ERROR: This option is not supported in this configuration.ERROR: This option is not supported in this configuration.

MUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 testing with a Supermicro X10DRG-O(T)+-CPU v1.00 (3.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe 11GB on Arch rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1910206-STAT-MUSESTA50
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Perf-Per
Dollar
Date
Triggered
  Test
  Duration
llvmpipe
October 19 2019
  41 Minutes
MUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance
October 19 2019
  41 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


MUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalanceOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.2.02 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads)Supermicro X10DRG-O(T)+-CPU v1.00 (3.1 BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon64512MB2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 860 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000NX0313llvmpipe 11GBNVIDIA TU102 HD AudioASUS VH242H2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2Arch rolling5.3.7-arch1-1-ARCH (x86_64)X Server 1.20.5modesetting 1.20.53.3 Mesa 19.2.1 (LLVM 9.0 256 bits)GCC 9.2.0 + CUDA 10.1xfs1920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance BenchmarksSystem LogsOPC Classification- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling

MUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalancengc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP16ngc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP32ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP32ngc-tensorflow: Googlenet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: Googlenet, FP32ngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP16ngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP32ngc-tensorflow: Inception v4, FP16ngc-tensorflow: Inception v4, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance205.53148.904266.703170.03936.30725.20396.57262.13107.7377.10206.07149.074264.633167.03936.90726.33398.03260.70107.6777.17OpenBenchmarking.org

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

This test profile uses the NVIDIA GPU Cloud (NGC/nvcr.io) for running the TensorFlow image inside Docker for benchmarking. You must have already signed into NGC for this test profile to work. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance50100150200250SE +/- 0.94, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3205.53206.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance4080120160200Min: 204.1 / Avg: 205.53 / Max: 207.3Min: 204.6 / Avg: 206.07 / Max: 207.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance306090120150SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3148.90149.07
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance306090120150Min: 148.8 / Avg: 148.9 / Max: 149Min: 148.9 / Avg: 149.07 / Max: 149.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance9001800270036004500SE +/- 5.48, N = 3SE +/- 3.69, N = 34266.704264.63
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance7001400210028003500Min: 4260.2 / Avg: 4266.7 / Max: 4277.6Min: 4257.6 / Avg: 4264.63 / Max: 4270.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance7001400210028003500SE +/- 7.19, N = 3SE +/- 3.13, N = 33170.033167.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance6001200180024003000Min: 3162.3 / Avg: 3170.03 / Max: 3184.4Min: 3162.4 / Avg: 3167.03 / Max: 3173

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance2004006008001000SE +/- 1.63, N = 3SE +/- 2.33, N = 3936.30936.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance160320480640800Min: 934.2 / Avg: 936.3 / Max: 939.5Min: 932.6 / Avg: 936.9 / Max: 940.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance160320480640800SE +/- 0.42, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3725.20726.33
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance130260390520650Min: 724.4 / Avg: 725.2 / Max: 725.8Min: 725.6 / Avg: 726.33 / Max: 726.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance90180270360450SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 1.03, N = 3396.57398.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance70140210280350Min: 396.3 / Avg: 396.57 / Max: 396.7Min: 396.1 / Avg: 398.03 / Max: 399.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance60120180240300SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 1.10, N = 3262.13260.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance50100150200250Min: 261.5 / Avg: 262.13 / Max: 262.9Min: 258.5 / Avg: 260.7 / Max: 261.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance20406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3107.73107.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance20406080100Min: 107.4 / Avg: 107.73 / Max: 108Min: 107 / Avg: 107.67 / Max: 108.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance20406080100SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 377.1077.17
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP32llvmpipeMUSE-Stable-IOMMU-irqbalance1530456075Min: 76.9 / Avg: 77.1 / Max: 77.3Min: 76.8 / Avg: 77.17 / Max: 77.4


OpenBenchmarking.org Community User Comments

Post A Comment