Intel Skylake DRI2 vs. DRI3 Ubuntu Linux

Intel Core i5-6600K testing of DRI2 vs. DRI2 direct rendering with OpenGL on Intel Skylake driver on Ubuntu. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1602207-GA-DRI33787295
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
DRI2
February 19 2016
 
DRI3
February 19 2016
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Minute
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Intel Skylake DRI2 vs. DRI3 Ubuntu LinuxOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores)MSI Z170A GAMING PRO (MS-7984) v1.0Intel Sky Lake15360MB256GB TS256GSSD370SIntel Sky Lake (1150MHz)Realtek ALC1150DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 15.104.5.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160218UnityX Server 1.17.2intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 11.2.0-devel (padoka PPA)GCC 5.2.1 20151010ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionIntel Skylake DRI2 Vs. DRI3 Ubuntu Linux BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- SNA

DRI2 vs. DRI3 ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+6.8%+6.8%+13.6%+13.6%+20.4%+20.4%+27.2%+27.2%27.3%19%14.4%8.2%8.2%8.1%6.2%4.3%3.6%3840 x 2160 - Low1920 x 10801920 x 10803840 x 2160 - High2560 x 14401920 x 10803840 x 2160 - Ultra3840 x 2160 - Ultimate3840 x 2160XonoticOpenArenaTeam Fortress 2XonoticTesseractTesseractXonoticXonoticTeam Fortress 2DRI2DRI3

Intel Skylake DRI2 vs. DRI3 Ubuntu Linuxopenarena: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 2560 x 1440tf2: 1920 x 1080tf2: 3840 x 2160unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - UltimateDRI2DRI351.2043.6031.2443.4021.777.4258.8729.6024.5319.1660.9347.1533.7949.6422.567.4074.9732.0326.0619.99OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31428425670SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 351.2060.93MIN: 12 / MAX: 68MIN: 9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31224364860Min: 49.9 / Avg: 51.2 / Max: 52.8Min: 60.3 / Avg: 60.93 / Max: 61.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeDRI2DRI31224364860Min: 12 / Avg: 18.92 / Max: 61Min: 10 / Avg: 16.51 / Max: 54

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31122334455SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 343.6047.15
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31020304050Min: 43.38 / Avg: 43.6 / Max: 43.79Min: 46.33 / Avg: 47.15 / Max: 48.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440DRI2DRI3816243240SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 331.2433.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440DRI2DRI3714212835Min: 30.83 / Avg: 31.24 / Max: 31.67Min: 33.53 / Avg: 33.79 / Max: 34.25

Team Fortress 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31122334455SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 343.4049.64
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080DRI2DRI31020304050Min: 42.62 / Avg: 43.4 / Max: 44.29Min: 49.21 / Avg: 49.64 / Max: 50.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160DRI2DRI3510152025SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 321.7722.56
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160DRI2DRI3510152025Min: 21.69 / Avg: 21.77 / Max: 21.84Min: 22.52 / Avg: 22.56 / Max: 22.6

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenDRI2DRI3246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 37.427.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenDRI2DRI33691215Min: 7.41 / Avg: 7.42 / Max: 7.43Min: 7.39 / Avg: 7.4 / Max: 7.41

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowDRI2DRI320406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 358.8774.97MIN: 37 / MAX: 79MIN: 43 / MAX: 117
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowDRI2DRI31428425670Min: 58.58 / Avg: 58.87 / Max: 59.11Min: 74.88 / Avg: 74.97 / Max: 75.05

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighDRI2DRI3714212835SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 329.6032.03MIN: 17 / MAX: 38MIN: 19 / MAX: 44
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighDRI2DRI3714212835Min: 29.55 / Avg: 29.6 / Max: 29.63Min: 31.98 / Avg: 32.03 / Max: 32.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraDRI2DRI3612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 324.5326.06MIN: 12 / MAX: 34MIN: 13 / MAX: 38
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraDRI2DRI3612182430Min: 24.49 / Avg: 24.53 / Max: 24.59Min: 26.05 / Avg: 26.06 / Max: 26.08

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateDRI2DRI3510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 319.1619.99MIN: 9 / MAX: 29MIN: 10 / MAX: 31
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateDRI2DRI3510152025Min: 19.14 / Avg: 19.16 / Max: 19.17Min: 19.98 / Avg: 19.99 / Max: 20.01