Steam Deck Gaming

AMD Custom APU 0405 testing with a Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0110 BIOS) and AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB on SteamOS rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2307026-NE-STEAMDECK41
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Steam Deck
July 02 2023
  4 Hours, 34 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Steam Deck

Processor: AMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0110 BIOS), Chipset: AMD VanGogh Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CG, Graphics: AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Monitor: ANX7530 U, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe

OS: SteamOS rolling, Kernel: 5.13.0-valve36-1-neptune (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.26.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.0 (git-17e5312102) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.45), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Steam Deck GamingOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0110 BIOS)AMD VanGogh Root Complex16GB512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CGAMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/400MHz)AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD AudioANX7530 URealtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIeSteamOS rolling5.13.0-valve36-1-neptune (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.26.1X Server 1.21.1.34.6 Mesa 22.2.0 (git-17e5312102) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.45)1.3.238GCC 12.2.0ext41280x800ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSteam Deck Gaming BenchmarksSystem Logs- amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201 - GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004 - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Steam Deck Gamingcsgo: 1280 x 800 - OpenGLcsgo: 1280 x 800 - Vulkancyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Lowcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Mediumcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Highcyberpunk2077: 1280 x 800 - Ultraf122: 1280 x 800 - Lowf122: 1280 x 800 - Mediumf122: 1280 x 800 - Highf122: 1280 x 800 - Ultra Highhitman3: 1280 x 800 - Lowhitman3: 1280 x 800 - Mediumhitman3: 1280 x 800 - Ultraxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Lowxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Highxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Ultraxonotic: 1280 x 800 - Ultimateunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Mediumunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Highunvanquished: 1280 x 800 - Ultraetlegacy: 1280 x 8003dmark: 1280 x 800gravitymark: 1280 x 800 - Vulkanunigine-super: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLunigine-super: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLunigine-super: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLunigine-heaven: 1280 x 800 - Fullscreen - OpenGLquake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Off - Off - VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelinequake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Off - Off - VK_KHR_ray_queryquake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Off - On - VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelinequake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Off - On - VK_KHR_ray_queryquake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Low - Off - VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelinequake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Low - Off - VK_KHR_ray_queryquake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Low - On - VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelinequake2rtx: 1280 x 800 - Low - On - VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck109.57109.2544.6640.6530.5026.189182604353.1951.9247.93232.3698100193.2767315184.2823448157.4969882125.5123.5122.3176.093.2233.152.033.725.256.162527.92253940.81855020.03260025.97669817.66122528.12361813.71977919.412202OpenBenchmarking.org

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck20406080100SE +/- 0.20, N = 3109.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: OpenGL - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck9001800270036004500Min: 3.75 / Avg: 11.05 / Max: 4928.56
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.28.214.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck20406080100SE +/- 0.56, N = 2109.25
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck369121513.42
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.28.114.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 798 Joules per run.

Cyberpunk 2077

This is a benchmark of Cyberpunk 2077 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: LowSteam Deck1020304050SE +/- 0.24, N = 344.66MIN: 14.32 / MAX: 74.98
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: LowSteam Deck0.93351.8672.80053.7344.66754.149
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.110.816.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1593 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: MediumSteam Deck918273645SE +/- 0.02, N = 340.65MIN: 14.85 / MAX: 65.94
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: MediumSteam Deck0.69411.38822.08232.77643.47053.085
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.313.216.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1511 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: HighSteam Deck714212835SE +/- 0.09, N = 330.50MIN: 12 / MAX: 63.94
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: HighSteam Deck0.52791.05581.58372.11162.63952.346
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.113.016.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1525 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: UltraSteam Deck612182430SE +/- 0.05, N = 326.18MIN: 8.25 / MAX: 53.86
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Setting: UltraSteam Deck0.45180.90361.35541.80722.2592.008
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.113.016.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1521 Joules per run.

F1 22

This is a benchmark of F1 22 (2022) running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: LowSteam Deck20406080100SE +/- 0.33, N = 391MIN: 73 / MAX: 110

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Low - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck510152025Min: 4.91 / Avg: 10.94 / Max: 22.36
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.212.516.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: MediumSteam Deck20406080100SE +/- 0.33, N = 382MIN: 67 / MAX: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck612182430Min: 5.33 / Avg: 12.03 / Max: 29.27
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.213.116.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: HighSteam Deck1326395265SE +/- 0.33, N = 360MIN: 49 / MAX: 75

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: High - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck714212835Min: 8.8 / Avg: 16.43 / Max: 31.76
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.212.716.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Ultra HighSteam Deck1020304050SE +/- 0.33, N = 343MIN: 36 / MAX: 53

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterF1 22Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Graphics Preset: Ultra High - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck1122334455Min: 9.85 / Avg: 22.76 / Max: 53.95
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.211.716.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 22CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

HITMAN 3

This is a benchmark of HITMAN 3 on Steam running on Linux under Steam Play. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: LowSteam Deck1224364860SE +/- 0.24, N = 353.19MIN: 52.84 / MAX: 53.64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: Low - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck1122334455Min: 7.53 / Avg: 18.84 / Max: 54.77
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.313.616.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: MediumSteam Deck1224364860SE +/- 0.19, N = 351.92MIN: 51.57 / MAX: 52.24

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: Medium - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck1122334455Min: 7.46 / Avg: 19.25 / Max: 53.71
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.213.816.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: UltraSteam Deck1122334455SE +/- 0.06, N = 347.93MIN: 47.81 / MAX: 47.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Quality Level: Ultra - Total Frame TimeSteam Deck1326395265Min: 7.94 / Avg: 20.84 / Max: 65.88
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.313.516.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 3CPU Power Consumption Monitor510152025

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game for this open-source first person shooter title. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: LowSteam Deck50100150200250SE +/- 1.24, N = 3232.37MIN: 171 / MAX: 340
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: LowSteam Deck81624324035.15
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.36.67.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1119 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck4080120160200SE +/- 0.40, N = 3193.28MIN: 129 / MAX: 284
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck61218243025.70
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.17.59.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor4.428.8413.2617.6822.11. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1502 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck4080120160200SE +/- 0.12, N = 3184.28MIN: 119 / MAX: 283
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck51015202522.66
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.28.110.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1697 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltimateSteam Deck306090120150SE +/- 0.34, N = 3157.50MIN: 61 / MAX: 277
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltimateSteam Deck51015202518.62
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.28.510.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 2041 Joules per run.

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: MediumSteam Deck306090120150SE +/- 1.36, N = 3125.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: MediumSteam Deck61218243027.15
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.24.611.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 313 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck306090120150SE +/- 0.58, N = 3123.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: HighSteam Deck61218243024.20
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.25.115.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 364 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck306090120150SE +/- 0.47, N = 3122.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: UltraSteam Deck51015202521.54
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.35.715.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.54CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 413 Joules per run.

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.81Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck4080120160200SE +/- 0.49, N = 3176.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.81Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck61218243026.08
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.26.78.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.81CPU Power Consumption Monitor36912151. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 200 Joules per run.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme

This test profile only automates the vendor build of 3DMark with its command-line / JSON support. If you do not have a licensed copy of the necessary 3DMark binaries in your Phoronix Test Suite download cache on your system, this test profile will not do anything and simply fail. You must have already obtained the proper licensed binaries from UL for this test profile to work -- this test profile simply automates the firing of the 3DMark benchmark at your desired resolution and capturing the results within the Phoronix Test Suite while you must already have the necessary 3DMark files on your system. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck20406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 393.22
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1Resolution: 1280 x 800Steam Deck2468106.727
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.213.916.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Better3DMark Wild Life Extreme 1.1.2.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 984 Joules per run.

GravityMark

GravityMark is a cross-API, cross-platform GPU accelerated benchmark developed by Tellusim. GravityMark aims to exploit the performance of modern GPUs and render hundreds of thousands of objects in real-time all using GPU acceleration. GravityMark supports a variety of graphics rendering APIs and optionally supports accelerated ray-tracing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.82Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck816243240SE +/- 0.10, N = 333.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.82Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Renderer: VulkanSteam Deck0.67191.34382.01572.68763.35952.986
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.211.114.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGravityMark 1.82CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 1962 Joules per run.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck1224364860SE +/- 0.59, N = 452.0MAX: 70.7
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck1.01272.02543.03814.05085.06354.501
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.311.615.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 2307 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 333.7MAX: 44.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck0.54451.0891.63352.1782.72252.42
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.313.916.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 2804 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 325.2MAX: 32
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck0.40010.80021.20031.60042.00051.778
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.214.216.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 2887 Joules per run.

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck1326395265SE +/- 0.23, N = 356.16
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLSteam Deck0.88431.76862.65293.53724.42153.93
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.214.316.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 3918 Joules per run.

Quake II RTX

NVIDIA's Quake II RTX ray-traced (RTX path-traced global illumination) version of the original Quake II game. Quake II RTX makes use of Vulkan ray-tracing extensions on Windows and Linux. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck714212835SE +/- 0.04, N = 327.92
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck0.65181.30361.95542.60723.2592.897
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.39.613.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 363 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck918273645SE +/- 0.02, N = 340.82
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck0.97651.9532.92953.9064.88254.34
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.29.414.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 276 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 320.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck0.41270.82541.23811.65082.06351.834
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.210.914.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 492 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck612182430SE +/- 0.00, N = 325.98
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Off - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck0.53531.07061.60592.14122.67652.379
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.210.914.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 408 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 317.66
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck0.37640.75281.12921.50561.8821.673
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.310.613.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor481216201. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 517 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck714212835SE +/- 0.01, N = 328.12
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: Off - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck0.61791.23581.85372.47163.08952.746
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.210.214.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 365 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck48121620SE +/- 0.00, N = 313.72
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_tracing_pipelineSteam Deck0.27160.54320.81481.08641.3581.207
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.211.413.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 675 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 319.41
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Global Illumination: Low - Denoiser: On - Ray Tracing API: VK_KHR_ray_querySteam Deck0.38180.76361.14541.52721.9091.697
MinAvgMaxSteam Deck2.111.414.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterQuake II RTX 1.6CPU Power Consumption Monitor5101520251. Steam Deck: Approximate power consumption of 519 Joules per run.

Meta Performance Per Watts

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watts, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattsPerformance Per WattsSteam Deck122436486053.28

CPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsCPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringSteam Deck48121620Min: 2.11 / Avg: 10.89 / Max: 16.37

Steam Deck

Processor: AMD Custom APU 0405 @ 2.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Valve Jupiter v1 (F7A0110 BIOS), Chipset: AMD VanGogh Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 512GB Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS + 1000GB RTL9210B-CG, Graphics: AMD Custom GPU 0405 1GB (1600/400MHz), Audio: AMD Rembrandt Radeon HD Audio, Monitor: ANX7530 U, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe

OS: SteamOS rolling, Kernel: 5.13.0-valve36-1-neptune (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.26.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.2.0 (git-17e5312102) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.45), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x800

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.gttsize=8128 spi_amd.speed_dev=1 - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8900201
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 1024 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-AMDAerithJ-004
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 2 July 2023 09:06 by user deck.