Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu Linux Intel Kabylake Gfx

Intel Core i7-7700K testing for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1702152-RI-INTEL790591
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10 Pro x64
February 12 2017
 
Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-dev
February 15 2017
 
Ubuntu 16.10
February 15 2017
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu Linux Intel Kabylake GfxProcessorDiskMotherboardChipsetMemoryGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devUbuntu 16.10Intel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 9 Intel (8 Cores)238GBWindows NT10.0 (x86_64)Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.60GHz (8 Cores)MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0Intel Device 591f15360MBSamsung SSD 950 PRO 256GBIntel Kabylake GT2 3072MB (1150MHz)Realtek ALC892Acer B286HKRealtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 16.104.10.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20170212Unity 7.5.0X Server 1.18.4modesetting 1.18.44.5 Mesa 17.1.0-devel- padoka PPA1.0.21GCC 6.2.0 20161005ext41920x10804.8.0-37-generic (x86_64)4.3 Mesa 12.0.3OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-dev, Ubuntu 16.10: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance

Windows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devUbuntu 16.10Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%136%171%207%243%OpenArenaUnigine ValleyUnigine HeavenXonoticGpuTest

Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu Linux Intel Kabylake Gfxopenarena: 1920 x 1080unigine-heaven: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimategputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x64Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devUbuntu 16.1034.1316.4318.52287.64158.81121.2086.561346855286331215399614943377.8014.8116.07227.99140.75110.2279.4985817304121914740482.8014.1413.11233.72135.90107.6077.64860871640486147402OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6420406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 1.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 382.8077.8034.13MIN: 2MIN: 2MIN: 1 / MAX: 76
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080Ubuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x641632486480Min: 82.6 / Avg: 82.8 / Max: 83.1Min: 75.9 / Avg: 77.8 / Max: 79.6Min: 33.6 / Avg: 34.13 / Max: 34.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x641326395265Min: 2 / Avg: 12.06 / Max: 28Min: 3 / Avg: 13.11 / Max: 29Min: 1 / Avg: 29.23 / Max: 67

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6448121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 314.1414.8116.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6448121620Min: 14.13 / Avg: 14.14 / Max: 14.16Min: 14.81 / Avg: 14.81 / Max: 14.82Min: 16.42 / Avg: 16.43 / Max: 16.43

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64510152025SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 313.1116.0718.52
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64510152025Min: 13.09 / Avg: 13.11 / Max: 13.14Min: 16.04 / Avg: 16.07 / Max: 16.11Min: 18.43 / Avg: 18.52 / Max: 18.67

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6460120180240300SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 1.04, N = 3233.72227.99287.64MIN: 159 / MAX: 367MIN: 155 / MAX: 352MIN: 207 / MAX: 481
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6450100150200250Min: 233.2 / Avg: 233.72 / Max: 234.4Min: 227.46 / Avg: 227.99 / Max: 228.56Min: 285.58 / Avg: 287.64 / Max: 288.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x644080120160200SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3135.90140.75158.81MIN: 86 / MAX: 163MIN: 84 / MAX: 176MIN: 98 / MAX: 210
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64306090120150Min: 135.7 / Avg: 135.9 / Max: 136.08Min: 140.08 / Avg: 140.75 / Max: 141.17Min: 158.73 / Avg: 158.81 / Max: 158.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3107.60110.22121.20MIN: 55 / MAX: 146MIN: 53 / MAX: 158MIN: 55 / MAX: 173
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6420406080100Min: 107.5 / Avg: 107.6 / Max: 107.73Min: 109.87 / Avg: 110.22 / Max: 110.4Min: 121.17 / Avg: 121.2 / Max: 121.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6420406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 377.6479.4986.56MIN: 40 / MAX: 119MIN: 40 / MAX: 125MIN: 39 / MAX: 142
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x641632486480Min: 77.59 / Avg: 77.64 / Max: 77.67Min: 79.45 / Avg: 79.49 / Max: 79.56Min: 86.54 / Avg: 86.56 / Max: 86.58

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x6430060090012001500SE +/- 0.33, N = 31346

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x642K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 10.27, N = 3SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3860885818552
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6415003000450060007500Min: 8595 / Avg: 8607.67 / Max: 8628Min: 8577 / Avg: 8580.67 / Max: 8584Min: 8551 / Avg: 8551.67 / Max: 8553

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x642004006008001000SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3716730863
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64150300450600750Min: 716 / Avg: 716.33 / Max: 717Min: 729 / Avg: 729.67 / Max: 731Min: 862 / Avg: 862.67 / Max: 863

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro x647001400210028003500SE +/- 0.33, N = 33121

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6412K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 179.94, N = 3SE +/- 70.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3404864121953996
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x649K18K27K36K45KMin: 40273 / Avg: 40486.33 / Max: 40844Min: 41082 / Avg: 41218.67 / Max: 41314Min: 53995 / Avg: 53995.67 / Max: 53996

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3147147149
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x64306090120150Min: 147 / Avg: 147 / Max: 147Min: 147 / Avg: 147 / Max: 147Min: 149 / Avg: 149 / Max: 149

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6490180270360450SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3402404433
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 16.10Ubuntu 16.10 - Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-devWindows 10 Pro x6480160240320400Min: 402 / Avg: 402 / Max: 402Min: 404 / Avg: 404 / Max: 404Min: 433 / Avg: 433 / Max: 433