Arc Graphics Linux 6.2 vs. Radeon

Intel Arc Graphics A750/A770 vs. Radeon graphics on Linux 6.2 Mesa 23.0-devel. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2301050-NE-ARCGRAPHI14
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Steam 6 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Arc Graphics A750
January 04 2023
  3 Hours, 50 Minutes
Arc Graphics A770
January 03 2023
  3 Hours, 50 Minutes
RX 6500 XT
January 04 2023
  4 Hours, 41 Minutes
RX 6600
January 04 2023
  4 Hours, 3 Minutes
RX 6600 XT
January 05 2023
  3 Hours, 29 Minutes
RX 6700 XT
January 05 2023
  4 Hours, 4 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  3 Hours, 59 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Arc Graphics A770

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Intel Arc A770 DG2 16GB (2400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Arc Graphics A750

Changed Graphics to Intel Arc A750 DG2 8GB (2400MHz).

RX 6500 XT

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB (2975/1124MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 4080 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D6320100-S06
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

RX 6600

Changed Graphics to Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6600 8GB (2750/875MHz).

Graphics Change: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D53201-R66E

RX 6600 XT

Changed Graphics to AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB (2900/1000MHz).

Graphics Change: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-EXT800286-L04

RX 6700 XT

Changed Graphics to AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB (2855/1000MHz).

Graphics Change: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 12272 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D5121100-101

Arc Graphics Linux 6.2 vs. RadeonProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLOpenCLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XTIntel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS)Intel Device 7a2732GB2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GBIntel Arc A770 DG2 16GB (2400MHz)Realtek ALC897ASUS VP28UIntel Device 7a70Ubuntu 22.106.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64)GNOME Shell 43.1X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa)OpenCL 3.01.3.238GCC 12.2.0ext43840x2160Intel Arc A750 DG2 8GB (2400MHz)Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB (2975/1124MHz)4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49)Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6600 8GB (2750/875MHz)AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB (2900/1000MHz)AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB (2855/1000MHz)OpenBenchmarking.orgKernel Details- Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1Security Details- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected Graphics Details- RX 6500 XT: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 4080 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D6320100-S06- RX 6600: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D53201-R66E- RX 6600 XT: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-EXT800286-L04- RX 6700 XT: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 12272 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D5121100-101

Arc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XTLogarithmic Result OverviewPhoronix Test SuiteShadow of the Tomb RaiderCyberpunk 2077WarsowUnigine SuperpositionUnigine HeavenGravityMarkXonoticDiRT Rally 2.0Counter-Strike: Global OffensiveUnvanquished

Arc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XTPer Watt Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%152%204%256%308%Cyberpunk 2077Shadow of the Tomb RaiderUnvanquishedDiRT Rally 2.0WarsowXonoticGravityMarkUnigine SuperpositionUnigine HeavenP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.M

Arc Graphics Linux 6.2 vs. Radeoncyberpunk2077: 1920 x 1080 - Highcyberpunk2077: 1920 x 1080 - Ultracyberpunk2077: 1920 x 1080 - Lowcyberpunk2077: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumshadowofthetombraider: 2560 x 1440 - High - Offshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - High - Offwarsow: 3840 x 2160unigine-super: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLcsgo: 2560 x 1440 - Vulkanunigine-super: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLgravitymark: 2560 x 1440 - Vulkanunigine-heaven: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - OpenGLxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraunigine-super: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Low - Offcsgo: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkanunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimategravitymark: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkanunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLshadowofthetombraider: 2560 x 1440 - Low - Offunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Ultradirt-rally2: 2560 x 1080 - Highcsgo: 2560 x 1440 - OpenGLunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Highunvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Ultracsgo: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Highunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultrabatman-knight: 2560 x 1440 - Highdow3: 1920 x 1080 - High - Vulkanunvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Highbatman-knight: 1920 x 1080 - HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT43.0040.1151.1547.6165.883.8446.262.598.2199.8889.4119.3146.218488.3439797177.8105.0199.11137.5230.433388.5283550134.7243.785.9485.384.846215346.78680.1705.2453.52723.9710.8126.68141.975021718.5169.8243.0939.0252.4847.7063.682427.959.693.0194.4084.9110.1136.626471.8100645169.1102.6193.86129.2219.558374.5329827125.6233.882.8443.684.290474336.53656.9699.1444.96722.8711.3120.88136.933492721.7164.8221.8918.2928.3763.714.87.6243.829.248.2123.3644.363.962.0527283.627203598.3118.6124.8071.7113.877221.686314178.6144.378.2258.542.816655251.10436.0498.0376.43679.0667.5696.897.9879.17139.62124.5783.9130.7390.246.078.1220.9769.2105.999.6752459.0222255159.0181.8219.36111.1179.410346.9926899129.7234.0124.2382.572.443854373.42624.0649.8463.85705.1698.0698.7112.2491.77150.69140.7698.9152.8488.158.599.2281.9288.8120.8126.745586.3134642198.6212.0275.94140.7225.778435.0298957144.7282.8147.1499.274.057849428.12702.0696.7475.11713.8700.5701.1141.19117.92163.54155.30129.5187.3680.878.2125.3308.65110.4159.2153.943699.7201754240.5250.0301.72170.5268.451516.7010821182.9334.4180.7582.474.246357451.32701.4696.9472.17698.3686.4699.2OpenBenchmarking.org

Cyberpunk 2077

This is a benchmark of Cyberpunk 2077 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 12SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 343.0043.0921.8997.98112.24141.19MIN: 0.43 / MAX: 119.35MIN: 0.51 / MAX: 126.1MIN: 6.53 / MAX: 156.53MIN: 34.03 / MAX: 210.88MIN: 27.03 / MAX: 208.56MIN: 37.11 / MAX: 233.87
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.26420.52840.79261.05681.3210.4200.4010.5761.1741.1700.997
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.2102.5156.4Arc Graphics A75037.5107.5157.0RX 6500 XT2.038.077.0RX 66003.083.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.095.9122.0RX 6700 XT5.0141.6180.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 6730 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 6878 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 3561 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 7625 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 8763 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 12885 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 340.1139.0218.2979.1791.77117.92MIN: 0.77 / MAX: 101.42MIN: 0.48 / MAX: 100.11MIN: 7.24 / MAX: 130.09MIN: 28.97 / MAX: 197.69MIN: 30.57 / MAX: 208.85MIN: 33.12 / MAX: 230.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.21440.42880.64320.85761.0720.3710.3540.4680.9530.9210.791
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.0108.2164.1Arc Graphics A75037.8110.3163.8RX 6500 XT2.039.176.0RX 66003.083.1100.0RX 6600 XT3.099.6125.0RX 6700 XT4.0149.1186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 7031 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 7061 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 3739 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 7644 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 9100 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 13615 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: LowArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 351.1552.4828.37139.62150.69163.54MIN: 0.37 / MAX: 173.39MIN: 0.69 / MAX: 156.81MIN: 10.09 / MAX: 142.99MIN: 31.69 / MAX: 271.38MIN: 37.55 / MAX: 245.14MIN: 36.85 / MAX: 267.87
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: LowArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.38680.77361.16041.54721.9340.5280.4960.8001.7171.7191.405
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.296.8143.8Arc Graphics A75037.9105.8146.1RX 6500 XT2.035.578.0RX 66003.081.3100.0RX 6600 XT3.087.6118.0RX 6700 XT4.0116.4167.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 6293 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 6488 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 3381 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 7591 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 8092 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10862 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: MediumArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.82, N = 347.6147.7063.71124.57140.76155.30MIN: 0.42 / MAX: 133.31MIN: 0.44 / MAX: 116.99MIN: 19.13 / MAX: 186.6MIN: 32.63 / MAX: 221.21MIN: 36.33 / MAX: 233.34MIN: 34.57 / MAX: 251.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCyberpunk 2077Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: MediumArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.3330.6660.9991.3321.6650.4720.4521.0971.4801.4391.163
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77034.1100.9149.7Arc Graphics A75038.0105.4153.0RX 6500 XT2.058.179.0RX 66003.084.2100.0RX 6600 XT3.097.8123.0RX 6700 XT4.0133.5176.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCyberpunk 2077GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 6526 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 6713 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 5306 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 7576 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 8773 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 11924 Joules per run.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 365.863.64.883.998.9129.5MAX: 115.2MAX: 109.1MAX: 123.7MAX: 146.4MAX: 199.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.20540.41080.61620.82161.0270.4430.4350.1810.9130.8730.772
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.3148.7175.5Arc Graphics A75037.7146.4169.6RX 6500 XT2.026.676.0RX 66003.091.9100.0RX 6600 XT3.0113.3131.0RX 6700 XT4.0167.7186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 20074 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 19711 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 20416 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 24407 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 30130 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 44556 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 383.882.07.6130.7152.8187.3MAX: 162.7MAX: 157.9MAX: 211.5MAX: 250.3MAX: 310.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.32420.64840.97261.29681.6210.6160.6030.2901.4411.3821.166
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.6136.1162.9Arc Graphics A75040.6135.9159.7RX 6500 XT2.026.262.0RX 66003.090.7100.0RX 6600 XT3.0110.6131.0RX 6700 XT4.0160.7186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 18376 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 18305 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 12925 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 24121 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 29412 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 42741 Joules per run.

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaResolution: 3840 x 2160Arc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT150300450600750SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 1.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 2.07, N = 3446.2427.9243.8390.2488.1680.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaResolution: 3840 x 2160Arc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.98121.96242.94363.92484.9062.5102.4693.1654.3613.8894.083
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.8177.8193.0Arc Graphics A75040.3173.3191.7RX 6500 XT2.077.091.0RX 66003.089.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.0125.5146.0RX 6700 XT5.0166.7187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 7468 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 7336 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 6547 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 7605 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10669 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 14172 Joules per run.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT20406080100SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 362.559.629.246.058.578.2MAX: 72.3MAX: 69.1MAX: 34.7MAX: 54.6MAX: 70.1MAX: 92.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.10980.21960.32940.43920.5490.3450.3280.3460.4880.4340.447
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.9181.1190.3Arc Graphics A75038.4181.5191.2RX 6500 XT2.084.491.0RX 66003.094.3100.0RX 6600 XT3.0134.7145.0RX 6700 XT4.0175.0187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 17145 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 17117 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 16028 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17823 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 25420 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 33021 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 398.293.048.278.199.2125.3MAX: 117.3MAX: 111.5MAX: 59.2MAX: 94.9MAX: 122.6MAX: 154.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.18770.37540.56310.75080.93850.5440.5300.5820.8340.7490.720
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.6180.5190.4Arc Graphics A75037.5175.4190.0RX 6500 XT2.082.890.0RX 66003.093.7100.0RX 6600 XT3.0132.5145.0RX 6700 XT4.0174.0187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 17089 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 16662 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 15683 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17764 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 25042 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 32953 Joules per run.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT70140210280350SE +/- 0.75, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3SE +/- 2.95, N = 12SE +/- 2.38, N = 4SE +/- 1.61, N = 3SE +/- 3.71, N = 3199.88194.40123.36220.97281.92308.65

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT20406080100SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 389.484.944.369.288.8110.4MAX: 105.3MAX: 98.8MAX: 55.3MAX: 85.4MAX: 111.1MAX: 137.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.16520.33040.49560.66080.8260.4940.4750.5260.7340.6580.630
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.8181.1190.4Arc Graphics A75038.1178.6191.6RX 6500 XT2.084.390.0RX 66003.094.3100.0RX 6600 XT3.0135.0145.0RX 6700 XT4.0175.4186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 17080 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 16906 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 15900 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17790 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 25424 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 33026 Joules per run.

GravityMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.72Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.84, N = 12119.3110.163.9105.9120.8159.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.72Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.27180.54360.81541.08721.3590.7320.7021.0061.1111.2081.042
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.6163.0181.3Arc Graphics A75037.6156.8173.0RX 6500 XT2.063.572.0RX 66003.095.3100.0RX 6600 XT3.0100.0111.0RX 6700 XT4.0152.8169.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGravityMark 1.72GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 14068 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 13481 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10944 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 16430 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 17236 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 26328 Joules per run.

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT306090120150SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3146.22136.6362.0599.68126.75153.94
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.23240.46480.69720.92961.1620.7900.7390.7301.0330.9180.857
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77037.5185.1192.6Arc Graphics A75039.9184.8192.8RX 6500 XT2.085.090.0RX 66003.096.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.0138.1146.0RX 6700 XT4.0179.6188.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 24868 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 24883 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 22875 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 25956 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 37092 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 48265 Joules per run.

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT150300450600750SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.99, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 2.90, N = 3488.34471.81283.63459.02586.31699.72MIN: 295 / MAX: 649MIN: 243 / MAX: 625MIN: 146 / MAX: 388MIN: 231 / MAX: 624MIN: 305 / MAX: 818MIN: 250 / MAX: 999
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT1.19232.38463.57694.76925.96152.9742.9503.4905.2994.8634.714
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77037.5164.2191.3Arc Graphics A75039.6159.9189.8RX 6500 XT2.081.391.0RX 66004.086.6100.0RX 6600 XT3.0120.6146.0RX 6700 XT5.0148.4188.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 6075 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 6131 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 9726 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 6757 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 7636 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 8163 Joules per run.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT50100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3177.8169.198.3159.0198.6240.5MAX: 247.1MAX: 226.7MAX: 135.1MAX: 226.4MAX: 283.1MAX: 354.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.38210.76421.14631.52841.91050.9880.9781.1911.6981.5101.377
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.9180.0192.2Arc Graphics A75038.5173.0188.6RX 6500 XT2.082.590.0RX 66003.093.6100.0RX 6600 XT3.0131.5145.0RX 6700 XT4.0174.6186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 16982 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 16316 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 15491 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17636 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 24721 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 32883 Joules per run.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Low - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT50100150200250SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3105.0102.6118.6181.8212.0250.0MAX: 211MAX: 204.4MAX: 187.6MAX: 296.7MAX: 354.4MAX: 424.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Low - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.45610.91221.36831.82442.28050.7890.7781.5692.0271.9051.589
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.5133.1160.8Arc Graphics A75038.9131.8158.1RX 6500 XT2.075.688.0RX 66003.089.7100.0RX 6600 XT3.0111.3133.0RX 6700 XT4.0157.4186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 18054 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 18194 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 20252 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 24121 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 29713 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 42334 Joules per run.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT70140210280350SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 3.09, N = 12SE +/- 2.12, N = 6SE +/- 2.95, N = 15SE +/- 2.10, N = 12199.11193.86124.80219.36275.94301.72

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3137.5129.271.7111.1140.7170.5MAX: 169.4MAX: 157.9MAX: 92.4MAX: 141.7MAX: 182.3MAX: 221
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.26620.53240.79861.06481.3310.7660.7530.8641.1831.0810.981
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.0179.4192.0Arc Graphics A75039.9171.5186.0RX 6500 XT2.083.090.0RX 66004.093.9100.0RX 6600 XT3.0130.2145.0RX 6700 XT4.0173.8187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 16925 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 16235 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 15685 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17746 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 24518 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 32900 Joules per run.

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT60120180240300SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3230.43219.56113.88179.41225.78268.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.41920.83841.25761.67682.0961.2501.2081.3251.8631.6371.496
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77037.4184.4192.8Arc Graphics A75040.0181.7192.5RX 6500 XT2.085.990.0RX 66003.096.3100.0RX 6600 XT3.0137.9146.0RX 6700 XT4.0179.5188.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 24771 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 24469 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 23118 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 25907 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 37058 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 48283 Joules per run.

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT110220330440550SE +/- 0.95, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 1.55, N = 3388.53374.53221.69346.99435.03516.70MIN: 89 / MAX: 577MIN: 89 / MAX: 552MIN: 82 / MAX: 330MIN: 104 / MAX: 523MIN: 103 / MAX: 701MIN: 104 / MAX: 873
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.90231.80462.70693.60924.51152.3782.3592.7804.0103.7713.591
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.7163.4192.1Arc Graphics A75039.0158.8185.9RX 6500 XT2.079.791.0RX 66004.086.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.0115.4147.0RX 6700 XT5.0143.9189.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 7352 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 7409 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 11961 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 8625 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 9382 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10121 Joules per run.

GravityMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.72Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3134.7125.678.6129.7144.7182.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterGravityMark 1.72Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.3350.671.0051.341.6750.8750.8401.2791.3881.4891.241
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77034.7154.0168.9Arc Graphics A75036.9149.4162.4RX 6500 XT2.061.568.0RX 66003.093.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.097.2105.0RX 6700 XT4.0147.4161.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGravityMark 1.72GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 13241 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 12902 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10595 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 16106 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 16715 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 25399 Joules per run.

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT70140210280350SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3243.7233.8144.3234.0282.8334.4MAX: 357.9MAX: 349.4MAX: 215.5MAX: 365.8MAX: 451MAX: 518.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.56071.12141.68212.24282.80351.4291.4301.8602.4922.3091.942
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.9170.5186.2Arc Graphics A75037.4163.5179.4RX 6500 XT2.077.688.0RX 66003.093.9100.0RX 6600 XT3.0122.5138.0RX 6700 XT4.0172.2187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 16086 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 15481 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 14635 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 17715 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 23064 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 32490 Joules per run.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Low - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 385.982.878.2124.2147.1180.7MAX: 166.7MAX: 151.5MAX: 117.5MAX: 191.1MAX: 231.5MAX: 285.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Low - Anti Aliasing: OffArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.30350.6070.91051.2141.51750.5880.5771.0091.3491.2561.084
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.9146.1173.9Arc Graphics A75041.1143.6168.1RX 6500 XT2.077.589.0RX 66003.092.1100.0RX 6600 XT3.0117.1136.0RX 6700 XT4.0166.7186.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 19625 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 19292 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 20597 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 24427 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 31071 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 44292 Joules per run.

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT130260390520650SE +/- 3.28, N = 3SE +/- 2.96, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3485.3443.6258.5382.5499.2582.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT2468104.1893.8694.4326.2556.6576.365
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.6115.9185.5Arc Graphics A75036.8114.6179.8RX 6500 XT2.058.388.0RX 66003.061.1100.0RX 6600 XT3.075.0141.0RX 6700 XT4.091.5187.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 1352 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 1490 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 2022 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 1671 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1700 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 2013 Joules per run.

DiRT Rally 2.0

This is a benchmark of DiRT Rally 2.0 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 2560 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT20406080100SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 12SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 684.8584.2942.8272.4474.0674.25MIN: 54.65 / MAX: 94.7MIN: 51.78 / MAX: 99.07MIN: 32.59 / MAX: 51.28MIN: 38.31 / MAX: 97.95MIN: 45.4 / MAX: 96.08MIN: 35.98 / MAX: 103.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 2560 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT0.40970.81941.22911.63882.04850.8350.8030.9641.6071.8211.391
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.1101.6124.2Arc Graphics A75037.8105.0133.5RX 6500 XT2.044.455.0RX 66003.045.176.0RX 6600 XT3.040.768.0RX 6700 XT4.053.497.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 11953 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 12352 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 10457 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 10547 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 9571 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 12528 Joules per run.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT100200300400500SE +/- 0.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3346.78336.53251.10373.42428.12451.32

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT150300450600750SE +/- 5.11, N = 4SE +/- 4.85, N = 4SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.69, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 4SE +/- 0.90, N = 4680.1656.9436.0624.0702.0701.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT36912156.7806.4908.49612.46411.77710.276
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.9100.3180.3Arc Graphics A75036.9101.2177.5RX 6500 XT2.051.390.0RX 66003.050.1100.0RX 6600 XT3.059.6142.0RX 6700 XT4.068.3174.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 978 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 1038 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1283 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 1051 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1133 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1331 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT150300450600750SE +/- 1.16, N = 4SE +/- 8.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 4SE +/- 0.53, N = 4SE +/- 0.83, N = 4705.2699.1498.0649.8696.7696.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT481216207.9587.81811.18713.98915.30113.641
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.088.6169.5Arc Graphics A75039.689.4170.0RX 6500 XT2.044.587.0RX 66003.046.5100.0RX 6600 XT3.045.5113.0RX 6700 XT4.051.1144.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 864 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 954 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1039 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 952 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 877 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 1022 Joules per run.

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT100200300400500SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 1.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.18, N = 3SE +/- 1.39, N = 3SE +/- 5.84, N = 3453.52444.96376.43463.85475.11472.17

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT160320480640800SE +/- 1.05, N = 4SE +/- 1.74, N = 4SE +/- 3.41, N = 4SE +/- 1.13, N = 4SE +/- 0.35, N = 4SE +/- 1.23, N = 4723.9722.8679.0705.1713.8698.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT122436486014.0713.3241.9946.8951.2838.60
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77037.351.572.6Arc Graphics A75039.554.377.1RX 6500 XT2.016.249.0RX 66003.015.036.0RX 6600 XT3.013.931.0RX 6700 XT5.018.138.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 489 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 529 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 311 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 293 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 261 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 357 Joules per run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT150300450600750SE +/- 1.72, N = 4SE +/- 3.75, N = 4SE +/- 0.93, N = 4SE +/- 1.49, N = 4SE +/- 2.10, N = 4SE +/- 4.05, N = 4710.8711.3667.5698.0700.5686.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT61218243010.8509.87220.70022.20425.70622.851
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.265.5134.7Arc Graphics A75039.472.1139.2RX 6500 XT2.032.282.0RX 66003.031.490.0RX 6600 XT3.027.370.0RX 6700 XT4.030.094.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 639 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 739 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 653 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 613 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 518 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 601 Joules per run.

Batman: Arkham Knight

This is a benchmark of >Batman: Arkham Knight running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Batman: Arkham Knight is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750306090120150SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3126.68120.88MIN: 78.74 / MAX: 179.78MIN: 67.75 / MAX: 173.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A7500.19190.38380.57570.76760.95950.8530.829
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.0148.4190.9Arc Graphics A75038.0145.9186.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 9203 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 8948 Joules per run.

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750306090120150SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3141.98136.93MIN: 113.89 / MAX: 212.15MIN: 112.77 / MAX: 205.38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: VulkanArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A7500.29660.59320.88981.18641.4831.3181.266
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77036.4107.7160.6Arc Graphics A75036.6108.2159.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 4812 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 4833 Joules per run.

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT160320480640800SE +/- 2.57, N = 4SE +/- 4.70, N = 4SE +/- 1.11, N = 4SE +/- 2.13, N = 4SE +/- 2.04, N = 4SE +/- 1.36, N = 4718.5721.7696.8698.7701.1699.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT71421283512.0711.0721.4425.0129.0825.31
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.859.594.6Arc Graphics A75040.165.2104.3RX 6500 XT2.032.582.0RX 66003.027.973.0RX 6600 XT3.024.161.0RX 6700 XT5.027.672.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 551 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 636 Joules per run.3. RX 6500 XT: Approximate power consumption of 626 Joules per run.4. RX 6600: Approximate power consumption of 538 Joules per run.5. RX 6600 XT: Approximate power consumption of 446 Joules per run.6. RX 6700 XT: Approximate power consumption of 539 Joules per run.

Batman: Arkham Knight

This is a benchmark of >Batman: Arkham Knight running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Batman: Arkham Knight is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A7504080120160200SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3169.82164.82MIN: 60.99 / MAX: 249.37MIN: 75.79 / MAX: 240.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A7500.28060.56120.84181.12241.4031.2471.223
MinAvgMaxArc Graphics A77035.3136.2181.9Arc Graphics A75037.0134.7177.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBatman: Arkham KnightGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Arc Graphics A770: Approximate power consumption of 8533 Joules per run.2. Arc Graphics A750: Approximate power consumption of 8398 Joules per run.

GPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsGPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringArc Graphics A770Arc Graphics A750RX 6500 XTRX 6600RX 6600 XTRX 6700 XT4080120160200Min: 34 / Avg: 143.55 / Max: 193Min: 36.6 / Avg: 142.27 / Max: 192.8Min: 2 / Avg: 61.04 / Max: 91Min: 3 / Avg: 78.04 / Max: 101Min: 3 / Avg: 107.68 / Max: 147Min: 4 / Avg: 141.88 / Max: 189

Arc Graphics A770

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Intel Arc A770 DG2 16GB (2400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 3 January 2023 19:51 by user phoronix.

Arc Graphics A750

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Intel Arc A750 DG2 8GB (2400MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa), OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 4 January 2023 07:03 by user phoronix.

RX 6500 XT

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB (2975/1124MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 4080 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D6320100-S06
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 4 January 2023 13:09 by user phoronix.

RX 6600

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6600 8GB (2750/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D53201-R66E
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 4 January 2023 18:34 by user phoronix.

RX 6600 XT

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB (2900/1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 8176 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-EXT800286-L04
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 5 January 2023 06:44 by user phoronix.

RX 6700 XT

Processor: Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.50GHz (24 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7a27, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB SOLIDIGM SSDPFKKW020X7 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB (2855/1000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel Device 7a70

OS: Ubuntu 22.10, Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2-phx (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 43.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.0.0-devel (git-fc0e23b 2023-01-02 kinetic-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.5 DRM 3.49), Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10e - Thermald 2.5.1
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 12272 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D5121100-101
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 5 January 2023 10:51 by user phoronix.