Radeon R600g Performance On Ubuntu Linux Releases.

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1509095-HA-R600GRADE36
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1
September 08 2015
 
Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2
September 05 2015
 
Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1
September 05 2015
 
Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3
September 04 2015
 
Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5
September 08 2015
 
Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev
September 09 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Radeon R600g Performance On Ubuntu Linux Releases.ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-devIntel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores)Gigabyte X99-UD4-CFIntel Haswell-E DMI216384MB240GB OCZ VERTEX3Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6870 1024MBRealtek ALC1150SyncMasterIntel Device 15a1Ubuntu 13.043.8.0-19-generic (x86_64)Xfce 4.10X Server 1.13.3radeon 7.1.03.0 Mesa 9.1.7 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.7.3ext42560x1600Intel ConnectionUbuntu 13.103.11.0-12-generic (x86_64)X Server 1.14.3radeon 7.2.03.1 Mesa 9.2.1 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.8.1Ubuntu 14.043.13.0-24-generic (x86_64)X Server 1.15.1radeon 7.3.03.3 Mesa 10.1.3 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.8.4Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores)Intel Xeon E5 v3/CoreIntel C610/X99Ubuntu 14.103.16.0-23-generic (x86_64)X Server 1.16.0radeon 7.4.03.3 Mesa 10.3.2 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.9.1Ubuntu 15.043.19.0-15-generic (x86_64)Xfce 4.12X Server 1.17.1radeon 7.5.03.3 Mesa 10.5.9 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.9.2Realtek ALC11504.2.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20150907radeon 7.5.993.3 Mesa 11.1.0-devel (git-c12ffb3) Gallium 0.4GCC 4.9.2 + LLVM 3.8.0OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- EXA

Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-devLogarithmic Result OverviewPhoronix Test SuiteOpenArenaWarsowXonoticGpuTestOpenArenaXonoticXonoticGpuTest2560 x 16002560 x 16002560 x 1600 - UltraFurmark - 2560 x 1600 - Fullscreen2560 x 16002560 x 1600 - Ultimate2560 x 1600 - HighTriangle - 2560 x 1600 - Fullscreen

Radeon R600g Performance On Ubuntu Linux Releases.openarena: 2560 x 1600openarena: 2560 x 1600tesseract: 2560 x 1600unigine-tropics: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenwarsow: 2560 x 1600xonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultraxonotic: 2560 x 1600 - Ultimategputest: Furmark - 2560 x 1600 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 2560 x 1600 - FullscreenUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev231.0325.5048.0098.5953.5337.2565543389327.97105.1756.6673.70123.0177.0755.6771855313332.9798.3084.7388.63124.8887.2261.4696144016271.2591.5078.0571.1180.90133.6784.5358.4084541528389.5098.5779.7266.6482.27134.4490.6861.31110652427319.6295.9376.4064.9983.90119.1790.5860.58108952253OpenBenchmarking.org

OpenArena

This is a test of OpenArena, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game is based upon ioquake3, which in turn uses the GPL version of id Software's Quake 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev80160240320400SE +/- 2.99, N = 3SE +/- 22.56, N = 6SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 4.59, N = 4SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 10.51, N = 6231.03327.97332.97271.25389.50319.62
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev70140210280350Min: 227.7 / Avg: 231.03 / Max: 237Min: 286 / Avg: 327.97 / Max: 399.3Min: 330.7 / Avg: 332.97 / Max: 334.4Min: 263.7 / Avg: 271.25 / Max: 284.6Min: 387.8 / Avg: 389.5 / Max: 391.3Min: 303.8 / Avg: 319.62 / Max: 371.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 325.50105.1798.3091.5098.5795.93MIN: 5 / MAX: 122MIN: 5MIN: 4MIN: 4MIN: 4 / MAX: 270MIN: 4 / MAX: 306
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100Min: 25.4 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 25.6Min: 104.6 / Avg: 105.17 / Max: 105.5Min: 98.1 / Avg: 98.3 / Max: 98.6Min: 91.2 / Avg: 91.5 / Max: 91.8Min: 98.3 / Avg: 98.57 / Max: 98.9Min: 95.4 / Avg: 95.93 / Max: 96.5

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 356.6684.7378.0579.7276.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev1632486480Min: 56.42 / Avg: 56.66 / Max: 56.79Min: 84.12 / Avg: 84.73 / Max: 85.15Min: 77.79 / Avg: 78.05 / Max: 78.45Min: 79.28 / Avg: 79.72 / Max: 80.17Min: 75.78 / Avg: 76.4 / Max: 77.38

Unigine Tropics

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev1632486480SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 371.1166.6464.99
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev1428425670Min: 71.06 / Avg: 71.11 / Max: 71.18Min: 66.6 / Avg: 66.64 / Max: 66.7Min: 64.9 / Avg: 64.99 / Max: 65.04

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 348.0073.7088.6380.9082.2783.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 1.51Resolution: 2560 x 1600Ubuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100Min: 47.9 / Avg: 48 / Max: 48.2Min: 73.4 / Avg: 73.7 / Max: 74.1Min: 88.2 / Avg: 88.63 / Max: 88.9Min: 80.5 / Avg: 80.9 / Max: 81.1Min: 82.1 / Avg: 82.27 / Max: 82.6Min: 83.6 / Avg: 83.9 / Max: 84.1

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev306090120150SE +/- 0.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 8.66, N = 6SE +/- 2.06, N = 698.59123.01124.88133.67134.44119.17MIN: 49 / MAX: 170MIN: 60 / MAX: 223MIN: 66 / MAX: 217MIN: 63 / MAX: 209MIN: 19 / MAX: 240MIN: 63 / MAX: 219
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: HighUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev306090120150Min: 97.7 / Avg: 98.59 / Max: 99.06Min: 122.8 / Avg: 123.01 / Max: 123.2Min: 123.73 / Avg: 124.88 / Max: 126.42Min: 132.71 / Avg: 133.67 / Max: 134.8Min: 113.38 / Avg: 134.44 / Max: 155.74Min: 114.99 / Avg: 119.17 / Max: 128.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.95, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 1.97, N = 6SE +/- 3.07, N = 6SE +/- 1.34, N = 653.5377.0787.2284.5390.6890.58MIN: 26 / MAX: 96MIN: 36 / MAX: 151MIN: 42 / MAX: 153MIN: 36 / MAX: 150MIN: 24 / MAX: 167MIN: 27 / MAX: 161
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltraUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev20406080100Min: 53.42 / Avg: 53.53 / Max: 53.61Min: 76.01 / Avg: 77.07 / Max: 78.96Min: 86.9 / Avg: 87.22 / Max: 87.73Min: 78.25 / Avg: 84.53 / Max: 87.86Min: 83.66 / Avg: 90.68 / Max: 98.5Min: 85.29 / Avg: 90.58 / Max: 94.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev1428425670SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.94, N = 337.2555.6761.4658.4061.3160.58MIN: 18 / MAX: 71MIN: 25 / MAX: 113MIN: 28 / MAX: 120MIN: 25 / MAX: 115MIN: 16 / MAX: 127MIN: 26 / MAX: 121
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Effects Quality: UltimateUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev1224364860Min: 37.18 / Avg: 37.25 / Max: 37.32Min: 54.92 / Avg: 55.67 / Max: 56.07Min: 61.14 / Avg: 61.46 / Max: 61.68Min: 58.34 / Avg: 58.4 / Max: 58.43Min: 59.48 / Avg: 61.31 / Max: 62.28Min: 59.51 / Avg: 60.58 / Max: 62.46

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev2004006008001000SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 365571896184511061089
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev2004006008001000Min: 655 / Avg: 655 / Max: 655Min: 718 / Avg: 718 / Max: 718Min: 960 / Avg: 960.67 / Max: 961Min: 844 / Avg: 845 / Max: 846Min: 1106 / Avg: 1106 / Max: 1106Min: 1089 / Avg: 1089 / Max: 1089

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 117.88, N = 3SE +/- 62.22, N = 3SE +/- 1963.54, N = 6SE +/- 17.01, N = 3SE +/- 13.05, N = 3SE +/- 4.04, N = 3433895531344016415285242752253
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 2560 x 1600 - Mode: FullscreenUbuntu 13.04 - Linux 3.8 + Mesa 9.1Ubuntu 13.10 - Linux 3.11 + Mesa 9.2Ubuntu 14.04 - Linux 3.13 + Mesa 10.1Ubuntu 14.10 - Linux 3.16 + Mesa 10.3Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 3.19 + Mesa 10.5Ubuntu 15.04 - Linux 4.3 + Mesa 11.1-dev10K20K30K40K50KMin: 43249 / Avg: 43388.67 / Max: 43623Min: 55189 / Avg: 55313 / Max: 55384Min: 34199 / Avg: 44015.5 / Max: 46053Min: 41494 / Avg: 41528 / Max: 41546Min: 52408 / Avg: 52427 / Max: 52452Min: 52248 / Avg: 52253 / Max: 52261