2ndtest

AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core testing with a ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (2501 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008086-NE-2NDTEST1542
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
002
August 08 2020
  17 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


2ndtestOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD FX-8320 Eight-Core @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (2501 BIOS)AMD RD9x0/RX98016GB1000GB Western Digital WD1003FZEX-0 + 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH1Sapphire AMD Radeon 8GB (1342/2000MHz)Realtek ALC892XG270HURealtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 20.045.4.0-42-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.36.4X Server 1.20.8modesetting 1.20.84.6.14752GCC 9.3.0ext42560x1440ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolution2ndtest BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x6000852- GLAMOR- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

2ndtestut2004-demo: AS-Convoy Botmatch - 1920 x 1200ut2004-demo: DM-Rankin Botmatch - 1920 x 1200ut2004-demo: ONS-Torlan Botmatch - 1920 x 1200ut2004-demo: BR-Colossus Botmatch - 1920 x 1200ut2004-demo: CTF-FaceClassic Botmatch - 1920 x 1200ut2004-demo: CTF-BridgeOfFate Botmatch - 1920 x 120000288.766538157.819122108.187480127.015634158.620972213.505808OpenBenchmarking.org

Unreal Tournament 2004 Demo

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Unreal Tournament 2004 game demo from Epic Games. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: AS-Convoy Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 120000220406080100SE +/- 1.01, N = 388.77

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: DM-Rankin Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 1200002306090120150SE +/- 0.68, N = 3157.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: ONS-Torlan Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 120000220406080100SE +/- 0.66, N = 3108.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: BR-Colossus Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 1200002306090120150SE +/- 1.52, N = 15127.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: CTF-FaceClassic Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 12000024080120160200SE +/- 1.74, N = 3158.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnreal Tournament 2004 Demo 3334Map: CTF-BridgeOfFate Botmatch - Resolution: 1920 x 120000250100150200250SE +/- 1.35, N = 3213.51