20first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 6.54, N = 319938.751. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

nginx

Connections: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.23.2Connections: 100first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 6.19, N = 321607.321. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

nginx

Connections: 200

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.23.2Connections: 200first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 12.90, N = 321432.791. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

nginx

Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.23.2Connections: 500first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 38.83, N = 321083.841. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

nginx

Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is Betternginx 1.23.2Connections: 1000first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 39.46, N = 320757.501. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

OpenSSL

Algorithm: SHA256

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: SHA256first test400M800M1200M1600M2000MSE +/- 71374.83, N = 317359947171. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: SHA512

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: SHA512first test400M800M1200M1600M2000MSE +/- 449188.40, N = 319346302201. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: RSA4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: RSA4096first test2004006008001000SE +/- 0.79, N = 31030.81. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: RSA4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: RSA4096first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 12.48, N = 367524.41. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: ChaCha20

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: ChaCha20first test2000M4000M6000M8000M10000MSE +/- 6608994.24, N = 3113825835701. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: AES-128-GCM

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: AES-128-GCMfirst test3000M6000M9000M12000M15000MSE +/- 2475484.51, N = 3123499006631. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: AES-256-GCM

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: AES-256-GCMfirst test2000M4000M6000M8000M10000MSE +/- 5071817.66, N = 3105918134471. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenSSL

Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.1Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305first test2000M4000M6000M8000M10000MSE +/- 3314413.99, N = 378078160431. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

Node.js Express HTTP Load Test

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNode.js Express HTTP Load Testfirst test6001200180024003000SE +/- 12.84, N = 32896

Apache CouchDB

Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.2.2Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30first test306090120150SE +/- 0.54, N = 3153.121. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -lstdc++ -shared -lei

Apache CouchDB

Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.2.2Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30first test120240360480600SE +/- 7.92, N = 3553.081. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -lstdc++ -shared -lei

Apache CouchDB

Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.2.2Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30first test70140210280350SE +/- 0.76, N = 3307.251. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -lstdc++ -shared -lei

Apache CouchDB

Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache CouchDB 3.2.2Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30first test2004006008001000SE +/- 9.70, N = 31051.281. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -lstdc++ -shared -lei

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test30060090012001500SE +/- 41.40, N = 151538

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test140280420560700SE +/- 20.43, N = 15646

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test14002800420056007000SE +/- 170.52, N = 136665

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test130260390520650SE +/- 18.41, N = 13591

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128first test6M12M18M24M30MSE +/- 180791.59, N = 1226187354

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 128first test0.450.91.351.82.25SE +/- 0.00, N = 122

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256first test300M600M900M1200M1500MSE +/- 267141511.52, N = 121415132115

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 256first test0.6751.352.0252.73.375SE +/- 0.11, N = 123

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 566.30, N = 1525022

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test140280420560700SE +/- 17.47, N = 15631

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 499.69, N = 1529314

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test2004006008001000SE +/- 20.40, N = 151077

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 304.09, N = 1532662

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test400800120016002000SE +/- 17.86, N = 151933

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 288.49, N = 732315

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test8001600240032004000SE +/- 34.41, N = 73927

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 431.83, N = 540796

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test10002000300040005000SE +/- 72.72, N = 54727

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test400800120016002000SE +/- 53.45, N = 121989

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test110220330440550SE +/- 15.31, N = 12495

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 423.84, N = 1412383

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test70140210280350SE +/- 11.71, N = 14318

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test30060090012001500SE +/- 60.43, N = 91368

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test160320480640800SE +/- 25.81, N = 9738

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test10002000300040005000SE +/- 36.67, N = 34781

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test2004006008001000SE +/- 6.43, N = 3835

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test30060090012001500SE +/- 28.18, N = 91288

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test2004006008001000SE +/- 14.81, N = 9777

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test10002000300040005000SE +/- 30.55, N = 34857

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test2004006008001000SE +/- 5.20, N = 3822

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 855.41, N = 1532781

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test100200300400500SE +/- 16.87, N = 15483

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 855.39, N = 1537756

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test2004006008001000SE +/- 24.36, N = 15839

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 470.38, N = 1343564

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test30060090012001500SE +/- 17.86, N = 131447

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 439.22, N = 1314889

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test1428425670SE +/- 2.20, N = 1362

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 1784.68, N = 1566687

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test1326395265SE +/- 1.91, N = 1556

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 337.09, N = 930375

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test110220330440550SE +/- 5.79, N = 9525

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 349.30, N = 932230

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test2004006008001000SE +/- 10.10, N = 9990

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 363.82, N = 432783

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test400800120016002000SE +/- 21.30, N = 41948

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test30060090012001500SE +/- 108.04, N = 31401

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1first test160320480640800SE +/- 51.85, N = 3720

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test10002000300040005000SE +/- 13.54, N = 34850

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4first test2004006008001000SE +/- 2.73, N = 3823

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 282.21, N = 929484

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test120240360480600SE +/- 4.90, N = 9541

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 385.11, N = 431415

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test2004006008001000SE +/- 12.32, N = 41017

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 245.49, N = 331861

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test400800120016002000SE +/- 15.28, N = 32006

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128first test8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 324.84, N = 837397

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128first test7001400210028003500SE +/- 32.47, N = 83388

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256first test10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 450.43, N = 347539

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256first test8001600240032004000SE +/- 44.67, N = 33883

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16first test30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 5497.85, N = 14144198

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16first test20406080100SE +/- 6.18, N = 14105

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32first test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 6919.69, N = 15165339

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 32first test4080120160200SE +/- 11.06, N = 15184

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64first test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 8509.29, N = 15187136

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 64first test70140210280350SE +/- 23.38, N = 15312

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 600.20, N = 331203

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test9001800270036004500SE +/- 77.08, N = 34097

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 86.90, N = 332316

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 21.65, N = 37900

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test400800120016002000SE +/- 6.66, N = 31741

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test120240360480600SE +/- 2.03, N = 3572

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test14002800420056007000SE +/- 24.85, N = 36754

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test130260390520650SE +/- 2.03, N = 3591

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 156.79, N = 329615

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 16first test120240360480600SE +/- 3.18, N = 3538

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 112.26, N = 331475

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 32first test2004006008001000SE +/- 3.93, N = 31016

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 60.47, N = 332422

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 64first test400800120016002000SE +/- 3.48, N = 31973

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 187.51, N = 331857

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test9001800270036004500SE +/- 23.73, N = 34015

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 68.63, N = 330521

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 19.15, N = 38376

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test400800120016002000SE +/- 8.01, N = 31704

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test130260390520650SE +/- 2.96, N = 3586

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test14002800420056007000SE +/- 52.70, N = 36711

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test130260390520650SE +/- 4.81, N = 3594

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128first test30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 5567.44, N = 13162832

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 128first test160320480640800SE +/- 37.71, N = 13749

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256first test60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 18999.25, N = 11257025

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 256first test5001000150020002500SE +/- 50.31, N = 112113

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 457.04, N = 350136

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test70140210280350SE +/- 3.06, N = 3318

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 220.55, N = 356090

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test120240360480600SE +/- 2.33, N = 3568

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 102.07, N = 366383

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test2004006008001000SE +/- 1.00, N = 3961

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 941.86, N = 1548703

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test510152025SE +/- 0.39, N = 1520

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 22276.26, N = 4107991

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test1020304050SE +/- 12.56, N = 446

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 881.90, N = 326951

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 128first test10002000300040005000SE +/- 150.71, N = 34756

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 4.41, N = 331029

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 256first test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1.20, N = 38247

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test30060090012001500SE +/- 12.03, N = 31484

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1first test150300450600750SE +/- 4.93, N = 3673

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 24.33, N = 38047

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4first test110220330440550SE +/- 1.53, N = 3496

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 199.86, N = 349447

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test70140210280350SE +/- 1.45, N = 3323

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 250.38, N = 355613

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test120240360480600SE +/- 2.65, N = 3574

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 649.96, N = 369617

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test2004006008001000SE +/- 8.35, N = 3918

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 885.25, N = 1552121

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test48121620SE +/- 0.39, N = 1518

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test10K20K30K40K50K48838

Apache HBase

Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 2000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4first test153045607568

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1first test6001200180024003000SE +/- 155.52, N = 152758

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1first test80160240320400SE +/- 22.56, N = 15371

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4first test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 276.48, N = 1510041

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4first test80160240320400SE +/- 9.41, N = 15391

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128first test16K32K48K64K80KSE +/- 804.33, N = 374465

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 128first test400800120016002000SE +/- 18.58, N = 31716

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256first test16K32K48K64K80KSE +/- 173.58, N = 375571

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 256first test7001400210028003500SE +/- 8.33, N = 33368

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16first test20K40K60K80K100K95867

Apache HBase

Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 16first test306090120150157

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 108.76, N = 347471

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 16first test70140210280350SE +/- 0.67, N = 3336

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 310.63, N = 358527

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 32first test120240360480600SE +/- 2.85, N = 3546

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 188.00, N = 370604

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 64first test2004006008001000SE +/- 2.40, N = 3906

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRows Per Second, More Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 5307.47, N = 342623

Apache HBase

Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache HBase 2.5.0Rows: 10000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1first test510152025SE +/- 0.67, N = 321

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1.23752.4753.71254.956.1875SE +/- 0.06, N = 35.50

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 2.24, N = 3315.75

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 317.57

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Timefirst test1.33652.6734.00955.3466.6825SE +/- 0.04, N = 35.94

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Timefirst test0.95181.90362.85543.80724.759SE +/- 0.02, N = 34.23

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.69081.38162.07242.76323.454SE +/- 0.03, N = 33.07

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.6481.2961.9442.5923.24SE +/- 0.15, N = 32.88

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1.2872.5743.8615.1486.435SE +/- 0.03, N = 35.72

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 0.75, N = 3314.68

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.14, N = 317.51

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Timefirst test246810SE +/- 0.05, N = 36.58

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Timefirst test0.96531.93062.89593.86124.8265SE +/- 0.04, N = 34.29

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.75381.50762.26143.01523.769SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.35

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.69981.39962.09942.79923.499SE +/- 0.28, N = 33.11

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test246810SE +/- 0.06, N = 36.28

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 2.20, N = 3316.46

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 317.49

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Timefirst test246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 37.08

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1.04632.09263.13894.18525.2315SE +/- 0.02, N = 34.65

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.87081.74162.61243.48324.354SE +/- 0.02, N = 33.87

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.76051.5212.28153.0423.8025SE +/- 0.04, N = 33.38

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test246810SE +/- 0.08, N = 46.97

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 1.57, N = 4315.51

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 417.38

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Timefirst test246810SE +/- 0.04, N = 47.88

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1.17452.3493.52354.6985.8725SE +/- 0.05, N = 45.22

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1.12952.2593.38854.5185.6475SE +/- 0.08, N = 45.02

Apache Spark

Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test0.93381.86762.80143.73524.669SE +/- 0.28, N = 44.15

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test612182430SE +/- 0.07, N = 326.04

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 0.50, N = 3313.66

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 317.59

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 313.78

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.18, N = 317.65

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.49, N = 320.98

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.49, N = 322.70

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test612182430SE +/- 0.09, N = 325.26

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 1.96, N = 3315.19

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.43

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.11, N = 313.95

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.41, N = 317.95

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.85, N = 320.29

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.37, N = 320.26

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1122334455SE +/- 0.13, N = 347.87

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 2.18, N = 3313.71

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 317.45

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.18, N = 322.15

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Timefirst test816243240SE +/- 0.28, N = 334.79

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.26, N = 342.12

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 1.38, N = 342.35

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.04, N = 343.21

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 2.43, N = 3313.16

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 317.41

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.13, N = 320.86

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Timefirst test816243240SE +/- 0.37, N = 332.80

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test816243240SE +/- 0.50, N = 336.80

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test918273645SE +/- 0.16, N = 338.66

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.48, N = 383.01

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 1.23, N = 3311.11

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 317.41

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Timefirst test1224364860SE +/- 0.35, N = 353.39

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1428425670SE +/- 0.13, N = 362.86

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1632486480SE +/- 1.61, N = 373.51

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.40, N = 374.83

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.40, N = 383.45

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 1.37, N = 3315.86

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.07, N = 317.47

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Timefirst test1122334455SE +/- 0.65, N = 346.44

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1428425670SE +/- 0.48, N = 361.17

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1632486480SE +/- 0.66, N = 374.20

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.67, N = 374.83

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test612182430SE +/- 0.05, N = 324.73

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 0.30, N = 3314.48

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.11, N = 317.51

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 313.98

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.40, N = 317.69

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.74, N = 320.46

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.32, N = 319.75

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test612182430SE +/- 0.19, N = 325.37

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 1.94, N = 3314.83

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.07, N = 317.44

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.23, N = 314.60

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.42, N = 318.17

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.25, N = 321.01

Apache Spark

Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.08, N = 320.05

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.11, N = 343.94

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 2.47, N = 3316.53

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.10, N = 317.49

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.19, N = 321.32

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test714212835SE +/- 0.20, N = 331.91

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test918273645SE +/- 0.95, N = 338.57

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test918273645SE +/- 0.85, N = 338.20

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.39, N = 344.18

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 3.36, N = 3315.86

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 317.51

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Timefirst test510152025SE +/- 0.30, N = 321.36

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test714212835SE +/- 0.05, N = 331.70

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test918273645SE +/- 0.02, N = 338.23

Apache Spark

Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test918273645SE +/- 1.26, N = 337.75

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 383.97

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 4.93, N = 3317.02

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.23, N = 317.50

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.31, N = 345.47

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1326395265SE +/- 0.29, N = 359.91

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1632486480SE +/- 1.50, N = 373.77

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.72, N = 374.55

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.22, N = 384.67

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmarkfirst test70140210280350SE +/- 0.07, N = 3313.87

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 317.49

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Timefirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.46, N = 345.69

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Timefirst test1428425670SE +/- 1.41, N = 361.69

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Timefirst test1632486480SE +/- 0.91, N = 372.90

Apache Spark

Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterApache Spark 3.3Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Timefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.94, N = 377.28

ClickHouse

100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is BetterClickHouse 22.12.3.5100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cachefirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.54, N = 3101.53MIN: 3.97 / MAX: 4285.71

ClickHouse

100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is BetterClickHouse 22.12.3.5100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Runfirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 3105.89MIN: 4.01 / MAX: 4000

ClickHouse

100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is BetterClickHouse 22.12.3.5100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Runfirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.22, N = 3105.85MIN: 3.99 / MAX: 3750

CockroachDB

Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128first test50100150200250SE +/- 0.31, N = 3222.3

CockroachDB

Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 256first test50100150200250SE +/- 0.55, N = 3222.3

CockroachDB

Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 512first test50100150200250SE +/- 0.17, N = 3222.4

CockroachDB

Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 1024first test50100150200250SE +/- 0.38, N = 3221.9

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 17.58, N = 320381.8

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 256first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 185.39, N = 320551.9

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 512first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 34.23, N = 320507.5

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 35.08, N = 323607.7

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 256first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 12.26, N = 323615.8

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 512first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 11.23, N = 323129.7

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 50.08, N = 324503.7

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 256first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 49.34, N = 324501.9

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 512first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 74.87, N = 323851.5

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 51.30, N = 328483.4

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 256first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 37.90, N = 327734.9

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512first test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 78.47, N = 326998.9

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 1024first test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 27.58, N = 319503.8

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 1024first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 55.72, N = 321683.5

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 1024first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 25.84, N = 322337.8

CockroachDB

Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgops/s, More Is BetterCockroachDB 22.2Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 1024first test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 55.78, N = 325176.6

Dragonflydb

Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 2718.15, N = 31631362.411. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Dragonflydb

Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 2906.86, N = 31776973.311. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Dragonflydb

Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 55829.36, N = 121481465.771. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Dragonflydb

Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 617.51, N = 31522099.101. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Dragonflydb

Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 11623.57, N = 31614367.641. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Dragonflydb

Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 8686.58, N = 31451171.921. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100first test8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 2080.75, N = 1236108.39

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.65251.3051.95752.613.2625SE +/- 0.19, N = 122.9

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 517.26, N = 339911.28

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.56251.1251.68752.252.8125SE +/- 0.03, N = 32.5

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 75.90, N = 352166.00

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 319.1

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 29.72, N = 340886.60

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.541.081.622.162.7SE +/- 0.00, N = 32.4

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 29.62, N = 350943.88

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 319.6

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000first test10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 63.34, N = 346730.42

etcd

Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 321.1

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 10.74, N = 343309.84

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.51751.0351.55252.072.5875SE +/- 0.00, N = 32.3

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 20.14, N = 340690.78

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.541.081.622.162.7SE +/- 0.03, N = 32.4

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 20.63, N = 352109.06

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 319.1

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 25.93, N = 340917.10

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latencyfirst test0.541.081.622.162.7SE +/- 0.00, N = 32.4

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000first test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 81.43, N = 351125.87

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 319.5

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000first test10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 51.53, N = 346688.47

etcd

Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 321.1

Memcached

Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemcached 1.6.19Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 4152.10, N = 31057792.691. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Memcached

Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemcached 1.6.19Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 2423.15, N = 3846003.131. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Memcached

Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemcached 1.6.19Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 4361.83, N = 31217382.941. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Memcached

Set To Get Ratio: 1:10

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemcached 1.6.19Set To Get Ratio: 1:10first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 5315.00, N = 3828721.261. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Memcached

Set To Get Ratio: 1:100

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterMemcached 1.6.19Set To Get Ratio: 1:100first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 9958.34, N = 3812848.491. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 6583.82, N = 31149781.621. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 3412.53, N = 31211011.461. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 4427.73, N = 31020230.351. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 9154.19, N = 81044301.761. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 14438.62, N = 31134006.801. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 6799.01, N = 13990773.911. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 5112.42, N = 31017334.251. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 15475.80, N = 31126537.901. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 9675.68, N = 151053730.571. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 8786.18, N = 151139301.721. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 3700.79, N = 3994801.731. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 12281.06, N = 3965268.451. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 11201.21, N = 151094712.351. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 11554.48, N = 3948097.391. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

memtier_benchmark

Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10

OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 1031.42, N = 31116053.521. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 35932.34, N = 151946029.571. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 17978.81, N = 121359544.041. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 22175.93, N = 31787013.881. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 30233.86, N = 152045504.991. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 26596.43, N = 151550769.621. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 20002.35, N = 151352814.851. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 34184.96, N = 151651781.711. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500first test400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 40123.42, N = 151996977.371. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 8273.15, N = 15944905.891. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 18705.05, N = 151551051.311. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 21224.53, N = 151326122.031. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 12070.82, N = 31072509.421. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 12181.66, N = 31071480.501. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000first test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 30191.10, N = 151492782.571. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000first test200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 12149.39, N = 151043912.291. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.30.1Threads / Copies: 1first test48121620SE +/- 0.09, N = 313.771. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -lm

RocksDB

Test: Random Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Random Fillfirst test80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 1237.03, N = 33592191. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Random Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Random Readfirst test5M10M15M20M25MSE +/- 238438.09, N = 15216436211. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Update Random

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Update Randomfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 767.70, N = 32143401. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Sequential Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Sequential Fillfirst test90K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 1993.54, N = 34375981. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Random Fill Sync

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Random Fill Syncfirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 68.17, N = 381751. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Read While Writing

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Read While Writingfirst test300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 13227.36, N = 314037951. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

RocksDB

Test: Read Random Write Random

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterRocksDB 8.0Test: Read Random Write Randomfirst test160K320K480K640K800KSE +/- 1888.56, N = 37691491. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread

LevelDB

Benchmark: Hot Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Hot Readfirst test3691215SE +/- 0.066, N = 39.6751. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Fill Sync

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill Syncfirst test0.2250.450.6750.91.125SE +/- 0.00, N = 311. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Fill Sync

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Fill Syncfirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 3.39, N = 31599.201. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Overwrite

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Overwritefirst test48121620SE +/- 0.21, N = 418.11. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Overwrite

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Overwritefirst test20406080100SE +/- 1.06, N = 497.481. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random Fillfirst test48121620SE +/- 0.17, N = 317.01. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random Fillfirst test20406080100SE +/- 1.10, N = 3103.681. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Read

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random Readfirst test3691215SE +/- 0.028, N = 39.6651. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Seek Random

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Seek Randomfirst test3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 313.301. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Random Delete

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Random Deletefirst test20406080100SE +/- 1.89, N = 1583.161. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Sequential Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential Fillfirst test48121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 317.21. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

LevelDB

Benchmark: Sequential Fill

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential Fillfirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.62, N = 3102.941. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy

SQLite Speedtest

Timed Time - Size 1,000

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite Speedtest 3.30Timed Time - Size 1,000first test20406080100SE +/- 0.23, N = 395.561. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz

Apache Cassandra

Test: Reads

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: Readsfirst test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 771.65, N = 1241200

Apache Cassandra

Test: Writes

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: Writesfirst test11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 214.61, N = 349799

Apache Cassandra

Test: Mixed 1:1

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: Mixed 1:1first test9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 501.23, N = 440304

Apache Cassandra

Test: Mixed 1:3

OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: Mixed 1:3first test8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 633.73, N = 939579

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 293.09, N = 4241871. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.00950.0190.02850.0380.0475SE +/- 0.001, N = 40.0421. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writefirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 1.13, N = 314491. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test0.15530.31060.46590.62120.7765SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.6901. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 405.17, N = 32310371. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.04880.09760.14640.19520.244SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.2171. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 1392.32, N = 32348371. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.09590.19180.28770.38360.4795SE +/- 0.003, N = 30.4261. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 569.62, N = 32351901. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.23920.47840.71760.95681.196SE +/- 0.003, N = 31.0631. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writefirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 1.03, N = 311791. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test1020304050SE +/- 0.04, N = 342.401. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 857.94, N = 32291981. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.49070.98141.47211.96282.4535SE +/- 0.008, N = 32.1811. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 2377.77, N = 32288391. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.78681.57362.36043.14723.934SE +/- 0.036, N = 33.4971. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 181.32, N = 3227071. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.00990.01980.02970.03960.0495SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0441. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2004006008001000SE +/- 6.32, N = 310061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.63, N = 399.391. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 2278.07, N = 32190551. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test1.02742.05483.08224.10965.137SE +/- 0.048, N = 34.5661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writefirst test140280420560700SE +/- 5.01, N = 36351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test90180270360450SE +/- 3.08, N = 3393.491. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writefirst test80160240320400SE +/- 14.06, N = 123701. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 54.70, N = 121373.611. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writefirst test60120180240300SE +/- 12.72, N = 122621. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test7001400210028003500SE +/- 172.40, N = 123140.021. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writefirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 14.27, N = 1213881. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test0.16220.32440.48660.64880.811SE +/- 0.007, N = 120.7211. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 297.15, N = 32197531. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.05110.10220.15330.20440.2555SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.2271. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 561.48, N = 9210231. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.01080.02160.03240.04320.054SE +/- 0.001, N = 90.0481. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writefirst test50100150200250SE +/- 13.72, N = 122271. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test10002000300040005000SE +/- 330.89, N = 124617.891. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 218.14, N = 32241881. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.10040.20080.30120.40160.502SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.4461. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 1447.75, N = 32217591. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.25360.50720.76081.01441.268SE +/- 0.007, N = 31.1271. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writefirst test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 245.44, N = 12224031. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test0.50291.00581.50872.01162.5145SE +/- 0.026, N = 122.2351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 1105.96, N = 32212571. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.50851.0171.52552.0342.5425SE +/- 0.011, N = 32.2601. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 1384.18, N = 32110611. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.8531.7062.5593.4124.265SE +/- 0.025, N = 33.7911. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writefirst test30060090012001500SE +/- 1.91, N = 313241. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test0.16990.33980.50970.67960.8495SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.7551. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 559.99, N = 31870591. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.06010.12020.18030.24040.3005SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.2671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writefirst test6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 112.90, N = 3257511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test0.87391.74782.62173.49564.3695SE +/- 0.017, N = 33.8841. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 2822.78, N = 121925621. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test1.17142.34283.51424.68565.857SE +/- 0.077, N = 125.2061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writefirst test5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 85.09, N = 3221091. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test3691215SE +/- 0.04, N = 311.311. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writefirst test4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 16.78, N = 3172071. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test714212835SE +/- 0.03, N = 329.061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writefirst test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 6.19, N = 3138061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test1326395265SE +/- 0.03, N = 357.941. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 330.27, N = 31899721. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.11860.23720.35580.47440.593SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.5271. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 246.83, N = 31857971. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.30260.60520.90781.21041.513SE +/- 0.002, N = 31.3451. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 137.11, N = 982361. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test246810SE +/- 0.108, N = 96.0851. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 883.09, N = 31756291. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test0.64061.28121.92182.56243.203SE +/- 0.014, N = 32.8471. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1199.79, N = 91526111. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test1.18012.36023.54034.72045.9005SE +/- 0.043, N = 95.2451. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 158.21, N = 12112011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test20406080100SE +/- 1.30, N = 1289.481. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 344.48, N = 6101981. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test3691215SE +/- 0.342, N = 69.8631. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlyfirst test30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 1507.37, N = 41435461. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencyfirst test246810SE +/- 0.074, N = 46.9691. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writefirst test3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 61.46, N = 3129701. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test510152025SE +/- 0.09, N = 319.281. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 286.25, N = 9105641. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test1122334455SE +/- 1.40, N = 947.641. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 236.91, N = 9100501. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test20406080100SE +/- 2.07, N = 979.991. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writefirst test2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 50.96, N = 3100091. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 15Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencyfirst test20406080100SE +/- 0.51, N = 399.911. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm

MariaDB

Clients: 1

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 1first test5001000150020002500SE +/- 8.63, N = 325491. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 64

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 64first test2004006008001000SE +/- 1.03, N = 39441. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 128

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 128first test100200300400500SE +/- 1.30, N = 34631. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 256

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 256first test90180270360450SE +/- 0.57, N = 33951. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 512

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 512first test90180270360450SE +/- 0.78, N = 34121. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 1024

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 1024first test90180270360450SE +/- 0.65, N = 34151. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 2048

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 2048first test90180270360450SE +/- 0.14, N = 34011. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 4096

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 4096first test80160240320400SE +/- 0.76, N = 33531. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

MariaDB

Clients: 8192

OpenBenchmarking.orgQueries Per Second, More Is BetterMariaDB 11.0.1Clients: 8192first test80160240320400SE +/- 1.46, N = 33591. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O3 -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl

ebizzy

OpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3first test40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 3542.59, N = 152066781. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native

Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgruns/s, More Is BetterNode.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmarkfirst test1.26232.52463.78695.04926.3115SE +/- 0.04, N = 125.61

simdjson

Throughput Test: Kostya

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: Kostyafirst test0.32850.6570.98551.3141.6425SE +/- 0.00, N = 31.461. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

simdjson

Throughput Test: TopTweet

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: TopTweetfirst test0.450.91.351.82.25SE +/- 0.00, N = 321. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

simdjson

Throughput Test: LargeRandom

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: LargeRandomfirst test0.14180.28360.42540.56720.709SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.631. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

simdjson

Throughput Test: PartialTweets

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: PartialTweetsfirst test0.4140.8281.2421.6562.07SE +/- 0.00, N = 31.841. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

simdjson

Throughput Test: DistinctUserID

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: DistinctUserIDfirst test0.44330.88661.32991.77322.2165SE +/- 0.01, N = 31.971. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

Perl Benchmarks

Test: Pod2html

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlfirst test0.04580.09160.13740.18320.229SE +/- 0.00180960, N = 30.20360552

Perl Benchmarks

Test: Interpreter

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Interpreterfirst test0.00040.00080.00120.00160.002SE +/- 0.00002190, N = 50.00196531

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4