GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs. GeForce GTX 1650 benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1905124-HV-GTX650VSG61
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 7 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 3 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Steam 7 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GTX 650
May 12 2019
  5 Hours, 11 Minutes
GTX 1650
May 12 2019
  2 Hours, 20 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  3 Hours, 46 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

GTX 650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 384
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

GTX 1650

Changed Graphics to ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz).

OpenCL Change: GPU Compute Cores: 896

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENTMSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz)Realtek ALC1220DELL P2415QIntel I219-VUbuntu 19.045.0.0-13-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.32.0X Server 1.20.4NVIDIA 430.094.6.0OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.1201.1.99GCC 8.3.0ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionGTX 650 Vs. GTX 1650 BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GTX 650: GPU Compute Cores: 384- GTX 1650: GPU Compute Cores: 896- Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+491.9%+491.9%+983.8%+983.8%+1475.7%+1475.7%577%474.4%364.5%351.6%347.8%347%345.8%313.6%308.6%298.4%298.3%274.6%273.1%267.8%267.8%249.2%248.6%248.2%226.2%217.6%1967.4%192.1%124.4%124.4%105.3%1223%1175.4%94.4%45.3%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - High Quality1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLWavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battle1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Point1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - H.G.a.D.i.D1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Stronghold1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - LandmoverMany Spheres - 1920 x 1080Many Spheres - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - High1920 x 1080 - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - Vulkan1920 x 1080ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms1920 x 1080Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Ultra1920 x 1080 - Medium1920 x 1080 - High Quality1920 x 1080 - High1920 x 1080Unigine SuperpositionF1 2018Total War: WARHAMMER IIUnigine SuperpositionParaViewParaViewTotal War: WARHAMMER IIMad MaxMad MaxOpenArenaMad MaxUnigine HeavenMad MaxParaViewParaViewUnigine ValleyTomb RaiderDota 2Dota 2PortalNAMD CUDATesseractParaViewParaViewXonoticHITMANDeus Ex: Mankind DividedXonoticGLmark2GTX 650GTX 1650

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLdota2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLdota2: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkantesseract: 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraopenarena: 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080deus-exmd: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualityf12018: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualityhitman: 1920 x 1080 - Mediummadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Pointmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Strongholdmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Hope, Glory, and Dog is Deadmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmoverportal: 1920 x 1080tww2: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battletomb-raider: 1920 x 1080 - Highglmark2: 1920 x 1080namd-cuda: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsGTX 650GTX 165017.3020.069.924.8340.0743.031262341691284.5345423.7424782.4813203.17394.9223.5422.7423.0229.1716513.9311.7729.3015947.7394164.8170.0544.8032.70139.53140.3736845534751016.661670106.111106185.11296240.4322465.0997.3790.5894.07108.8352464.7052.47102.1323160.37435OpenBenchmarking.org

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501428425670SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 364.8117.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501326395265Min: 64.74 / Avg: 64.81 / Max: 64.87Min: 17.27 / Avg: 17.3 / Max: 17.31

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.11930.23860.35790.47720.59650.530.16

MinAvgMaxGTX 165037.6123.1126.6GTX 65043.7110.0113.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501632486480SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 370.0520.06
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501428425670Min: 70.03 / Avg: 70.05 / Max: 70.08Min: 20.04 / Avg: 20.06 / Max: 20.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.1260.2520.3780.5040.630.560.18

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.7125.9130.7GTX 65040.6111.4116.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501020304050SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 1244.809.92MAX: 56.1MAX: 13.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650918273645Min: 44.8 / Avg: 44.8 / Max: 44.8Min: 9.5 / Avg: 9.92 / Max: 10.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.350.09

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.9126.5132.0GTX 65042.6109.1113.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 332.704.83MAX: 38.9MAX: 5.7
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650714212835Min: 32.7 / Avg: 32.7 / Max: 32.7Min: 4.8 / Avg: 4.83 / Max: 4.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.05850.1170.17550.2340.29250.260.05

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.6125.6131.1GTX 65042.1103.5107.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150SE +/- 1.31, N = 9SE +/- 0.03, N = 3139.5340.07MIN: 129.1 / MAX: 141.5MIN: 40 / MAX: 40.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150Min: 129.1 / Avg: 139.53 / Max: 141.5Min: 40 / Avg: 40.07 / Max: 40.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.2970.5940.8911.1881.4851.320.36

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.0105.3165.6GTX 65042.2111.2132.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3140.3743.03MIN: 138.7 / MAX: 142.2MIN: 43 / MAX: 43.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150Min: 138.7 / Avg: 140.37 / Max: 142.2Min: 43 / Avg: 43.03 / Max: 43.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650GTX 6500.29480.58960.88441.17921.4741.310.46

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.5107.5152.5GTX 65042.493.5119.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65080160240320400SE +/- 2.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3368126
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65070140210280350Min: 363.46 / Avg: 367.91 / Max: 371.47Min: 125.44 / Avg: 126.19 / Max: 126.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6500.7831.5662.3493.1323.9153.481.43

MinAvgMaxGTX 165050.1105.8117.5GTX 65042.588.196.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 650100200300400500SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3455234MIN: 282 / MAX: 673MIN: 134 / MAX: 298
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 65080160240320400Min: 453.44 / Avg: 454.51 / Max: 455.64Min: 233.6 / Avg: 233.79 / Max: 233.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 6501.04632.09263.13894.18525.23154.652.23

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.897.7120.7GTX 65041.9105.0114.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 65080160240320400SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3347169MIN: 208 / MAX: 524MIN: 85 / MAX: 248
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 65060120180240300Min: 345.93 / Avg: 347.23 / Max: 347.99Min: 169.28 / Avg: 169.3 / Max: 169.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 6500.73351.4672.20052.9343.66753.261.56

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.8106.6128.4GTX 65042.1108.2115.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenArena

This is a test of OpenArena, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game is based upon ioquake3, which in turn uses the GPL version of id Software's Quake 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650110220330440550SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3510128MIN: 1MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65090180270360450Min: 509.2 / Avg: 509.73 / Max: 510.7Min: 127.7 / Avg: 127.7 / Max: 127.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 65048121620Min: 1 / Avg: 1.95 / Max: 12Min: 1 / Avg: 7.81 / Max: 14

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.488.5131.5GTX 65041.296.8104.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65048121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 1216.664.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65048121620Min: 16.65 / Avg: 16.66 / Max: 16.67Min: 0.12 / Avg: 4.53 / Max: 4.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650400800120016002000SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 40.18, N = 121670454
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65030060090012001500Min: 1669.02 / Avg: 1669.84 / Max: 1671.36Min: 11.66 / Avg: 453.65 / Max: 494.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65051015202520.875.31

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.180.0123.2GTX 65040.885.5116.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65020406080100SE +/- 1.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3106.1123.74
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65020406080100Min: 102.76 / Avg: 106.11 / Max: 108.88Min: 23.72 / Avg: 23.74 / Max: 23.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6502004006008001000SE +/- 18.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 31106247
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6502004006008001000Min: 1070.92 / Avg: 1105.84 / Max: 1134.63Min: 247.24 / Avg: 247.38 / Max: 247.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6504812162017.133.33

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.964.579.4GTX 65041.174.390.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6504080120160200SE +/- 1.99, N = 15SE +/- 0.22, N = 3185.1182.48
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650306090120150Min: 176.26 / Avg: 185.11 / Max: 197.58Min: 82.22 / Avg: 82.48 / Max: 82.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6506001200180024003000SE +/- 31.76, N = 15SE +/- 3.46, N = 329621320
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6505001000150020002500Min: 2820.09 / Avg: 2961.82 / Max: 3161.34Min: 1315.53 / Avg: 1319.77 / Max: 1326.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650132639526558.1423.50

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

This is a benchmark of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 650918273645SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 340.433.17MIN: 32.3 / MAX: 52.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 650816243240Min: 40.3 / Avg: 40.43 / Max: 40.6Min: 3.1 / Avg: 3.17 / Max: 3.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 6500.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.350.03

MinAvgMaxGTX 165043.9115.4155.7GTX 65045.598.9108.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

F1 2018

This is a benchmark of F1 2018 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 6505010015020025022439MIN: 196 / MAX: 263MIN: 33 / MAX: 46

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 6500.10350.2070.31050.4140.51750.46

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.1134.3171.9GTX 65043.485.3176.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

HITMAN

This is a benchmark of HITMAN on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: MediumGTX 1650GTX 6501530456075SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 365.094.92MIN: 64.91 / MAX: 65.38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: MediumGTX 1650GTX 6501326395265Min: 64.91 / Avg: 65.09 / Max: 65.38Min: 4.87 / Avg: 4.92 / Max: 4.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Medium - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 650160320480640800Min: 3.91 / Avg: 15.41 / Max: 89.05Min: 10.37 / Avg: 201.83 / Max: 884.96

MinAvgMaxGTX 165041.2143.8169.1GTX 65051.6107.3119.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMANSystem Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

Mad Max

This is a benchmark of Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Camp Hollow PointGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010097.3723.54MIN: 54.45 / MAX: 99.42MIN: 22.21 / MAX: 24.12

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: StrongholdGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010090.5822.74MIN: 88.18 / MAX: 96.66MIN: 21.49 / MAX: 23.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Hope, Glory, and Dog is DeadGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010094.0723.02MIN: 19.92 / MAX: 124.12MIN: 9.99 / MAX: 36.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: LandmoverGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100108.8329.17MIN: 17.9 / MAX: 2652.52MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 883.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: LandmoverGTX 1650GTX 6500.19580.39160.58740.78320.9790.870.35

MinAvgMaxGTX 165040.1125.7144.8GTX 65049.783.4106.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterMad MaxSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Portal

This is a benchmark of Valve's Portal game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650110220330440550SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3524165
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65090180270360450Min: 523.48 / Avg: 524.15 / Max: 525.32Min: 164.71 / Avg: 165.13 / Max: 165.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6502468106.331.72

MinAvgMaxGTX 165050.082.9138.7GTX 65056.396.0119.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortalSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501428425670SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 364.7013.93MIN: 11.8 / MAX: 240MIN: 5.7 / MAX: 252.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501326395265Min: 64 / Avg: 64.7 / Max: 65.8Min: 13.9 / Avg: 13.93 / Max: 14

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100Min: 5 / Avg: 15.19 / Max: 66.7Min: 4.2 / Avg: 71.55 / Max: 130.4

MinAvgMaxGTX 165044.4114.5146.4GTX 65048.697.1131.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501224364860SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 352.4711.77MIN: 13.8 / MAX: 194.4MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 207.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501122334455Min: 52.3 / Avg: 52.47 / Max: 52.8Min: 11.7 / Avg: 11.77 / Max: 11.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150Min: 5.4 / Avg: 19.1 / Max: 49.2Min: 5.7 / Avg: 85.78 / Max: 157.1

MinAvgMaxGTX 165040.3115.7146.0GTX 65047.597.6146.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3102.1329.30MIN: 79.1 / MAX: 119.5MIN: 23.4 / MAX: 35
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100Min: 101.5 / Avg: 102.13 / Max: 102.5Min: 29.3 / Avg: 29.3 / Max: 29.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 6500.17550.3510.52650.7020.87750.780.26

MinAvgMaxGTX 165051.0130.2150.3GTX 65047.3112.4120.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

GLmark2

This is a test of Linaro's glmark2 port, currently using the X11 OpenGL 2.0 target. GLmark2 is a basic OpenGL benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650500100015002000250023161594

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65051015202522.1115.50

MinAvgMaxGTX 165056.3104.8127.4GTX 65047.5102.8118.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGLmark2 276System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

NAMD CUDA

NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This version of the NAMD test profile uses CUDA GPU acceleration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsGTX 1650GTX 650246810SE +/- 0.00253, N = 3SE +/- 0.06210, N = 30.374357.73941
OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsGTX 1650GTX 6503691215Min: 0.37 / Avg: 0.37 / Max: 0.38Min: 7.62 / Avg: 7.74 / Max: 7.83

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.6150.7204.0GTX 65046.8169.1172.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

Meta Performance Per Watt

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattPerformance Per WattGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150143.5146.78

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 1650GTX 6504080120160200Min: 37.6 / Avg: 120.16 / Max: 204Min: 40.6 / Avg: 106.58 / Max: 177.8

Harmonic Mean Of Frames Per Second Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHarmonic Mean Of Frames Per Second Test ResultsHarmonic MeanGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010088.0315.05

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterGeometric Mean Of All Test ResultsResult Composite - GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650GTX 1650GTX 6504080120160200169.1041.53

77 Results Shown

Unigine Heaven
Unigine Heaven:
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Unigine Valley
Unigine Valley:
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Superposition:
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Superposition:
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Dota 2
Dota 2:
  1920 x 1080 - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Dota 2
Dota 2:
  1920 x 1080 - Vulkan
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Tesseract
Tesseract:
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Xonotic
Xonotic:
  1920 x 1080 - High
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Xonotic
Xonotic:
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra
  System Power Consumption Monitor
OpenArena
OpenArena:
  1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time
  System Power Consumption Monitor
ParaView:
  Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
ParaView:
  Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
ParaView:
  Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
ParaView:
  Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
ParaView:
  Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
ParaView
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided:
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  System Power Consumption Monitor
F1 2018
F1 2018:
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  System Power Consumption Monitor
HITMAN
HITMAN:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Total Frame Time
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Mad Max:
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Point
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Stronghold
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Hope, Glory, and Dog is Dead
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmover
Mad Max:
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmover
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Portal
Portal:
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II:
  1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II:
  1920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider:
  1920 x 1080 - High
  System Power Consumption Monitor
GLmark2
GLmark2:
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NAMD CUDA
NAMD CUDA:
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Performance Per Watt
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Harmonic Mean
  Result Composite - GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650

GTX 650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 384
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 12 May 2019 09:23 by user phoronix.

GTX 1650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 896
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 12 May 2019 14:12 by user phoronix.