test2

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 testing with a Dell PowerEdge R630 [0CNCJW] (2.12.1 BIOS) and Microsoft Basic Display on Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard Build 9600 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2209018-NE-TEST2629740
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
test2
August 26 2022
  6 Days, 17 Hours, 54 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

test2

Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 [0CNCJW] (2.12.1 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 16384 MB M393A2G40DB0-CPB, Disk: 465GB DELL PERC H730P Mini Disk, Graphics: Microsoft Basic Display, Monitor: BQ GW765

OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard Build 9600, Kernel: 6.3.9600 (x86_64), Display Driver: 6.3.9600.16384, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768

Processor Notes: CPU Microcode: 0000000043000000
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.30.1Threads / Copies: 1test2130260390520650SE +/- 7.97, N = 3619.57

BlogBench

BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: Readtest211002200330044005500SE +/- 58.58, N = 45274

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.1Test: Writetest220406080100SE +/- 1.00, N = 389

ebizzy

This is a test of ebizzy, a program to generate workloads resembling web server workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3test230060090012001500SE +/- 13.06, N = 81483

Perl Benchmarks

Perl benchmark suite that can be used to compare the relative speed of different versions of perl. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmltest20.05540.11080.16620.22160.277SE +/- 0.00258473, N = 40.24629327

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Interpretertest20.00420.00840.01260.01680.021SE +/- 0.00001790, N = 30.01884628

PostgreSQL pgbench

This is a benchmark of PostgreSQL using pgbench for facilitating the database benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlytest22K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 75.82, N = 128529

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencytest20.02630.05260.07890.10520.1315SE +/- 0.001, N = 120.117

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writetest2306090120150SE +/- 0.13, N = 3116

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencytest2246810SE +/- 0.009, N = 38.624

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlytest217003400510068008500SE +/- 92.63, N = 37771

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencytest20.0290.0580.0870.1160.145SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.129

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writetest220406080100SE +/- 0.46, N = 390

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencytest23691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 311.05

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlytest216003200480064008000SE +/- 25.58, N = 37234

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencytest20.03110.06220.09330.12440.1555SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.138

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writetest220406080100SE +/- 1.42, N = 3104

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencytest23691215SE +/- 0.134, N = 39.650

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlytest220406080100SE +/- 5.57, N = 3100

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencytest23691215SE +/- 0.58, N = 310.11

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writetest2816243240SE +/- 0.58, N = 335

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencytest2714212835SE +/- 0.47, N = 328.33

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: dropdb: error: connection to server at "localhost" (::1), port 7777 failed: Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061)

test2

Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 [0CNCJW] (2.12.1 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 16384 MB M393A2G40DB0-CPB, Disk: 465GB DELL PERC H730P Mini Disk, Graphics: Microsoft Basic Display, Monitor: BQ GW765

OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard Build 9600, Kernel: 6.3.9600 (x86_64), Display Driver: 6.3.9600.16384, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1024x768

Processor Notes: CPU Microcode: 0000000043000000
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled

Testing initiated at 26 August 2022 17:05 by user Administrator.