raid_test_2 RAid setup testing
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1108308-ASVA-RAIDTES36 pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
raid_test_2 OpenBenchmarking.org Phoronix Test Suite AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores) ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE AMD Device 1510 3584MB 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M ATI Device 9802 ATI R6xx HDMI Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64) ati GCC 4.4.5 ext4 1920x1200 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio OS Kernel Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Raid_test_2 Benchmarks System Logs - Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies vs. level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD Comparison Phoronix Test Suite Baseline +160.7% +160.7% +321.4% +321.4% +482.1% +482.1% 13.3% Write - 256MB - 4 642.8% 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance 279.3% 1.F.1.S.N.S.F 258.5% 5.F.1.S.4.T 180.1% 1.F.1.S 129.3% 4.F.3.S.D.1.S 94.9% Rand Write 55% Rand Write - 256MB - 4 53.8% Read - 256MB - 4 17.5% 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance Rand Read - 256MB - 4 9.4% Threaded I/O Tester IOzone FS-Mark FS-Mark FS-Mark FS-Mark AIO-Stress Threaded I/O Tester Threaded I/O Tester IOzone Threaded I/O Tester pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD
raid_test_2 aio-stress: Rand Write fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance tiobench: Write - 256MB - 4 tiobench: Rand Write - 256MB - 4 tiobench: Read - 256MB - 4 tiobench: Rand Read - 256MB - 4 pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD 18.48 38.37 280.23 68.83 33.13 210.60 184.69 142.17 1.00 2199.08 1768.00 11.92 16.73 78.17 24.57 17.00 55.52 209.19 19.14 0.65 1871.33 1616.25 OpenBenchmarking.org
AIO-Stress OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 11.92 18.48
FS-Mark OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 16.73 38.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.60, N = 6 SE +/- 16.48, N = 6 78.17 280.23
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 24.57 68.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 6 17.00 33.13
IOzone OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 1.80, N = 3 55.52 210.60
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.347 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 184.69 209.19
Threaded I/O Tester OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.42, N = 8 SE +/- 3.48, N = 8 19.14 142.17
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Write - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 0.225 0.45 0.675 0.9 1.125 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 0.65 1.00
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 14.08, N = 4 SE +/- 32.92, N = 4 1871.33 2199.08
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 4 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 87.76, N = 8 SE +/- 9.96, N = 4 1616.25 1768.00
pipi 512K chunks 2 near-copies System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
Testing initiated at 30 August 2011 13:21 by user asvany.
level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 , REBUILD Processor: AMD E-350 @ 1.60GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS E35M1-I DELUXE, Chipset: AMD Device 1510, Memory: 3584MB, Disk: 4 x 2000GB Western Digital WDC WD20EARS-00M, Graphics: ATI Device 9802, Audio: ATI R6xx HDMI
OS: Linux, Kernel: 2.6.32-5-amd64 (x86_64), Display Driver: ati, Compiler: GCC 4.4.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ.
Testing initiated at 30 August 2011 21:14 by user asvany.