GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs. GeForce GTX 1650 benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1905124-HV-GTX650VSG61
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GTX 650
May 12 2019
  5 Hours, 11 Minutes
GTX 1650
May 12 2019
  2 Hours, 20 Minutes
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
  3 Hours, 46 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

GTX 650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 384
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

GTX 1650

Changed Graphics to ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz).

OpenCL Change: GPU Compute Cores: 896

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENTMSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz)ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz)Realtek ALC1220DELL P2415QIntel I219-VUbuntu 19.045.0.0-13-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.32.0X Server 1.20.4NVIDIA 430.094.6.0OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.1201.1.99GCC 8.3.0ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionGTX 650 Vs. GTX 1650 BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GTX 650: GPU Compute Cores: 384- GTX 1650: GPU Compute Cores: 896- Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+491.9%+491.9%+983.8%+983.8%+1475.7%+1475.7%577%474.4%364.5%351.6%347.8%347%345.8%313.6%308.6%298.4%298.3%274.6%273.1%267.8%267.8%249.2%248.6%248.2%226.2%217.6%1967.4%192.1%124.4%124.4%105.3%1223%1175.4%94.4%45.3%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - High Quality1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLWavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battle1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Point1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - H.G.a.D.i.D1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Stronghold1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - LandmoverMany Spheres - 1920 x 1080Many Spheres - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - High1920 x 1080 - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - Vulkan1920 x 1080ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms1920 x 1080Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Ultra1920 x 1080 - Medium1920 x 1080 - High Quality1920 x 1080 - High1920 x 1080Unigine SuperpositionF1 2018Total War: WARHAMMER IIUnigine SuperpositionParaViewParaViewTotal War: WARHAMMER IIMad MaxMad MaxOpenArenaMad MaxUnigine HeavenMad MaxParaViewParaViewUnigine ValleyTomb RaiderDota 2Dota 2PortalNAMD CUDATesseractParaViewParaViewXonoticHITMANDeus Ex: Mankind DividedXonoticGLmark2GTX 650GTX 1650

GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLdeus-exmd: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualityunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmovermadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Hope, Glory, and Dog is Deadmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Strongholdmadmax: 1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Pointhitman: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumunigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLnamd-cuda: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atomsf12018: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualityglmark2: 1920 x 1080tww2: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battleparaview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080tomb-raider: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultradota2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Hightesseract: 1920 x 1080dota2: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkanportal: 1920 x 1080openarena: 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080GTX 650GTX 16509.923.1717.3029.1723.0222.7423.544.924.8320.067.7394139159413.9311.774544.5329.3016940.0723412643.03165128132082.4824723.7444.8040.4364.81108.8394.0790.5897.3765.0932.7070.050.37435224231664.7052.47167016.66102.13347139.53455368140.375245102962185.111106106.11OpenBenchmarking.org

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501020304050SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 1244.809.92MAX: 56.1MAX: 13.2

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

This is a benchmark of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 650918273645SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 340.433.17MIN: 32.3 / MAX: 52.9

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501428425670SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 364.8117.30

Mad Max

This is a benchmark of Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: LandmoverGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100108.8329.17MIN: 17.9 / MAX: 2652.52MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 883.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Hope, Glory, and Dog is DeadGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010094.0723.02MIN: 19.92 / MAX: 124.12MIN: 9.99 / MAX: 36.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: StrongholdGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010090.5822.74MIN: 88.18 / MAX: 96.66MIN: 21.49 / MAX: 23.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Camp Hollow PointGTX 1650GTX 6502040608010097.3723.54MIN: 54.45 / MAX: 99.42MIN: 22.21 / MAX: 24.12

HITMAN

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Medium - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 650160320480640800Min: 3.91 / Avg: 15.41 / Max: 89.05Min: 10.37 / Avg: 201.83 / Max: 884.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: MediumGTX 1650GTX 6501530456075SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 365.094.92MIN: 64.91 / MAX: 65.38

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 332.704.83MAX: 38.9MAX: 5.7

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6501632486480SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 370.0520.06

NAMD CUDA

NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This version of the NAMD test profile uses CUDA GPU acceleration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsGTX 1650GTX 650246810SE +/- 0.00253, N = 3SE +/- 0.06210, N = 30.374357.73941

F1 2018

This is a benchmark of F1 2018 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 6505010015020025022439MIN: 196 / MAX: 263MIN: 33 / MAX: 46

GLmark2

This is a test of Linaro's glmark2 port, currently using the X11 OpenGL 2.0 target. GLmark2 is a basic OpenGL benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650500100015002000250023161594

Total War: WARHAMMER II

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100Min: 5 / Avg: 15.19 / Max: 66.7Min: 4.2 / Avg: 71.55 / Max: 130.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501428425670SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 364.7013.93MIN: 11.8 / MAX: 240MIN: 5.7 / MAX: 252.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150Min: 5.4 / Avg: 19.1 / Max: 49.2Min: 5.7 / Avg: 85.78 / Max: 157.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleGTX 1650GTX 6501224364860SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 352.4711.77MIN: 13.8 / MAX: 194.4MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 207.1

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650400800120016002000SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 40.18, N = 121670454

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65048121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 1216.664.53

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 65020406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3102.1329.30MIN: 79.1 / MAX: 119.5MIN: 23.4 / MAX: 35

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 65080160240320400SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3347169MIN: 208 / MAX: 524MIN: 85 / MAX: 248

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150SE +/- 1.31, N = 9SE +/- 0.03, N = 3139.5340.07MIN: 129.1 / MAX: 141.5MIN: 40 / MAX: 40.1

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 650100200300400500SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3455234MIN: 282 / MAX: 673MIN: 134 / MAX: 298

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65080160240320400SE +/- 2.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3368126

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3140.3743.03MIN: 138.7 / MAX: 142.2MIN: 43 / MAX: 43.1

Portal

This is a benchmark of Valve's Portal game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650110220330440550SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3524165

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeGTX 1650GTX 65048121620Min: 1 / Avg: 1.95 / Max: 12Min: 1 / Avg: 7.81 / Max: 14

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650110220330440550SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3510128MIN: 1MIN: 1

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6506001200180024003000SE +/- 31.76, N = 15SE +/- 3.46, N = 329621320

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6504080120160200SE +/- 1.99, N = 15SE +/- 0.22, N = 3185.1182.48

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6502004006008001000SE +/- 18.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 31106247

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65020406080100SE +/- 1.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3106.1123.74

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 1650GTX 6504080120160200Min: 37.6 / Avg: 120.16 / Max: 204Min: 40.6 / Avg: 106.58 / Max: 177.8

Meta Performance Per Watt

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattPerformance Per WattGTX 1650GTX 650306090120150143.5146.78

NAMD CUDA

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.6150.7204.0GTX 65046.8169.1172.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNAMD CUDA 2.13System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

GLmark2

MinAvgMaxGTX 165056.3104.8127.4GTX 65047.5102.8118.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGLmark2 276System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterGLmark2 276Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65051015202522.1115.50

Tomb Raider

MinAvgMaxGTX 165051.0130.2150.3GTX 65047.3112.4120.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 6500.17550.3510.52650.7020.87750.780.26

Total War: WARHAMMER II

MinAvgMaxGTX 165040.3115.7146.0GTX 65047.597.6146.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxGTX 165044.4114.5146.4GTX 65048.697.1131.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Portal

MinAvgMaxGTX 165050.082.9138.7GTX 65056.396.0119.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortalSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6502468106.331.72

Mad Max

MinAvgMaxGTX 165040.1125.7144.8GTX 65049.783.4106.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterMad MaxSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterMad MaxResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: LandmoverGTX 1650GTX 6500.19580.39160.58740.78320.9790.870.35

HITMAN

MinAvgMaxGTX 165041.2143.8169.1GTX 65051.6107.3119.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMANSystem Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

F1 2018

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.1134.3171.9GTX 65043.485.3176.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2018System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterF1 2018Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 6500.10350.2070.31050.4140.51750.46

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

MinAvgMaxGTX 165043.9115.4155.7GTX 65045.598.9108.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedSystem Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityGTX 1650GTX 6500.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.350.03

ParaView

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 650132639526558.1423.50

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.964.579.4GTX 65041.174.390.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6504812162017.133.33

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.180.0123.2GTX 65040.885.5116.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 65051015202520.875.31

OpenArena

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.488.5131.5GTX 65041.296.8104.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Xonotic

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.8106.6128.4GTX 65042.1108.2115.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 1650GTX 6500.73351.4672.20052.9343.66753.261.56

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.897.7120.7GTX 65041.9105.0114.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighGTX 1650GTX 6501.04632.09263.13894.18525.23154.652.23

Tesseract

MinAvgMaxGTX 165050.1105.8117.5GTX 65042.588.196.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080GTX 1650GTX 6500.7831.5662.3493.1323.9153.481.43

Dota 2

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.5107.5152.5GTX 65042.493.5119.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanGTX 1650GTX 6500.29480.58960.88441.17921.4741.310.46

MinAvgMaxGTX 165049.0105.3165.6GTX 65042.2111.2132.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2System Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.2970.5940.8911.1881.4851.320.36

Unigine Superposition

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.6125.6131.1GTX 65042.1103.5107.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.05850.1170.17550.2340.29250.260.05

MinAvgMaxGTX 165038.9126.5132.0GTX 65042.6109.1113.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.350.09

Unigine Valley

MinAvgMaxGTX 165039.7125.9130.7GTX 65040.6111.4116.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.1260.2520.3780.5040.630.560.18

Unigine Heaven

MinAvgMaxGTX 165037.6123.1126.6GTX 65043.7110.0113.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLGTX 1650GTX 6500.11930.23860.35790.47720.59650.530.16

75 Results Shown

Unigine Superposition
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Unigine Heaven
Mad Max:
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmover
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Hope, Glory, and Dog is Dead
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Stronghold
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Camp Hollow Point
HITMAN
HITMAN
Unigine Superposition
Unigine Valley
NAMD CUDA
F1 2018
GLmark2
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
Total War: WARHAMMER II
ParaView:
  Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080:
    MiPolys / Sec
    Frames / Sec
Tomb Raider
Xonotic
Dota 2
Xonotic
Tesseract
Dota 2
Portal
OpenArena
OpenArena
ParaView:
  Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080:
    MiVoxels / Sec
    Frames / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080:
    MiPolys / Sec
    Frames / Sec
System Power Consumption Monitor:
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Performance Per Watt
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - High
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Default - Vulkan - Landmover
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - High Quality
  Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - High
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Vulkan
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL

GTX 650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 384
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 12 May 2019 09:23 by user phoronix.

GTX 1650

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V

OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
OpenCL Notes: GPU Compute Cores: 896
Python Notes: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 12 May 2019 14:12 by user phoronix.