Windows Server 2019 vs. Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu - AMD Threadripper

Adding Epyc 7551P testing in UMA, NUMA and with bcdedit /set groupsize 16 for a video at Level1 by Wendell (@tekwendell)

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1901136-SP-1901068SP78
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 4 Tests
CPU Massive 12 Tests
Creator Workloads 7 Tests
Encoding 3 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Multi-Core 8 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 8 Tests
Single-Threaded 6 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per RAM Channel Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows Server 2019
January 05 2019
  1 Hour, 21 Minutes
Windows 10
January 05 2019
  1 Hour, 27 Minutes
Windows 10 + NUMA Dissociater
January 06 2019
  1 Hour, 16 Minutes
Ubuntu 18.10
January 06 2019
  1 Hour, 9 Minutes
Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P
January 07 2019
  1 Hour, 29 Minutes
Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMA
January 09 2019
  1 Hour, 7 Minutes
Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdedit
January 09 2019
  1 Hour, 15 Minutes
Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrio
January 10 2019
  1 Hour, 14 Minutes
Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio
January 12 2019
  1 Hour, 34 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 19 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows Server 2019 vs. Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu - AMD ThreadripperProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkChipsetAudioMonitorOSKernelDisplay DriverFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenCLCompilerDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrioAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME4 x 8192 MB 1600MHz Unknown F4-3200C14-8GFX466GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GBMicrosoft Basic DisplayRealtek USB GbE FamilyMicrosoft Windows Server 2019 Essentials Build 1776310.0 (x86_64)10.0.17763.1NTFS1024x7684 x 8192 MB 1600MHz F4-3200C14-8GFXAMD Radeon RX Vega 4GBBluetooth Device (Personal Area ) + Intel I211 Gigabit Connection + Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4A WirelessMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro Build 1776322.19.677.257OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2442.9)3840x2160GCC 7.1.0ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME (1601 BIOS)AMD Family 17h32768MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 500GBAMD Radeon RX 64 8GB (1630/945MHz)Realtek ALC1220ASUS VP28UIntel I211 + Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac WirelessUbuntu 18.104.18.0-13-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.30.1X Server 1.20.1amdgpu 18.1.04.5 Mesa 18.2.2 (LLVM 7.0.0)GCC 8.2.0ext4AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-008 x 8192 MB 2667MHz Unknown112GB BPXMicrosoft Basic DisplayIntel X550 + Intel I210 Gigabit Connection + Intel X550 #2Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Build 1776310.0 (x86_64)10.0.17763.1NTFS1920x1200GCC 7.1.04 x AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)OpenBenchmarking.orgPython Details- Windows Server 2019, Windows 10: Python 2.7.15Compiler Details- Ubuntu 18.10: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details- Ubuntu 18.10: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemandGraphics Details- Ubuntu 18.10: GLAMORSecurity Details- Ubuntu 18.10: __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Windows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrioLogarithmic Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suitem-queensPHPBench7-Zip CompressionIndigoBenchx264Perl BenchmarksFhourstonesCraftylibjpeg-turbo tjbenchFFmpegFLAC Audio EncodingBlenderDaCapo BenchmarkStockfish

Windows Server 2019 vs. Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu - AMD Threadripperjava-scimark2: Compositedacapobench: H2dacapobench: Jythondacapobench: Tradesoapdacapobench: Tradebeansfhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solvingcrafty: Elapsed Timex264: H.264 Video Encodingcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Teststockfish: Total Timeencode-flac: WAV To FLACffmpeg: H.264 HD To NTSC DVm-queens: Time To Solveperl-benchmark: Interpretertjbench: Decompression Throughputindigobench: Bedroomindigobench: Supercarblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyblender: Classroom - CPU-Onlyblender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Onlyblender: Barbershop - CPU-Onlyblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Onlyphpbench: PHP Benchmark Suitev-ray: CPUWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio24413681572310950418613482733560413352525581098199.266.0721.780.015315911791.764.5292.0820413751823726372435.4424004388613410610428213297736481912842003582206639.336.7321.870.019879171813.6810.2392.0520413551423626541435.9924984085575398174062112237368270126423855875999411.157.0021.800.013546101473.7010.3688.8118713050622221591834.712960554746115105726514080750918414289225665835809.328.5321.230.001346101832.906.7380.2015911140721052465130.46512288851425560358632456679495.05385114856907214.729.0929.840.017253881121.664.02120.202581776553061657275094770011451655185635181334134.10881625679843412.648.0929.030.015225271292.926.27113.97248166598293180346530389271418361607878462326559.25282645618664714.789.80118.060.016804971152.805.78119257175618300158938523688221423562017884461652959.60282205653577914.419.14116.920.016757041142.805.76117.47257172619300162575497776261292358539770525978595.12387984789310212.718.6829.030.014103691292.505.47122.34268179651312189882OpenBenchmarking.org

Java SciMark

This test runs the Java version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This benchmark is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.106001200180024003000SE +/- 41.46, N = 4SE +/- 7.86, N = 4SE +/- 30.43, N = 8SE +/- 30.68, N = 42441240024982960
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.105001000150020002500Min: 2397.57 / Avg: 2441.31 / Max: 2565.67Min: 2377.05 / Avg: 2399.84 / Max: 2412.37Min: 2378.9 / Avg: 2498.14 / Max: 2578.14Min: 2883.7 / Avg: 2960.18 / Max: 3013.34

DaCapo Benchmark

This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2Windows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio12002400360048006000SE +/- 49.34, N = 16SE +/- 62.79, N = 4SE +/- 63.90, N = 16SE +/- 82.30, N = 5SE +/- 73.10, N = 4SE +/- 70.20, N = 4SE +/- 20.15, N = 4SE +/- 44.54, N = 4SE +/- 41.14, N = 4368143884085554751225094530352364977
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2Windows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio10002000300040005000Min: 3438 / Avg: 3680.88 / Max: 4219Min: 4276 / Avg: 4387.5 / Max: 4542Min: 3663 / Avg: 4084.63 / Max: 4570Min: 5405 / Avg: 5547 / Max: 5864Min: 4978 / Avg: 5121.5 / Max: 5276Min: 4938 / Avg: 5094.25 / Max: 5235Min: 5250 / Avg: 5303 / Max: 5347Min: 5157 / Avg: 5236.25 / Max: 5361Min: 4860 / Avg: 4977.25 / Max: 5048

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 31.54, N = 4SE +/- 22.75, N = 4SE +/- 18.43, N = 4SE +/- 43.58, N = 4SE +/- 45.75, N = 4SE +/- 45.82, N = 4SE +/- 63.25, N = 4SE +/- 16.08, N = 4SE +/- 23.16, N = 4572361345753461188857700892788227626
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio15003000450060007500Min: 5657 / Avg: 5723.25 / Max: 5798Min: 6092 / Avg: 6134.25 / Max: 6196Min: 5708 / Avg: 5753.25 / Max: 5798Min: 4535 / Avg: 4610.75 / Max: 4724Min: 8780 / Avg: 8885.25 / Max: 9003Min: 7594 / Avg: 7699.75 / Max: 7813Min: 8855 / Avg: 8926.5 / Max: 9116Min: 8782 / Avg: 8821.5 / Max: 8856Min: 7563 / Avg: 7626 / Max: 7673

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 138.15, N = 7SE +/- 167.29, N = 16SE +/- 107.55, N = 4SE +/- 80.99, N = 4SE +/- 181.08, N = 16SE +/- 178.50, N = 4SE +/- 144.43, N = 4SE +/- 162.19, N = 4SE +/- 159.10, N = 41095010610981751051425511451141831423512923
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio2K4K6K8K10KMin: 10423 / Avg: 10949.71 / Max: 11469Min: 9635 / Avg: 10609.94 / Max: 11880Min: 9514 / Avg: 9816.5 / Max: 10023Min: 4903 / Avg: 5105 / Max: 5278Min: 13442 / Avg: 14254.56 / Max: 15637Min: 11111 / Avg: 11450.75 / Max: 11845Min: 13847 / Avg: 14183.25 / Max: 14543Min: 13948 / Avg: 14235 / Max: 14701Min: 12626 / Avg: 12923 / Max: 13360

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradebeansWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio16003200480064008000SE +/- 61.71, N = 16SE +/- 66.77, N = 4SE +/- 41.48, N = 11SE +/- 30.14, N = 4SE +/- 86.66, N = 16SE +/- 29.57, N = 4SE +/- 100.81, N = 4SE +/- 87.97, N = 6SE +/- 55.02, N = 16418642824062726560356551616062015853
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradebeansWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio13002600390052006500Min: 3953 / Avg: 4185.81 / Max: 4922Min: 4090 / Avg: 4281.75 / Max: 4398Min: 3863 / Avg: 4062.45 / Max: 4377Min: 7217 / Avg: 7265 / Max: 7353Min: 5555 / Avg: 6034.81 / Max: 6822Min: 6469 / Avg: 6551.25 / Max: 6610Min: 5982 / Avg: 6160 / Max: 6366Min: 5892 / Avg: 6200.83 / Max: 6432Min: 5594 / Avg: 5852.94 / Max: 6141

Fhourstones

This integer benchmark solves positions in the game of Connect-4, as played on a vertical 7x6 board. By default, it uses a 64Mb transposition table with the twobig replacement strategy. Positions are represented as 64-bit bitboards, and the hash function is computed using a single 64-bit modulo operation, giving 64-bit machines a slight edge. The alpha-beta searcher sorts moves dynamically based on the history heuristic. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgKpos / sec, More Is BetterFhourstones 3.1Complex Connect-4 SolvingWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 16.82, N = 3SE +/- 260.16, N = 9SE +/- 14.02, N = 3SE +/- 32.05, N = 3SE +/- 42.40, N = 3SE +/- 34.45, N = 3SE +/- 42.86, N = 3SE +/- 41.67, N = 3SE +/- 17.62, N = 313482132971122314080863285637878788497701. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgKpos / sec, More Is BetterFhourstones 3.1Complex Connect-4 SolvingWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio2K4K6K8K10KMin: 13450.2 / Avg: 13481.53 / Max: 13507.8Min: 11218.6 / Avg: 13297.16 / Max: 13612.6Min: 11208 / Avg: 11222.67 / Max: 11250.7Min: 14016.7 / Avg: 14079.9 / Max: 14120.8Min: 8584.6 / Avg: 8632 / Max: 8716.6Min: 8495.3 / Avg: 8562.93 / Max: 8608.1Min: 7792.4 / Avg: 7877.63 / Max: 7928.2Min: 7810.5 / Avg: 7883.77 / Max: 7954.8Min: 9744 / Avg: 9769.83 / Max: 9803.51. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Crafty

This is a performance test of Crafty, an advanced open-source chess engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio1.6M3.2M4.8M6.4M8MSE +/- 14767.73, N = 3SE +/- 15937.60, N = 3SE +/- 16848.98, N = 3SE +/- 19931.32, N = 3SE +/- 28234.88, N = 3SE +/- 15607.48, N = 3SE +/- 3730.31, N = 3SE +/- 9712.61, N = 3SE +/- 1316.00, N = 37335604736481973682707509184456679451813344623265461652952597851. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio1.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MMin: 7320253 / Avg: 7335604.33 / Max: 7365132Min: 7332944 / Avg: 7364819 / Max: 7380853Min: 7340534 / Avg: 7368269.67 / Max: 7398712Min: 7485945 / Avg: 7509183.67 / Max: 7548852Min: 4518243 / Avg: 4566793.67 / Max: 4616044Min: 5160508 / Avg: 5181334.33 / Max: 5211884Min: 4616601 / Avg: 4623265 / Max: 4629502Min: 4603500 / Avg: 4616529 / Max: 4635521Min: 5257454 / Avg: 5259785 / Max: 52620091. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm

x264

This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio306090120150SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.29, N = 3SE +/- 1.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3133.00128.00126.00142.0095.05134.1059.2559.6095.121. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio306090120150Min: 132.42 / Avg: 133.03 / Max: 133.33Min: 127.85 / Avg: 128.12 / Max: 128.29Min: 123.48 / Avg: 125.98 / Max: 127.8Min: 139.32 / Avg: 141.7 / Max: 143.45Min: 92.74 / Avg: 95.05 / Max: 97.04Min: 133.81 / Avg: 134.1 / Max: 134.26Min: 59.19 / Avg: 59.25 / Max: 59.32Min: 59.5 / Avg: 59.6 / Max: 59.7Min: 94.8 / Avg: 95.12 / Max: 95.511. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize

7-Zip Compression

This is a test of 7-Zip using p7zip with its integrated benchmark feature or upstream 7-Zip for the Windows x64 build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1013.77, N = 11SE +/- 256.04, N = 3SE +/- 1336.20, N = 3SE +/- 88.02, N = 3SE +/- 519.94, N = 3SE +/- 60.68, N = 3SE +/- 99.31, N = 3SE +/- 373.30, N = 35252542003423858922538511881622826428220387981. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio15K30K45K60K75KMin: 42408 / Avg: 52524.73 / Max: 53967Min: 42029 / Avg: 42385.33 / Max: 42882Min: 87397 / Avg: 89224.67 / Max: 91827Min: 38336 / Avg: 38511 / Max: 38615Min: 87256 / Avg: 88162.33 / Max: 89057Min: 28145 / Avg: 28263.67 / Max: 28345Min: 28047 / Avg: 28220 / Max: 28391Min: 38059 / Avg: 38798.33 / Max: 392581. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread

Stockfish

This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio14M28M42M56M70MSE +/- 203244.48, N = 3SE +/- 318132.91, N = 3SE +/- 583779.28, N = 3SE +/- 430686.49, N = 3SE +/- 580393.73, N = 3SE +/- 413269.27, N = 3SE +/- 124239.50, N = 3SE +/- 319508.50, N = 3SE +/- 522694.36, N = 35810981958220663587599946658358048569072567984345618664756535779478931021. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio12M24M36M48M60MMin: 57703387 / Avg: 58109818.67 / Max: 58318945Min: 57891310 / Avg: 58220662.67 / Max: 58856795Min: 57613569 / Avg: 58759994 / Max: 59524719Min: 65737473 / Avg: 66583580.33 / Max: 67146453Min: 47432146 / Avg: 48569072.33 / Max: 49340315Min: 56192196 / Avg: 56798433.67 / Max: 57588103Min: 56004214 / Avg: 56186647.33 / Max: 56423963Min: 55956804 / Avg: 56535779 / Max: 57059463Min: 46851991 / Avg: 47893102 / Max: 484954751. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto

FLAC Audio Encoding

This test times how long it takes to encode a sample WAV file to FLAC format five times. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2WAV To FLACWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 5SE +/- 0.06, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 5SE +/- 0.03, N = 5SE +/- 0.03, N = 5SE +/- 0.03, N = 59.269.3311.159.3214.7212.6414.7814.4112.711. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -logg -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2WAV To FLACWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio48121620Min: 9.25 / Avg: 9.26 / Max: 9.28Min: 9.3 / Avg: 9.33 / Max: 9.37Min: 11.13 / Avg: 11.15 / Max: 11.16Min: 9.29 / Avg: 9.32 / Max: 9.35Min: 14.6 / Avg: 14.72 / Max: 14.87Min: 12.61 / Avg: 12.64 / Max: 12.68Min: 14.7 / Avg: 14.78 / Max: 14.9Min: 14.34 / Avg: 14.41 / Max: 14.49Min: 12.66 / Avg: 12.71 / Max: 12.841. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -logg -lm

FFmpeg

This test uses FFmpeg for testing the system's audio/video encoding performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 4.0.2H.264 HD To NTSC DVWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3691215SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 7SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 7SE +/- 0.17, N = 4SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 36.076.737.008.539.098.099.809.148.681. (CC) gcc options: -lavdevice -lavfilter -lavformat -lavcodec -lswresample -lswscale -lavutil -lXv -lX11 -lXext -lm -lxcb -lxcb-shape -lxcb-xfixes -lasound -lSDL2 -lsndio -pthread -lbz2 -llzma -std=c11 -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -O3 -fno-math-errno -fno-signed-zeros -fno-tree-vectorize -MMD -MF -MT
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 4.0.2H.264 HD To NTSC DVWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3691215Min: 6.03 / Avg: 6.07 / Max: 6.16Min: 6.65 / Avg: 6.73 / Max: 6.8Min: 6.8 / Avg: 7 / Max: 7.51Min: 8.48 / Avg: 8.53 / Max: 8.64Min: 8.96 / Avg: 9.09 / Max: 9.33Min: 7.95 / Avg: 8.09 / Max: 8.71Min: 9.61 / Avg: 9.8 / Max: 10.3Min: 9.1 / Avg: 9.14 / Max: 9.19Min: 8.57 / Avg: 8.68 / Max: 8.731. (CC) gcc options: -lavdevice -lavfilter -lavformat -lavcodec -lswresample -lswscale -lavutil -lXv -lX11 -lXext -lm -lxcb -lxcb-shape -lxcb-xfixes -lasound -lSDL2 -lsndio -pthread -lbz2 -llzma -std=c11 -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -O3 -fno-math-errno -fno-signed-zeros -fno-tree-vectorize -MMD -MF -MT

m-queens

A solver for the N-queens problem with multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.2Time To SolveWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio306090120150SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 321.7821.8721.8021.2329.8429.03118.06116.9229.031. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O2 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.2Time To SolveWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio20406080100Min: 21.72 / Avg: 21.78 / Max: 21.86Min: 21.81 / Avg: 21.87 / Max: 21.96Min: 21.76 / Avg: 21.8 / Max: 21.84Min: 21.21 / Avg: 21.23 / Max: 21.24Min: 29.6 / Avg: 29.84 / Max: 30.09Min: 28.97 / Avg: 29.03 / Max: 29.09Min: 117.94 / Avg: 118.06 / Max: 118.16Min: 116.89 / Avg: 116.92 / Max: 116.98Min: 28.97 / Avg: 29.03 / Max: 29.071. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O2 -march=native

Perl Benchmarks

Perl benchmark suite that can be used to compare the relative speed of different versions of perl. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio0.00450.0090.01350.0180.0225SE +/- 0.00003494, N = 3SE +/- 0.00001354, N = 3SE +/- 0.00021977, N = 4SE +/- 0.00001022, N = 3SE +/- 0.00005313, N = 3SE +/- 0.00002223, N = 3SE +/- 0.00007376, N = 3SE +/- 0.00005689, N = 3SE +/- 0.00010196, N = 30.015315910.019879170.013546100.001346100.017253880.015225270.016804970.016757040.01410369
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio12345Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.01 / Avg: 0.01 / Max: 0.01Min: 0 / Avg: 0 / Max: 0Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.01 / Avg: 0.01 / Max: 0.01

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

tjbench is a JPEG decompression/compression benchmark part of libjpeg-turbo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio4080120160200SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 31791811471831121291151141291. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio306090120150Min: 178.87 / Avg: 179 / Max: 179.17Min: 181.13 / Avg: 181.2 / Max: 181.3Min: 147.05 / Avg: 147.21 / Max: 147.32Min: 183 / Avg: 183.28 / Max: 183.47Min: 111.77 / Avg: 112.15 / Max: 112.9Min: 128.37 / Avg: 129 / Max: 129.35Min: 114.83 / Avg: 115 / Max: 115.24Min: 113.61 / Avg: 113.95 / Max: 114.15Min: 128.11 / Avg: 129.04 / Max: 129.511. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm

IndigoBench

This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: BedroomWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio0.83251.6652.49753.334.1625SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 121.763.683.702.901.662.922.802.802.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: BedroomWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio246810Min: 1.75 / Avg: 1.76 / Max: 1.77Min: 3.67 / Avg: 3.68 / Max: 3.69Min: 3.7 / Avg: 3.7 / Max: 3.7Min: 2.8 / Avg: 2.9 / Max: 2.98Min: 1.66 / Avg: 1.66 / Max: 1.67Min: 2.92 / Avg: 2.92 / Max: 2.92Min: 2.79 / Avg: 2.8 / Max: 2.81Min: 2.79 / Avg: 2.8 / Max: 2.82Min: 1.85 / Avg: 2.5 / Max: 2.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: SupercarWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 12SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 124.5210.2310.366.734.026.275.785.765.47
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: SupercarWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio3691215Min: 4.49 / Avg: 4.52 / Max: 4.56Min: 10.19 / Avg: 10.23 / Max: 10.27Min: 10.3 / Avg: 10.36 / Max: 10.42Min: 6 / Avg: 6.73 / Max: 7.2Min: 4 / Avg: 4.02 / Max: 4.03Min: 6.24 / Avg: 6.27 / Max: 6.31Min: 5.77 / Avg: 5.78 / Max: 5.81Min: 5.74 / Avg: 5.76 / Max: 5.78Min: 4.7 / Avg: 5.47 / Max: 5.89

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing via OpenCL or CUDA is supported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio30609012015092.0892.0588.8180.20120.20113.97119.00117.47122.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio60120180240300204204187159258248257257268

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio4080120160200137135130111177166175172179

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio140280420560700518514506407655598618619651

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio70140210280350237236222210306293300300312

PHPBench

PHPBench is a benchmark suite for PHP. It performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter. PHPBench can be used to compare hardware, operating systems, PHP versions, PHP accelerators and caches, compiler options, etc. The number of iterations used is 1,000,000. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 1269.75, N = 3SE +/- 1486.58, N = 3SE +/- 444.76, N = 3SE +/- 224.65, N = 3SE +/- 1022.93, N = 3SE +/- 477.55, N = 3SE +/- 476.74, N = 3SE +/- 2474.34, N = 3SE +/- 609.27, N = 3263724265414215918524651165727180346158938162575189882
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10Windows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551PWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P UMAWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S bcdeditWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P 4S CorePrioWindows Server 2019 + Epyc 7551P NUMA + CorePrio90K180K270K360K450KMin: 261219 / Avg: 263723.67 / Max: 265339Min: 263182 / Avg: 265414 / Max: 268231Min: 215289 / Avg: 215917.67 / Max: 216777Min: 524308 / Avg: 524651.33 / Max: 525074Min: 163870 / Avg: 165727 / Max: 167399Min: 179528 / Avg: 180346 / Max: 181182Min: 158030 / Avg: 158938 / Max: 159644Min: 159028 / Avg: 162575 / Max: 167337Min: 189109 / Avg: 189881.67 / Max: 191084

Chaos Group V-RAY

This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0Mode: CPUWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10816243240SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 1235.4435.9934.7130.46
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0Mode: CPUWindows Server 2019Windows 10Windows 10 + NUMA DissociaterUbuntu 18.10816243240Min: 35.02 / Avg: 35.44 / Max: 36.24Min: 35.51 / Avg: 35.99 / Max: 36.92Min: 34.03 / Avg: 34.71 / Max: 35.84Min: 24.6 / Avg: 30.46 / Max: 31.39