SPECFEM3D

simulates acoustic (fluid), elastic (solid), coupled acoustic/elastic, poroelastic or seismic wave propagation in any type of conforming mesh of hexahedra. This test profile currently relies on CPU-based execution for SPECFEM3D and using a variety of their built-in examples/models for benchmarking.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark specfem3d.

Project Site

seg.ethz.ch

Source Repository

github.com

Test Created

14 March 2023

Last Updated

6 April 2024

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

31 Seconds

Average Run Time

7 Minutes, 5 Seconds

Test Dependencies

Fortran + OpenMPI + C/C++ Compiler Toolchain

Accolades

10k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms


Public Result Uploads *Reported Installs **Reported Test Completions **Test Profile Page ViewsOpenBenchmarking.orgEventsSPECFEM3D Popularity Statisticspts/specfem3d2023.032023.042023.052023.062023.072023.082023.092023.102023.112023.122024.012024.022024.032024.042024.052024.062024.072024.082024.092024.102024.112024.1213002600390052006500
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
Data updated weekly as of 19 December 2024.
Water-layered Halfspace20.2%Homogeneous Halfspace20.4%Mount St. Helens19.8%Layered Halfspace19.8%Tomographic Model19.7%Model Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/specfem3d-1.1.0   [View Source]   Sat, 06 Apr 2024 10:14:12 GMT
Update against SPECFEM3D 4.1.1

pts/specfem3d-1.0.0   [View Source]   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:46:13 GMT
SPECFEM3D 4.0 update.


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

SPECFEM3D 4.1.1

Model: Layered Halfspace

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 584 public results since 6 April 2024 with the latest data as of 29 November 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Seconds (Average)
Mid-Tier
75th
> 74
62nd
13
90 +/- 5
52nd
18
104 +/- 1
Median
50th
105
50th
3
109 +/- 1
42nd
14
133 +/- 2
41st
10
134 +/- 2
35th
13
148 +/- 3
33rd
4
153 +/- 1
29th
18
164 +/- 2
Low-Tier
25th
> 167
22nd
5
176 +/- 12
22nd
4
177 +/- 12
21st
4
180 +/- 2
21st
5
184 +/- 20
18th
7
196 +/- 12
15th
4
224 +/- 4
14th
8
226 +/- 11
14th
3
230 +/- 8
11th
8
236 +/- 4
11th
4
238 +/- 4
5th
4
313 +/- 31
4th
4
318 +/- 4
4th
5
323 +/- 19
3rd
5
407 +/- 16
1st
4
519 +/- 12
Detailed Performance Overview
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Model: Layered Halfspace584 Results Range From 6 To 530 Seconds62952759812114416719021323625928230532835137439742044346648951253520406080100

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 - Model: Layered Halfspace) has an average run-time of 8 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkModel: Layered HalfspaceRun-Time816243240Min: 1 / Avg: 7.68 / Max: 36

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.4%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsModel: Layered HalfspaceDeviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.4 / Max: 3

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

IntelAMDOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseSPECFEM3D CPU Core ScalingModel: Layered Halfspace4681012141624321.03752.0753.11254.155.1875

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture
Kernel Identifier
Verified On
Intel / AMD x86 64-bit
x86_64
(Many Processors)
ARMv8 64-bit
aarch64
ARMv8 Neoverse-N1, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, AmpereOne, AmpereOne 192-Core