Nouveau Boost Testing

Karol Herbst's 4.5 re-clocking Git tree on Ubuntu 16.04 with Mesa 11.3-dev. GLXVBlank 0. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1604155-HA-NOUVEAUBO97
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
Steam 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Comparison
Transpose Comparison

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Boost 1: GTX 680
April 14 2016
 
Boost 2: GTX 680
April 14 2016
 
Boost 1: GTX 760
April 14 2016
 
Boost 2: GTX 760
April 14 2016
 
Boost 1: GTX 780 Ti
April 14 2016
 
Boost 2: GTX 780 Ti
April 14 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Boost 2: GTX 780 Ti

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Boost 1: GTX 780 Ti

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Boost 1: GTX 680

Boost 2: GTX 680

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB.

Boost 2: GTX 760

Boost 1: GTX 760

Changed Graphics to NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB.

Nouveau Boost TestingOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0Intel Sky Lake16384MB120GB Samsung SSD 850NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MBRealtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 16.044.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64)Unity 7.4.0X Server 1.18.3nouveau 1.0.124.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4GCC 5.3.1 20160413ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionNouveau Boost Testing BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- EXA

bioshock-infinite: 3840 x 2160 - Very Highdirt-showdown: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra - 4x MSAAopenarena: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 2560 x 1440tesseract: 3840 x 2160tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimategputest: Plot3D - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 2560 x 1440 - FullscreenBoost 2Boost 1Boost 2Boost 1 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti GTX 680 GTX 680 GTX 760 GTX 76030.2225.54258.47220.26130.20120.4559.54199.30141.4843943208411215428676927.7523.92245.97208.34120.20119.9254.60187.00133.8240348190410457725969623.4220.50198.10152.1981.4797.1340.27128.7792.663282811137033817142923.5220.50204.93157.0082.0096.4740.33128.9393.303285011147030117142921.6015.43156.10131.5271.8784.1334.30108.5177.73338439196820013634120.7318.75165.93129.4868.4583.1832.23107.5576.463233785666826125315OpenBenchmarking.org

BioShock Infinite

A Steam-based test of the BioShock Infinite game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760714212835SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 330.2223.5221.6027.7523.4220.73
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBioShock InfiniteResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Very HighGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760714212835Min: 30.2 / Avg: 30.22 / Max: 30.23Min: 23.48 / Avg: 23.52 / Max: 23.54Min: 21.58 / Avg: 21.6 / Max: 21.61Min: 27.73 / Avg: 27.75 / Max: 27.76Min: 23.41 / Avg: 23.42 / Max: 23.43Min: 20.73 / Avg: 20.73 / Max: 20.73

DiRT Showdown

This is a benchmark of DiRT Showdown on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760612182430SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 325.5420.5015.4323.9220.5018.75
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT ShowdownResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 4x MSAAGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760612182430Min: 25.5 / Avg: 25.54 / Max: 25.57Min: 20.46 / Avg: 20.5 / Max: 20.51Min: 15.41 / Avg: 15.43 / Max: 15.45Min: 23.89 / Avg: 23.92 / Max: 23.94Min: 20.44 / Avg: 20.5 / Max: 20.55Min: 18.72 / Avg: 18.75 / Max: 18.77

OpenArena

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76060120180240300SE +/- 1.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.29, N = 3SE +/- 1.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 1.32, N = 3258.47204.93156.10245.97198.10165.93
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76050100150200250Min: 256.1 / Avg: 258.47 / Max: 259.8Min: 203.9 / Avg: 204.93 / Max: 205.9Min: 153.6 / Avg: 156.1 / Max: 157.9Min: 244.8 / Avg: 245.97 / Max: 248Min: 197.5 / Avg: 198.1 / Max: 198.5Min: 163.3 / Avg: 165.93 / Max: 167.5

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760714212835Min: 1 / Avg: 3.84 / Max: 32Min: 2 / Avg: 4.87 / Max: 28Min: 3 / Avg: 6.36 / Max: 20Min: 1 / Avg: 4.07 / Max: 33Min: 2 / Avg: 5.05 / Max: 24Min: 3 / Avg: 6.11 / Max: 28

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76050100150200250SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3220.26157.00131.52208.34152.19129.48
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7604080120160200Min: 219.85 / Avg: 220.26 / Max: 220.64Min: 156.8 / Avg: 157 / Max: 157.36Min: 126.86 / Avg: 131.52 / Max: 134.27Min: 206.73 / Avg: 208.34 / Max: 210.74Min: 149.98 / Avg: 152.19 / Max: 153.91Min: 127.97 / Avg: 129.48 / Max: 130.82

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760306090120150SE +/- 1.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3130.2082.0071.87120.2081.4768.45
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76020406080100Min: 127.74 / Avg: 130.2 / Max: 132.59Min: 81.21 / Avg: 82 / Max: 82.68Min: 71.69 / Avg: 71.87 / Max: 72.14Min: 118.04 / Avg: 120.2 / Max: 122.73Min: 80.84 / Avg: 81.47 / Max: 82.05Min: 67.73 / Avg: 68.45 / Max: 68.87

Team Fortress 2

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760306090120150SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 3120.4596.4784.13119.9297.1383.18
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160GTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76020406080100Min: 119.8 / Avg: 120.45 / Max: 121.64Min: 94.77 / Avg: 96.47 / Max: 97.52Min: 83.17 / Avg: 84.13 / Max: 85.04Min: 119.33 / Avg: 119.92 / Max: 120.67Min: 96.54 / Avg: 97.13 / Max: 97.83Min: 82.74 / Avg: 83.18 / Max: 84.02

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7601326395265SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 359.5440.3334.3054.6040.2732.23
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7601224364860Min: 59.42 / Avg: 59.54 / Max: 59.74Min: 40.28 / Avg: 40.33 / Max: 40.39Min: 34.25 / Avg: 34.3 / Max: 34.36Min: 54.54 / Avg: 54.6 / Max: 54.69Min: 40.19 / Avg: 40.27 / Max: 40.39Min: 32.22 / Avg: 32.23 / Max: 32.25

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7604080120160200SE +/- 1.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3199.30128.93108.51187.00128.77107.55
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7604080120160200Min: 197.46 / Avg: 199.3 / Max: 202.44Min: 126.99 / Avg: 128.93 / Max: 129.98Min: 108.05 / Avg: 108.51 / Max: 108.82Min: 185.38 / Avg: 187 / Max: 189.49Min: 127.74 / Avg: 128.77 / Max: 129.71Min: 107.13 / Avg: 107.55 / Max: 107.93

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760306090120150SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3141.4893.3077.73133.8292.6676.46
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760306090120150Min: 140.22 / Avg: 141.48 / Max: 142.51Min: 93.08 / Avg: 93.3 / Max: 93.46Min: 77.41 / Avg: 77.73 / Max: 78.14Min: 133.4 / Avg: 133.82 / Max: 134.11Min: 92.22 / Avg: 92.66 / Max: 93.47Min: 76.36 / Avg: 76.46 / Max: 76.62

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7609K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3439433285033843403483282832337
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 7608K16K24K32K40KMin: 43942 / Avg: 43942.67 / Max: 43944Min: 32846 / Avg: 32849.67 / Max: 32852Min: 33843 / Avg: 33843.33 / Max: 33844Min: 40347 / Avg: 40347.67 / Max: 40348Min: 32827 / Avg: 32828 / Max: 32829Min: 32337 / Avg: 32337.33 / Max: 32338

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760400800120016002000SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 32084111491919041113856
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760400800120016002000Min: 2084 / Avg: 2084 / Max: 2084Min: 1114 / Avg: 1114 / Max: 1114Min: 919 / Avg: 919 / Max: 919Min: 1904 / Avg: 1904.33 / Max: 1905Min: 1113 / Avg: 1113 / Max: 1113Min: 856 / Avg: 856 / Max: 856

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76020K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 12.29, N = 3SE +/- 9.53, N = 3SE +/- 4.48, N = 3SE +/- 5.04, N = 3SE +/- 7.37, N = 3SE +/- 7.17, N = 311215470301682001045777033866826
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76020K40K60K80K100KMin: 112135 / Avg: 112154 / Max: 112177Min: 70285 / Avg: 70301.33 / Max: 70318Min: 68191 / Avg: 68199.67 / Max: 68206Min: 104567 / Avg: 104576.67 / Max: 104584Min: 70327 / Avg: 70338 / Max: 70352Min: 66812 / Avg: 66826.33 / Max: 66834

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76060120180240300SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3286171136259171125
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 76050100150200250Min: 285 / Avg: 285.67 / Max: 286Min: 171 / Avg: 171.33 / Max: 172Min: 136 / Avg: 136 / Max: 136Min: 259 / Avg: 259.33 / Max: 260Min: 171 / Avg: 171.33 / Max: 172Min: 124 / Avg: 124.67 / Max: 125

Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760170340510680850SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3769429341696429315
Boost 2Boost 1OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: FullscreenGTX 780 TiGTX 680GTX 760140280420560700Min: 769 / Avg: 769 / Max: 769Min: 428 / Avg: 428.67 / Max: 429Min: 340 / Avg: 341.33 / Max: 342Min: 696 / Avg: 696.33 / Max: 697Min: 428 / Avg: 428.67 / Max: 429Min: 314 / Avg: 314.67 / Max: 315

Boost 2: GTX 780 Ti

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 17:22 by user phoronix.

Boost 1: GTX 780 Ti

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 18:22 by user phoronix.

Boost 1: GTX 680

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 19:31 by user phoronix.

Boost 2: GTX 680

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 20:31 by user phoronix.

Boost 2: GTX 760

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 21:56 by user phoronix.

Boost 1: GTX 760

Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.5.0-karolherbst-nouveau (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Server: X Server 1.18.3, Display Driver: nouveau 1.0.12, OpenGL: 4.1 Mesa 11.3.0-devel (padoka PPA) Gallium 0.4, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Graphics Notes: EXA

Testing initiated at 14 April 2016 23:32 by user phoronix.