Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 17.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Gallium3D - Radeon R9 Fury

Tests for a future article on Phoronix comparing Windows and Linux.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1707066-TR-WINDOWS4135
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10 Pro x64
July 05 2017
 
Ubuntu 17.04
July 05 2017
 
Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev
July 05 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 17.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Gallium3D - Radeon R9 FuryProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionVulkanUbuntu 17.04Windows 10 Pro x64Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devIntel Core i7-7900X @ 4.50GHz (20 Cores)MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93) v1.0Intel Device 202016384MB240GB Force MP500Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBRealtek GenericDELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 17.044.10.0-26-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.5.0X Server 1.19.3modesetting 1.19.34.5 Mesa 17.0.3 Gallium 0.4 (LLVM 4.0.0)GCC 6.3.0 20170406ext43840x2160Intel Family 6 Model 85 Stepping 4 Intel (20 Cores)224GBWindows NT10.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i7-7900X @ 4.50GHz (20 Cores)MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93) v1.0Intel Device 202016384MB240GB Force MP500Sapphire AMD FIJI (DRM 3.15.0 / 4.12.0-041200-generic LLVM 5.0.0) 4096MBRealtek ALC1220DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 17.044.12.0-041200-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.5.0X Server 1.19.3modesetting 1.19.34.5 Mesa 17.2.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 5.0.0)1.0.3GCC 6.3.0 20170406ext43840x2160OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 17.04, Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- Ubuntu 17.04, Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev: GLAMOR

Ubuntu 17.04Windows 10 Pro x64Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%109%117%126%134%GpuTestUnigine ValleyXonoticUnigine Heaven

Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 17.04 AMDGPU RadeonSI Gallium3D - Radeon R9 Furyxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimategputest: GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreenunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenunigine-heaven: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - FullscreenUbuntu 17.04Windows 10 Pro x64Linux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-dev320.26244.39195.35694203429269563363113784.4119.5991.3623.13342.00247.86188.494220485473230916396072499110185.7321.4192.1128.90341.29269.16213.42712073513265830463116186.5219.9994.5923.58OpenBenchmarking.org

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0470140210280350SE +/- 1.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3341.29342.00320.26MIN: 200 / MAX: 770MIN: 200 / MAX: 705MIN: 182 / MAX: 698
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0460120180240300Min: 338.4 / Avg: 341.29 / Max: 343Min: 341.84 / Avg: 342 / Max: 342.23Min: 318.72 / Avg: 320.26 / Max: 322.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0460120180240300SE +/- 1.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3269.16247.86244.39MIN: 130 / MAX: 486MIN: 146 / MAX: 500MIN: 95 / MAX: 466
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0450100150200250Min: 265.71 / Avg: 269.16 / Max: 271.19Min: 247.5 / Avg: 247.86 / Max: 248.08Min: 244.32 / Avg: 244.39 / Max: 244.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0450100150200250SE +/- 0.71, N = 3SE +/- 1.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3213.42188.49195.35MIN: 47 / MAX: 405MIN: 25 / MAX: 470MIN: 47 / MAX: 386
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.044080120160200Min: 212.04 / Avg: 213.42 / Max: 214.37Min: 187.12 / Avg: 188.49 / Max: 191.22Min: 194.78 / Avg: 195.35 / Max: 195.9

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x649001800270036004500SE +/- 0.33, N = 34220

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0415K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 30.42, N = 3SE +/- 7.88, N = 3SE +/- 22.98, N = 3712074854769420
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0412K24K36K48K60KMin: 71173 / Avg: 71207.33 / Max: 71268Min: 48535 / Avg: 48547.33 / Max: 48562Min: 69378 / Avg: 69420.33 / Max: 69457

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.048001600240032004000SE +/- 16.76, N = 3SE +/- 45.73, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3351332303429
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.046001200180024003000Min: 3493 / Avg: 3512.67 / Max: 3546Min: 3139 / Avg: 3230.33 / Max: 3280Min: 3424 / Avg: 3429.33 / Max: 3433

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x642K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 0.58, N = 39163

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0460K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 270.85, N = 3SE +/- 26.01, N = 3SE +/- 1016.16, N = 326583096072269563
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0450K100K150K200K250KMin: 265468 / Avg: 265830 / Max: 266360Min: 96028 / Avg: 96071.67 / Max: 96118Min: 267534 / Avg: 269563 / Max: 270678

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04110220330440550SE +/- 0.33, N = 3463499363
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0490180270360450Min: 362 / Avg: 362.67 / Max: 363

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.042004006008001000SE +/- 9.00, N = 3116111011137
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.042004006008001000Min: 1143 / Avg: 1161 / Max: 1170

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0420406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 286.5285.7384.41
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.041632486480Min: 86.24 / Avg: 86.52 / Max: 86.77Min: 85.32 / Avg: 85.73 / Max: 85.98Min: 84.1 / Avg: 84.41 / Max: 84.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04510152025SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 319.9921.4119.59
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04510152025Min: 19.93 / Avg: 19.99 / Max: 20.1Min: 21.4 / Avg: 21.41 / Max: 21.42Min: 19.54 / Avg: 19.59 / Max: 19.64

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0420406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 294.5992.1191.36
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0420406080100Min: 94.39 / Avg: 94.59 / Max: 94.91Min: 91.93 / Avg: 92.11 / Max: 92.36Min: 90.77 / Avg: 91.36 / Max: 91.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04714212835SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 323.5828.9023.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04612182430Min: 23.55 / Avg: 23.58 / Max: 23.59Min: 28.89 / Avg: 28.9 / Max: 28.92Min: 23.08 / Avg: 23.13 / Max: 23.19

GRID Autosport

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGRID AutosportResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: LowLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04306090120150125.63106.53119.35MIN: 96.62 / MAX: 173.13MIN: 90.84 / MAX: 126.64MIN: 58.43 / MAX: 167.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterGRID AutosportResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: UltraLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04163248648055.6669.9938.69MIN: 47.44 / MAX: 71.92MIN: 58.75 / MAX: 93.24MIN: 27.07 / MAX: 62.38

Shadow of Mordor

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of MordorResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: LowLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.042040608010069.5391.5168.66MIN: 15.62 / MAX: 102MIN: 66.27 / MAX: 127.78MIN: 17.82 / MAX: 99.55

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of MordorResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: UltraLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04102030405038.2145.6332.30MIN: 17.74 / MAX: 60.84MIN: 35.28 / MAX: 62.31MIN: 10.58 / MAX: 74.58

Total War: WARHAMMER

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMERResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: LowLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.04132639526554.259.647.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMERResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: UltraLinux 4.12 + Mesa 17.2-devWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 17.0481624324028.932.826.0