NIR RadeonSI Early Test

Intel Core i7-7740K testing with a ASUS PRIME X299-A and Sapphire AMD FIJI 4096MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1708075-TY-NIRRADEON28
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
Steam 4 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Stock
August 07 2017
 
R600_DEBUG=nir
August 07 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


NIR RadeonSI Early TestOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Intel Core i7-7740K @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores)ASUS PRIME X299-AIntel Device 591f16384MB525GB Crucial_CT525MX3 + Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GBSapphire AMD FIJI 4096MBRealtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.13.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20170730Unity 7.4.0modesetting 1.19.34.5 Mesa 17.3.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 6.0.0)3.1 Mesa 17.3.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 6.0.0)1.0.42GCC 5.4.0 20160609ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay DriverOpenGLsVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionNIR RadeonSI Early Test BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- GLAMOR- R600_DEBUG=nir: R600_DEBUG=nir

Stock vs. R600_DEBUG=nir ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+1.8%+1.8%+3.6%+3.6%+5.4%+5.4%7%4.9%3.3%Renderer2 - 3840 x 21603840 x 21603840 x 2160ET: LegacyCounter-Strike: Global OffensivePortalStockR600_DEBUG=nir

NIR RadeonSI Early Testcsgo: 1920 x 1080csgo: 3840 x 2160dota2: 3840 x 2160 - OpenGLetlegacy: Renderer2 - 3840 x 2160openarena: 1920 x 1080portal: 3840 x 2160tesseract: 3840 x 2160tf2: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - UltimateStockR600_DEBUG=nir238.22169.4974.97219.72463.73355.79253.85171.76313.96234.09237.65177.7976.27235.08462.33367.38250.56172.33313.52233.29OpenBenchmarking.org

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080StockR600_DEBUG=nir50100150200250SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3238.22237.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080StockR600_DEBUG=nir4080120160200Min: 236.48 / Avg: 238.22 / Max: 239.88Min: 235.66 / Avg: 237.65 / Max: 239.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir4080120160200SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3169.49177.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir306090120150Min: 169.07 / Avg: 169.49 / Max: 169.8Min: 176.24 / Avg: 177.79 / Max: 179.16

Dota 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLStockR600_DEBUG=nir20406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 374.9776.27
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLStockR600_DEBUG=nir1530456075Min: 74.9 / Avg: 74.97 / Max: 75.1Min: 76.2 / Avg: 76.27 / Max: 76.3

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir50100150200250SE +/- 5.05, N = 6SE +/- 11.14, N = 6219.72235.08
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir4080120160200Min: 196.1 / Avg: 219.72 / Max: 230.3Min: 183.1 / Avg: 235.08 / Max: 254.1

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080StockR600_DEBUG=nir100200300400500SE +/- 0.95, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 3463.73462.33MIN: 1MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080StockR600_DEBUG=nir80160240320400Min: 462.1 / Avg: 463.73 / Max: 465.4Min: 461.4 / Avg: 462.33 / Max: 463.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeStockR600_DEBUG=nir48121620Min: 1 / Avg: 2.16 / Max: 16Min: 1 / Avg: 2.16 / Max: 16

Portal

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir80160240320400SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3355.79367.38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortalResolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir70140210280350Min: 355.11 / Avg: 355.79 / Max: 356.33Min: 366.64 / Avg: 367.38 / Max: 368.21

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir60120180240300SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.53, N = 3253.85250.56
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir50100150200250Min: 252.77 / Avg: 253.85 / Max: 255.07Min: 249.74 / Avg: 250.56 / Max: 251.55

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir4080120160200SE +/- 1.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3171.76172.33
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160StockR600_DEBUG=nir306090120150Min: 169.23 / Avg: 171.76 / Max: 173.23Min: 171.13 / Avg: 172.33 / Max: 173.45

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraStockR600_DEBUG=nir70140210280350SE +/- 3.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3313.96313.52MIN: 142 / MAX: 507MIN: 153 / MAX: 503
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraStockR600_DEBUG=nir60120180240300Min: 307.54 / Avg: 313.96 / Max: 318.65Min: 313.22 / Avg: 313.52 / Max: 313.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateStockR600_DEBUG=nir50100150200250SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3234.09233.29MIN: 54 / MAX: 429MIN: 55 / MAX: 430
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateStockR600_DEBUG=nir4080120160200Min: 233.21 / Avg: 234.09 / Max: 234.55Min: 232.81 / Avg: 233.29 / Max: 234.07