cent79upgrade-fw4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.9.2009 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2103049-HA-CENT79UPG86&grr .
cent79upgrade-fw4 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MT/s M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9271-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.9.2009 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server matrox GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x71a - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_282-b08) - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
cent79upgrade-fw4 pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 16 pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only cassandra: Reads pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write cassandra: Mixed 1:3 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 blogbench: Read hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24 influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 nginx: Static Web Page Serving cassandra: Mixed 1:1 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 perl-benchmark: Pod2html hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 cassandra: Writes hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 memtier-benchmark: Redis apache: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 perl-benchmark: Interpreter hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance ebizzy: sqlite: 1 php: Zend micro_bench apache-siege: 250 apache-siege: 200 php: Zend bench blogbench: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 85.241 2942 33.379 3008 2.966 338 31.470 7961 13.348 7515 178 121392 8.592 5826 16.014 3125 2.433 411 2898 20.635 4854 10.947 4573 48.137 5199 3200 2793 45625 477 2136 1764092 331 3012 1342 47438 1174 108093 0.562 178099 0.105 9533 0.264 189685 0.732 1366 1.458 171545 106142 181.211 629973.9 666102.8 669986.3 153.588 169 23513 13821.19 5175 695 45820 613 103557 142.473 1767 430 36869 0.30338025 242 65402 80951 343 92404 1110513.56 15858.12 298 13349 0.00304545 45 161213 28.166 8881 5.638 8875 11.155 8971 0.541 184905 1.421 176064 0.102 9829 0.255 196023 0.689 1453 23 41042 0.088 11365 1.100 227437 38.875 2575 14.936 3351 0.609 1643 0.222 225418 0.455 220217 1622.9 348642 3.965 11.367 7828.42 21916.3 2.713 6364 OpenBenchmarking.org
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.51, N = 9 85.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 54.51, N = 9 2942 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.69, N = 9 33.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 63.91, N = 9 3008 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6674 1.3348 2.0022 2.6696 3.337 SE +/- 0.051, N = 9 2.966 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.79, N = 9 338 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.41, N = 9 31.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 109.36, N = 9 7961 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.23, N = 9 13.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 130.86, N = 9 7515 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 53.03, N = 4 178
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 35561.38, N = 4 121392
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.060, N = 3 8.592 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 40.84, N = 3 5826 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 14.23, N = 3 3125 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.5474 1.0948 1.6422 2.1896 2.737 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 2.433 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.55, N = 3 411 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 415.69, N = 8 2898
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 9 20.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 50.71, N = 9 4854 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 9 10.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 36.90, N = 9 4573 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.42, N = 8 48.14 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 45.65, N = 8 5199 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 51.09, N = 12 3200
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 24.10, N = 3 2793
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 331.55, N = 3 45625
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 17.77, N = 15 477
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 97.98, N = 15 2136
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 3092.05, N = 3 1764092 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 7.06, N = 15 331
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 67.31, N = 15 3012
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.67, N = 3 1342
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 210.49, N = 3 47438
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 14.68, N = 3 1174
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1340.08, N = 3 108093
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1265 0.253 0.3795 0.506 0.6325 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.562 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 128.62, N = 3 178099 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0236 0.0472 0.0708 0.0944 0.118 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.105 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 41.04, N = 3 9533 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0594 0.1188 0.1782 0.2376 0.297 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.264 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 134.60, N = 3 189685 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1647 0.3294 0.4941 0.6588 0.8235 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.732 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.84, N = 3 1366 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3281 0.6562 0.9843 1.3124 1.6405 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 1.458 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 545.77, N = 3 171545 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 279.31, N = 3 106142
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 181.21
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 1378.68, N = 3 629973.9
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2415.89, N = 3 666102.8
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 947.03, N = 3 669986.3
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 153.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.26, N = 12 169
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 170.54, N = 12 23513
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 15.10, N = 3 13821.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 36.96, N = 3 5175
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 150 300 450 600 750 695
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 139.81, N = 3 45820
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.20, N = 3 613
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 938.67, N = 3 103557
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.49, N = 12 142.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 41.06, N = 12 1767 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 430
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 301.50, N = 3 36869
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0683 0.1366 0.2049 0.2732 0.3415 SE +/- 0.00246274, N = 3 0.30338025
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.73, N = 5 242
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 730.95, N = 5 65402
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 154.37, N = 3 80951
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.70, N = 3 343
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1216.26, N = 3 92404
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5671.37, N = 3 1110513.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 161.08, N = 3 15858.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.06, N = 3 298
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 141.19, N = 3 13349
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 SE +/- 0.00004327, N = 3 0.00304545
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 16.49, N = 12 45
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 18714.26, N = 12 161213
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 28.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 41.36, N = 3 8881 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1.2686 2.5372 3.8058 5.0744 6.343 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 5.638 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 30.64, N = 3 8875 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 11.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3.50, N = 3 8971 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1217 0.2434 0.3651 0.4868 0.6085 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.541 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 258.02, N = 3 184905 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3197 0.6394 0.9591 1.2788 1.5985 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 1.421 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1427.47, N = 3 176064 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.023 0.046 0.069 0.092 0.115 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.102 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 89.10, N = 3 9829 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0574 0.1148 0.1722 0.2296 0.287 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.255 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 95.62, N = 3 196023 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.155 0.31 0.465 0.62 0.775 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 0.689 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 9.68, N = 3 1453 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.40, N = 15 23
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 784.87, N = 15 41042
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0198 0.0396 0.0594 0.0792 0.099 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.088 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 13.80, N = 3 11365 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2475 0.495 0.7425 0.99 1.2375 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.100 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 195.25, N = 3 227437 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 38.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 34.99, N = 3 2575 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 14.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 16.07, N = 3 3351 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.137 0.274 0.411 0.548 0.685 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 0.609 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.82, N = 3 1643 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.222 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 60.10, N = 3 225418 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1024 0.2048 0.3072 0.4096 0.512 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.455 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 349.48, N = 3 220217 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 1622.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 1432.87, N = 3 348642 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.8921 1.7842 2.6763 3.5684 4.4605 SE +/- 0.038, N = 15 3.965 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 5 11.37
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 250 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 2673.88, N = 12 7828.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 200 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 21916.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6104 1.2208 1.8312 2.4416 3.052 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 2.713
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 65.38, N = 3 6364 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4