cent74-fw4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.4.1708 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2102264-HA-CENT74FW481 .
cent74-fw4 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MHz M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9271-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.4.1708 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server matrox GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x717 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
cent74-fw4 sqlite: 1 blogbench: Read blogbench: Write ebizzy: perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24 pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 memtier-benchmark: Redis cassandra: Reads cassandra: Writes cassandra: Mixed 1:1 cassandra: Mixed 1:3 nginx: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 16 apache: Static Web Page Serving apache-siege: 250 phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite php: Zend bench php: Zend micro_bench influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7.621 1551959 7113 365591 0.29884282 0.00275552 1627.9 155.739 12266 0.082 1751 0.571 248492 0.201 243252 0.411 247103 1.012 3411 14.667 10825 0.092 2694 37.151 1830 137.297 1440 0.696 216268 0.231 10361 0.097 203434 0.492 193467 1.293 8878 5.640 1427 0.701 209767 0.238 424 2.359 8680 11.530 8866 28.220 196416 0.510 186468 1.341 4607 10.862 345 2.903 6425 7.791 4775 20.954 5192 48.215 8017 12.487 8486 29.485 3220 15.543 3058 32.754 2882 86.867 122.597 1125582.87 5718 90569 7670 4378 17155.58 1899 532 14451 275 40309 395 52108 610 52593 1211 50464 2525 2969 348 24896 159 73689 215 105259 301 110923 571 40507 24 169460 40 111719 1135 153793 158 20495.63 7401.06 104326 2.754 11.743 631610.5 669074.6 671427.0 OpenBenchmarking.org
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 7.621 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 19970.95, N = 3 1551959 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 84.10, N = 3 7113 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 4171.53, N = 4 365591 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0672 0.1344 0.2016 0.2688 0.336 SE +/- 0.00251099, N = 3 0.29884282
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0006 0.0012 0.0018 0.0024 0.003 SE +/- 0.00000813, N = 3 0.00275552
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 1627.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 155.74
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 17.71, N = 3 12266 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0185 0.037 0.0555 0.074 0.0925 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.082 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 7.87, N = 3 1751 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1285 0.257 0.3855 0.514 0.6425 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 0.571 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 204.30, N = 3 248492 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0452 0.0904 0.1356 0.1808 0.226 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.201 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 738.35, N = 3 243252 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0925 0.185 0.2775 0.37 0.4625 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.411 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 673.66, N = 3 247103 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2277 0.4554 0.6831 0.9108 1.1385 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.012 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 5.48, N = 3 3411 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 25.57, N = 3 10825 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0207 0.0414 0.0621 0.0828 0.1035 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.092 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 30.94, N = 3 2694 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 37.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 32.87, N = 15 1830 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.42, N = 15 137.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 19.91, N = 15 1440 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1566 0.3132 0.4698 0.6264 0.783 SE +/- 0.010, N = 15 0.696 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 289.34, N = 3 216268 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.052 0.104 0.156 0.208 0.26 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.231 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 44.37, N = 3 10361 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0218 0.0436 0.0654 0.0872 0.109 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.097 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 611.06, N = 3 203434 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1107 0.2214 0.3321 0.4428 0.5535 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 0.492 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 397.33, N = 3 193467 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.2909 0.5818 0.8727 1.1636 1.4545 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.293 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 78.02, N = 14 8878 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1.269 2.538 3.807 5.076 6.345 SE +/- 0.045, N = 14 5.640 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 12.88, N = 3 1427 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1577 0.3154 0.4731 0.6308 0.7885 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 0.701 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 248.16, N = 3 209767 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0536 0.1072 0.1608 0.2144 0.268 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.238 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 424 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.5308 1.0616 1.5924 2.1232 2.654 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 2.359 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 91.49, N = 3 8680 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 11.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 115.26, N = 3 8866 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 28.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 212.58, N = 3 196416 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1148 0.2296 0.3444 0.4592 0.574 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.510 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 414.63, N = 3 186468 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3017 0.6034 0.9051 1.2068 1.5085 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.341 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 36.47, N = 3 4607 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 10.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 345 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6532 1.3064 1.9596 2.6128 3.266 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 2.903 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 81.07, N = 3 6425 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.099, N = 3 7.791 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 26.58, N = 3 4775 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 20.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 47.47, N = 12 5192 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.44, N = 12 48.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 73.80, N = 7 8017 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 7 12.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 107.91, N = 3 8486 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 29.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 21.58, N = 3 3220 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 15.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 33.88, N = 9 3058 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.36, N = 9 32.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 30.88, N = 9 2882 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.94, N = 9 86.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 122.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11760.21, N = 5 1125582.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 837.27, N = 8 5718
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 351.54, N = 3 90569
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 204.41, N = 9 7670
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 95.90, N = 9 4378
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 92.07, N = 3 17155.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 71.93, N = 12 1899
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 19.56, N = 12 532
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 151.30, N = 3 14451
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 275
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 295.80, N = 11 40309
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 2.83, N = 11 395
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 339.01, N = 3 52108
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 610
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 90.09, N = 3 52593
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 1211
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 353.56, N = 3 50464
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 20.74, N = 3 2525
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 174.97, N = 15 2969
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 17.23, N = 15 348
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 208.37, N = 15 24896
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.40, N = 15 159
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 763.39, N = 5 73689
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.17, N = 5 215
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 914.71, N = 8 105259
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.71, N = 8 301
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 957.45, N = 3 110923
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 4.67, N = 3 571
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 560.49, N = 3 40507
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 24
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 19114.18, N = 12 169460
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 13.92, N = 12 40
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1178.75, N = 3 111719
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 11.46, N = 3 1135
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 51943.42, N = 3 153793
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 80.83, N = 3 158
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 206.57, N = 3 20495.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 250 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 3110.24, N = 15 7401.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1031.95, N = 12 104326
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6197 1.2394 1.8591 2.4788 3.0985 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 2.754
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 5 11.74
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 1125.29, N = 3 631610.5
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 1172.54, N = 3 669074.6
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 4228.30, N = 3 671427.0
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4