centos74-fw3-server 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.4.1708 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2103059-HA-CENTOS74F57 .
centos74-fw3-server Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MHz M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9271-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.4.1708 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server matrox GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x710 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
centos74-fw3-server sqlite: 1 blogbench: Read blogbench: Write ebizzy: perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24 pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 memtier-benchmark: Redis cassandra: Reads cassandra: Writes cassandra: Mixed 1:1 cassandra: Mixed 1:3 nginx: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 19.408 1493330 8803 385677 0.29628831 0.00273948 1630.6 156.898 12453 0.080 1039 0.963 247279 0.202 243179 0.411 247750 1.010 1104 45.618 10866 0.092 1012 98.945 1061 235.787 779 1.285 216382 0.231 10513 0.095 204048 0.490 195744 1.278 13049 3.835 844 1.191 209455 0.239 14811 6.756 14311 17.477 195691 0.511 187034 1.338 7764 6.447 8922 11.291 9689 25.820 123.272 1129503.72 56698 91745 20440 8734 19054.96 2370 432 15191 262 41179 386 51475 617 52267 1218 51533 2474 3491 294 28984 137 83895 188 113926 278 117908 537 40360 24 185538 21 113797 1114 OpenBenchmarking.org
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 7 19.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 5915.81, N = 3 1493330 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 443.58, N = 3 8803 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 2018.42, N = 3 385677 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0667 0.1334 0.2001 0.2668 0.3335 SE +/- 0.00074547, N = 3 0.29628831
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0006 0.0012 0.0018 0.0024 0.003 SE +/- 0.00000786, N = 3 0.00273948
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 1630.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 156.90
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 21.16, N = 3 12453 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.080 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.65, N = 3 1039 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2167 0.4334 0.6501 0.8668 1.0835 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 0.963 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 706.89, N = 3 247279 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0455 0.091 0.1365 0.182 0.2275 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.202 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 558.91, N = 3 243179 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0925 0.185 0.2775 0.37 0.4625 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.411 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 378.44, N = 3 247750 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2273 0.4546 0.6819 0.9092 1.1365 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.010 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 25.09, N = 15 1104 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.93, N = 15 45.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 36.24, N = 3 10866 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0207 0.0414 0.0621 0.0828 0.1035 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.092 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 11.26, N = 4 1012 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.09, N = 4 98.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 15.14, N = 3 1061 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.35, N = 3 235.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 7.27, N = 3 779 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2891 0.5782 0.8673 1.1564 1.4455 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 1.285 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 320.15, N = 3 216382 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.052 0.104 0.156 0.208 0.26 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.231 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 55.66, N = 3 10513 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0214 0.0428 0.0642 0.0856 0.107 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.095 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 242.60, N = 3 204048 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1103 0.2206 0.3309 0.4412 0.5515 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.490 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 565.93, N = 3 195744 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2876 0.5752 0.8628 1.1504 1.438 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 1.278 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 124.97, N = 3 13049 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.8629 1.7258 2.5887 3.4516 4.3145 SE +/- 0.037, N = 3 3.835 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 15.79, N = 12 844 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.268 0.536 0.804 1.072 1.34 SE +/- 0.026, N = 12 1.191 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 163.56, N = 3 209455 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0538 0.1076 0.1614 0.2152 0.269 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.239 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 31.48, N = 3 14811 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 6.756 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 6.31, N = 3 14311 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 500.45, N = 3 195691 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.115 0.23 0.345 0.46 0.575 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.511 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 531.26, N = 3 187034 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3011 0.6022 0.9033 1.2044 1.5055 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 1.338 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1700 3400 5100 6800 8500 SE +/- 85.78, N = 5 7764 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.072, N = 5 6.447 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 225.11, N = 12 8922 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.28, N = 12 11.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 108.35, N = 3 9689 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 25.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 123.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4515.21, N = 3 1129503.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 2542.26, N = 12 56698
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 321.07, N = 3 91745
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 1471.86, N = 9 20440
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 368.17, N = 9 8734
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 107.76, N = 3 19054.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 139.83, N = 12 2370
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 20.90, N = 12 432
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 204.20, N = 3 15191
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.18, N = 3 262
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 201.66, N = 3 41179
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 386
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 392.52, N = 3 51475
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 4.41, N = 3 617
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 232.46, N = 3 52267
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1218
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 430.75, N = 3 51533
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 23.95, N = 3 2474
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 217.68, N = 12 3491
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 15.66, N = 12 294
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 283.35, N = 6 28984
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 6 137
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 858.67, N = 3 83895
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 188
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 776.89, N = 3 113926
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 278
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1318.94, N = 3 117908
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.49, N = 3 537
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 721.23, N = 15 40360
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.38, N = 15 24
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 7172.25, N = 3 185538
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 21
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 919.55, N = 3 113797
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 9.45, N = 3 1114
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4