Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D

Karol Herbst's 4.5 re-clocking Git tree on Ubuntu 16.04 with Mesa 11.3-dev. GLXVBlank 0. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com compared to AMD Radeon cards on the latest Radeon/AMDGPU kernel and RadeonSI Gallium3D driver code. The Nouveau results are when using Herbst's tree with the boost 2 level and 0f performance state.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1604198-HA-RADEONBOO58
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
Steam 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GeForce GTX 680
April 14 2016
 
GeForce GTX 760
April 14 2016
 
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
April 14 2016
 
Radeon R9 Fury
April 17 2016
 
Radeon R7 370
April 19 2016
 
Radeon R9 285
April 19 2016
 
Radeon R9 290
April 19 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

GeForce GTX 680

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

GeForce GTX 760

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB.

Radeon R9 Fury

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Radeon R7 370

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Radeon R9 290

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3DOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MBSapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBMSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MBXFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MBXFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MBRealtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64)4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3nouveau 1.0.12modesetting 1.18.34.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.44.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelsDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriversOpenGLsCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionNouveau Linux Boost Testing Vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 680: EXA- GeForce GTX 760: EXA- GeForce GTX 780 Ti: EXA- Radeon R9 Fury: GLAMOR- Radeon R7 370: GLAMOR- Radeon R9 285: GLAMOR- Radeon R9 290: GLAMOR

GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%147%194%240%287%BioShock InfiniteGpuTestOpenArenaUnigine ValleyTesseractXonoticTeam Fortress 2

Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3Dbioshock-infinite: 3840 x 2160 - Very Highdirt-showdown: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra - 4x MSAAopenarena: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 3840 x 2160tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - FullscreenGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 29023.5220.50204.93157.0082.0096.4740.33128.9393.303285011147030117142921.6015.43156.10131.5271.8784.1334.30108.5177.73338439196820013634130.2225.54258.47220.26130.20120.4559.54199.30141.4843943208411215428676962.04318.23223.43164.10113.9680.47205.21148.17417683106133373443117038.49133.10118.3672.0586.3134.42109.0479.902775310676757510729842.95193.73111.9964.22110.3246.22136.98101.382885514015807520152744.50206.73163.05106.98113.8163.68169.32128.2731973172381997239675OpenBenchmarking.org

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 Fury1428425670SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 321.6023.5230.2238.4942.9544.5062.04MIN: 12.64 / MAX: 81.68MIN: 12.67 / MAX: 82.03MIN: 14.92 / MAX: 82.06MIN: 9.83 / MAX: 81.88MIN: 11.1 / MAX: 81.78MIN: 11.26 / MAX: 81.92MIN: 10.81 / MAX: 82.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 Fury1224364860Min: 21.58 / Avg: 21.6 / Max: 21.61Min: 23.48 / Avg: 23.52 / Max: 23.54Min: 30.2 / Avg: 30.22 / Max: 30.23Min: 38.36 / Avg: 38.49 / Max: 38.65Min: 42.88 / Avg: 42.95 / Max: 43.01Min: 44.35 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 44.64Min: 61.84 / Avg: 62.04 / Max: 62.16

DiRT Showdown

This is a benchmark of DiRT Showdown on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 Ti612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 315.4320.5025.54MIN: 12.5MIN: 15.5MIN: 19.31
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 780 Ti612182430Min: 15.41 / Avg: 15.43 / Max: 15.45Min: 20.46 / Avg: 20.5 / Max: 20.51Min: 25.5 / Avg: 25.54 / Max: 25.57

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury70140210280350SE +/- 2.33, N = 4SE +/- 1.29, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.87, N = 3SE +/- 1.19, N = 3SE +/- 2.63, N = 3133.10156.10193.73204.93206.73258.47318.23MIN: 1MIN: 3MIN: 1MIN: 2MIN: 1MIN: 1MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury60120180240300Min: 129.8 / Avg: 133.1 / Max: 140Min: 153.6 / Avg: 156.1 / Max: 157.9Min: 191.7 / Avg: 193.73 / Max: 195.7Min: 203.9 / Avg: 204.93 / Max: 205.9Min: 205 / Avg: 206.73 / Max: 207.8Min: 256.1 / Avg: 258.47 / Max: 259.8Min: 313.2 / Avg: 318.23 / Max: 322.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury714212835Min: 2 / Avg: 7.6 / Max: 31Min: 3 / Avg: 6.36 / Max: 20Min: 1 / Avg: 5.2 / Max: 29Min: 2 / Avg: 4.87 / Max: 28Min: 1 / Avg: 4.86 / Max: 31Min: 1 / Avg: 3.84 / Max: 32Min: 1 / Avg: 3.09 / Max: 29

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 1.44, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.36, N = 3111.99118.36131.52157.00163.05220.26223.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury4080120160200Min: 109.84 / Avg: 111.99 / Max: 114.14Min: 115.96 / Avg: 118.36 / Max: 120.94Min: 126.86 / Avg: 131.52 / Max: 134.27Min: 156.8 / Avg: 157 / Max: 157.36Min: 157.58 / Avg: 163.05 / Max: 165.83Min: 219.85 / Avg: 220.26 / Max: 220.64Min: 221.36 / Avg: 223.43 / Max: 225.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury4080120160200SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 1.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.40, N = 3SE +/- 2.08, N = 364.2271.8772.0582.00106.98130.20164.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury306090120150Min: 64 / Avg: 64.22 / Max: 64.53Min: 71.69 / Avg: 71.87 / Max: 72.14Min: 71.67 / Avg: 72.05 / Max: 72.62Min: 81.21 / Avg: 82 / Max: 82.68Min: 104.35 / Avg: 106.98 / Max: 109.41Min: 127.74 / Avg: 130.2 / Max: 132.59Min: 159.95 / Avg: 164.1 / Max: 166.39

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.69, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 384.1386.3196.47110.32113.81113.96120.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 Ti20406080100Min: 83.17 / Avg: 84.13 / Max: 85.04Min: 85.23 / Avg: 86.31 / Max: 87.59Min: 94.77 / Avg: 96.47 / Max: 97.52Min: 108.65 / Avg: 110.32 / Max: 111.45Min: 111.92 / Avg: 113.81 / Max: 115.32Min: 110.94 / Avg: 113.96 / Max: 116.44Min: 119.8 / Avg: 120.45 / Max: 121.64

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 Fury20406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 334.3034.4240.3346.2259.5463.6880.47
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 Fury1530456075Min: 34.25 / Avg: 34.3 / Max: 34.36Min: 34.39 / Avg: 34.42 / Max: 34.45Min: 40.28 / Avg: 40.33 / Max: 40.39Min: 46.2 / Avg: 46.22 / Max: 46.24Min: 59.42 / Avg: 59.54 / Max: 59.74Min: 63.62 / Avg: 63.68 / Max: 63.73Min: 80.24 / Avg: 80.47 / Max: 80.78

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury50100150200250SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 1.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.57, N = 3SE +/- 3.20, N = 3108.51109.04128.93136.98169.32199.30205.21MIN: 53 / MAX: 160MIN: 46 / MAX: 182MIN: 67 / MAX: 182MIN: 52 / MAX: 214MIN: 73 / MAX: 290MIN: 100 / MAX: 297MIN: 54 / MAX: 468
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury4080120160200Min: 108.05 / Avg: 108.51 / Max: 108.82Min: 107.73 / Avg: 109.04 / Max: 110.35Min: 126.99 / Avg: 128.93 / Max: 129.98Min: 136.64 / Avg: 136.98 / Max: 137.47Min: 167.45 / Avg: 169.32 / Max: 171.32Min: 197.46 / Avg: 199.3 / Max: 202.44Min: 198.82 / Avg: 205.21 / Max: 208.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury306090120150SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 1.40, N = 3SE +/- 1.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.64, N = 377.7379.9093.30101.38128.27141.48148.17MIN: 30 / MAX: 129MIN: 34 / MAX: 147MIN: 32 / MAX: 150MIN: 37 / MAX: 184MIN: 46 / MAX: 258MIN: 29 / MAX: 247MIN: 40 / MAX: 404
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury306090120150Min: 77.41 / Avg: 77.73 / Max: 78.14Min: 79.43 / Avg: 79.9 / Max: 80.26Min: 93.08 / Avg: 93.3 / Max: 93.46Min: 98.73 / Avg: 101.38 / Max: 103.47Min: 126.56 / Avg: 128.27 / Max: 130.9Min: 140.22 / Avg: 141.48 / Max: 142.51Min: 145.1 / Avg: 148.17 / Max: 150.72

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 Ti9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 50.72, N = 3SE +/- 13.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 28.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 327753288553197332850338434176843943
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 Ti8K16K24K32K40KMin: 27652 / Avg: 27753.33 / Max: 27808Min: 28838 / Avg: 28854.67 / Max: 28881Min: 31972 / Avg: 31973.33 / Max: 31974Min: 32846 / Avg: 32849.67 / Max: 32852Min: 33843 / Avg: 33843.33 / Max: 33844Min: 41739 / Avg: 41768 / Max: 41825Min: 43942 / Avg: 43942.67 / Max: 43944

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury7001400210028003500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 16.19, N = 3919106711141401172320843106
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury5001000150020002500Min: 919 / Avg: 919 / Max: 919Min: 1064 / Avg: 1067.33 / Max: 1069Min: 1114 / Avg: 1114 / Max: 1114Min: 1401 / Avg: 1401 / Max: 1401Min: 1719 / Avg: 1722.67 / Max: 1730Min: 2084 / Avg: 2084 / Max: 2084Min: 3074 / Avg: 3106.33 / Max: 3124

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 236.96, N = 3SE +/- 14.01, N = 3SE +/- 4.48, N = 3SE +/- 9.53, N = 3SE +/- 60.54, N = 3SE +/- 12.29, N = 3SE +/- 21.96, N = 35807567575682007030181997112154133373
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury20K40K60K80K100KMin: 57607 / Avg: 58074.67 / Max: 58375Min: 67548 / Avg: 67575 / Max: 67595Min: 68191 / Avg: 68199.67 / Max: 68206Min: 70285 / Avg: 70301.33 / Max: 70318Min: 81923 / Avg: 81997 / Max: 82117Min: 112135 / Avg: 112154 / Max: 112177Min: 133330 / Avg: 133372.67 / Max: 133403

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury100200300400500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3107136171201239286443
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury80160240320400Min: 107 / Avg: 107 / Max: 107Min: 136 / Avg: 136 / Max: 136Min: 171 / Avg: 171.33 / Max: 172Min: 201 / Avg: 201 / Max: 201Min: 239 / Avg: 239 / Max: 239Min: 285 / Avg: 285.67 / Max: 286Min: 443 / Avg: 443 / Max: 443

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury30060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 32983414295276757691170
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 Fury2004006008001000Min: 298 / Avg: 298 / Max: 298Min: 340 / Avg: 341.33 / Max: 342Min: 428 / Avg: 428.67 / Max: 429Min: 527 / Avg: 527 / Max: 527Min: 675 / Avg: 675 / Max: 675Min: 769 / Avg: 769 / Max: 769Min: 1170 / Avg: 1170 / Max: 1170

GeForce GTX 680

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 20:31 by user phoronix.

GeForce GTX 760

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 21:56 by user phoronix.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 17:22 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 Fury

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 17 April 2016 08:59 by user phoronix.

Radeon R7 370

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 08:29 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 09:57 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 290

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 11:12 by user phoronix.