win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019

win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019 asus gx501vk zeph

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1903122-SK-1901295SK71
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019
January 29 2019
  1 Hour, 30 Minutes
win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019
March 11 2019
  1 Hour, 2 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 16 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019

Processor: Intel Core i7-7700HQ @ 2.81GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS GX501VIK, Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 2400MHz Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC, Disk: 932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB Device, Graphics: DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design 8GB (1708/5005MHz), Network: Realtek USB GbE Family #2 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) + DisplayLink

OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Home Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 398.35 (8.3.2008.0), File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Java Notes: Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11)
Python Notes: Python 2.7.15

win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019

Changed Disk to 932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 954GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB Device.

win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-7700HQ @ 2.81GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)ASUS GX501VIK2 x 8192 MB 2400MHz Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB Device932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 954GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB DeviceDisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design 8GB (1708/5005MHz)Realtek USB GbE Family #2 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) + DisplayLinkMicrosoft Windows 10 Home Build 1713410.0 (x86_64)398.35 (8.3.2008.0)NTFS1920x1080ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDisksGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverFile-SystemScreen ResolutionWin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11)- win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019: Python 2.7.15

win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019 vs. win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+15.3%+15.3%+30.6%+30.6%+45.9%+45.9%Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen61%Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen39.9%Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen28.9%TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen17.5%GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen10.1%1920 x 1080 - Yes - On8.8%1920 x 10805.2%Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen5%1920 x 1080 - Ultimate3.8%Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen3.3%1920 x 1080 - Yes - Off2.8%GpuTestGpuTestGpuTestGpuTestGpuTestNexuizOpenArenaGpuTestXonoticGpuTestNexuizwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019

win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019lightsmark: 1920 x 1080nexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - Onnexuiz: 1920 x 1080 - Yes - Offopenarena: 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimateoctanebench: Total Scorej2dbench: All Rendering Testsgputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019127817318528316414810010602786210570275062177719607621607036159180269158147994738271417555846621853815207520906704OpenBenchmarking.org

Lightsmark

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Lightsmark 2008. Lightsmark is an OpenGL real-time global illumination and penumbra shadow benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterLightsmark 2008Resolution: 1920 x 1080win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan201930060090012001500SE +/- 31.90, N = 91278

Nexuiz

This is a benchmark of Nexuiz, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the DarkPlaces engine, which is a largely modified version of the Quake engine with extra features such as High Dynamic Range rendering and OpenGL 2.0 shaders. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Onwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20194080120160200SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3173159MIN: 100 / MAX: 442MIN: 89 / MAX: 417
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Onwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019306090120150Min: 170.73 / Avg: 172.57 / Max: 174.67Min: 158.74 / Avg: 159.47 / Max: 160.32

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Offwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20194080120160200SE +/- 1.85, N = 3SE +/- 2.79, N = 3185180MIN: 110 / MAX: 541MIN: 90 / MAX: 606
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Offwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019306090120150Min: 182.01 / Avg: 184.98 / Max: 188.39Min: 175.93 / Avg: 180.43 / Max: 185.53

OpenArena

This is a test of OpenArena, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game is based upon ioquake3, which in turn uses the GPL version of id Software's Quake 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201960120180240300SE +/- 0.73, N = 3SE +/- 2.18, N = 3283269MIN: 1MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201950100150200250Min: 281.9 / Avg: 283.23 / Max: 284.4Min: 265.2 / Avg: 268.67 / Max: 272.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Timewin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019918273645Min: 1 / Avg: 3.47 / Max: 18Min: 1 / Avg: 3.6 / Max: 46

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimatewin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20194080120160200SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 2.38, N = 3164158MIN: 34 / MAX: 408MIN: 26 / MAX: 375
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimatewin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019306090120150Min: 163.76 / Avg: 164.18 / Max: 164.67Min: 153.65 / Avg: 157.5 / Max: 161.86

OctaneBench

OctaneBench is a test of the OctaneRender on the GPU and requires the use of NVIDIA CUDA. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterOctaneBench 4.00Total Scorewin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019306090120150148147

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering Testswin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20192M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 33151.42, N = 4SE +/- 55491.99, N = 4100106029947382
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering Testswin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20192M4M6M8M10MMin: 9926815.54 / Avg: 10010601.82 / Max: 10078356.22Min: 9826656.7 / Avg: 9947381.85 / Max: 10088869.71

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20192K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 39.06, N = 3SE +/- 45.89, N = 378627141
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201914002800420056007000Min: 7803 / Avg: 7862.33 / Max: 7936Min: 7074 / Avg: 7141.33 / Max: 7229

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201920K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1469.37, N = 3SE +/- 287.92, N = 310570275558
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201920K40K60K80K100KMin: 102957 / Avg: 105702.33 / Max: 107983Min: 75001 / Avg: 75558 / Max: 75963

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201916003200480064008000SE +/- 47.50, N = 3SE +/- 5.69, N = 375064662
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201913002600390052006500Min: 7458 / Avg: 7506 / Max: 7601Min: 4654 / Avg: 4662 / Max: 4673

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20195K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 73.55, N = 3SE +/- 77.67, N = 32177718538
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20194K8K12K16K20KMin: 21633 / Avg: 21777 / Max: 21875Min: 18421 / Avg: 18538 / Max: 18685

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201940K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 3920.14, N = 12SE +/- 765.64, N = 3196076152075
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201930K60K90K120K150KMin: 180196 / Avg: 196076.42 / Max: 210954Min: 150672 / Avg: 152074.67 / Max: 153308

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar20195001000150020002500SE +/- 16.46, N = 3SE +/- 23.97, N = 321602090
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019400800120016002000Min: 2132 / Avg: 2160 / Max: 2189Min: 2048 / Avg: 2090 / Max: 2131

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201915003000450060007500SE +/- 31.18, N = 3SE +/- 47.37, N = 370366704
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreenwin10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar201912002400360048006000Min: 6983 / Avg: 7036.33 / Max: 7091Min: 6628 / Avg: 6704 / Max: 6791

win10-h02_graphics-bench_29Jan2019

Processor: Intel Core i7-7700HQ @ 2.81GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS GX501VIK, Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 2400MHz Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC, Disk: 932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB Device, Graphics: DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design 8GB (1708/5005MHz), Network: Realtek USB GbE Family #2 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) + DisplayLink

OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Home Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 398.35 (8.3.2008.0), File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Java Notes: Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11)
Python Notes: Python 2.7.15

Testing initiated at 29 January 2019 15:04 by user Chi.

win10-h02_graphics-bench_11mar2019

Processor: Intel Core i7-7700HQ @ 2.81GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS GX501VIK, Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 2400MHz Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC, Disk: 932GB ATA Samsung SSD 840 USB Device + 954GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 0GB Generic SD/MMC USB Device + 932GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 477GB SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-00000 + 477GB Inateck SCSI Disk Device + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable USB Device + 0GB Generic Micro SD/M2 USB Device, Graphics: DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design 8GB (1708/5005MHz), Network: Realtek USB GbE Family #2 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + Bluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Bluetooth Device (RFCOMM Protocol TDI) + DisplayLink

OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Home Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 398.35 (8.3.2008.0), File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Java Notes: Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11)

Testing initiated at 11 March 2019 19:51 by user Chi.