Icelake Graphics

Intel Core i5-8259U testing with a Intel NUC8BEB (BECFL357.86A.0073.2019.0618.1409 BIOS) and Intel HD 3GB on Fedora 30 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1910255-AS-1910110AS44
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Web Browsers 1 Tests
Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Steam 3 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10
October 11 2019
  7 Hours, 16 Minutes
nuc
October 24 2019
  3 Hours, 14 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  5 Hours, 15 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Icelake GraphicsProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkChipsetAudioMonitorOSKernelDisplay DriverFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLCompilerWindows 10nucIntel Core i7-1065G7 @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS)2 x 8192 MB 3733MHz Micron MT53E1G32D4NQ-046477GB KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBIntel Iris Plus 1GBRealtek USB GbE + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area )Microsoft Windows 10 Home Single Language Build 1836210.0 (x86_64)25.20.100.7102NTFS1920x1200Intel Core i5-8259U @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Intel NUC8BEB (BECFL357.86A.0073.2019.0618.1409 BIOS)Intel Cannon Point-LP16384MB256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-00000 + 160GB INTEL SSDSA2BW16Intel HD 3GB (1050MHz)Realtek ALC233Acer E211HIntel I219-V + Intel Cannon Point-LP CNViFedora 305.2.13-200.fc30.x86_64 (x86_64)Xfce 4.14X Server 1.20.5modesetting 1.20.54.5 Mesa 19.1.7GCC 9.2.1 20190827ext41920x1080OpenBenchmarking.orgJava Details- Windows 10: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1-ojdkbuild+13-LTS)- nuc: OpenJDK Runtime Environment 19.3 (build 13+33)Python Details- Windows 10: Python 3.7.1- nuc: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.4Processor Details- nuc: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Details- nuc: SELinux + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling

Windows 10 vs. nuc ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+14.5%+14.5%+29%+29%+43.5%+43.5%50%49.9%34.9%13.9%7%7%2.8%Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen57.9%A.R.TImage RenderingPixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen47.9%Many Spheres - 1920 x 108043.5%Many Spheres - 1920 x 108043.5%MotionMark - Firefox40.7%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL40.5%Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen35.9%V.G.R1920 x 1080 - Ultimate34.4%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL32.1%1920 x 1080 - Ultra26.8%Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen21.1%1920 x 1080 - High18.8%Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen18.7%MotionMark - Google ChromeWavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Low6.8%Text Rendering6.4%CanvasMark - Google ChromeGpuTestJava 2D MicrobenchmarkJava 2D MicrobenchmarkGpuTestParaViewParaViewSeleniumUnigine ValleyGpuTestJava 2D MicrobenchmarkXonoticUnigine HeavenXonoticGpuTestXonoticGpuTestSeleniumParaViewParaViewXonoticJava 2D MicrobenchmarkSeleniumWindows 10nuc

Icelake Graphicsdota2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLdota2: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkanportal: 1920 x 1080unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatexplane11: Low - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080j2dbench: Text Renderingj2dbench: Image Renderingj2dbench: All Rendering Testsj2dbench: Vector Graphics Renderinggputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenselenium: CanvasMark - Firefoxselenium: MotionMark - Firefoxselenium: CanvasMark - Google Chromeselenium: MotionMark - Google ChromeWindows 10nuc34.6332.05214.5320.3422.81273.52218.34190.75149.7916.317.79780.7437.45599.2328.46296.5916095.441999042.791109689.70868575.401198129341595353514074534899811289186.6113821259.2615.4016.24256.15183.82150.39111.445.43544.1638.07609.1530.45317.2915131.512996282.271664660.731171443.241067913448915825667511090132.6514207295.37OpenBenchmarking.org

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10816243240SE +/- 0.65, N = 1234.63MIN: 29.8 / MAX: 38.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanWindows 10714212835SE +/- 0.47, N = 1532.05MIN: 28.6 / MAX: 35.4

Portal

This is a benchmark of Valve's Portal game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 1050100150200250SE +/- 0.65, N = 3214.53

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10nuc510152025SE +/- 0.39, N = 9SE +/- 0.02, N = 320.3415.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10nuc510152025Min: 19.45 / Avg: 20.34 / Max: 23.31Min: 15.36 / Avg: 15.4 / Max: 15.44

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10nuc510152025SE +/- 0.51, N = 12SE +/- 0.03, N = 322.8116.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10nuc510152025Min: 20.26 / Avg: 22.81 / Max: 25.05Min: 16.19 / Avg: 16.24 / Max: 16.28

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10nuc60120180240300SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 3273.52256.15MIN: 173 / MAX: 537MIN: 169 / MAX: 454
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10nuc50100150200250Min: 270.92 / Avg: 273.52 / Max: 277.52Min: 253.3 / Avg: 256.15 / Max: 257.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10nuc50100150200250SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 1.02, N = 3218.34183.82MIN: 128 / MAX: 383MIN: 121 / MAX: 288
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10nuc4080120160200Min: 217.94 / Avg: 218.34 / Max: 218.6Min: 182.16 / Avg: 183.82 / Max: 185.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10nuc4080120160200SE +/- 1.62, N = 15SE +/- 0.14, N = 3190.75150.39MIN: 84 / MAX: 357MIN: 80 / MAX: 241
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10nuc306090120150Min: 182.25 / Avg: 190.75 / Max: 198.34Min: 150.11 / Avg: 150.39 / Max: 150.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 10nuc306090120150SE +/- 1.58, N = 15SE +/- 0.24, N = 3149.79111.44MIN: 18 / MAX: 306MIN: 34 / MAX: 201
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 10nuc306090120150Min: 140.77 / Avg: 149.79 / Max: 158.54Min: 111.06 / Avg: 111.44 / Max: 111.87

X-Plane

This is a test of X-Plane, a realistic multi-platform flight simulator designed for personal computers. This is commercial closed-source software and relies upon the Steam version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterX-Plane 11Quality: Low - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 104812162016.31

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc246810SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 37.795.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc3691215Min: 7.75 / Avg: 7.79 / Max: 7.85Min: 5.38 / Avg: 5.43 / Max: 5.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc2004006008001000SE +/- 2.96, N = 3SE +/- 2.66, N = 3780.74544.16
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc140280420560700Min: 777.38 / Avg: 780.74 / Max: 786.63Min: 539.47 / Avg: 544.16 / Max: 548.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc918273645SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 737.4538.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc816243240Min: 37.37 / Avg: 37.45 / Max: 37.52Min: 35.19 / Avg: 38.07 / Max: 39

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc130260390520650SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 7.91, N = 7599.23609.15
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc110220330440550Min: 597.94 / Avg: 599.23 / Max: 600.26Min: 563.03 / Avg: 609.15 / Max: 623.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc714212835SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 328.4630.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc714212835Min: 27.72 / Avg: 28.46 / Max: 29Min: 30.41 / Avg: 30.45 / Max: 30.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc70140210280350SE +/- 3.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3296.59317.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10nuc60120180240300Min: 288.92 / Avg: 296.59 / Max: 302.22Min: 316.88 / Avg: 317.29 / Max: 317.87

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingWindows 10nuc3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 372.57, N = 19SE +/- 121.65, N = 416095.4415131.51
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingWindows 10nuc3K6K9K12K15KMin: 15659.12 / Avg: 16095.44 / Max: 22800.59Min: 14828.65 / Avg: 15131.51 / Max: 15361.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingWindows 10nuc600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 23763.22, N = 20SE +/- 7232.94, N = 41999042.792996282.27
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingWindows 10nuc500K1000K1500K2000K2500KMin: 1773471.04 / Avg: 1999042.79 / Max: 2201501Min: 2976982.39 / Avg: 2996282.27 / Max: 3011597.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsWindows 10nuc400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 9591.59, N = 4SE +/- 6072.83, N = 41109689.701664660.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsWindows 10nuc300K600K900K1200K1500KMin: 1084158.69 / Avg: 1109689.7 / Max: 1129612.96Min: 1647310.09 / Avg: 1664660.73 / Max: 1673825.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingWindows 10nuc300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 7805.30, N = 11SE +/- 4422.82, N = 4868575.401171443.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingWindows 10nuc200K400K600K800K1000KMin: 810636.57 / Avg: 868575.4 / Max: 894452.31Min: 1163543.01 / Avg: 1171443.24 / Max: 1181491.75

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 1030060090012001500SE +/- 9.07, N = 31198

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 14.53, N = 3SE +/- 25.50, N = 31293410679
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc2K4K6K8K10KMin: 12911 / Avg: 12934.33 / Max: 12961Min: 10649 / Avg: 10679.33 / Max: 10730

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc30060090012001500SE +/- 43.30, N = 15SE +/- 15.30, N = 315951344
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc30060090012001500Min: 1350 / Avg: 1595.4 / Max: 1844Min: 1314 / Avg: 1343.67 / Max: 1365

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 108001600240032004000SE +/- 42.72, N = 33535

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 3797.56, N = 15SE +/- 77.74, N = 314074589158
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc20K40K60K80K100KMin: 125721 / Avg: 140745.07 / Max: 165402Min: 89074 / Avg: 89157.67 / Max: 89313

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc80160240320400SE +/- 7.14, N = 15348256
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc60120180240300Min: 309 / Avg: 347.87 / Max: 384

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc2004006008001000SE +/- 13.87, N = 3998675
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10nuc2004006008001000Min: 973 / Avg: 997.67 / Max: 1021

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10nuc2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 100.24, N = 3SE +/- 158.18, N = 311289110901. firefox 69.0.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10nuc2K4K6K8K10KMin: 11177 / Avg: 11289 / Max: 11489Min: 10799 / Avg: 11090 / Max: 113431. firefox 69.0.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10nuc4080120160200SE +/- 2.80, N = 3SE +/- 7.69, N = 6186.61132.651. firefox 69.0.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10nuc306090120150Min: 182.55 / Avg: 186.61 / Max: 191.98Min: 112.09 / Avg: 132.65 / Max: 165.31. firefox 69.0.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10nuc3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 155.11, N = 6SE +/- 220.26, N = 313821142071. chrome 77.0.3865.120
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10nuc2K4K6K8K10KMin: 13228 / Avg: 13820.83 / Max: 14248Min: 13768 / Avg: 14207.33 / Max: 144551. chrome 77.0.3865.120

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10nuc60120180240300SE +/- 4.49, N = 9SE +/- 4.16, N = 3259.26295.371. chrome 77.0.3865.120
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10nuc50100150200250Min: 236.03 / Avg: 259.26 / Max: 276.29Min: 287.64 / Avg: 295.37 / Max: 301.921. chrome 77.0.3865.120