Clear Linux Sierra Forest 2 x Intel Xeon 6780E testing with a Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D55Q-2U S7Q-MB-MPS-MDP (2A05.QCT001 BIOS) and ASPEED on Clear Linux OS 41900 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2406213-NE-CLEARLINU05&grr .
Clear Linux Sierra Forest Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Clear Linux 41900 2 x Intel Xeon 6780E @ 3.00GHz (288 Cores) Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D55Q-2U S7Q-MB-MPS-MDP (2A05.QCT001 BIOS) Intel Ice Lake IEH 512GB 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZWLJ1T9HBJR-00007 + 64GB Flash Drive ASPEED 2 x Broadcom BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Clear Linux OS 41900 6.9.5-1441.native (x86_64) GCC 14.1.1 20240618 releases/gcc-14.1.0-150-g789f05536d + Clang 17.0.6 + LLVM 17.0.6 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: always - FFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -ffunction-sections" CXXFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -std=gnu++17" FCFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" CFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections" THEANO_FLAGS="floatX=float32,openmp=true,gcc.cxxflags="-ftree-vectorize -mavx"" - --build=x86_64-generic-linux --disable-libmpx --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multiarch --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-host-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,jit --enable-ld=default --enable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-linux-futex --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --exec-prefix=/usr --includedir=/usr/include --target=x86_64-generic-linux --with-arch=x86-64-v3 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-glibc-version=2.35 --with-gnu-ld --with-isl --with-pic --with-ppl=yes --with-tune=sapphirerapids --with-zstd - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: default) - CPU Microcode: 0x13000131 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 19.0.2-internal-adhoc.mockbuild.corretto-19-19.0.2.7.1) - Python 3.12.4 - gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Clear Linux Sierra Forest dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine openvkl: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework stress-ng: IO_uring clickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run clickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run clickhouse: 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache stress-ng: Cloning openssl: RSA4096 openssl: RSA4096 compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed graphics-magick: Enhanced graphics-magick: Sharpen graphics-magick: Resizing pyperformance: asyncio_tcp_ssl dacapobench: H2 Database Engine john-the-ripper: HMAC-SHA512 rocksdb: Read While Writing pyperformance: async_tree_io compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed openssl: ChaCha20-Poly1305 openssl: ChaCha20 openssl: AES-256-GCM openssl: SHA512 openssl: AES-128-GCM openssl: SHA256 uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Slow dacapobench: Apache Tomcat stress-ng: CPU Cache stress-ng: MMAP stress-ng: Pipe stress-ng: Glibc C String Functions stress-ng: Futex stress-ng: Mixed Scheduler dacapobench: Spring Boot stress-ng: Fractal Generator stress-ng: Socket Activity stress-ng: Mutex pyperformance: xml_etree pyperformance: asyncio_websockets blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast pyperformance: gc_collect ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer - CPU ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer - CPU ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer - CPU pyperformance: python_startup webp: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer - CPU rocksdb: Update Rand compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed john-the-ripper: MD5 rocksdb: Read Rand Write Rand graphics-magick: Rotate graphics-magick: HWB Color Space rocksdb: Rand Read graphics-magick: Noise-Gaussian graphics-magick: Swirl ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer - CPU ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer - CPU pyperformance: raytrace dacapobench: Eclipse namd: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer - CPU uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast pyperformance: django_template compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating stress-ng: Atomic ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer - CPU dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer - CPU dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed pyperformance: pickle_pure_python dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index pyperformance: nbody renaissance: Apache Spark Bayes pyperformance: float pyperformance: pathlib uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Medium stress-ng: Pthread pyperformance: regex_compile blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only liquid-dsp: 288 - 256 - 512 liquid-dsp: 256 - 256 - 512 pyperformance: crypto_pyaes dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing stress-ng: NUMA stress-ng: AVX-512 VNNI liquid-dsp: 128 - 256 - 512 stress-ng: Forking pyperformance: go stress-ng: Zlib stress-ng: MEMFD namd: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms stress-ng: Matrix 3D Math stress-ng: System V Message Passing stress-ng: Malloc stress-ng: Context Switching stress-ng: Vector Floating Point stress-ng: Poll john-the-ripper: WPA PSK stress-ng: Function Call stress-ng: Radix String Sort stress-ng: Bitonic Integer Sort stress-ng: Matrix Math stress-ng: CPU Stress stress-ng: Jpeg Compression stress-ng: Power Math stress-ng: Logarithmic Math stress-ng: Floating Point stress-ng: AVL Tree stress-ng: Trigonometric Math stress-ng: Exponential Math stress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting stress-ng: Hash stress-ng: Vector Shuffle stress-ng: SENDFILE stress-ng: Semaphores stress-ng: Wide Vector Math stress-ng: Fused Multiply-Add stress-ng: Memory Copying pyperformance: json_loads stress-ng: x86_64 RdRand stress-ng: Vector Math liquid-dsp: 288 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 256 - 256 - 57 john-the-ripper: bcrypt john-the-ripper: Blowfish liquid-dsp: 288 - 256 - 32 liquid-dsp: 256 - 256 - 32 liquid-dsp: 128 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 128 - 256 - 32 dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework pyperformance: chaos dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast dacapobench: GraphChi c-ray: 5K - 16 uvg266: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast blender: Classroom - CPU-Only webp: Quality 100, Lossless dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine dacapobench: Apache Kafka dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only c-ray: 4K - 16 embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Slow kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Medium oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - CPU-Only blender: Junkshop - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only webp: Quality 100, Highest Compression oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - CPU-Only embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown webp: Default webp: Quality 100 vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Fast Clear Linux 41900 102811 2312 39474 682027.21 361.58 361.82 348.37 7626.33 1643145.5 25107.0 1998.7 25.7 469 488 730 1.73 6384 63723462 21759721 1.10 2634.5 542.4 266901056610 392186198153 1126144141370 94488975943 1263794283343 316385457893 17.60 8169 2147282.42 16700.79 10950147.68 175677128.75 125459.27 474518.11 4971 18.46 21620.12 411022022.55 59.4 590 97.43 37.38 38.40 39.27 1.46 1300 1121 1094 12.9 0.36 54730 192071 2496.9 2526.6 11083667 2370393 187 258 1647323286 227 993 48748 47846 294 14922 1.78773 33644 22.67 41.1 789237 711194 108.75 30901 1847 30394 1810 1930.2 52.4 308 5292 91.0 640.5 82.5 18.6 17.71 32368.35 136 31.89 1704933333 1500933333 73.6 463 9.32 13674169.13 750146667 18021.51 140 12248.63 274.08 3.41189 15844.18 12542627.12 886723730.13 28059085.44 178310.52 79131286.33 402399 155367.18 834.45 1609.10 479049.52 393406.85 172290.69 350671.69 1024718.12 41765.18 1015.21 444729.91 484078.14 4458.39 28855220.38 159274.67 3867787.34 2235705610.93 9006184.84 152500538.79 116683.43 27.0 385989.23 856914.22 9582866667 8549133333 403270 403775 11153000000 9798366667 4235500000 4887433333 8837 61.9 7704 961 21.27 5848 24.470 23.51 24.63 1.02 6963 5568 2724 9.58 13.912 136.5828 1390908 32.77 32.95 1.72 16.76 15.42 2.48 3.41 152.8564 134.8220 14.68 8.48 OpenBenchmarking.org
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine Clear Linux 41900 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2236.36, N = 9 102811
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC Clear Linux 41900 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 5.49, N = 3 2312 MIN: 174 / MAX: 24325
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework Clear Linux 41900 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 1076.50, N = 12 39474
Stress-NG Test: IO_uring OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: IO_uring Clear Linux 41900 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 109677.56, N = 9 682027.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
ClickHouse 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Clear Linux 41900 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 361.58 MIN: 60.36 / MAX: 4615.38
ClickHouse 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Clear Linux 41900 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 361.82 MIN: 63.36 / MAX: 4615.38
ClickHouse 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Clear Linux 41900 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.10, N = 3 348.37 MIN: 61.41 / MAX: 4285.71
Stress-NG Test: Cloning OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Cloning Clear Linux 41900 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 2760.99, N = 12 7626.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 Clear Linux 41900 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 253.51, N = 3 1643145.5 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 Clear Linux 41900 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 2.14, N = 3 25107.0 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.80, N = 15 1998.7 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.53, N = 15 25.7 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced Clear Linux 41900 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 6.88, N = 15 469 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen Clear Linux 41900 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 5.42, N = 15 488 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Resizing Clear Linux 41900 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 16.18, N = 15 730 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
PyPerformance Benchmark: asyncio_tcp_ssl OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_tcp_ssl Clear Linux 41900 0.3893 0.7786 1.1679 1.5572 1.9465 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.73
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine Clear Linux 41900 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 233.31, N = 12 6384
John The Ripper Test: HMAC-SHA512 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Clear Linux 41900 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 777805.92, N = 13 63723462 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
RocksDB Test: Read While Writing OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Clear Linux 41900 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 1158835.59, N = 12 21759721 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17 -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread
PyPerformance Benchmark: async_tree_io OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: async_tree_io Clear Linux 41900 0.2475 0.495 0.7425 0.99 1.2375 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.10
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 2.87, N = 15 2634.5 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed Clear Linux 41900 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 13.13, N = 15 542.4 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Clear Linux 41900 60000M 120000M 180000M 240000M 300000M SE +/- 58549266.77, N = 3 266901056610 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20 Clear Linux 41900 80000M 160000M 240000M 320000M 400000M SE +/- 124201946.75, N = 3 392186198153 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-256-GCM Clear Linux 41900 200000M 400000M 600000M 800000M 1000000M SE +/- 1231851966.12, N = 3 1126144141370 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 Clear Linux 41900 20000M 40000M 60000M 80000M 100000M SE +/- 5309591.09, N = 3 94488975943 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-128-GCM Clear Linux 41900 300000M 600000M 900000M 1200000M 1500000M SE +/- 923357125.69, N = 3 1263794283343 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 Clear Linux 41900 70000M 140000M 210000M 280000M 350000M SE +/- 2232003647.52, N = 3 316385457893 1. OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024)
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 15 17.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat Clear Linux 41900 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 70.74, N = 15 8169
Stress-NG Test: CPU Cache OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Cache Clear Linux 41900 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 26151.76, N = 15 2147282.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: MMAP OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MMAP Clear Linux 41900 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 471.97, N = 15 16700.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Pipe OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pipe Clear Linux 41900 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 83103.72, N = 15 10950147.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Glibc C String Functions OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc C String Functions Clear Linux 41900 40M 80M 120M 160M 200M SE +/- 1921633.36, N = 15 175677128.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Futex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Futex Clear Linux 41900 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 3442.08, N = 12 125459.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Mixed Scheduler OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mixed Scheduler Clear Linux 41900 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 15087.90, N = 12 474518.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot Clear Linux 41900 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 51.62, N = 15 4971
Stress-NG Test: Fractal Generator OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fractal Generator Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.33, N = 12 18.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Socket Activity OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Socket Activity Clear Linux 41900 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 752.34, N = 12 21620.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Mutex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mutex Clear Linux 41900 90M 180M 270M 360M 450M SE +/- 6981618.15, N = 12 411022022.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
PyPerformance Benchmark: xml_etree OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: xml_etree Clear Linux 41900 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 59.4
PyPerformance Benchmark: asyncio_websockets OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_websockets Clear Linux 41900 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 590
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 97.43
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Clear Linux 41900 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 37.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Clear Linux 41900 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.37, N = 15 38.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Clear Linux 41900 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.51, N = 15 39.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lpthread -lm -lrt
PyPerformance Benchmark: gc_collect OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: gc_collect Clear Linux 41900 0.3285 0.657 0.9855 1.314 1.6425 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.46
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 14.75, N = 3 1300
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 5.86, N = 3 1121
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.84, N = 3 1094
PyPerformance Benchmark: python_startup OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: python_startup Clear Linux 41900 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 12.9
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Clear Linux 41900 0.081 0.162 0.243 0.324 0.405 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lm
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 366.18, N = 3 54730
RocksDB Test: Update Random OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Clear Linux 41900 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 529.63, N = 3 192071 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17 -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.95, N = 5 2496.9 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed Clear Linux 41900 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 26.22, N = 5 2526.6 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Clear Linux 41900 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 33167.92, N = 3 11083667 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
RocksDB Test: Read Random Write Random OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Clear Linux 41900 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 3947.52, N = 3 2370393 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17 -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Rotate Clear Linux 41900 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 187 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: HWB Color Space Clear Linux 41900 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 258 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
RocksDB Test: Random Read OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Clear Linux 41900 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M SE +/- 4641848.69, N = 3 1647323286 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17 -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Noise-Gaussian OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Clear Linux 41900 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.00, N = 3 227 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
GraphicsMagick Operation: Swirl OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Swirl Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.73, N = 3 993 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -ltiff -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lturbojpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 106.74, N = 3 48748
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 469.41, N = 3 47846
PyPerformance Benchmark: raytrace OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: raytrace Clear Linux 41900 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 294
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse Clear Linux 41900 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 60.90, N = 3 14922
NAMD Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms Clear Linux 41900 0.4022 0.8044 1.2066 1.6088 2.011 SE +/- 0.02440, N = 3 1.78773
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 151.67, N = 3 33644
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 22.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17
PyPerformance Benchmark: django_template OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: django_template Clear Linux 41900 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 41.1
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating Clear Linux 41900 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1888.46, N = 3 789237 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating Clear Linux 41900 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 4742.21, N = 3 711194 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
Stress-NG Test: Atomic OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Atomic Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 108.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 297.69, N = 3 30901
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 12.24, N = 14 1847
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU Clear Linux 41900 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 113.57, N = 3 30394
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 23.75, N = 15 1810
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.72, N = 3 1930.2 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed Clear Linux 41900 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 52.4 1. *** Zstandard CLI (64-bit) v1.5.6, by Yann Collet ***
PyPerformance Benchmark: pickle_pure_python OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Clear Linux 41900 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 308
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index Clear Linux 41900 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 38.00, N = 3 5292
PyPerformance Benchmark: nbody OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: nbody Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 91.0
Renaissance Test: Apache Spark Bayes OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark Bayes Clear Linux 41900 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 8.42, N = 3 640.5 MIN: 413.67 / MAX: 957.13
PyPerformance Benchmark: float OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: float Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 82.5
PyPerformance Benchmark: pathlib OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pathlib Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.6
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 17.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17
Stress-NG Test: Pthread OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pthread Clear Linux 41900 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 131.18, N = 3 32368.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: regex_compile Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 136
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 31.89
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M SE +/- 1967513.94, N = 3 1704933333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M SE +/- 2620644.53, N = 3 1500933333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
PyPerformance Benchmark: crypto_pyaes OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Clear Linux 41900 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 73.6
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing Clear Linux 41900 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 11.13, N = 15 463
Stress-NG Test: NUMA OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: NUMA Clear Linux 41900 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 9.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: AVX-512 VNNI OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Clear Linux 41900 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 1339.10, N = 3 13674169.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 160M 320M 480M 640M 800M SE +/- 1093470.52, N = 3 750146667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Stress-NG Test: Forking OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Forking Clear Linux 41900 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 66.59, N = 3 18021.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
PyPerformance Benchmark: go OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: go Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 140
Stress-NG Test: Zlib OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Zlib Clear Linux 41900 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 0.76, N = 3 12248.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: MEMFD OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MEMFD Clear Linux 41900 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 274.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
NAMD Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms Clear Linux 41900 0.7677 1.5354 2.3031 3.0708 3.8385 SE +/- 0.00823, N = 3 3.41189
Stress-NG Test: Matrix 3D Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix 3D Math Clear Linux 41900 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 16.17, N = 3 15844.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: System V Message Passing OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: System V Message Passing Clear Linux 41900 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 36536.77, N = 3 12542627.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Malloc OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Malloc Clear Linux 41900 200M 400M 600M 800M 1000M SE +/- 973653.47, N = 3 886723730.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Context Switching OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Context Switching Clear Linux 41900 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 187136.45, N = 3 28059085.44 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Vector Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Floating Point Clear Linux 41900 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 51.63, N = 3 178310.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Poll OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Poll Clear Linux 41900 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 910353.43, N = 3 79131286.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
John The Ripper Test: WPA PSK OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Clear Linux 41900 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 914.61, N = 3 402399 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
Stress-NG Test: Function Call OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Function Call Clear Linux 41900 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 12.51, N = 3 155367.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Radix String Sort OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Radix String Sort Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.24, N = 3 834.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Bitonic Integer Sort OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Bitonic Integer Sort Clear Linux 41900 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.39, N = 3 1609.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Matrix Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix Math Clear Linux 41900 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 1161.41, N = 3 479049.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: CPU Stress OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Stress Clear Linux 41900 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 25.52, N = 3 393406.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Jpeg Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Jpeg Compression Clear Linux 41900 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 109.35, N = 3 172290.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Power Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Power Math Clear Linux 41900 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 152.21, N = 3 350671.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Logarithmic Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Logarithmic Math Clear Linux 41900 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 583.25, N = 3 1024718.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Floating Point Clear Linux 41900 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 13.33, N = 3 41765.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: AVL Tree OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVL Tree Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.56, N = 3 1015.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Trigonometric Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Trigonometric Math Clear Linux 41900 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 229.92, N = 3 444729.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Exponential Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Exponential Math Clear Linux 41900 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 74.48, N = 3 484078.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Clear Linux 41900 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.68, N = 3 4458.39 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Hash OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Hash Clear Linux 41900 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 9651.59, N = 3 28855220.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Vector Shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Shuffle Clear Linux 41900 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 39.42, N = 3 159274.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: SENDFILE OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: SENDFILE Clear Linux 41900 800K 1600K 2400K 3200K 4000K SE +/- 7206.23, N = 3 3867787.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Semaphores OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Semaphores Clear Linux 41900 500M 1000M 1500M 2000M 2500M SE +/- 31873703.65, N = 3 2235705610.93 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Wide Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Wide Vector Math Clear Linux 41900 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 17277.43, N = 3 9006184.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Fused Multiply-Add OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Clear Linux 41900 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 74073.92, N = 3 152500538.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Memory Copying OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Memory Copying Clear Linux 41900 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 255.83, N = 3 116683.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
PyPerformance Benchmark: json_loads OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: json_loads Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 27.0
Stress-NG Test: x86_64 RdRand OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: x86_64 RdRand Clear Linux 41900 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 4.98, N = 3 385989.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Stress-NG Test: Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Math Clear Linux 41900 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 50.22, N = 3 856914.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lacl -laio -latomic -lcrypt -ldl -ljpeg -lEGL -lGLESv2 -lgmp -lmpfr -lz -lrt -lpthread -lc -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu99 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 8840123.18, N = 3 9582866667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 15562811.80, N = 3 8549133333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
John The Ripper Test: bcrypt OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Clear Linux 41900 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 510.27, N = 3 403270 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Clear Linux 41900 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 789.12, N = 3 403775 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 11590225.77, N = 3 11153000000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 56118693.66, N = 3 9798366667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 900M 1800M 2700M 3600M 4500M SE +/- 17473503.75, N = 3 4235500000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 1000M 2000M 3000M 4000M 5000M SE +/- 24427739.24, N = 3 4887433333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework Clear Linux 41900 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 9.77, N = 3 8837
PyPerformance Benchmark: chaos OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: chaos Clear Linux 41900 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 61.9
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython Clear Linux 41900 1700 3400 5100 6800 8500 SE +/- 51.68, N = 3 7704
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.47, N = 13 961
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 21.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi Clear Linux 41900 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 52.87, N = 3 5848
C-Ray Resolution: 5K - Rays Per Pixel: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 2.0 Resolution: 5K - Rays Per Pixel: 16 Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lm
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -std=gnu++17
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 24.63
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Clear Linux 41900 0.2295 0.459 0.6885 0.918 1.1475 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lm
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine Clear Linux 41900 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 7.80, N = 3 6963
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka Clear Linux 41900 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 22.61, N = 3 5568
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer Clear Linux 41900 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 20.34, N = 4 2724
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 6 9.58
C-Ray Resolution: 4K - Rays Per Pixel: 16 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 2.0 Resolution: 4K - Rays Per Pixel: 16 Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 13.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 136.58 MIN: 128.24 / MAX: 146.8
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Clear Linux 41900 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2749.35, N = 4 1390908
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Clear Linux 41900 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 32.77 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Clear Linux 41900 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 32.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lpthread -lm -lrt
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 0.387 0.774 1.161 1.548 1.935 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.72
Blender Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 16.76
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 15.42
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Clear Linux 41900 0.558 1.116 1.674 2.232 2.79 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 2.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lm
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 0.7673 1.5346 2.3019 3.0692 3.8365 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 3.41
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 7 152.86 MIN: 144.59 / MAX: 163.83
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 6 134.82 MIN: 126.56 / MAX: 146.43
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Default OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Default Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 15 14.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lm
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Clear Linux 41900 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 9 8.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -pipe -fexceptions -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop -ffunction-sections -lm
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Clear Linux 41900 300 600 900 1200 1500 Min: 54.39 / Avg: 288.63 / Max: 1774.62
Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts Clear Linux 41900 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 112325.19
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 109 539 647 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K 3165507.34
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 564 688 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 16996609.80
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.8 539.4 618.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Liquid-DSP Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 288 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 20676460.33
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.1 498.2 609.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 3012455.05
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 529 628 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 16173112.74
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 483.9 559.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 20250084.33
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.0 314.6 363.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 Clear Linux 41900 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2384481.32
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.0 326.1 371.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 Clear Linux 41900 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 12987854.92
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 297.8 337.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 Clear Linux 41900 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 16411143.54
PHPBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 106.8 111.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Clear Linux 41900 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 13019.18
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.3 109.0 111.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.6 108.2 111.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.1 108.3 112.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 54.8 109.3 112.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.1 107.5 112.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.9 107.8 112.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.6 107.5 112.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.8 107.5 112.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.1 108.0 112.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.2 107.6 112.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.8 108.2 111.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.6 108.9 114.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.5 107.8 112.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.4 108.1 113.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.2 108.7 112.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 54.4 108.1 112.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.5 113.6 117.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.9 183.0 316.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 71.5 138.7 200.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.2 121.1 140.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.0 107.1 118.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.6 116.2 138.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.5 109.7 118.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.6 111.3 129.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.1 140.8 289.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Clear Linux 41900 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 69.26 / Avg: 139.18 / Max: 247.24
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.6 110.5 126.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.8 149.7 281.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 63.8 145.7 227.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 156.3 282.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.5 117.2 134.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 113.1 136.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 103.96 / Avg: 133.59 / Max: 142.14
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 103.5 115.9 136.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Renaissance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 102.8 193.4 349.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Renaissance 0.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 564 656 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Clear Linux 41900 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M 473055486.98
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.3 548.4 617.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: ChaCha20 Clear Linux 41900 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M 715154027.17
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 645 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-256-GCM OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-256-GCM Clear Linux 41900 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M 1746321003.26
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 645 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-128-GCM OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: AES-128-GCM Clear Linux 41900 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M 1959815509.53
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107 643 714 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA512 Clear Linux 41900 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M 146924448.71
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107 559 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 Clear Linux 41900 120M 240M 360M 480M 600M 565955148.34
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.4 458.9 480.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 Clear Linux 41900 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3581.01
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 76.0 138.9 168.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 14.39
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 133.2 189.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 4 8 12 16 20 14.50
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.1 118.9 146.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 22.15
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 88.0 134.5 180.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed Clear Linux 41900 5 10 15 20 25 18.56
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.1 510.8 595.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
John The Ripper Test: WPA PSK OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 787.83
John The Ripper Test: bcrypt OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Clear Linux 41900 160 320 480 640 800 731.38
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 342.3 394.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
John The Ripper Test: HMAC-SHA512 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Clear Linux 41900 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 186160.85
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 554 645 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Clear Linux 41900 160 320 480 640 800 729.24
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.1 531.5 595.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Clear Linux 41900 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 20851.82
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.6 391.8 426.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
GraphicsMagick Operation: Swirl OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Swirl Clear Linux 41900 0.5702 1.1404 1.7106 2.2808 2.851 2.534
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.2 498.2 549.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen Clear Linux 41900 0.2205 0.441 0.6615 0.882 1.1025 0.98
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.3 115.0 118.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
GraphicsMagick Operation: Rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Rotate Clear Linux 41900 0.3659 0.7318 1.0977 1.4636 1.8295 1.626
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.0 326.4 373.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Resizing Clear Linux 41900 0.5033 1.0066 1.5099 2.0132 2.5165 2.237
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.9 463.0 518.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced Clear Linux 41900 0.2279 0.4558 0.6837 0.9116 1.1395 1.013
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.5 212.5 229.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GraphicsMagick Operation: Noise-Gaussian OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Clear Linux 41900 0.2403 0.4806 0.7209 0.9612 1.2015 1.068
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.9 153.7 165.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: HWB Color Space Clear Linux 41900 0.3778 0.7556 1.1334 1.5112 1.889 1.679
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 105.0 113.5 124.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Clear Linux 41900 0.0007 0.0014 0.0021 0.0028 0.0035 0.003
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.7 109.8 122.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Clear Linux 41900 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.009
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 104.0 106.8 113.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Clear Linux 41900 0.0052 0.0104 0.0156 0.0208 0.026 0.023
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 103.9 106.1 114.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Clear Linux 41900 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 103.8 106.5 113.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Default OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.4 Encode Settings: Default Clear Linux 41900 0.0311 0.0622 0.0933 0.1244 0.1555 0.138
C-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107 535 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
C-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106 483 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.1 349.2 398.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Radix String Sort OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Radix String Sort Clear Linux 41900 0.5378 1.0756 1.6134 2.1512 2.689 2.39
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 565 662 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Bitonic Integer Sort OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Bitonic Integer Sort Clear Linux 41900 0.641 1.282 1.923 2.564 3.205 2.849
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 547 639 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Jpeg Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Jpeg Compression Clear Linux 41900 70 140 210 280 350 315.19
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 455.8 532.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Stress-NG Test: Trigonometric Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Trigonometric Math Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 975.76
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.3 363.6 415.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Power Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Power Math Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 964.39
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.2 382.0 438.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Logarithmic Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Logarithmic Math Clear Linux 41900 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2682.26
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 85.3 237.3 263.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: Fractal Generator OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fractal Generator Clear Linux 41900 0.0176 0.0352 0.0528 0.0704 0.088 0.078
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 357.1 406.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Exponential Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Exponential Math Clear Linux 41900 300 600 900 1200 1500 1355.55
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.6 385.1 484.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: Mixed Scheduler OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mixed Scheduler Clear Linux 41900 300 600 900 1200 1500 1232.35
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 129.9 255.9 613.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Stress-NG Test: AVX-512 VNNI OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Clear Linux 41900 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K 53441.19
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Clear Linux 41900 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 108.71 / Avg: 176.59 / Max: 492.77
Stress-NG Test: Cloning OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Cloning Clear Linux 41900 10 20 30 40 50 43.19
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 577 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Wide Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Wide Vector Math Clear Linux 41900 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15621.94
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 524.2 612.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Stress-NG Test: Vector Shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Shuffle Clear Linux 41900 70 140 210 280 350 303.87
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 324.5 368.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Stress-NG Test: Vector Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Floating Point Clear Linux 41900 120 240 360 480 600 549.46
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 381.2 436.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: AVL Tree OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVL Tree Clear Linux 41900 0.5992 1.1984 1.7976 2.3968 2.996 2.663
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 383.0 439.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: Matrix 3D Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix 3D Math Clear Linux 41900 9 18 27 36 45 41.37
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 267.6 298.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: Pipe OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pipe Clear Linux 41900 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 40922.56
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.9 451.3 519.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: Fused Multiply-Add OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Clear Linux 41900 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 337943.14
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.9 436.7 504.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Floating Point Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 95.63
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.4 516.7 620.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Stress-NG Test: Zlib OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Zlib Clear Linux 41900 6 12 18 24 30 23.70
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 267.3 334.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Stress-NG Test: Pthread OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pthread Clear Linux 41900 30 60 90 120 150 121.09
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 387.6 443.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: Hash OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Hash Clear Linux 41900 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K 74446.91
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.3 434.5 504.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: Poll OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Poll Clear Linux 41900 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 182109.72
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 514.5 597.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Stress-NG Test: Function Call OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Function Call Clear Linux 41900 70 140 210 280 350 301.97
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.9 368.9 433.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Mutex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mutex Clear Linux 41900 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1114196.53
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 138.4 277.8 369.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Stress-NG Test: Futex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Futex Clear Linux 41900 100 200 300 400 500 451.62
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 313 1775 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Stress-NG Test: IO_uring OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: IO_uring Clear Linux 41900 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2176.92
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 447.6 523.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: SENDFILE OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: SENDFILE Clear Linux 41900 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8642.08
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 235.8 261.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: x86_64 RdRand OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: x86_64 RdRand Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1636.75
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.0 394.9 459.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: NUMA OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: NUMA Clear Linux 41900 0.0054 0.0108 0.0162 0.0216 0.027 0.024
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.9 258.2 298.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: MMAP OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MMAP Clear Linux 41900 14 28 42 56 70 64.67
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 244.1 272.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: MEMFD OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MEMFD Clear Linux 41900 0.2527 0.5054 0.7581 1.0108 1.2635 1.123
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.4 384.1 445.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: Malloc OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Malloc Clear Linux 41900 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2308470.57
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.8 206.0 484.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Stress-NG Test: CPU Cache OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Cache Clear Linux 41900 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10426.13
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 265.3 304.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Stress-NG Test: Atomic OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Atomic Clear Linux 41900 0.0923 0.1846 0.2769 0.3692 0.4615 0.41
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.8 328.0 371.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Stress-NG Test: Context Switching OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Context Switching Clear Linux 41900 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 85539.41
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 290.7 379.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Stress-NG Test: Socket Activity OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Socket Activity Clear Linux 41900 20 40 60 80 100 74.38
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.8 374.9 432.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Stress-NG Test: Semaphores OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Semaphores Clear Linux 41900 1.3M 2.6M 3.9M 5.2M 6.5M 5964091.72
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.0 236.1 270.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stress-NG Test: System V Message Passing OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: System V Message Passing Clear Linux 41900 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K 53115.84
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.6 272.0 307.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Stress-NG Test: Forking OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Forking Clear Linux 41900 15 30 45 60 75 66.26
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.7 497.9 578.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Stress-NG Test: Matrix Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix Math Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 962.09
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.6 442.2 507.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Math Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1937.93
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 109 591 713 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Glibc C String Functions OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc C String Functions Clear Linux 41900 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 297303.10
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 109 580 715 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Clear Linux 41900 2 4 6 8 10 7.681
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 575 698 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Stress-NG Test: Memory Copying OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Memory Copying Clear Linux 41900 40 80 120 160 200 202.76
Stress-NG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.0 454.2 529.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stress-NG Test: CPU Stress OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s Per Watt, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Stress Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 866.10
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 383.0 586.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.8 303.4 580.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.6 398.2 586.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.3 366.4 584.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.7 288.4 577.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.7 396.3 586.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 359.4 589.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.6 284.9 581.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 394.6 589.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 445 649 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 24.05 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating Clear Linux 41900 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1775.40
OpenVKL CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Clear Linux 41900 110 220 330 440 550 Min: 107.64 / Avg: 420.7 / Max: 625.61
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC Clear Linux 41900 1.2366 2.4732 3.7098 4.9464 6.183 5.496
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 487 630 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 0.0009 0.0018 0.0027 0.0036 0.0045 0.004
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.8 417.7 624.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.3 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Clear Linux 41900 0.0018 0.0036 0.0054 0.0072 0.009 0.008
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 178.2 198.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.0297 0.0594 0.0891 0.1188 0.1485 0.132
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.2 186.3 216.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.0275 0.055 0.0825 0.11 0.1375 0.122
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.3 188.6 213.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.0254 0.0508 0.0762 0.1016 0.127 0.113
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 244.2 282.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Clear Linux 41900 0.0164 0.0328 0.0492 0.0656 0.082 0.073
uvg266 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 260.2 316.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
uvg266 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.8.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Clear Linux 41900 0.0153 0.0306 0.0459 0.0612 0.0765 0.068
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 159.8 180.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.0554 0.1108 0.1662 0.2216 0.277 0.246
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 91.8 173.1 200.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.222
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.7 180.6 215.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Clear Linux 41900 0.0466 0.0932 0.1398 0.1864 0.233 0.207
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.1 232.6 285.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Clear Linux 41900 0.032 0.064 0.096 0.128 0.16 0.142
Kvazaar CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.7 240.9 310.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Clear Linux 41900 0.0306 0.0612 0.0918 0.1224 0.153 0.136
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 109.0 384.6 600.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 109 536 626 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 502 631 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108.5 402.7 614.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.8 491.4 617.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.7 389.3 614.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.3 345.8 561.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Clear Linux 41900 0.0878 0.1756 0.2634 0.3512 0.439 0.39
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 210.1 552.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Clear Linux 41900 0.1463 0.2926 0.4389 0.5852 0.7315 0.65
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.8 324.9 550.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Clear Linux 41900 0.1058 0.2116 0.3174 0.4232 0.529 0.47
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 306.5 559.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
NAMD Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms Clear Linux 41900 0.0014 0.0028 0.0042 0.0056 0.007 0.006
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.3 227.9 432.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAMD Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms Clear Linux 41900 0.0034 0.0068 0.0102 0.0136 0.017 0.015
RocksDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.4 183.0 204.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
RocksDB Test: Update Random OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Clear Linux 41900 200 400 600 800 1000 1049.84
RocksDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107.5 288.8 354.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
RocksDB Test: Read Random Write Random OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Clear Linux 41900 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8207.70
RocksDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 108 392 692 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
RocksDB Test: Read While Writing OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Clear Linux 41900 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K 55439.70
RocksDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 107 614 716 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 200 400 600 800 1000
RocksDB Test: Random Read OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Clear Linux 41900 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 2682372.79
ClickHouse CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Clear Linux 41900 106.9 158.7 433.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
ClickHouse 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean Per Watt, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Clear Linux 41900 0.5126 1.0252 1.5378 2.0504 2.563 2.278
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4