DragonFlyBSD 4.9 HAMMER vs. HAMMER2

Tests by Michael Larabel with the Phoronix Test
Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709136-TY-HAMMER10584
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
HAMMER2
September 12 2017
 
HAMMER
September 13 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


DragonFlyBSD 4.9 HAMMER vs. HAMMER2Processor MotherboardMemoryDiskNetworkMotherboardOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemHAMMER2HAMMERIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores)MSI MS-7998 1.016384MBNVMe-PCIe Intel PRO/1000 Connection PCH_SPT_I219_V2 7.4.2DragonFly4.9-DEVELOPMENT (x86_64)GCC 5.4.1hammer2MSI MS-7998 1.0NVME-PCIeIntel PRO/1000 Connection PCH_SPT_I219_V2 7.4.2hammerOpenBenchmarking.orgSystem Details- Python 2.7.13.

HAMMER2 vs. HAMMER ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+97%+97%+194%+194%+291%+291%146.9%29.5%24.7%16%D.T.D387.9%Compile362%Initial CreateRead Compiled Tree110.3%198.1%4Kb - 2GB - Write Performance95.1%D.T.P71.8%4Kb - 4GB - Write Performance39.6%Read Scorelinux-2.6.32.tar.bz24Kb - 512MB - Write PerformanceSQLiteCompile BenchCompile BenchCompile BenchDbenchIOzonePostMarkIOzoneBlogBenchUnpacking The Linux KernelIOzoneHAMMER2HAMMER

DragonFlyBSD 4.9 HAMMER vs. HAMMER2sqlite: Default Test Directorycompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treeunpack-linux: linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2postmark: Disk Transaction Performancedbench: 1iozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Write Performanceblogbench: Read ScoreHAMMER2HAMMER7.11627.8483.52579.9112.482752180.55397.74409.75403.8238454034.69135.89206.21275.7810.01160291.16203.91293.58468.28498112OpenBenchmarking.org

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.8.10.2Test Target: Default Test DirectoryHAMMERHAMMER2816243240SE +/- 0.79, N = 6SE +/- 0.06, N = 334.697.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.8.10.2Test Target: Default Test DirectoryHAMMERHAMMER2714212835Min: 31.65 / Avg: 34.69 / Max: 36.47Min: 7.04 / Avg: 7.11 / Max: 7.23

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileHAMMERHAMMER2140280420560700SE +/- 3.85, N = 6SE +/- 15.54, N = 6135.89627.84
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileHAMMERHAMMER2110220330440550Min: 122.4 / Avg: 135.89 / Max: 151.34Min: 584.42 / Avg: 627.84 / Max: 699.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateHAMMERHAMMER250100150200250SE +/- 7.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3206.2183.52
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateHAMMERHAMMER24080120160200Min: 191.28 / Avg: 206.21 / Max: 216.71Min: 82.93 / Avg: 83.52 / Max: 84.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeHAMMERHAMMER2130260390520650SE +/- 7.20, N = 3SE +/- 19.88, N = 3275.78579.91
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeHAMMERHAMMER2100200300400500Min: 266.51 / Avg: 275.78 / Max: 289.96Min: 556.95 / Avg: 579.91 / Max: 619.51

Unpacking The Linux Kernel

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterUnpacking The Linux Kernellinux-2.6.32.tar.bz2HAMMERHAMMER23691215SE +/- 0.13, N = 8SE +/- 0.09, N = 410.0112.48
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterUnpacking The Linux Kernellinux-2.6.32.tar.bz2HAMMERHAMMER248121620Min: 9.51 / Avg: 10.01 / Max: 10.65Min: 12.23 / Avg: 12.48 / Max: 12.61

PostMark

This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER26001200180024003000SE +/- 66.35, N = 6SE +/- 220.06, N = 616022752
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER25001000150020002500Min: 1420 / Avg: 1602 / Max: 1851Min: 2118 / Avg: 2751.5 / Max: 3571

Dbench

Dbench is a benchmark designed by the Samba project as a free alternative to netbench, but dbench contains only file-system calls for testing the disk performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 1HAMMERHAMMER24080120160200SE +/- 9.84, N = 691.16180.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 1HAMMERHAMMER2306090120150Min: 144.54 / Avg: 180.55 / Max: 213.59

IOzone

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER290180270360450SE +/- 8.97, N = 6203.91397.74
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER270140210280350Min: 367.12 / Avg: 397.74 / Max: 416.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER290180270360450SE +/- 1.68, N = 3293.58409.75
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER270140210280350Min: 407.92 / Avg: 409.75 / Max: 413.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER2100200300400500SE +/- 1.74, N = 3468.28403.82
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzoneRecord Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceHAMMERHAMMER280160240320400Min: 400.35 / Avg: 403.82 / Max: 405.69

BlogBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Read ScoreHAMMERHAMMER2110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 4711.07, N = 3498112384540
OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Read ScoreHAMMERHAMMER290K180K270K360K450KMin: 379703 / Avg: 384540 / Max: 393961

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Write ScoreHAMMERHAMMER28001600240032004000SE +/- 48.91, N = 335632868
OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Write ScoreHAMMERHAMMER26001200180024003000Min: 2778 / Avg: 2868.33 / Max: 2946