OS X 10.9 Mavericks MacBook Retina Pro

Intel Core i7 testing with a Apple MacBook Pro and Intel HD 4000 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 512MB on OS X 10.8.5 versus OS X 10.9 Mavericks. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1311183-SO-OSX109MAV08
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 5 Tests
CPU Massive 6 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 4 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
OS X 10.8.5
November 17 2013
 
OS X 10.9
November 17 2013
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


OS X 10.9 Mavericks MacBook Retina ProProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsMonitorOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOS X 10.8.5OS X 10.9Intel Core i7 @ 2.30GHz (4 Cores)Apple MacBook ProIntel 72 x 4096 MB DDR3-1600MHz251GB APPLE SSD SM256EIntel HD 4000 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 512MBThunderbolt DisplayOS X 10.8.512.5.0 (x86_64)Apple LLVM 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn) + GCC 4.2.1 + Xcode 5.0.1Unknown2560x1440Intel HD 4000 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024MBOS X 10.913.0.0 (x86_64)OpenBenchmarking.org

OS X 10.8.5 vs. OS X 10.9 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+7%+7%+14%+14%+21%+21%27.9%20.8%5.4%2.9%2.8%2560 x 1440 - Yes - On2560 x 1440 - High27.1%2560 x 1440 - Ultra23.2%1920 x 1080 - Yes - On1920 x 1080 - Ultra10.3%Monte Carlo10.1%1920 x 1080 - High9.8%C.S.T2560 x 1440P.T.S.v.8.4NexuizXonoticXonoticNexuizXonoticSciMarkXonotic7-Zip CompressionOpenArenaBLAKE2OS X 10.8.5OS X 10.9

Nexuiz

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OnOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5816243240SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 336.0629.84MIN: 16 / MAX: 205MIN: 14 / MAX: 147

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterNexuiz 2.5.2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - HDR: Yes - Sound: OnOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5816243240SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 334.4826.95MIN: 18 / MAX: 106MIN: 14 / MAX: 96

OpenArena

This is a test of OpenArena, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game is based upon ioquake3, which in turn uses the GPL version of id Software's Quake 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080OS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5306090120150SE +/- 2.13, N = 3SE +/- 2.85, N = 6137.23137.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440OS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5306090120150SE +/- 1.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3128.40124.77

Xonotic

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5306090120150SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3132.14132.92MIN: 45 / MAX: 376MIN: 43 / MAX: 384

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5306090120150SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3130.91132.61MIN: 42 / MAX: 352MIN: 42 / MAX: 361

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.51326395265SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 353.4258.67MIN: 16 / MAX: 199MIN: 20 / MAX: 195

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.51224364860SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 343.0854.77MIN: 18 / MAX: 66MIN: 19 / MAX: 124

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.51122334455SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 342.6347.01MIN: 13 / MAX: 168MIN: 15 / MAX: 165

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.7Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.51020304050SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 335.2043.36MIN: 14 / MAX: 62MIN: 15 / MAX: 111

SciMark

This test runs the ANSI C version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This test is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5110220330440550SE +/- 17.17, N = 8SE +/- 0.87, N = 4450.03495.61

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.560120180240300SE +/- 0.63, N = 4SE +/- 3.30, N = 4293.28288.64

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.55001000150020002500SE +/- 8.22, N = 4SE +/- 6.85, N = 42215.632211.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5400800120016002000SE +/- 5.76, N = 4SE +/- 5.60, N = 41899.111897.44

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.530060090012001500SE +/- 4.27, N = 4SE +/- 3.47, N = 41404.551404.18

Himeno Benchmark

The Himeno benchmark is a linear solver of pressure Poisson using a point-Jacobi method. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMFLOPS, More Is BetterHimeno Benchmark 3.0Poisson Pressure SolverOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5120240360480600SE +/- 1.38, N = 3SE +/- 1.75, N = 3576.79577.171. (CC) gcc options: -O3

7-Zip Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.20.1Compress Speed TestOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.54K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 30.44, N = 3SE +/- 220.77, N = 317239163501. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread

OpenSSL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.1cRSA 4096-bit PerformanceOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5612182430SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 327.6027.501. (CC) gcc options: -arch -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -lssl -lcrypto

BLAKE2

OpenBenchmarking.orgCycles Per Byte, Fewer Is BetterBLAKE2 20121223Phoronix Test Suite v4.8.4OS X 10.9OS X 10.8.51.06882.13763.20644.27525.344SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 34.624.751. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native -lcrypto -lz

C-Ray

This is a test of C-Ray, a simple raytracer designed to test the floating-point CPU performance. This test is multi-threaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 1600 x 1200 image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.5918273645SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 338.4138.841. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3

Primesieve

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 4.21e12 Prime Number GenerationOS X 10.9OS X 10.8.590180270360450SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 3.05, N = 3423.21427.971. (CXX) g++ options: -O2