TTSIOD 3D Renderer

A portable GPL 3D software renderer that supports OpenMP and Intel Threading Building Blocks with many different rendering modes. This version does not use OpenGL but is entirely CPU/software based.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark ttsiod-renderer.

Project Site

github.com

Test Created

6 December 2010

Last Updated

14 August 2018

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

33 Seconds

Average Run Time

5 Minutes, 54 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + SDL 1.x

Accolades

200k+ Downloads + 5k+ Public Benchmark Results

Supported Platforms

* Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
Data current as of Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:45:58 GMT.

Revision History

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.7.0 [View Source] Tue, 14 Aug 2018 14:35:14 GMT
Update against ttsiod renderer 2.3b that should provide 64-bit ARM build improvements, etc. Also increase run count to 1000 frames to be more demanding on modern CPUs.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.6.1 [View Source] Sun, 08 Apr 2018 06:57:08 GMT
Drop BSD for this test.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.6.0 [View Source] Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:51:03 GMT
Update against latest upstream.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.5.0 [View Source] Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:28:48 GMT
Use SDL_VIDEODRIVER=dummy as default so this test can run from the CLI without any X11/Wayland.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.4.0 [View Source] Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:57:54 GMT
Update against upstream renderer 2.2z.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.3.1 [View Source] Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:57:31 GMT
Works on BSD.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.3.0 [View Source] Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:24:08 GMT
Update against upstream TTSIOD 3D Renderer v2.2w.

pts/ttsiod-renderer-1.2.0 [View Source] Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:25:56 GMT
Initial import into OpenBenchmarking.org

Suites Using This Test

Multi-Core

CPU Massive

Creator Workloads

Renderers

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b

Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 2,015 public results since 14 August 2018 with the latest data as of 24 January 2021.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Matching Public Results

FPS (Average)

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core

100th

1028 ^{+/- 15}

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280

99th

995 ^{+/- 31}

AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core

98th

903 ^{+/- 66}

AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core

97th

876

AMD EPYC 7662 64-Core

96th

862

AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core

96th

857

AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core

96th

855 ^{+/- 2}

AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core

95th

854

AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core

95th

850 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core

94th

835

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core

94th

831 ^{+/- 7}

AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core

92nd

766 ^{+/- 9}

AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core

92nd

749 ^{+/- 53}

Intel Core i9-7980XE

92nd

738 ^{+/- 67}

AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core

92nd

735

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core

91st

726 ^{+/- 10}

POWER9 altivec supported 44-Core

91st

725 ^{+/- 5}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6138

91st

723 ^{+/- 20}

AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core

91st

722

Intel Core i9-10900K

88th

702 ^{+/- 11}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6130

88th

688 ^{+/- 3}

2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6230

86th

670 ^{+/- 50}

2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core

85th

666 ^{+/- 33}

Intel Core i9-7960X

84th

658 ^{+/- 11}

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core

83rd

643 ^{+/- 66}

2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core

83rd

642 ^{+/- 50}

Intel Xeon Gold 6226R

82nd

619 ^{+/- 2}

AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core

81st

601

AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core

81st

592 ^{+/- 3}

AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core

80th

574

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core

80th

572 ^{+/- 5}

AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core

78th

549 ^{+/- 25}

Intel Core i9-9900KS

78th

545 ^{+/- 5}

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core

77th

541 ^{+/- 14}

Mid-Tier

75th

< 519

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core

75th

516 ^{+/- 21}

Intel Core i9-9900K

75th

507 ^{+/- 64}

Intel Core i7-7900X

75th

507 ^{+/- 30}

Intel Xeon Gold 5218

74th

493 ^{+/- 13}

Intel Xeon Silver 4216

73rd

492 ^{+/- 1}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core

72nd

483 ^{+/- 47}

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2

72nd

477 ^{+/- 42}

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4

70th

442 ^{+/- 25}

Intel Xeon Silver 4214R

69th

438

AMD EPYC 7401P 24-Core

68th

431 ^{+/- 57}

AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core

67th

421 ^{+/- 14}

AMD EPYC 7272 12-Core

67th

419

Intel Core i5-10600K

66th

415 ^{+/- 2}

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core

65th

411 ^{+/- 30}

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core

64th

406 ^{+/- 21}

Intel Core i7-8700K

64th

405 ^{+/- 31}

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3

63rd

402

Intel Core i7-8086K

63rd

401 ^{+/- 10}

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core

61st

372 ^{+/- 41}

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core

60th

362 ^{+/- 37}

Intel Core i7-8700

59th

356 ^{+/- 6}

Intel Xeon W-2295

59th

351 ^{+/- 42}

AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core

58th

346

Intel Core i7-5960X

58th

343 ^{+/- 38}

AMD EPYC 7232P 8-Core

57th

336

Intel Xeon Gold 5217

56th

333

AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core

55th

316

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core

55th

315 ^{+/- 17}

AMD EPYC 7252 8-Core

55th

313

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core

55th

308 ^{+/- 18}

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core

53rd

295 ^{+/- 18}

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

53rd

293 ^{+/- 9}

Intel Xeon Silver 4215R

53rd

292

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Six-Core

52nd

291 ^{+/- 13}

Intel Core i7-7740K

52nd

289 ^{+/- 4}

Intel Core i7-7700K

52nd

286 ^{+/- 12}

Intel Core i5-8400

51st

280 ^{+/- 11}

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 16-Core

51st

271 ^{+/- 25}

Median

50th

271

Intel Core i3-10100

50th

261 ^{+/- 1}

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

47th

237 ^{+/- 6}

Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5

46th

234 ^{+/- 2}

Intel Core i7 990X

45th

229 ^{+/- 14}

Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5

44th

223 ^{+/- 1}

Intel Core i7-4790K

44th

222 ^{+/- 27}

Intel Xeon Silver 4108

43rd

215 ^{+/- 1}

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2

42nd

203 ^{+/- 28}

Intel Core i5-7600K

41st

199 ^{+/- 5}

Intel Core i7-3770K

41st

199 ^{+/- 8}

Intel Core i3-8100

39th

181 ^{+/- 9}

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

39th

176 ^{+/- 5}

Intel Core i7-7700T

39th

175 ^{+/- 2}

POWER9 4-Core

39th

175 ^{+/- 22}

Intel Core i5-4690K

38th

169 ^{+/- 21}

Intel Core i7-3770

38th

169 ^{+/- 18}

Intel Core i5-6600

38th

169 ^{+/- 1}

Intel Core i5-6500

37th

167 ^{+/- 3}

Intel Core i5-4670

36th

165 ^{+/- 2}

Intel Core i5-4690

35th

163 ^{+/- 6}

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4

35th

162 ^{+/- 2}

AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core

35th

161 ^{+/- 9}

Intel Core i7-2700K

34th

158 ^{+/- 9}

Intel Core i5-8250U

34th

158 ^{+/- 11}

Intel Core i7-8565U

32nd

150 ^{+/- 5}

Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5

31st

139 ^{+/- 2}

ARMv8 rev 0 8-Core

31st

138 ^{+/- 16}

Intel Core i5-2500K

30th

135

Intel Xeon W3530

29th

131 ^{+/- 15}

AMD Athlon 3000G

28th

123 ^{+/- 2}

Intel Core i5-2400

28th

121 ^{+/- 6}

Intel Core i5-7267U

26th

110 ^{+/- 2}

Intel Core i7-1065G7

26th

106 ^{+/- 3}

Low-Tier

25th

< 99

Intel Core i7 740Q

24th

Intel Core i7-4600U

23rd

79 ^{+/- 9}

ARMv8 Cortex-A73 8-Core

22nd

76 ^{+/- 10}

ARMv8 rev 3 6-Core

21st

71 ^{+/- 1}

Intel Core i3-7100U

21st

69 ^{+/- 8}

Loongson-3A R4

19th

61 ^{+/- 2}

ARMv8 Cortex-A73 6-Core

18th

56 ^{+/- 8}

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 6-Core

14th

42 ^{+/- 3}

ARMv8 rev 1 4-Core

14th

41 ^{+/- 2}

AMD A6-3410MX APU

14th

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 4-Core

13th

40 ^{+/- 5}

Intel Atom E3845

12th

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

10th

30 ^{+/- 1}

ARMv7 4-Core

9th

28 ^{+/- 1}

Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

9th

AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300

7th

21 ^{+/- 3}

ARMv7 rev 4 4-Core

6th

18 ^{+/- 1}

ARMv7 rev 10 4-Core

5th

16 ^{+/- 1}

ARMv7 rev 5 4-Core

3rd

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping) has an average run-time of 6 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.7%.

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor Featured Monitor Comparison	VE228
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 Perf Governor 3 Systems - 376 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Linux 5.11 Schedutil vs. Performance 2 Systems - 220 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 3 Systems - 376 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Linux 5.11 Featured Kernel Comparison	5.10.9-051009-generic - 5.11.0-051100rc4daily20210121-generic - 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 1 System - 466 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.10.9-051009-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
Clear Linux vs. Ubuntu vs. Fedora 2019 Intel Core i9 Benchmarks 8 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-7980XE - ASUS PRIME X299-A - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 18.10 - 4.18.0-25-generic - GNOME Shell 3.30.1
slehpc-renderers-cpu-07jan2020 1 System - 40 Benchmark Results	8 x AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core - Intel 440BX - Intel 440BX SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 15.2 - 5.3.18-24.9-default - GNOME Shell 3.34.4
slehpc-renderers-cpu-06jan2021 1 System - 40 Benchmark Results	8 x AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core - Intel 440BX - Intel 440BX SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 15.2 - 5.3.18-24.9-default - GNOME Shell 3.34.4
slehpc-wk1-rned-cpu-05jan2021 1 System - 40 Benchmark Results	8 x AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core - Intel 440BX - Intel 440BX SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 15.2 - 5.3.18-24.9-default - GNOME Shell 3.34.4
Raspberry Pi 4 vs. Intel Comet Lake 5 Systems - 71 Benchmark Results	HP Hexa-Core 2.0GHz - HP 2268 v73.41 - AMD 16h Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-33-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
POWER9 44c 176t 2021 4 Systems - 210 Benchmark Results	POWER9 - PowerNV T2P9D01 REV 1.01 - 64GB Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.9.10-050910-generic - X Server

AMD Ryzen vs. Intel Core Benchmarking On Ubuntu Linux 12 Systems - 593 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASRock X570 Taichi - AMD Starship Fedora 33 - 5.8.16-300.fc33.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
Ryzen 9 5900X / Ryzen 9 5950X Linux Performance 11 Systems - 217 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD 17h Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
CPU Benchmarks - POWER9 Blackbird 12 Systems - 209 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - MSI B350M GAMING PRO - AMD Device 15d0 Ubuntu 19.04 - 5.2.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.32.1
Core i9-10980XE vs. Threadripper 3 8 Systems - 360 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-10980XE - Gigabyte X299X DESIGNARE 10G - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.4.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Linux Benchmarks 1 System - 248 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Device 1480 Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.2.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz 5 Systems - 1840 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i5-6200U - HP 8079 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5 Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-21-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4
VirtualBox 6.0 vs. KVM vs. Bare Linux Benchmarks 3 Systems - 36 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME - AMD Family 17h Ubuntu 18.10 - 4.18.0-12-generic - GNOME Shell 3.30.1
AMD Threadripper 3960X vs. Intel Core i9 10980XE Featured Processor Comparison	Intel Core i9-10980XE - Gigabyte X299X DESIGNARE 10G - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.3.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Linux Benchmarks 1 System - 263 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core - MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE - AMD Device 1480 Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.2.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4
Ryzen 9 3900X Linux SMT Performance Featured Processor Comparison	AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Device 1480 Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.3.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.4
Intel Core i9 9900K Linux Benchmarks On Ubuntu 15 Systems - 47 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i7-7740K - Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming-CF - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6 Ubuntu 18.10 - 4.18.0-9-generic - GNOME Shell 3.30.1
Core i9 10900K - Ubuntu 20.04 LTS vs. Ubuntu 20.10 2 Systems - 403 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-10900K - Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER - Intel Comet Lake PCH Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-48-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

TTSIOD 3D Renderer

Project Site

Test Created

Last Updated

Test Maintainer

Test Type

Average Install Time

Average Run Time

Test Dependencies

Accolades

Supported Platforms

Revision History

Suites Using This Test

Performance Metrics

TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b

Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Recent Test Results

Most Popular Test Results

User Comments