cent79upgrade-fw4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.9.2009 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2103049-HA-CENT79UPG86 .
cent79upgrade-fw4 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MT/s M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9271-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.9.2009 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server matrox GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x71a - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_282-b08) - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
cent79upgrade-fw4 sqlite: 1 blogbench: Read blogbench: Write ebizzy: perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24 pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 memtier-benchmark: Redis cassandra: Reads cassandra: Writes cassandra: Mixed 1:1 cassandra: Mixed 1:3 nginx: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 16 apache: Static Web Page Serving apache-siege: 200 apache-siege: 250 phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite php: Zend bench php: Zend micro_bench influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3.965 1764092 6364 348642 0.30338025 0.00304545 1622.9 181.211 11365 0.088 1643 0.609 225418 0.222 220217 0.455 227437 1.100 3351 14.936 9829 0.102 2575 38.875 1767 142.473 1453 0.689 196023 0.255 9533 0.105 184905 0.541 176064 1.421 8875 5.638 1366 0.732 189685 0.264 411 2.433 8971 11.155 8881 28.166 178099 0.562 171545 1.458 4573 10.947 338 2.966 5826 8.592 4854 20.635 5199 48.137 7515 13.348 7961 31.470 3125 16.014 3008 33.379 2942 85.241 153.588 1110513.56 2898 80951 5175 3200 13821.19 2136 477 13349 298 36869 430 45820 695 47438 1342 45625 2793 3012 331 23513 169 65402 242 92404 343 103557 613 41042 23 161213 45 108093 1174 121392 178 15858.12 21916.3 7828.42 106142 2.713 11.367 629973.9 669986.3 666102.8 OpenBenchmarking.org
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.8921 1.7842 2.6763 3.5684 4.4605 SE +/- 0.038, N = 15 3.965 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 3092.05, N = 3 1764092 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 65.38, N = 3 6364 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 1432.87, N = 3 348642 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0683 0.1366 0.2049 0.2732 0.3415 SE +/- 0.00246274, N = 3 0.30338025
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 SE +/- 0.00004327, N = 3 0.00304545
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 1622.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 181.21
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 13.80, N = 3 11365 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0198 0.0396 0.0594 0.0792 0.099 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.088 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.82, N = 3 1643 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.137 0.274 0.411 0.548 0.685 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 0.609 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 60.10, N = 3 225418 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.222 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 349.48, N = 3 220217 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1024 0.2048 0.3072 0.4096 0.512 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.455 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 195.25, N = 3 227437 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2475 0.495 0.7425 0.99 1.2375 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.100 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 16.07, N = 3 3351 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 14.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 89.10, N = 3 9829 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.023 0.046 0.069 0.092 0.115 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.102 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 34.99, N = 3 2575 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 38.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 41.06, N = 12 1767 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.49, N = 12 142.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 9.68, N = 3 1453 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.155 0.31 0.465 0.62 0.775 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 0.689 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 95.62, N = 3 196023 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0574 0.1148 0.1722 0.2296 0.287 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.255 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 41.04, N = 3 9533 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0236 0.0472 0.0708 0.0944 0.118 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.105 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 258.02, N = 3 184905 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1217 0.2434 0.3651 0.4868 0.6085 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.541 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1427.47, N = 3 176064 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3197 0.6394 0.9591 1.2788 1.5985 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 1.421 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 30.64, N = 3 8875 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1.2686 2.5372 3.8058 5.0744 6.343 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 5.638 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.84, N = 3 1366 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1647 0.3294 0.4941 0.6588 0.8235 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.732 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 134.60, N = 3 189685 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0594 0.1188 0.1782 0.2376 0.297 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.264 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.55, N = 3 411 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.5474 1.0948 1.6422 2.1896 2.737 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 2.433 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3.50, N = 3 8971 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 11.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 41.36, N = 3 8881 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 28.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 128.62, N = 3 178099 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1265 0.253 0.3795 0.506 0.6325 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.562 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 545.77, N = 3 171545 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3281 0.6562 0.9843 1.3124 1.6405 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 1.458 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 36.90, N = 9 4573 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 9 10.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.79, N = 9 338 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6674 1.3348 2.0022 2.6696 3.337 SE +/- 0.051, N = 9 2.966 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 40.84, N = 3 5826 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.060, N = 3 8.592 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 50.71, N = 9 4854 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 9 20.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 45.65, N = 8 5199 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.42, N = 8 48.14 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 130.86, N = 9 7515 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.23, N = 9 13.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 109.36, N = 9 7961 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.41, N = 9 31.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 14.23, N = 3 3125 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 63.91, N = 9 3008 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.69, N = 9 33.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 54.51, N = 9 2942 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.51, N = 9 85.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 153.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5671.37, N = 3 1110513.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 415.69, N = 8 2898
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 154.37, N = 3 80951
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 36.96, N = 3 5175
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 51.09, N = 12 3200
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 15.10, N = 3 13821.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 97.98, N = 15 2136
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 17.77, N = 15 477
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 141.19, N = 3 13349
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.06, N = 3 298
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 301.50, N = 3 36869
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 430
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 139.81, N = 3 45820
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 150 300 450 600 750 695
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 210.49, N = 3 47438
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.67, N = 3 1342
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 331.55, N = 3 45625
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 24.10, N = 3 2793
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 67.31, N = 15 3012
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 7.06, N = 15 331
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 170.54, N = 12 23513
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.26, N = 12 169
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 730.95, N = 5 65402
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.73, N = 5 242
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1216.26, N = 3 92404
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.70, N = 3 343
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 938.67, N = 3 103557
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.20, N = 3 613
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 784.87, N = 15 41042
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.40, N = 15 23
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 18714.26, N = 12 161213
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 16.49, N = 12 45
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1340.08, N = 3 108093
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 14.68, N = 3 1174
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 35561.38, N = 4 121392
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 53.03, N = 4 178
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 161.08, N = 3 15858.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 200 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 21916.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 250 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 2673.88, N = 12 7828.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 279.31, N = 3 106142
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6104 1.2208 1.8312 2.4416 3.052 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 2.713
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 5 11.37
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 1378.68, N = 3 629973.9
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 947.03, N = 3 669986.3
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2415.89, N = 3 666102.8
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4