Intel Iris Pro Graphics Power Efficiency

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1507213-BE-1GRAPHICS87
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
i7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600
July 02 2015
 
i7 5775C - Iris 6200
July 13 2015
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Intel Iris Pro Graphics Power EfficiencyProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolutioni7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600i7 5775C - Iris 6200Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (8 Cores)Gigabyte Z97-HD3PIntel 4th Gen Core DRAM16384MB120GB Toshiba MKNSSDEC120GBIntel HD 4600 (1250MHz)Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4thDELL P2210HRealtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 15.104.2.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20150712Unity 7.3.2X Server 1.17.1intel 2.99.9173.3 Mesa 10.5.8GCC 4.9.2ext41920x1080Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores)MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) v1.0Intel Broadwell-U- DMIIntel Broadwell-U (1150MHz)Intel Broadwell-U AudioQualcomm Atheros Killer E220x GigabitOpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveGraphics Details- SNA

i7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600 vs. i7 5775C - Iris 6200 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+44.5%+44.5%+89%+89%+133.5%+133.5%177.9%154.6%148.4%105.1%104.8%103.1%79.6%41.4%Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenFurmark - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenPixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Ultra1920 x 1080 - UltimateTriangle - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenPlot3D - 1920 x 1080 - FullscreenGpuTestGpuTestGpuTestTesseractXonoticXonoticGpuTestGpuTesti7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600i7 5775C - Iris 6200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics Power Efficiencygputest: Plot3D - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Triangle - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreentesseract: 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatei7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600i7 5775C - Iris 62005584377472619528549.2271.9350.14789796084861264708100.97147.28101.84OpenBenchmarking.org

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 3.93, N = 3SE +/- 4.10, N = 378975584

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002040608010099.4397.16

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460032.957.566.6i7 5775C - Iris 620028.879.491.2OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002004006008001000SE +/- 2.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 3960377

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002468108.165.33

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460035.170.782.9i7 5775C - Iris 620029.2117.7133.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460036.045.551.1OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor1530456075

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 460020K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 564.66, N = 3SE +/- 46.77, N = 38486147261

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002004006008001000830.18727.19

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460037.465.078.2i7 5775C - Iris 620029.7102.2111.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 460060120180240300SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 326495

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46000.6751.352.0252.73.3753.001.57

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460033.460.474.4i7 5775C - Iris 620028.988.198.4OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600150300450600750SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3708285

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreeni7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46002468107.795.02

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460033.956.859.1i7 5775C - Iris 620028.490.997.5OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0System Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

System Power Consumption Monitor

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460032.964.286.7i7 5775C - Iris 620027.792.5133.8OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring4080120160200

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080i7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 460020406080100SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3100.9749.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080i7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46000.23850.4770.71550.9541.19251.060.75

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460035.366.077.8i7 5775C - Iris 620029.395.1121.3OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

Warsow

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460033.433.634.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 1.51System Power Consumption Monitor1020304050

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultrai7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 4600306090120150SE +/- 0.72, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3147.2871.93MIN: 67 / MAX: 238MIN: 31 / MAX: 105

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultrai7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46000.31050.6210.93151.2421.55251.380.97

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460035.574.086.7i7 5775C - Iris 620028.8107.1123.7OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimatei7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 460020406080100SE +/- 1.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3101.8450.14MIN: 38 / MAX: 184MIN: 22 / MAX: 82

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimatei7 5775C - Iris 6200i7 4790K - HD Graphics 46000.21380.42760.64140.85521.0690.950.69

MinAvgMaxi7 4790K - HD Graphics 460035.573.185.2i7 5775C - Iris 620028.6107.5122.6OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8System Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200