cent6jdk1625_64

cent6jdk1625_64

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1304169-FO-CENT6JDK180
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
cent6jdk1625_64
April 16 2013
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


cent6jdk1625_64OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteQEMU Virtual 1.0 @ 2.93GHz (2 Cores)Bochs4096MB6GBCentOS 6.4 (Final)2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 (x86_64)GCC 4.4.7 20120313ext4QEMU 1.0ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemSystem LayerCent6jdk1625_64 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_25-b06).

cent6jdk1625_64java-scimark2: FFT Performancejava-scimark2: SOR Performancejava-scimark2: Composite Performancejava-scimark2: Monte Carlo Performancebork: File Encryption Timecent6jdk1625_64675.741316.681217.07630.3424.10OpenBenchmarking.org

Java SciMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0FFT Performancecent6jdk1625_64150300450600750SE +/- 5.43, N = 4675.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0SOR Performancecent6jdk1625_6430060090012001500SE +/- 1.82, N = 41316.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Composite Performancecent6jdk1625_6430060090012001500SE +/- 1.54, N = 41217.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Monte Carlo Performancecent6jdk1625_64140280420560700SE +/- 2.09, N = 4630.34

Bork File Encrypter

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBork File Encrypter 1.4File Encryption Timecent6jdk1625_64612182430SE +/- 0.53, N = 624.10