AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Tests

AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core testing with a GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-00 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8192MB on Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 14393 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1803084-PTS-AMDEPYCN59
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows Server 2016
March 07 2018
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU TestsOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD EPYC 7551 32-Core @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)GIGABYTE MZ31-AR0-008 x 4096 MB 2666MHz 9ASF51272PZ-2G6E1466GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 500GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8192MB (1911/4004MHz)Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAPMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 1439310.0 (x86_64)391.01 (23.21.13.9101)1.0.65GCC 7.1.0NTFS2560x1440ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionAMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Tests PerformanceSystem Logs- python is not recognized as an internal or external command operable program or batch file.

AMD EPYC + NVIDIA GPU Testsparaview: Wavelet Contour - 2560 x 1440paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 2560 x 1440paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 2560 x 1440paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080gputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedgputest: GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowedgputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowedj2dbench: Vector Graphics Renderingj2dbench: All Rendering Testsj2dbench: Image Renderingj2dbench: Text Renderingopenarena: 2560 x 1440openarena: 1920 x 1080luxmark: GPU - Luxball HDRluxmark: GPU - Microphoneluxmark: GPU - Hotelfahbench: darktable: Server Room - OpenCLdarktable: Masskrug - OpenCLdarktable: Boat - OpenCLxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimatexonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Lowunigine-heaven: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreenunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenWindows Server 201653.5764.0257.1362.3535.7150.07481883414639801714022441139623831678671565802039525114500671781961911506681931724897938641045477992850559028119107811132020780885068561555.788616129.5013488473.044747.80161.80134.831652210077445062.055.195.155.80102.73142.00169.21214.4479.83106.04OpenBenchmarking.org

ParaView

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 2016120240360480600SE +/- 10.29, N = 3558.32

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 20161224364860SE +/- 0.99, N = 353.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 2016140280420560700SE +/- 0.00, N = 3667.14

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 20161428425670SE +/- 0.00, N = 364.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 50.56, N = 6914.09

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 20161326395265SE +/- 3.16, N = 657.13

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 20162004006008001000SE +/- 20.49, N = 6997.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 20161428425670SE +/- 1.28, N = 662.35

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 20168001600240032004000SE +/- 39.43, N = 33579.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 2016816243240SE +/- 0.40, N = 335.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 201611002200330044005500SE +/- 182.37, N = 65019.27

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 20161122334455SE +/- 1.82, N = 650.07

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201610002000300040005000SE +/- 11.70, N = 34818

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 13.20, N = 38341

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201610002000300040005000SE +/- 9.56, N = 34639

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 25.63, N = 38017

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201630060090012001500SE +/- 0.67, N = 31402

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20165001000150020002500SE +/- 2.40, N = 32441

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201630060090012001500SE +/- 3.18, N = 31396

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20165001000150020002500SE +/- 7.75, N = 32383

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201640K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 386.11, N = 3167867

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201630K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 488.88, N = 3156580

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20164K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 26.43, N = 320395

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20165K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 34.71, N = 325114

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201611002200330044005500SE +/- 1.33, N = 35006

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201615003000450060007500SE +/- 3.28, N = 37178

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201640K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 6811.15, N = 6196191

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201630K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 208.39, N = 3150668

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20164K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 34.95, N = 319317

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20165K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 87.61, N = 324897

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201620K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 27.85, N = 393864

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201620K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 113.49, N = 3104547

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 5.51, N = 37992

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 62.00, N = 38505

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201613002600390052006500SE +/- 10.35, N = 35902

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 3.76, N = 38119

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201620K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 67.22, N = 3107811

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 201630K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 108.37, N = 3132020

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 12.55, N = 37808

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: WindowedWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 30.02, N = 38506

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingWindows Server 20162M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 134969.73, N = 48561555.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsWindows Server 20162M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 134270.60, N = 58616129.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingWindows Server 20163M6M9M12M15MSE +/- 113314.24, N = 413488473.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingWindows Server 201610002000300040005000SE +/- 6.31, N = 44747.80

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeWindows Server 2016612182430Min: 2 / Avg: 5.96 / Max: 28

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows Server 20164080120160200SE +/- 1.70, N = 3161.80MIN: 2 / MAX: 221

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeWindows Server 201620406080100Min: 2 / Avg: 9.11 / Max: 92

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 12.11, N = 6134.83MIN: 2

LuxMark

LuxMark is a multi-platform OpenGL benchmark using LuxRender. LuxMark supports targeting different OpenCL devices and has multiple scenes available for rendering. LuxMark is a fully open-source OpenCL program with real-world rendering examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRWindows Server 20164K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 16.29, N = 316522

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: MicrophoneWindows Server 20162K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 44.96, N = 310077

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: HotelWindows Server 201610002000300040005000SE +/- 12.50, N = 34450

FAHBench

FAHBench is a Folding@Home benchmark on the GPU. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterFAHBench 2.3.2Windows Server 20161428425670SE +/- 0.09, N = 362.05

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.4.1Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCLWindows Server 20161.16782.33563.50344.67125.839SE +/- 0.10, N = 65.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.4.1Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCLWindows Server 20161.15882.31763.47644.63525.794SE +/- 0.26, N = 65.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.4.1Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCLWindows Server 20161.3052.613.9155.226.525SE +/- 0.05, N = 35.80

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 0.45, N = 3102.73MIN: 9 / MAX: 287

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows Server 2016306090120150SE +/- 2.01, N = 6142.00MIN: 47 / MAX: 380

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighWindows Server 20164080120160200SE +/- 0.77, N = 3169.21MIN: 61 / MAX: 385

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowWindows Server 201650100150200250SE +/- 0.65, N = 3214.44MIN: 106 / MAX: 431

Unigine Heaven

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 1.10, N = 379.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows Server 201620406080100SE +/- 1.08, N = 3106.04

61 Results Shown

ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
ParaView
GpuTest:
  Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  TessMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen
  Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
  GiMark - 2560 x 1440 - Windowed
  GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Windowed
Java 2D Microbenchmark:
  Vector Graphics Rendering
  All Rendering Tests
  Image Rendering
  Text Rendering
OpenArena
OpenArena
OpenArena
OpenArena
LuxMark:
  GPU - Luxball HDR
  GPU - Microphone
  GPU - Hotel
FAHBench
Darktable:
  Server Room - OpenCL
  Masskrug - OpenCL
  Boat - OpenCL
Xonotic:
  2560 x 1440 - Ultimate
  2560 x 1440 - Ultra
  2560 x 1440 - High
  2560 x 1440 - Low
Unigine Heaven:
  2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen
  1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen