ten64wireguard

Ten64 (8xCortex-A53) testing on Debian 10 (mainline 5.8 kernel)

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2010204-NE-TEN64WIRE09
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Traverse Ten64, 5.8.x kernel
October 20 2020
  54 Minutes


ten64wireguardOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteARMv8 Cortex-A53 @ 1.60GHz (8 Cores)traverse ten64 (2020.07-rc1-00404-g175d0de361-dirty BIOS)3584MB230GB M.2 (P42) 3TE2 + 4 x 500GB Samsung SSD 860Debian 105.8.16-traverse-stable-5-8+136-00001-gd4b7f859a (aarch64)GCC 8.3.0ext4ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemTen64wireguard BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: qoriq_cpufreq performance- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Not affected + spectre_v1: Mitigation of __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test

This is a benchmark of the WireGuard secure VPN tunnel and Linux networking stack stress test. The test runs on the local host but does require root permissions to run. The way it works is it creates three namespaces. ns0 has a loopback device. ns1 and ns2 each have wireguard devices. Those two wireguard devices send traffic through the loopback device of ns0. The end result of this is that tests wind up testing encryption and decryption at the same time -- a pretty CPU and scheduler-heavy workflow. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress TestTraverse Ten64, 5.8.x kernel2004006008001000SE +/- 3.60, N = 31076.48