Hawk-8370_gputest_201703071601

AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core testing with a ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 and XFX AMD Radeon RX 480 8192MB on Ubuntu 16.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1703075-RI-HAWK8370G91
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Hawk-8370
March 07 2017
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Hawk-8370_gputest_201703071601OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD FX-8370 Eight-Core @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0AMD RD890 bridge16384MB256GB PLEXTOR PX-256M6 + 3001GB My Book 1235XFX AMD Radeon RX 480 8192MBRealtek ALC892VX2270Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 16.044.4.0-65-generic (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.4modesetting 1.18.44.5.13468OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2264.10)GCC 5.4.0 20160609ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionHawk-8370_gputest_201703071601 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- GLAMOR

Hawk-8370_gputest_201703071601gputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenHawk-837061838036060361852425913916503652OpenBenchmarking.org

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-837013002600390052006500SE +/- 2.08, N = 36183

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-837020K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 92.09, N = 380360

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-837013002600390052006500SE +/- 2.00, N = 36036

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-83704K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 4.81, N = 318524

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-837060K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 4829.14, N = 3259139

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-8370400800120016002000SE +/- 1.20, N = 31650

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenHawk-83708001600240032004000SE +/- 0.58, N = 33652