Windows 10 vs Windows 7 Graphics Tests

Intel Nehalem i7-860, P55M chipset, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA GTX 460v2, 355.82 driver

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1509057-RSKI-WIN10UP34
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows10
September 05 2015
 
Windows7
September 04 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Windows10

Processor: Intel Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5 Intel (8 Cores), Disk: 79GB

OS: Windows NT, Kernel: 6.2 (x86_64)

Windows7

OS: Windows NT, Kernel: 6.1 (x86_64)

Windows 10 vs Windows 7 Graphics TestsOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5 Intel (8 Cores)79GBWindows NT6.2 (x86_64)6.1 (x86_64)ProcessorDiskOSKernelsWindows 10 Vs Windows 7 Graphics Tests PerformanceSystem Logs

Windows10 vs. Windows7 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+3.4%+3.4%+6.8%+6.8%+10.2%+10.2%3.3%1920 x 1080 - Low13.5%1920 x 1080 - Ultra11.3%1920 x 1080 - Ultimate10.1%1920 x 1080 - High8.2%1920 x 1080 - FullscreenXonoticXonoticXonoticXonoticUnigine ValleyWindows10Windows7

Windows 10 vs Windows 7 Graphics Testsunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - UltimateWindows10Windows725.82159.98136.29125.61103.7426.67140.97125.99112.8694.22OpenBenchmarking.org

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL GL3 Core Profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows10Windows7612182430SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 325.8226.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows10Windows7612182430Min: 25.61 / Avg: 25.82 / Max: 25.96Min: 26.26 / Avg: 26.67 / Max: 26.88

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows10Windows74080120160200SE +/- 1.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3159.98140.97MIN: 66 / MAX: 323MIN: 29 / MAX: 275
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowWindows10Windows7306090120150Min: 158.03 / Avg: 159.98 / Max: 161.7Min: 140.33 / Avg: 140.97 / Max: 141.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows10Windows7306090120150SE +/- 3.38, N = 6SE +/- 0.32, N = 3136.29125.99MIN: 56 / MAX: 315MIN: 49 / MAX: 242
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighWindows10Windows7306090120150Min: 120.12 / Avg: 136.29 / Max: 143.74Min: 125.37 / Avg: 125.99 / Max: 126.44

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows10Windows7306090120150SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3125.61112.86MIN: 59 / MAX: 290MIN: 42 / MAX: 226
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows10Windows720406080100Min: 121.99 / Avg: 125.61 / Max: 128.4Min: 112.35 / Avg: 112.86 / Max: 113.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows10Windows720406080100SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3103.7494.22MIN: 22 / MAX: 254MIN: 21 / MAX: 204
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows10Windows720406080100Min: 103.4 / Avg: 103.74 / Max: 103.94Min: 93.62 / Avg: 94.22 / Max: 94.54

Windows10

Processor: Intel Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5 Intel (8 Cores), Disk: 79GB

OS: Windows NT, Kernel: 6.2 (x86_64)

Testing initiated at 5 September 2015 16:03 by user rsking84.

Windows7

Processor: Intel Family 6 Model 30 Stepping 5 Intel (8 Cores), Disk: 79GB

OS: Windows NT, Kernel: 6.1 (x86_64)

Testing initiated at 4 September 2015 22:49 by user rsking84.