Icelake vs. AMD Renoir Graphics

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U tests against Ice Lake for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005305-NI-2005303NI19
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Core i7 1065G7
May 12 2020
  1 Hour, 36 Minutes
Ryzen 7 4700U
May 12 2020
  2 Hours, 14 Minutes
Core i7 8565U
May 30 2020
  2 Hours, 30 Minutes
Core i5 8265U
May 30 2020
  2 Hours, 56 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 19 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Icelake vs. AMD Renoir GraphicsProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenCLCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700UCore i7 8565UCore i5 8265UIntel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS)Intel Device 34ef16GBKBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBIntel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz)Realtek ALC289Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHzUbuntu 20.045.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200511GNOME Shell 3.36.1X Server 1.20.8modesetting 1.20.84.6 Mesa 20.0.4GCC 9.3.0ext41920x1080AMD Ryzen 7 4700U @ 2.00GHz (8 Cores)LENOVO LNVNB161216 (DTCN18WWV1.04 BIOS)AMD Renoir Root Complex512GB SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2AMD Renoir 512MB (1600/400MHz)AMD Device 1637Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX2004.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1)Intel Core i7-8565U @ 4.60GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Dell 0KTW76 (1.0.0 BIOS)Intel Cannon Point-LPPC401 NVMe SK hynix 256GBIntel UHD 620 3GB (1150MHz)Realtek ALC3271Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac5.4.0-31-generic (x86_64)4.6 Mesa 20.0.4OpenCL 2.1Intel Core i5-8265U @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Raticate_WL (V1.09 BIOS)8GB256GB Micron_1100_MTFDIntel UHD 620 3GB (1100MHz)Realtek ALC255Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Cannon Point-LP CNVi5.4.0-33-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.36.2OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Core i7 1065G7: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x78- Ryzen 7 4700U: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102- Core i7 8565U: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xca- Core i5 8265U: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xcaJava Details- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Details- Python 3.8.2Security Details- Core i7 1065G7: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Ryzen 7 4700U: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Core i7 8565U: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Core i5 8265U: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700UCore i7 8565UCore i5 8265UResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%175%250%326%401%ParaViewTesseractSuperTuxKartXonoticET: LegacyUnigine SuperpositionJava 2D Microbenchmark

Icelake vs. AMD Renoir Graphicsetlegacy: Renderer2 - 1920 x 1080supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 4 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 4 - Cocoa Templesupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Cocoa Templetesseract: 1920 x 1080unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimateparaview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080j2dbench: Text Renderingj2dbench: Image Renderingj2dbench: All Rendering Testsj2dbench: Vector Graphics RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700UCore i7 8565UCore i5 8265U114.627.41761227.53976663.66402967.35488697.8791120.2269.0997266166.3315228136.5085529106.60420084.49450.38045.11721.72119.42202.33721653.2253196881805333.57736441394885.95486621288145.0464815137.427.11476625.32835059.20067160.485523123.995527.0282.3998863193.8509860165.6879915130.96378665.06507.08466.531064.47257.72601.45812880.9063064275975599.19766864609035.40106604160397.392489759.813.54549212.94203414.84652519.80156645.5988512.1129.501729172.883982465.616514257.82313185.45546.19913.35213.62819.00198.04424234.1433428521650869.33088801014085.91714623790538.3809456149.310.2780459.89452114.66759518.41711034.255409.7110.089983360.623778553.588279045.990803213.67218.69317.48182.20725112.0298431711586489.7896528955220.71539001740244.32434011OpenBenchmarking.org

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 349.359.8137.4114.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7306090120150Min: 49.1 / Avg: 49.33 / Max: 49.6Min: 59.2 / Avg: 59.83 / Max: 60.2Min: 136.1 / Avg: 137.37 / Max: 138Min: 113.4 / Avg: 114.6 / Max: 116.7

SuperTuxKart

This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 6SE +/- 0.46, N = 310.2813.5527.1127.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430Min: 10 / Avg: 10.28 / Max: 10.46Min: 13.22 / Avg: 13.55 / Max: 13.75Min: 25.96 / Avg: 27.11 / Max: 28.18Min: 26.51 / Avg: 27.42 / Max: 27.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430SE +/- 0.148982, N = 3SE +/- 0.163606, N = 5SE +/- 0.276068, N = 7SE +/- 0.332118, N = 39.89452112.94203425.32835027.539766
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430Min: 9.6 / Avg: 9.89 / Max: 10.06Min: 12.3 / Avg: 12.94 / Max: 13.16Min: 23.77 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 25.83Min: 26.88 / Avg: 27.54 / Max: 27.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71428425670SE +/- 0.20, N = 4SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 314.6714.8559.2063.66
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71224364860Min: 14.06 / Avg: 14.67 / Max: 14.91Min: 14.67 / Avg: 14.85 / Max: 15.13Min: 57.47 / Avg: 59.2 / Max: 60.51Min: 62.38 / Avg: 63.66 / Max: 64.32

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71530456075SE +/- 0.23, N = 15SE +/- 0.44, N = 15SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 318.4219.8060.4967.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71326395265Min: 17.01 / Avg: 18.42 / Max: 20.06Min: 16.64 / Avg: 19.8 / Max: 22.64Min: 59.11 / Avg: 60.49 / Max: 62.22Min: 65.59 / Avg: 67.35 / Max: 68.53

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7306090120150SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 15SE +/- 0.82, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 334.2645.60124.0097.88
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G720406080100Min: 33.7 / Avg: 34.26 / Max: 35.35Min: 38.19 / Avg: 45.6 / Max: 49.16Min: 122.39 / Avg: 124 / Max: 125.13Min: 97.48 / Avg: 97.88 / Max: 98.47

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 39.712.127.020.2MAX: 11.8MAX: 15.3MAX: 35.1MAX: 25.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7612182430Min: 9.7 / Avg: 9.7 / Max: 9.7Min: 12.1 / Avg: 12.13 / Max: 12.2Min: 26.9 / Avg: 26.97 / Max: 27Min: 20.2 / Avg: 20.2 / Max: 20.2

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G760120180240300SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 3.81, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3110.09129.50282.40269.10MIN: 77 / MAX: 151MIN: 84 / MAX: 194MIN: 180 / MAX: 524MIN: 180 / MAX: 453
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G750100150200250Min: 109.94 / Avg: 110.09 / Max: 110.17Min: 129.19 / Avg: 129.5 / Max: 129.72Min: 276.65 / Avg: 282.4 / Max: 289.6Min: 268.36 / Avg: 269.1 / Max: 269.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G74080120160200SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 0.53, N = 360.6272.88193.85166.33MIN: 41 / MAX: 82MIN: 42 / MAX: 137MIN: 126 / MAX: 313MIN: 101 / MAX: 276
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G74080120160200Min: 60.37 / Avg: 60.62 / Max: 61.06Min: 72.54 / Avg: 72.88 / Max: 73.09Min: 192.58 / Avg: 193.85 / Max: 195.59Min: 165.77 / Avg: 166.33 / Max: 167.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G74080120160200SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 353.5965.62165.69136.51MIN: 38 / MAX: 80MIN: 40 / MAX: 120MIN: 101 / MAX: 256MIN: 78 / MAX: 245
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7306090120150Min: 53.22 / Avg: 53.59 / Max: 53.84Min: 65.22 / Avg: 65.62 / Max: 65.83Min: 164.42 / Avg: 165.69 / Max: 166.93Min: 136.22 / Avg: 136.51 / Max: 136.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7306090120150SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 345.9957.82130.96106.60MIN: 21 / MAX: 71MIN: 27 / MAX: 98MIN: 35 / MAX: 231MIN: 35 / MAX: 199
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G720406080100Min: 45.77 / Avg: 45.99 / Max: 46.15Min: 57.47 / Avg: 57.82 / Max: 58.02Min: 130.23 / Avg: 130.96 / Max: 132.06Min: 106.12 / Avg: 106.6 / Max: 107.06

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71.22632.45263.67894.90526.1315SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 35.455.064.49
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7246810Min: 5.38 / Avg: 5.45 / Max: 5.49Min: 5.06 / Avg: 5.06 / Max: 5.06Min: 4.47 / Avg: 4.49 / Max: 4.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7120240360480600SE +/- 3.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3546.20507.08450.38
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7100200300400500Min: 539.24 / Avg: 546.2 / Max: 550.05Min: 506.94 / Avg: 507.08 / Max: 507.32Min: 448.45 / Avg: 450.38 / Max: 452.64

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71530456075SE +/- 0.20, N = 4SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 313.6713.3566.5345.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71326395265Min: 13.1 / Avg: 13.67 / Max: 14Min: 12.91 / Avg: 13.35 / Max: 13.64Min: 65.97 / Avg: 66.53 / Max: 66.88Min: 44.5 / Avg: 45.11 / Max: 45.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G72004006008001000SE +/- 3.22, N = 4SE +/- 3.58, N = 3SE +/- 4.52, N = 3SE +/- 4.83, N = 3218.69213.631064.47721.72
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G72004006008001000Min: 209.66 / Avg: 218.69 / Max: 224.05Min: 206.6 / Avg: 213.63 / Max: 218.3Min: 1055.53 / Avg: 1064.47 / Max: 1070.11Min: 712.06 / Avg: 721.72 / Max: 726.61

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71326395265SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.4819.0057.7219.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71122334455Min: 17.45 / Avg: 17.48 / Max: 17.52Min: 18.96 / Avg: 19 / Max: 19.03Min: 57.52 / Avg: 57.72 / Max: 57.94Min: 19.38 / Avg: 19.42 / Max: 19.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7130260390520650SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 1.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3182.21198.04601.46202.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7110220330440550Min: 181.89 / Avg: 182.21 / Max: 182.58Min: 197.63 / Avg: 198.04 / Max: 198.29Min: 599.4 / Avg: 601.46 / Max: 603.8Min: 202.01 / Avg: 202.34 / Max: 202.78

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G75K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 316.85, N = 4SE +/- 121.69, N = 4SE +/- 150.00, N = 20SE +/- 173.42, N = 425112.0324234.1412880.9121653.23
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G74K8K12K16K20KMin: 24401.54 / Avg: 25112.03 / Max: 25838.79Min: 23980.18 / Avg: 24234.14 / Max: 24539.55Min: 11553.71 / Avg: 12880.91 / Max: 13611.17Min: 21187.93 / Avg: 21653.23 / Max: 21950.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MSE +/- 3412.15, N = 4SE +/- 4545.80, N = 4SE +/- 69455.85, N = 20SE +/- 1614.83, N = 41586489.791650869.335975599.201805333.58
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71000K2000K3000K4000K5000KMin: 1577993.52 / Avg: 1586489.79 / Max: 1593162.03Min: 1639804.54 / Avg: 1650869.33 / Max: 1659740.02Min: 5420992.96 / Avg: 5975599.2 / Max: 6525799.26Min: 1803060.4 / Avg: 1805333.58 / Max: 1809960.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G71000K2000K3000K4000K5000KSE +/- 5454.20, N = 4SE +/- 9238.17, N = 4SE +/- 33413.51, N = 4SE +/- 1383.63, N = 4955220.721014085.924609035.401394885.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7800K1600K2400K3200K4000KMin: 946583.98 / Avg: 955220.72 / Max: 971086.79Min: 992724.03 / Avg: 1014085.92 / Max: 1037799.73Min: 4535185.23 / Avg: 4609035.4 / Max: 4696814.95Min: 1391879.23 / Avg: 1394885.95 / Max: 1398532.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 20173.91, N = 8SE +/- 7499.14, N = 4SE +/- 1403.59, N = 4SE +/- 3640.91, N = 4740244.32790538.384160397.391288145.05
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingCore i5 8265UCore i7 8565URyzen 7 4700UCore i7 1065G7700K1400K2100K2800K3500KMin: 682382.49 / Avg: 740244.32 / Max: 860561.16Min: 774329.85 / Avg: 790538.38 / Max: 810603.36Min: 4158062.51 / Avg: 4160397.39 / Max: 4164057.4Min: 1279654.12 / Avg: 1288145.05 / Max: 1296121.36