74baseline 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.4.1708 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2006277-VE-74BASELIN97 .
74baseline Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 74baseline 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads) Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) Intel Xeon E5/Core 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MHz M393B2G70BH0-YK0 2396GB MR9266-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] Cisco VIC NIC CentOS 7.4.1708 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) X Server GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x710 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
74baseline blogbench: Read blogbench: Write postmark: Disk Transaction Performance tinymembench: Standard Memcpy tinymembench: Standard Memset mbw: Memory Copy - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 4096 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 8192 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 4096 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 8192 MiB t-test1: 1 t-test1: 2 pmbench: 1 - 50% pmbench: 2 - 50% pmbench: 4 - 50% pmbench: 8 - 50% pmbench: 16 - 50% pmbench: 32 - 50% pmbench: 1 - 100% Reads pmbench: 2 - 100% Reads pmbench: 4 - 100% Reads pmbench: 8 - 100% Reads pmbench: 1 - 100% Writes pmbench: 16 - 100% Reads pmbench: 2 - 100% Writes pmbench: 32 - 100% Reads pmbench: 4 - 100% Writes pmbench: 8 - 100% Writes pmbench: 16 - 100% Writes pmbench: 32 - 100% Writes pmbench: 1 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 2 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 4 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 8 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 16 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 32 - 80% Reads 20% Writes iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 1 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 1 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 32 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 64 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 32 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 64 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 1 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 32 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 64 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 32 iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 64 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096 ebizzy: hackbench: 1 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Thread hackbench: 4 - Thread hackbench: 8 - Thread hackbench: 1 - Process hackbench: 16 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Process hackbench: 4 - Process hackbench: 8 - Process hackbench: 16 - Process hackbench: 32 - Process openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance pgbench: On-Disk - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: On-Disk - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Normal Load - Read Write pgbench: Mostly RAM - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: On-Disk - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: On-Disk - Heavy Contention - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Write pgbench: Mostly RAM - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Only pgbench: Mostly RAM - Heavy Contention - Read Write pgbench: Buffer Test - Heavy Contention - Read Write sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 memtier-benchmark: Redis redis: LPOP redis: SADD redis: LPUSH redis: GET redis: SET stress-ng: MMAP stress-ng: NUMA stress-ng: MEMFD stress-ng: Atomic stress-ng: Crypto stress-ng: Malloc stress-ng: Forking stress-ng: SENDFILE stress-ng: CPU Cache stress-ng: CPU Stress stress-ng: Semaphores stress-ng: Matrix Math stress-ng: Vector Math stress-ng: Memory Copying stress-ng: Socket Activity stress-ng: Context Switching stress-ng: Glibc C String Functions stress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting stress-ng: System V Message Passing ctx-clock: Context Switch Time cassandra: Reads cassandra: Writes cassandra: Mixed 1:1 cassandra: Mixed 1:3 nginx: Static Web Page Serving hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 1 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 4 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 16 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 32 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 64 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Increment - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 1 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 16 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 32 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Read - 64 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 1 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Write - 4 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Read - 128 hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 16 hbase: Rand Write - 32 hbase: Rand Write - 32 apache: Static Web Page Serving apache-siege: 250 phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite php: Zend bench php: Zend micro_bench schbench: 8 - 4 74baseline 1537274 3878 2689 3899.9 9115.9 2944.865 2937.028 2932.240 2934.632 2935.342 5061.971 5064.564 5063.514 5070.636 5070.472 26.558 9.337 0.1090 0.1276 0.1258 0.1216 0.1255 0.1347 0.0478 0.0481 0.0480 0.0491 0.0925 0.0494 0.1073 0.0680 0.1071 0.1064 0.1097 0.1122 0.1168 0.1332 0.1295 0.1299 0.1327 0.1415 100 1000 3200 6400 24257 23419 38736 1.05 32934 30322 33.6 67.2 1936631 1763593 1672351 1365051 1097652 733053 1288395 1286876 1178103 1043766 877238 587711 533912 527122 510376 478189 466454 398034 1219743 1274402 1235341 1060149 933817 641820 390552 4.483 4.851 12.103 16.684 4.170 31.175 4.424 8.290 15.281 29.348 56.851 1630.0 797.609718 242.383337 84.260492 1890.315929 35.670665 200598.420459 341.662688 1285.436515 169.480391 836.878807 10499.643613 56.697977 250.346249 147.636893 2010.407579 208020.612321 379.211447 1577.288055 124.818 1150406.57 1178686.67 907695.65 741875.85 1119625.75 861810.04 506.39 15.82 1984.01 57225.10 1346.79 112367556.68 11860.36 244612.45 17.97 4002.98 2862343.37 42374.51 44516.38 3257.32 11024.56 5531828.32 794468.88 150.23 8908290.59 264 52898 90785 21087 9046 16879.69 2240 448 14285 278 41029 386 51635 616 52124 1222 52282 2438 3169 327 27759 143 83504 190 114186 277 117890 538 41239 23 153160 60 114575 1107 171339 129 109402 289 20506.61 11725.71 108975 2.649 11.796 4572 OpenBenchmarking.org
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 21183.22, N = 4 1537274 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 74baseline 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 30.69, N = 3 3878 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 43.54, N = 3 2689 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Tinymembench Standard Memcpy OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy 74baseline 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 5.92, N = 3 3899.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm
Tinymembench Standard Memset OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset 74baseline 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 9.27, N = 3 9115.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 12.66, N = 3 2944.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 11.00, N = 3 2937.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 5.09, N = 3 2932.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 6.79, N = 3 2934.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB 74baseline 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 6.37, N = 3 2935.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB 74baseline 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 13.94, N = 3 5061.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB 74baseline 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 4.41, N = 3 5064.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB 74baseline 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 5063.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB 74baseline 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 5070.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB 74baseline 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 5070.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
t-test1 Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 74baseline 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 26.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
t-test1 Threads: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 74baseline 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.072, N = 3 9.337 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0245 0.049 0.0735 0.098 0.1225 SE +/- 0.0004, N = 3 0.1090 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0287 0.0574 0.0861 0.1148 0.1435 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 3 0.1276 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0283 0.0566 0.0849 0.1132 0.1415 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 3 0.1258 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0274 0.0548 0.0822 0.1096 0.137 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 3 0.1216 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0282 0.0564 0.0846 0.1128 0.141 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 9 0.1255 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 74baseline 0.0303 0.0606 0.0909 0.1212 0.1515 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.1347 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.0108 0.0216 0.0324 0.0432 0.054 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0478 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.0108 0.0216 0.0324 0.0432 0.054 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.0481 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.0108 0.0216 0.0324 0.0432 0.054 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0480 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.011 0.022 0.033 0.044 0.055 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.0491 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0208 0.0416 0.0624 0.0832 0.104 SE +/- 0.0004, N = 3 0.0925 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.0111 0.0222 0.0333 0.0444 0.0555 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 14 0.0494 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0004, N = 3 0.1073 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 74baseline 0.0153 0.0306 0.0459 0.0612 0.0765 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 15 0.0680 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 3 0.1071 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0239 0.0478 0.0717 0.0956 0.1195 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.1064 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0247 0.0494 0.0741 0.0988 0.1235 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.1097 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 74baseline 0.0252 0.0504 0.0756 0.1008 0.126 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 3 0.1122 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.0263 0.0526 0.0789 0.1052 0.1315 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.1168 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 SE +/- 0.0013, N = 15 0.1332 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.0291 0.0582 0.0873 0.1164 0.1455 SE +/- 0.0019, N = 3 0.1295 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.0292 0.0584 0.0876 0.1168 0.146 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 3 0.1299 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.0299 0.0598 0.0897 0.1196 0.1495 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.1327 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 74baseline 0.0318 0.0636 0.0954 0.1272 0.159 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.1415 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 74baseline 20 40 60 80 100 100 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 74baseline 200 400 600 800 1000 1000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 74baseline 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3200 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 74baseline 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6400 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 74baseline 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 222.83, N = 3 24257 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 74baseline 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 59.68, N = 3 23419 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 74baseline 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 135.01, N = 3 38736 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 74baseline 0.2363 0.4726 0.7089 0.9452 1.1815 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 74baseline 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 293.57, N = 15 32934 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 74baseline 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 287.20, N = 3 30322 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 74baseline 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 33.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
iPerf Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 74baseline 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 67.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 74baseline 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 27451.74, N = 15 1936631
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 74baseline 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 29269.67, N = 3 1763593
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 74baseline 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 17733.75, N = 8 1672351
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 19681.36, N = 4 1365051
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 16216.23, N = 3 1097652
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 74baseline 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 4973.76, N = 3 733053
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 16640.32, N = 15 1288395
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15017.38, N = 15 1286876
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 12331.22, N = 15 1178103
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11010.01, N = 15 1043766
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10578.56, N = 6 877238
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 74baseline 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 7938.11, N = 3 587711
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 74baseline 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 6082.70, N = 3 533912
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 74baseline 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 7016.88, N = 4 527122
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 74baseline 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 7442.34, N = 4 510376
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 74baseline 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 6324.70, N = 5 478189
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 74baseline 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 2245.00, N = 3 466454
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 74baseline 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 3756.58, N = 15 398034
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 36124.43, N = 13 1219743
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2178.37, N = 3 1274402
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15301.77, N = 15 1235341
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 8135.85, N = 3 1060149
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3165.91, N = 3 933817
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 74baseline 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 5752.87, N = 3 641820
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 74baseline 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5102.29, N = 3 390552 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread 74baseline 1.0087 2.0174 3.0261 4.0348 5.0435 SE +/- 0.052, N = 6 4.483 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread 74baseline 1.0915 2.183 3.2745 4.366 5.4575 SE +/- 0.073, N = 3 4.851 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread 74baseline 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.84, N = 15 12.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread 74baseline 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 16.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process 74baseline 0.9383 1.8766 2.8149 3.7532 4.6915 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 4.170 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread 74baseline 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 31.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process 74baseline 0.9954 1.9908 2.9862 3.9816 4.977 SE +/- 0.016, N = 3 4.424 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process 74baseline 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.069, N = 3 8.290 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process 74baseline 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process 74baseline 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 29.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process 74baseline 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 56.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 74baseline 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 1630.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 33.21, N = 3 797.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 11.00, N = 3 242.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.48, N = 3 84.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 101.72, N = 3 1890.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 1.57, N = 3 35.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 12.75, N = 3 200598.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 13.89, N = 3 341.66 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 45.43, N = 12 1285.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.89, N = 3 169.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 13.51, N = 3 836.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 10.91, N = 3 10499.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 6.81, N = 3 56.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 15.41, N = 3 250.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.02, N = 4 147.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 65.87, N = 3 2010.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 74baseline 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 220.66, N = 3 208020.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 32.78, N = 3 379.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 74baseline 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 47.50, N = 12 1577.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 74baseline 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 124.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5456.84, N = 3 1150406.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis Test: LPOP OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP 74baseline 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 14630.71, N = 3 1178686.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread -lrt
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10730.00, N = 3 907695.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread -lrt
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH 74baseline 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 9059.60, N = 3 741875.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread -lrt
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11119.56, N = 3 1119625.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread -lrt
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10029.58, N = 3 861810.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread -lrt
Stress-NG Test: MMAP OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP 74baseline 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 506.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: NUMA OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA 74baseline 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 15.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: MEMFD OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD 74baseline 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 1984.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Atomic OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic 74baseline 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 294.00, N = 3 57225.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Crypto OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto 74baseline 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.56, N = 3 1346.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Malloc OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc 74baseline 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 205252.93, N = 3 112367556.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Forking OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking 74baseline 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 29.60, N = 3 11860.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: SENDFILE OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE 74baseline 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 855.45, N = 3 244612.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: CPU Cache OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache 74baseline 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.33, N = 15 17.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: CPU Stress OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress 74baseline 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 15.97, N = 3 4002.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Semaphores OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores 74baseline 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 18642.82, N = 3 2862343.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Matrix Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math 74baseline 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 49.23, N = 3 42374.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math 74baseline 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 5.07, N = 3 44516.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Memory Copying OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying 74baseline 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 15.58, N = 3 3257.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Socket Activity OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity 74baseline 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 77.89, N = 3 11024.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Context Switching OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching 74baseline 1.2M 2.4M 3.6M 4.8M 6M SE +/- 72937.80, N = 4 5531828.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Glibc C String Functions OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions 74baseline 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 656.91, N = 3 794468.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting 74baseline 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 150.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
Stress-NG Test: System V Message Passing OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing 74baseline 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 116930.97, N = 5 8908290.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -laio -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
ctx_clock Context Switch Time OpenBenchmarking.org Clocks, Fewer Is Better ctx_clock Context Switch Time 74baseline 60 120 180 240 300 264
Apache Cassandra Test: Reads OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads 74baseline 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 2269.89, N = 12 52898
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 439.08, N = 3 90785
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 74baseline 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 1756.99, N = 9 21087
Apache Cassandra Test: Mixed 1:3 OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 74baseline 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 404.40, N = 9 9046
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving 74baseline 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 16.99, N = 3 16879.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 74baseline 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 59.65, N = 15 2240
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 74baseline 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 11.11, N = 15 448
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 74baseline 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 171.51, N = 3 14285
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 74baseline 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.53, N = 3 278
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 74baseline 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 333.96, N = 3 41029
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 74baseline 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 386
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 74baseline 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 220.54, N = 3 51635
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 74baseline 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 616
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 74baseline 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 203.70, N = 3 52124
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 74baseline 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 6.64, N = 3 1222
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 74baseline 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 571.76, N = 3 52282
Apache HBase Test: Increment - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 74baseline 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 29.72, N = 3 2438
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 74baseline 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 215.86, N = 15 3169
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 74baseline 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 15.61, N = 15 327
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 74baseline 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 318.12, N = 3 27759
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 74baseline 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 143
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 904.14, N = 3 83504
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 74baseline 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 190
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 783.27, N = 3 114186
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 74baseline 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 277
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 74baseline 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 929.71, N = 3 117890
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 74baseline 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 4.41, N = 3 538
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 74baseline 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 657.13, N = 15 41239
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 74baseline 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.42, N = 15 23
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 74baseline 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 22967.84, N = 12 153160
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 74baseline 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 21.58, N = 12 60
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 252.15, N = 3 114575
Apache HBase Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 74baseline 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.60, N = 3 1107
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 74baseline 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 39066.26, N = 4 171339
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 74baseline 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 54.26, N = 4 129
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Rows Per Second, More Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 109402
Apache HBase Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds - Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 74baseline 60 120 180 240 300 289
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving 74baseline 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 218.73, N = 3 20506.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Apache Siege Concurrent Users: 250 OpenBenchmarking.org Transactions Per Second, More Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 74baseline 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 5466.00, N = 7 11725.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread -ldl -lssl -lcrypto
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite 74baseline 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 269.33, N = 3 108975
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench 74baseline 0.596 1.192 1.788 2.384 2.98 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 2.649
PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench 74baseline 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 11.80
Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 74baseline 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 635.35, N = 12 4572 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4