centos79-fw4-try3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.9.2009 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2102260-HA-CENTOS79F64 .
centos79-fw4-try3 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 2.70GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.4e.0.1106191007 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MT/s M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9266-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.9.2009 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server matrox GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x71a - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_282-b08) - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline IBPB + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
centos79-fw4-try3 sqlite: 1 blogbench: Read blogbench: Write ebizzy: perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 24 pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 memtier-benchmark: Redis cassandra: Reads cassandra: Writes cassandra: Mixed 1:1 cassandra: Mixed 1:3 nginx: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 16 apache: Static Web Page Serving apache-siege: 250 phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite php: Zend bench php: Zend micro_bench influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 1024 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3.649 1730333 6114 350597 0.31103693 0.00303316 1623.5 181.919 11333 0.088 1659 0.603 226050 0.221 221118 0.453 226898 1.102 3369 14.855 9799 0.102 2680 37.349 1838 136.877 1468 0.681 195819 0.255 9570 0.105 184761 0.542 177882 1.406 8815 5.677 1400 0.715 190067 0.263 428 2.342 8883 11.266 8801 28.442 178692 0.560 171671 1.457 4539 11.027 335 2.998 6289 7.965 4861 20.589 5078 49.262 7626 13.125 8279 30.223 3278 15.281 3009 33.273 2898 86.513 153.799 1113866.49 51149 82581 22357 9213 13604.16 2375 428 13813 288 36587 434 46381 685 47235 1349 47348 2691 2979 344 26007 153 75187 210 102208 309 111847 566 41280 23 148267 65 113757 1113 160187 125 16181.80 21900.86 105883 2.677 11.144 862182.0 891048.5 902594.4 OpenBenchmarking.org
SQLite Threads / Copies: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.821 1.642 2.463 3.284 4.105 SE +/- 0.044, N = 4 3.649 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -lm -ldl -lpthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 24769.65, N = 3 1730333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 90.17, N = 3 6114 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 3867.28, N = 5 350597 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.28 0.35 SE +/- 0.00308628, N = 3 0.31103693
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 SE +/- 0.00003222, N = 3 0.00303316
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 1623.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 181.92
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 40.73, N = 3 11333 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0198 0.0396 0.0594 0.0792 0.099 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.088 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 1659 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1357 0.2714 0.4071 0.5428 0.6785 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.603 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 188.93, N = 3 226050 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0497 0.0994 0.1491 0.1988 0.2485 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.221 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 284.50, N = 3 221118 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1019 0.2038 0.3057 0.4076 0.5095 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.453 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 269.96, N = 3 226898 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.248 0.496 0.744 0.992 1.24 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.102 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 15.54, N = 3 3369 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 14.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 8.73, N = 3 9799 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.023 0.046 0.069 0.092 0.115 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.102 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 24.61, N = 3 2680 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 37.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 41.38, N = 12 1838 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.07, N = 12 136.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.58, N = 3 1468 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1532 0.3064 0.4596 0.6128 0.766 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.681 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 170.59, N = 3 195819 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0574 0.1148 0.1722 0.2296 0.287 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.255 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 8.46, N = 3 9570 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0236 0.0472 0.0708 0.0944 0.118 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.105 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 263.72, N = 3 184761 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.122 0.244 0.366 0.488 0.61 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.542 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 276.34, N = 3 177882 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3164 0.6328 0.9492 1.2656 1.582 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 1.406 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 58.23, N = 3 8815 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1.2773 2.5546 3.8319 5.1092 6.3865 SE +/- 0.038, N = 3 5.677 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.12, N = 3 1400 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.1609 0.3218 0.4827 0.6436 0.8045 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.715 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 173.50, N = 3 190067 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.0592 0.1184 0.1776 0.2368 0.296 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.263 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.49, N = 9 428 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.527 1.054 1.581 2.108 2.635 SE +/- 0.030, N = 9 2.342 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 52.67, N = 3 8883 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 11.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 64.07, N = 15 8801 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 28.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 289.14, N = 3 178692 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.126 0.252 0.378 0.504 0.63 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.560 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 165.62, N = 3 171671 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.3278 0.6556 0.9834 1.3112 1.639 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.457 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 37.12, N = 3 4539 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 11.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 8.69, N = 8 335 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6746 1.3492 2.0238 2.6984 3.373 SE +/- 0.082, N = 8 2.998 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 67.52, N = 9 6289 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.081, N = 9 7.965 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 52.48, N = 3 4861 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 20.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 19.21, N = 3 5078 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 49.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 55.38, N = 3 7626 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 13.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 96.64, N = 3 8279 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 30.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 34.21, N = 9 3278 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.16, N = 9 15.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 32.15, N = 5 3009 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.36, N = 5 33.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 62.34, N = 6 2898 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.80, N = 6 86.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 153.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4417.14, N = 3 1113866.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 2577.23, N = 9 51149
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 48.57, N = 3 82581
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 1750.65, N = 9 22357
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 395.44, N = 9 9213
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 28.12, N = 3 13604.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 112.90, N = 12 2375
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 18.78, N = 12 428
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 164.57, N = 3 13813
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 60 120 180 240 300 288
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 139.31, N = 3 36587
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 434
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 197.24, N = 3 46381
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 150 300 450 600 750 685
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 351.46, N = 3 47235
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 13.05, N = 3 1349
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 235.35, N = 3 47348
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 16.29, N = 3 2691
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 200.49, N = 12 2979
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 16.01, N = 12 344
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 224.95, N = 8 26007
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.35, N = 8 153
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 447.78, N = 3 75187
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 210
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 820.99, N = 3 102208
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.00, N = 3 309
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 936.29, N = 3 111847
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 4.41, N = 3 566
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 615.47, N = 15 41280
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.33, N = 15 23
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 22368.43, N = 12 148267
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 24.55, N = 12 65
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 965.11, N = 3 113757
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 9.24, N = 3 1113
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 32404.06, N = 4 160187
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 42.51, N = 4 125
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 215.40, N = 3 16181.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 250 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 21900.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 433.97, N = 3 105883
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 0.6023 1.2046 1.8069 2.4092 3.0115 SE +/- 0.023, N = 3 2.677
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 11.14
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1244.77, N = 3 862182.0
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 585.86, N = 3 891048.5
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1628.66, N = 3 902594.4
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4