OpenFOAM

OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark openfoam.

Project Site

openfoam.org

Source Repository

github.com

Test Created

10 January 2021

Last Updated

17 September 2022

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

18 Minutes, 22 Seconds

Average Run Time

3 Minutes, 35 Seconds

Test Dependencies

OpenMPI + C++ Boost + Zlib + FFTW + C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + Flex + Bison + NCurses

Accolades

50k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms


Public Result Uploads *Reported Installs **Reported Test Completions **Test Profile Page Views ***OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsOpenFOAM Popularity Statisticspts/openfoam2021.012021.032021.052021.072021.092021.112022.012022.032022.052022.072022.092022.112023.012023.032023.052023.072023.092023.112024.012024.032024.052024.072024.092024.1120K40K60K80K100K
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 11 November 2024.
drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size47.7%drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size52.3%Input Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/openfoam-1.2.0   [View Source]   Sat, 17 Sep 2022 06:03:21 GMT
Update against OpenFOAM 10.

pts/openfoam-1.1.2   [View Source]   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:29:01 GMT
Add drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size for large servers as on EPYC finding medium mesh size runs rather quickly still.

pts/openfoam-1.1.1   [View Source]   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 19:23:40 GMT
Update against OpenFOAM 9, add new drivaerFastback model, use in-tree motorBike too. Closes: https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/phoronix-test-suite/issues/521

pts/openfoam-1.0.1   [View Source]   Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:07:31 GMT
Add Motorbike 60M for larger HPC servers.

pts/openfoam-1.0.0   [View Source]   Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:37:16 GMT
Initial commit of OpenFOAM 8 at long last...

Suites Using This Test

HPC - High Performance Computing

Molecular Dynamics

Scientific Computing


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

OpenFOAM 10

Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 1,411 public results since 17 September 2022 with the latest data as of 6 November 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Seconds (Average)
99th
21
72 +/- 2
92nd
11
127 +/- 4
88th
17
161 +/- 1
82nd
14
186 +/- 9
81st
29
193 +/- 20
81st
8
194 +/- 1
Mid-Tier
75th
> 241
74th
5
270 +/- 1
73rd
25
272 +/- 40
68th
16
320 +/- 17
61st
11
410 +/- 26
58th
4
442 +/- 1
55th
4
532 +/- 16
52nd
15
632 +/- 7
52nd
3
632 +/- 1
51st
6
648 +/- 2
Median
50th
654
50th
3
656 +/- 4
50th
7
663 +/- 1
49th
4
678 +/- 2
49th
10
680 +/- 7
47th
3
778 +/- 10
39th
37
1281 +/- 50
36th
13
1526 +/- 159
36th
3
1606 +/- 7
34th
14
1757 +/- 29
34th
16
1780 +/- 39
31st
27
1929 +/- 125
30th
21
2013 +/- 121
28th
18
2096 +/- 28
Low-Tier
25th
> 2124
25th
28
2127 +/- 167
24th
9
2144 +/- 13
22nd
11
2166 +/- 19
20th
22
2197 +/- 137
20th
8
2222 +/- 42
19th
30
2311 +/- 166
18th
23
2367 +/- 163
18th
5
2370 +/- 42
18th
10
2401 +/- 2
15th
10
2497 +/- 7
12th
4
2656 +/- 12
12th
18
2658 +/- 153
11th
5
2664 +/- 6
10th
15
2678 +/- 141
10th
6
2767 +/- 156
9th
19
2812 +/- 189
8th
4
2853 +/- 50
8th
3
2978 +/- 4
6th
4
3662 +/- 33
5th
3
4378 +/- 13
4th
5
4540 +/- 205
4th
8
4636 +/- 397
4th
6
4765 +/- 144
2nd
10
5761 +/- 13
1st
3
5837 +/- 3
1st
5
5886 +/- 7
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time1411 Results Range From 33 To 9338 Seconds3322040759478196811551342152917161903209022772464265128383025321233993586377339604147433445214708489550825269545656435830601762046391657867656952713973267513770078878074826184488635882290099196938370140210280350

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (OpenFOAM 10 - Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time) has an average run-time of 24 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 1 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkInput: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution TimeRun-Time20406080100Min: 1 / Avg: 23.61 / Max: 94

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

AMDIntelOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseOpenFOAM CPU Core ScalingInput: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time6812141624324864961281921122334455

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Notable instruction set extensions supported by this test, based on an automatic analysis by the Phoronix Test Suite / OpenBenchmarking.org analytics engine.

Instruction Set
Support
Instructions Detected
SSE2 (SSE2)
Used by default on supported hardware.
 
MULSD ADDSD MOVDQU CVTSI2SD DIVSD COMISD UNPCKLPD MOVUPD MOVAPD SHUFPD MOVHPD MULPD DIVPD ADDPD SUBPD SUBSD MAXSD PUNPCKLQDQ MOVLPD ANDPD MAXPD MINSD XORPD MOVDQA UCOMISD MINPD SQRTSD UNPCKHPD MOVD PSHUFD CMPLTPD ANDNPD CVTTSD2SI ORPD PMULUDQ PSRLDQ CVTSD2SS CVTSS2SD CVTPD2PS CVTPS2PD PADDQ CMPLTSD PSHUFLW CMPNLTSD CMPLESD CMPLEPD CVTDQ2PD CMPNLESD CVTTPD2DQ PSLLDQ
Last automated analysis: 18 January 2022

This test profile binary relies on the shared libraries libmomentumTransportModels.so, libincompressibleMomentumTransportModels.so, libincompressibleTransportModels.so, libfiniteVolume.so, libmeshTools.so, libfvOptions.so, libsampling.so, libOpenFOAM.so, libm.so.6, libc.so.6, libPstream.so.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture
Kernel Identifier
Verified On
Intel / AMD x86 64-bit
x86_64
(Many Processors)
ARMv8 64-bit
aarch64
ARMv8 Neoverse-N1, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 80-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core, Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, Ampere ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 256-Core, AmpereOne 128-Core, AmpereOne 160-Core, AmpereOne 192-Core, AmpereOne 32-Core, AmpereOne 64-Core, AmpereOne 72-Core, AmpereOne 96-Core

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

33 Systems - 367 Benchmark Results

1 System - 7 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core - 16GB - 0GB Virtual Disk + 4GB Virtual Disk + 1100GB Virtual Disk

Ubuntu 24.04 - 5.15.153.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 - Wayland

2 Systems - 84 Benchmark Results

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K - ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z890 HERO - Intel Device ae7f

Ubuntu 24.10 - 6.11.0-9-generic - GNOME Shell 47.0

4 Systems - 856 Benchmark Results

8 Systems - 6 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

7 Systems - 6 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

7 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

4 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

3 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

3 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

2 Systems - 4 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

6 Systems - 3 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

5 Systems - 2 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

1 System - 2 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core - Gigabyte A620M S2H - AMD Device 14d8

Debian 12 - 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 - Xfce 4.18

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

12 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 23.04 - 6.2.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 44.0

2 Systems - 135 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 22.10 - 6.1.0-phx - GNOME Shell 43.0

18 Systems - 110 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 22.10 - 6.0.0-060000rc3daily20220904-generic - GNOME Shell

2 Systems - 334 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core - Dell 02MJ3T - AMD 17h

Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.0-40-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2

18 Systems - 442 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-14600K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI - Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH

Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-061000rc2-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0

20 Systems - 199 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Ice Lake IEH

Ubuntu 22.10 - 6.0.0-060000rc3daily20220904-generic - GNOME Shell

3 Systems - 167 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-13600K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI - Intel Device 7a27

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.0.0-060000rc1daily20220820-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2

8 Systems - 271 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

24 Systems - 193 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 22.10 - 6.0.0-060000rc3daily20220904-generic - GNOME Shell

3 Systems - 435 Benchmark Results

2 Systems - 343 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 - GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.11.0-49-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

Find More Test Results