Integrated Graphics 1080p

AMD Ryzen 7 4750G Perf Uplift vs older processors with iGPUs

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2010254-AS-2010242AS79
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Core i9 9900K
August 18 2019
  2 Hours, 54 Minutes
Ryzen 3 2200G
August 20 2019
  1 Hour, 9 Minutes
Ryzen 5 2400G
August 22 2019
  1 Hour, 32 Minutes
Ryzen 5 3400G
August 21 2019
  2 Hours, 5 Minutes
Ryzen 7 4750G
October 24 2020
  48 Minutes
Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4
October 24 2020
  1 Hour, 9 Minutes
Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4
October 25 2020
  2 Hours, 25 Minutes
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
  1 Hour, 43 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Integrated Graphics 1080pProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionCore i9 9900KRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 7 4750GRyzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Intel Core i9-9900K @ 4.10GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MB2000GB Force MP600Intel HD 3GB (1200MHz)Realtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel I219-VUbuntu 19.045.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811GNOME Shell 3.32.2X Server 1.20.4modesetting 1.20.44.5 Mesa 19.0.2GCC 8.3.0ext41920x1080AMD Ryzen 3 2200G @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores)MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) v1.0 (2.NM BIOS)AMD Device 15d0MSI AMD Radeon Vega / Mobile 2GB (1100/1600MHz)AMD Device 15deASUS PB278Realtek RTL8111/8168/84114.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0)AMD Ryzen 5 2400G @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)MSI AMD Radeon Vega / Mobile 2GB (1250/1600MHz)AMD Ryzen 5 3400G @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)MSI AMD Picasso 2GB (1400/1600MHz)AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASRock X300M-STX (P1.40 BIOS)AMD Renoir Root Complex14336MB14GB INTEL MEMPEK1W016GA + 500GB Samsung SSD 860AMD Renoir 2GB (2100/400MHz)AMD Device 1637Pixio PXC273Fedora 325.8.15-201.fc32.x86_64 (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.36.7X Server 1.20.9 + Waylandmodesetting 1.20.94.6 Mesa 20.1.10 (LLVM 10.0.1)GCC 10.2.1 20201005 + Clang 10.0.1AMD Renoir 2GB (2100/1600MHz)AMD Renoir 2GB (2100/1800MHz)OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Core i9 9900K: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Ryzen 3 2200G: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ryzen 5 2400G: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ryzen 5 3400G: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ryzen 7 4750G: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemandJava Details- Core i9 9900K: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.4+11-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu219.04)- Ryzen 3 2200G: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.4+11-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu219.04)- Ryzen 5 2400G: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.4+11-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu219.04)- Ryzen 5 3400G: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.4+11-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu219.04)- Ryzen 7 4750G: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_265-b01)- Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_265-b01)- Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_265-b01)Python Details- Core i9 9900K: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Ryzen 3 2200G: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Ryzen 5 2400G: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Ryzen 5 3400G: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Ryzen 7 4750G: Python 3.8.6- Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: Python 3.8.6- Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: Python 3.8.6Security Details- Core i9 9900K: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling- Ryzen 3 2200G: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling- Ryzen 5 2400G: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling- Ryzen 5 3400G: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling- Ryzen 7 4750G: SELinux + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: SELinux + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: SELinux + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Core i9 9900KRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 7 4750GRyzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%202%305%407%GLmark2SuperTuxKartParaViewTesseractXonoticSelenium

Integrated Graphics 1080pparaview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatetesseract: 1920 x 1080supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - 8 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - 8 - Cocoa Templesupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - 8 - Gran Paradiso Islandsupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 8 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 8 - Cocoa Templesupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 8 - Gran Paradiso Islandparaview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080glmark2: 1920 x 1080selenium: MotionMark - Google Chromeselenium: CanvasMark - Firefoxselenium: CanvasMark - Google Chromej2dbench: Vector Graphics Renderingj2dbench: Image RenderingCore i9 9900KRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 7 4750GRyzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR419.5627.31115.20154.1282.6672.1918.6818.5420.0614.9014.0715.71203.85437.00726581.221206813128903830.142002426.3243.9955.76197.40232.03145.81159.9833.8033.2836.3523.9222.7425.00458.45892.151153116483123476.625579855.1253.0867.90214.61241.38167.84172.3244.3144.0748.5132.0931.1133.82553.141086.381196400.7911487142373480525.486160475.5760.2670.56219.94246.48173.71194.0148.0747.0952.1534.5333.2036.58628.041128.951245416.0611129142083804847.106607737.0659.2352.70181.27200.91152.90152.4745.9245.8250.8534.5633.7637.69617.22843.2529571085575.1753.31215.00238.14182.13179.5053.9453.5459.3040.4339.8143.37783.41853.033428488.52110451684282.9253.22232.86255.38195.19195.1457.6956.0061.7842.4841.8746.03864.09851.463698486.0211929174895388545.949011533.60OpenBenchmarking.org

System Power Consumption Monitor

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G35.458.5102.3Ryzen 5 2400G33.660.7104.4Core i9 9900K34.256.565.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring20406080100

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K20406080100SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 382.9275.1759.2360.2653.0843.9919.56

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1632486480SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 353.2253.3152.7070.5667.9055.7627.31

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K50100150200250SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.99, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3232.86215.00181.27219.94214.61197.40115.20MIN: 161 / MAX: 375MIN: 144 / MAX: 344MIN: 116 / MAX: 282MIN: 141 / MAX: 328MIN: 141 / MAX: 317MIN: 117 / MAX: 290MIN: 56 / MAX: 173

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.63681.27361.91042.54723.1842.712.832.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.55351.1071.66052.2142.76752.272.461.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.41850.8371.25551.6742.09251.741.861.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K60120180240300SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3255.38238.14200.91246.48241.38232.03154.12MIN: 176 / MAX: 440MIN: 163 / MAX: 395MIN: 141 / MAX: 331MIN: 160 / MAX: 368MIN: 167 / MAX: 362MIN: 159 / MAX: 339MIN: 90 / MAX: 202

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3195.19182.13152.90173.71167.84145.8182.66MIN: 49 / MAX: 331MIN: 45 / MAX: 309MIN: 38 / MAX: 264MIN: 42 / MAX: 286MIN: 42 / MAX: 275MIN: 40 / MAX: 242MIN: 39 / MAX: 139

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 1.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 1.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3195.14179.50152.47194.01172.32159.9872.19

SuperTuxKart

This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela CityRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1326395265SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 357.6953.9445.9248.0744.3133.8018.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa TempleRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1326395265SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 356.0053.5445.8247.0944.0733.2818.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Gran Paradiso IslandRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1428425670SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 361.7859.3050.8552.1548.5136.3520.06

Tesseract

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.50181.00361.50542.00722.5092.232.201.28

SuperTuxKart

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela CityRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.11480.22960.34440.45920.5740.500.510.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa TempleRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.11480.22960.34440.45920.5740.480.510.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Gran Paradiso IslandRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K0.12830.25660.38490.51320.64150.540.570.37

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela CityRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1020304050SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 5SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 342.4840.4334.5634.5332.0923.9214.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa TempleRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1020304050SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 341.8739.8133.7633.2031.1122.7414.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Gran Paradiso IslandRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1020304050SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 346.0343.3737.6936.5833.8225.0015.71

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K2004006008001000SE +/- 3.22, N = 3SE +/- 2.20, N = 3SE +/- 1.31, N = 3SE +/- 5.89, N = 3SE +/- 4.34, N = 3SE +/- 1.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3864.09783.41617.22628.04553.14458.45203.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K2004006008001000SE +/- 3.72, N = 3SE +/- 6.10, N = 3SE +/- 5.06, N = 3SE +/- 15.70, N = 3SE +/- 8.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.71, N = 3851.46853.03843.251128.951086.38892.15437.00

GLmark2

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K4812162015.3115.9812.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K8001600240032004000369834282957124511961153726

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google ChromeRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K130260390520650SE +/- 7.48, N = 9SE +/- 7.67, N = 3SE +/- 16.79, N = 5SE +/- 2.21, N = 3SE +/- 8.16, N = 3486.02488.52416.06400.79581.221. Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: chrome 86.0.4240.1112. Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: chrome 86.0.4240.1113. Ryzen 5 3400G: chrome 76.0.3809.1004. Ryzen 5 2400G: chrome 76.0.3809.1005. Core i9 9900K: chrome 76.0.3809.100

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750GRyzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 487.45, N = 12SE +/- 67.03, N = 3SE +/- 27.78, N = 3SE +/- 128.66, N = 12SE +/- 169.68, N = 3SE +/- 92.68, N = 3SE +/- 80.83, N = 3119291104510855111291148711648120681. Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: firefox 81.0.22. Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: firefox 81.0.23. Ryzen 7 4750G: firefox 81.0.24. Ryzen 5 3400G: firefox 68.0.25. Ryzen 5 2400G: firefox 68.0.26. Ryzen 3 2200G: firefox 68.0.27. Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GCore i9 9900K4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 112.52, N = 3SE +/- 232.65, N = 3SE +/- 49.79, N = 3SE +/- 121.41, N = 3SE +/- 476.86, N = 917489168421420814237131281. Ryzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4: chrome 86.0.4240.1112. Ryzen 7 4750G 3200M DDR4: chrome 86.0.4240.1113. Ryzen 5 3400G: chrome 76.0.3809.1004. Ryzen 5 2400G: chrome 76.0.3809.1005. Core i9 9900K: chrome 76.0.3809.100

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K1.2M2.4M3.6M4.8M6MSE +/- 6093.46, N = 4SE +/- 4041.95, N = 4SE +/- 5139.85, N = 4SE +/- 4239.05, N = 4SE +/- 14560.94, N = 125388545.943804847.103480525.483123476.62903830.14

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingRyzen 7 4750G 3600M DDR4Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GCore i9 9900K2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 84929.28, N = 4SE +/- 35311.14, N = 4SE +/- 49995.74, N = 4SE +/- 8325.99, N = 4SE +/- 3331.31, N = 49011533.606607737.066160475.575579855.122002426.32

GLmark2

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G35.281.398.4Ryzen 5 2400G33.974.889.9Core i9 9900K34.357.965.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGLmark2 276System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.290.9111.6Ryzen 5 2400G33.685.3100.3Core i9 9900K34.761.365.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.097.1117.7Ryzen 5 2400G34.087.3103.6Core i9 9900K34.360.563.9OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.699.7118.2Ryzen 5 2400G34.790.3103.6Core i9 9900K34.458.665.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Tesseract

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.387.098.2Ryzen 5 2400G34.278.294.2Core i9 9900K34.556.360.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

SuperTuxKart

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.295.9107.5Ryzen 5 2400G34.686.594.7Core i9 9900K34.253.556.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.297.3108.6Ryzen 5 2400G34.186.195.8Core i9 9900K34.251.456.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRyzen 5 3400G36.396.6107.3Ryzen 5 2400G34.385.395.8Core i9 9900K34.253.956.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100