Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D

Karol Herbst's 4.5 re-clocking Git tree on Ubuntu 16.04 with Mesa 11.3-dev. GLXVBlank 0. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com compared to AMD Radeon cards on the latest Radeon/AMDGPU kernel and RadeonSI Gallium3D driver code. The Nouveau results are when using Herbst's tree with the boost 2 level and 0f performance state.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1604198-HA-RADEONBOO58
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
Steam 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GeForce GTX 680
April 14 2016
 
GeForce GTX 760
April 14 2016
 
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
April 14 2016
 
Radeon R9 Fury
April 17 2016
 
Radeon R7 370
April 19 2016
 
Radeon R9 285
April 19 2016
 
Radeon R9 290
April 19 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

GeForce GTX 680

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

GeForce GTX 760

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB.

Radeon R9 Fury

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Radeon R7 370

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Radeon R9 290

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3DOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MBSapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MBMSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MBXFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MBXFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MBRealtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64)4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3nouveau 1.0.12modesetting 1.18.34.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.44.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelsDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriversOpenGLsCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionNouveau Linux Boost Testing Vs. RadeonSI Gallium3D BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GeForce GTX 680: EXA- GeForce GTX 760: EXA- GeForce GTX 780 Ti: EXA- Radeon R9 Fury: GLAMOR- Radeon R7 370: GLAMOR- Radeon R9 285: GLAMOR- Radeon R9 290: GLAMOR

GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 290Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%147%194%240%287%BioShock InfiniteGpuTestOpenArenaUnigine ValleyTesseractXonoticTeam Fortress 2

Nouveau Linux Boost Testing vs. RadeonSI Gallium3Dbioshock-infinite: 3840 x 2160 - Very Highdirt-showdown: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra - 4x MSAAopenarena: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 3840 x 2160tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - FullscreenGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R7 370Radeon R9 285Radeon R9 29023.5220.50204.93157.0082.0096.4740.33128.9393.303285011147030117142921.6015.43156.10131.5271.8784.1334.30108.5177.73338439196820013634130.2225.54258.47220.26130.20120.4559.54199.30141.4843943208411215428676962.04318.23223.43164.10113.9680.47205.21148.17417683106133373443117038.49133.10118.3672.0586.3134.42109.0479.902775310676757510729842.95193.73111.9964.22110.3246.22136.98101.382885514015807520152744.50206.73163.05106.98113.8163.68169.32128.2731973172381997239675OpenBenchmarking.org

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 7601428425670SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 362.0444.5042.9538.4930.2223.5221.60MIN: 10.81 / MAX: 82.03MIN: 11.26 / MAX: 81.92MIN: 11.1 / MAX: 81.78MIN: 9.83 / MAX: 81.88MIN: 14.92 / MAX: 82.06MIN: 12.67 / MAX: 82.03MIN: 12.64 / MAX: 81.68
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 7601224364860Min: 61.84 / Avg: 62.04 / Max: 62.16Min: 44.35 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 44.64Min: 42.88 / Avg: 42.95 / Max: 43.01Min: 38.36 / Avg: 38.49 / Max: 38.65Min: 30.2 / Avg: 30.22 / Max: 30.23Min: 23.48 / Avg: 23.52 / Max: 23.54Min: 21.58 / Avg: 21.6 / Max: 21.61

DiRT Showdown

This is a benchmark of DiRT Showdown on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760612182430SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 325.5420.5015.43MIN: 19.31MIN: 15.5MIN: 12.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760612182430Min: 25.5 / Avg: 25.54 / Max: 25.57Min: 20.46 / Avg: 20.5 / Max: 20.51Min: 15.41 / Avg: 15.43 / Max: 15.45

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 37070140210280350SE +/- 2.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.87, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 1.29, N = 3SE +/- 2.33, N = 4318.23258.47206.73204.93193.73156.10133.10MIN: 1MIN: 1MIN: 1MIN: 2MIN: 1MIN: 3MIN: 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 37060120180240300Min: 313.2 / Avg: 318.23 / Max: 322.1Min: 256.1 / Avg: 258.47 / Max: 259.8Min: 205 / Avg: 206.73 / Max: 207.8Min: 203.9 / Avg: 204.93 / Max: 205.9Min: 191.7 / Avg: 193.73 / Max: 195.7Min: 153.6 / Avg: 156.1 / Max: 157.9Min: 129.8 / Avg: 133.1 / Max: 140

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370714212835Min: 1 / Avg: 3.09 / Max: 29Min: 1 / Avg: 3.84 / Max: 32Min: 1 / Avg: 4.86 / Max: 31Min: 2 / Avg: 4.87 / Max: 28Min: 1 / Avg: 5.2 / Max: 29Min: 3 / Avg: 6.36 / Max: 20Min: 2 / Avg: 7.6 / Max: 31

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 28550100150200250SE +/- 1.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 1.44, N = 3SE +/- 1.24, N = 3223.43220.26163.05157.00131.52118.36111.99
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 2854080120160200Min: 221.36 / Avg: 223.43 / Max: 225.99Min: 219.85 / Avg: 220.26 / Max: 220.64Min: 157.58 / Avg: 163.05 / Max: 165.83Min: 156.8 / Avg: 157 / Max: 157.36Min: 126.86 / Avg: 131.52 / Max: 134.27Min: 115.96 / Avg: 118.36 / Max: 120.94Min: 109.84 / Avg: 111.99 / Max: 114.14

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 2854080120160200SE +/- 2.08, N = 3SE +/- 1.40, N = 3SE +/- 1.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3164.10130.20106.9882.0072.0571.8764.22
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 285306090120150Min: 159.95 / Avg: 164.1 / Max: 166.39Min: 127.74 / Avg: 130.2 / Max: 132.59Min: 104.35 / Avg: 106.98 / Max: 109.41Min: 81.21 / Avg: 82 / Max: 82.68Min: 71.67 / Avg: 72.05 / Max: 72.62Min: 71.69 / Avg: 71.87 / Max: 72.14Min: 64 / Avg: 64.22 / Max: 64.53

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760306090120150SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 1.61, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.69, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3120.45113.96113.81110.3296.4786.3184.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 76020406080100Min: 119.8 / Avg: 120.45 / Max: 121.64Min: 110.94 / Avg: 113.96 / Max: 116.44Min: 111.92 / Avg: 113.81 / Max: 115.32Min: 108.65 / Avg: 110.32 / Max: 111.45Min: 94.77 / Avg: 96.47 / Max: 97.52Min: 85.23 / Avg: 86.31 / Max: 87.59Min: 83.17 / Avg: 84.13 / Max: 85.04

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 76020406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 380.4763.6859.5446.2240.3334.4234.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 7601530456075Min: 80.24 / Avg: 80.47 / Max: 80.78Min: 63.62 / Avg: 63.68 / Max: 63.73Min: 59.42 / Avg: 59.54 / Max: 59.74Min: 46.2 / Avg: 46.22 / Max: 46.24Min: 40.28 / Avg: 40.33 / Max: 40.39Min: 34.39 / Avg: 34.42 / Max: 34.45Min: 34.25 / Avg: 34.3 / Max: 34.36

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 76050100150200250SE +/- 3.20, N = 3SE +/- 1.57, N = 3SE +/- 1.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3205.21199.30169.32136.98128.93109.04108.51MIN: 54 / MAX: 468MIN: 100 / MAX: 297MIN: 73 / MAX: 290MIN: 52 / MAX: 214MIN: 67 / MAX: 182MIN: 46 / MAX: 182MIN: 53 / MAX: 160
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 7604080120160200Min: 198.82 / Avg: 205.21 / Max: 208.79Min: 197.46 / Avg: 199.3 / Max: 202.44Min: 167.45 / Avg: 169.32 / Max: 171.32Min: 136.64 / Avg: 136.98 / Max: 137.47Min: 126.99 / Avg: 128.93 / Max: 129.98Min: 107.73 / Avg: 109.04 / Max: 110.35Min: 108.05 / Avg: 108.51 / Max: 108.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760306090120150SE +/- 1.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.34, N = 3SE +/- 1.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3148.17141.48128.27101.3893.3079.9077.73MIN: 40 / MAX: 404MIN: 29 / MAX: 247MIN: 46 / MAX: 258MIN: 37 / MAX: 184MIN: 32 / MAX: 150MIN: 34 / MAX: 147MIN: 30 / MAX: 129
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 760306090120150Min: 145.1 / Avg: 148.17 / Max: 150.72Min: 140.22 / Avg: 141.48 / Max: 142.51Min: 126.56 / Avg: 128.27 / Max: 130.9Min: 98.73 / Avg: 101.38 / Max: 103.47Min: 93.08 / Avg: 93.3 / Max: 93.46Min: 79.43 / Avg: 79.9 / Max: 80.26Min: 77.41 / Avg: 77.73 / Max: 78.14

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 3709K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 28.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 1.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 13.32, N = 3SE +/- 50.72, N = 343943417683384332850319732885527753
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 680Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 285Radeon R7 3708K16K24K32K40KMin: 43942 / Avg: 43942.67 / Max: 43944Min: 41739 / Avg: 41768 / Max: 41825Min: 33843 / Avg: 33843.33 / Max: 33844Min: 32846 / Avg: 32849.67 / Max: 32852Min: 31972 / Avg: 31973.33 / Max: 31974Min: 28838 / Avg: 28854.67 / Max: 28881Min: 27652 / Avg: 27753.33 / Max: 27808

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 7607001400210028003500SE +/- 16.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3310620841723140111141067919
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680Radeon R7 370GeForce GTX 7605001000150020002500Min: 3074 / Avg: 3106.33 / Max: 3124Min: 2084 / Avg: 2084 / Max: 2084Min: 1719 / Avg: 1722.67 / Max: 1730Min: 1401 / Avg: 1401 / Max: 1401Min: 1114 / Avg: 1114 / Max: 1114Min: 1064 / Avg: 1067.33 / Max: 1069Min: 919 / Avg: 919 / Max: 919

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 28530K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 21.96, N = 3SE +/- 12.29, N = 3SE +/- 60.54, N = 3SE +/- 9.53, N = 3SE +/- 4.48, N = 3SE +/- 14.01, N = 3SE +/- 236.96, N = 31333731121548199770301682006757558075
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370Radeon R9 28520K40K60K80K100KMin: 133330 / Avg: 133372.67 / Max: 133403Min: 112135 / Avg: 112154 / Max: 112177Min: 81923 / Avg: 81997 / Max: 82117Min: 70285 / Avg: 70301.33 / Max: 70318Min: 68191 / Avg: 68199.67 / Max: 68206Min: 67548 / Avg: 67575 / Max: 67595Min: 57607 / Avg: 58074.67 / Max: 58375

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 370100200300400500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3443286239201171136107
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 37080160240320400Min: 443 / Avg: 443 / Max: 443Min: 285 / Avg: 285.67 / Max: 286Min: 239 / Avg: 239 / Max: 239Min: 201 / Avg: 201 / Max: 201Min: 171 / Avg: 171.33 / Max: 172Min: 136 / Avg: 136 / Max: 136Min: 107 / Avg: 107 / Max: 107

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 37030060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 31170769675527429341298
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenRadeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX 780 TiRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 285GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 760Radeon R7 3702004006008001000Min: 1170 / Avg: 1170 / Max: 1170Min: 769 / Avg: 769 / Max: 769Min: 675 / Avg: 675 / Max: 675Min: 527 / Avg: 527 / Max: 527Min: 428 / Avg: 428.67 / Max: 429Min: 340 / Avg: 341.33 / Max: 342Min: 298 / Avg: 298 / Max: 298

GeForce GTX 680

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 20:31 by user phoronix.

GeForce GTX 760

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 21:56 by user phoronix.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 17:22 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 Fury

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 17 April 2016 08:59 by user phoronix.

Radeon R7 370

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 08:29 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 09:57 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 290

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.6.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160413, Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, OpenGL: 4.2 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: GLAMOR

Testing initiated at 19 April 2016 11:12 by user phoronix.