3970x sep 2023 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2309185-NE-3970XSEP295&grs .
3970x sep 2023 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution a AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads) ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1603 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 64GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz) AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio ASUS VP28U Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 Ubuntu 22.04 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 42.2 X Server + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47) 1.2.204 GCC 11.4.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x830104d - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20.1+1-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04) - Python 3.10.12 - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Mitigation of untrained return thunk; SMT enabled with STIBP protection + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
3970x sep 2023 brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric hadoop: File Status - 100 - 10000000 hadoop: File Status - 50 - 10000000 hadoop: File Status - 20 - 10000000 hadoop: File Status - 100 - 1000000 hadoop: File Status - 50 - 1000000 hadoop: File Status - 20 - 1000000 hadoop: File Status - 100 - 100000 hadoop: File Status - 50 - 100000 hadoop: File Status - 20 - 100000 hadoop: Rename - 100 - 10000000 hadoop: Delete - 100 - 10000000 hadoop: Create - 100 - 10000000 hadoop: Rename - 50 - 10000000 hadoop: Rename - 20 - 10000000 hadoop: Rename - 100 - 1000000 hadoop: Delete - 50 - 10000000 hadoop: Delete - 20 - 10000000 hadoop: Delete - 100 - 1000000 hadoop: Create - 50 - 10000000 hadoop: Create - 20 - 10000000 hadoop: Create - 100 - 1000000 hadoop: Rename - 50 - 1000000 hadoop: Rename - 20 - 1000000 hadoop: Rename - 100 - 100000 hadoop: Open - 100 - 10000000 hadoop: Delete - 50 - 1000000 hadoop: Delete - 20 - 1000000 hadoop: Delete - 100 - 100000 hadoop: Create - 50 - 1000000 hadoop: Create - 20 - 1000000 hadoop: Create - 100 - 100000 hadoop: Rename - 50 - 100000 hadoop: Rename - 20 - 100000 hadoop: Open - 50 - 10000000 hadoop: Open - 20 - 10000000 hadoop: Open - 100 - 1000000 hadoop: Delete - 50 - 100000 hadoop: Delete - 20 - 100000 hadoop: Create - 50 - 100000 hadoop: Create - 20 - 100000 hadoop: Open - 50 - 1000000 hadoop: Open - 20 - 1000000 hadoop: Open - 100 - 100000 hadoop: Open - 50 - 100000 hadoop: Open - 20 - 100000 cassandra: Writes ncnn: CPU - FastestDet ncnn: CPU - vision_transformer ncnn: CPU - regnety_400m ncnn: CPU - squeezenet_ssd ncnn: CPU - yolov4-tiny ncnn: CPU - resnet50 ncnn: CPU - alexnet ncnn: CPU - resnet18 ncnn: CPU - vgg16 ncnn: CPU - googlenet ncnn: CPU - blazeface ncnn: CPU - efficientnet-b0 ncnn: CPU - mnasnet ncnn: CPU - shufflenet-v2 ncnn: CPU-v3-v3 - mobilenet-v3 ncnn: CPU-v2-v2 - mobilenet-v2 ncnn: CPU - mobilenet stress-ng: System V Message Passing stress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting stress-ng: Glibc C String Functions stress-ng: Vector Floating Point stress-ng: Fused Multiply-Add stress-ng: Context Switching stress-ng: Wide Vector Math stress-ng: Socket Activity stress-ng: Mixed Scheduler stress-ng: Vector Shuffle stress-ng: Memory Copying stress-ng: Matrix 3D Math stress-ng: Floating Point stress-ng: x86_64 RdRand stress-ng: Function Call stress-ng: AVX-512 VNNI stress-ng: Vector Math stress-ng: Matrix Math stress-ng: Semaphores stress-ng: CPU Stress stress-ng: CPU Cache stress-ng: SENDFILE stress-ng: IO_uring stress-ng: AVL Tree stress-ng: Pthread stress-ng: Forking stress-ng: Cloning stress-ng: Malloc stress-ng: Crypto stress-ng: Atomic stress-ng: Mutex stress-ng: MEMFD stress-ng: Futex stress-ng: Zlib stress-ng: Poll stress-ng: Pipe stress-ng: NUMA stress-ng: MMAP stress-ng: Hash memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:10 memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:10 memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:5 memtier-benchmark: Redis - 100 - 1:1 memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:5 memtier-benchmark: Redis - 50 - 1:1 deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: ResNet-50, Baseline - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: ResNet-50, Baseline - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Asynchronous Multi-Stream pgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Write pgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write pgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency pgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 800 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 800 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 500 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 200 - 400 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 500 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 200 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 800 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 500 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 200 - 100 apache-iotdb: 100 - 1 - 200 - 100 couchdb: 500 - 3000 - 30 couchdb: 500 - 1000 - 30 couchdb: 300 - 3000 - 30 couchdb: 300 - 1000 - 30 couchdb: 100 - 3000 - 30 couchdb: 100 - 1000 - 30 build-gcc: Time To Compile avifenc: 10, Lossless avifenc: 6, Lossless avifenc: 6 avifenc: 2 avifenc: 0 vvenc: Bosphorus 1080p - Faster vvenc: Bosphorus 1080p - Fast vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Faster vvenc: Bosphorus 4K - Fast svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 13 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 12 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K openradioss: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container openradioss: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation openradioss: Bird Strike on Windshield openradioss: Cell Phone Drop Test openradioss: Chrysler Neon 1M openradioss: Bumper Beam aom-av1: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Bosphorus 4K a 537121 1490535 307475 489237 2074689 2288330 1960784 396825 724638 149925 15992 18086 16006 8889 3789 16064 9635 3926 18208 8861 3752 16260 8910 3733 26157 153128 11088 3712 17599 8839 3685 15373 8203 3571 158995 89635 284333 9132 3735 8593 3567 113714 1226994 502513 420168 436681 263638 7.61 52.81 19.01 12.43 23.28 17.13 7.74 9.69 29.24 14.2 2.86 8.07 4.97 7.05 5.21 5.52 14.02 10638598.45 946.62 31979929.5 94009.97 33465006.28 10942678.54 1498606.48 9538.61 34353.13 22868.27 12458.08 2795.68 11278.99 4453.62 24195.96 1396743.12 224058.27 199130.4 107860946.05 82381.09 1617463.87 530872.63 442330.43 373.47 128780.28 51559.3 3222.12 98198159.73 78148.34 479.35 18884754.77 393.05 4441035 3502.5 4086609.46 13851265.33 754.61 446.68 7624024.19 2191452.33 2127101.53 2147272.63 1943330.63 2085593.65 1962532.28 553.1876 28.8052 129.9008 123.0023 45.988 347.2985 490.6618 32.354 68.1472 234.6932 101.8795 156.9096 49.5813 322.5404 469.0201 34.1095 104.6882 152.6078 8.026 1987.8228 49.8469 320.8471 189.9882 84.1963 62.6834 255.1247 24.6833 647.5511 550.2483 28.9402 82.731 12087 69.696 11478 47.687 10485 22.525 11099 0.986 1014537 11.066 9037 89.767 11140 0.783 1022077 0.473 1056453 0.226 1107736 0.097 1026569 72.3 11065 45.588 10968 24.071 10386 0.698 1433045 12.072 8284 0.554 1443932 0.335 1493244 0.169 1481168 0.068 1466898 3762.871 266 2523.265 317 1517.751 329 630.711 396 0.656 1524497 175.942 568 0.522 1533021 0.319 1567522 0.159 1576869 0.065 1540137 355.25 81231176 95.15 79844854 233.73 78451272 60.12 77801658 130.54 53828947 34.76 53756801 339.42 77131211 93.94 79688165 248.51 66302152 65.93 69052926 160.29 41758329 42.19 43282315 112.37 60748076 98.48 44916090 77.25 22807204 157.62 39801968 147.22 27615777 128.15 12720025 87.3 3333342 23.05 3256331 78.33 2292358 20.78 2250548 73 953899 19.61 952128 120.74 2307967 32.26 2294842 115.25 1520487 30.83 1477700 109.8 631664 28.32 650057 69.25 1044528 65.67 675295 65.05 266795 122.28 546770 115.63 344892 117.16 139562 1252.186 405.365 872.944 279.302 485.932 147.598 984.347 4.882 6.746 3.333 42.345 79.614 25.035 13.924 10.993 5.468 368.88 316.793 81.057 8.942 129.986 126.784 64.245 3.81 216.49 66.03 139.13 42.11 547.81 94.37 OpenBenchmarking.org
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric a 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K 537121 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -ltcl8.6 -lregex_brl -lz_brl -lnetpbm -ldl -lm -ltk8.6
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1490535
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 a 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 307475
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 a 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K 489237
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 a 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K 2074689
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2288330
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 a 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K 1960784
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 a 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K 396825
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 a 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K 724638
Apache Hadoop Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: File Status - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 149925
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15992
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 a 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18086
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 16006
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8889
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3789
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 16064
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9635
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3926
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 a 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18208
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8861
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3752
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 16260
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8910
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3733
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 a 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K 26157
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 10000000 a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 153128
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11088
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3712
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 a 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17599
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8839
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3685
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 15373
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8203
Apache Hadoop Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Rename - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3571
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 10000000 a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 158995
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 10000000 a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 89635
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 1000000 a 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 284333
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9132
Apache Hadoop Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Delete - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3735
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8593
Apache Hadoop Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Create - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3567
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 1000000 a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 113714
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 1000000 a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1226994
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 100 - Files: 100000 a 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K 502513
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 50 - Files: 100000 a 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K 420168
Apache Hadoop Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops per sec, More Is Better Apache Hadoop 3.3.6 Operation: Open - Threads: 20 - Files: 100000 a 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K 436681
Apache Cassandra Test: Writes OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes a 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 263638
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet a 2 4 6 8 10 7.61 MIN: 7.49 / MAX: 8.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer a 12 24 36 48 60 52.81 MIN: 52.34 / MAX: 56.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m a 5 10 15 20 25 19.01 MIN: 18.5 / MAX: 19.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd a 3 6 9 12 15 12.43 MIN: 12.27 / MAX: 14.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny a 6 12 18 24 30 23.28 MIN: 21.99 / MAX: 102.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 a 4 8 12 16 20 17.13 MIN: 16.86 / MAX: 17.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: alexnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet a 2 4 6 8 10 7.74 MIN: 7.22 / MAX: 8.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 a 3 6 9 12 15 9.69 MIN: 9.48 / MAX: 11.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 a 7 14 21 28 35 29.24 MIN: 28.45 / MAX: 31.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: googlenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet a 4 8 12 16 20 14.2 MIN: 14.03 / MAX: 16.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: blazeface OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface a 0.6435 1.287 1.9305 2.574 3.2175 2.86 MIN: 2.78 / MAX: 3.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 a 2 4 6 8 10 8.07 MIN: 7.98 / MAX: 10.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet a 1.1183 2.2366 3.3549 4.4732 5.5915 4.97 MIN: 4.88 / MAX: 6.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 a 2 4 6 8 10 7.05 MIN: 6.87 / MAX: 7.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 a 1.1723 2.3446 3.5169 4.6892 5.8615 5.21 MIN: 5.15 / MAX: 5.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 a 1.242 2.484 3.726 4.968 6.21 5.52 MIN: 5.41 / MAX: 8.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet a 4 8 12 16 20 14.02 MIN: 13.89 / MAX: 14.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
Stress-NG Test: System V Message Passing OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing a 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M 10638598.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting a 200 400 600 800 1000 946.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Glibc C String Functions OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions a 7M 14M 21M 28M 35M 31979929.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Vector Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 94009.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Fused Multiply-Add OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add a 7M 14M 21M 28M 35M 33465006.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Context Switching OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching a 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M 10942678.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Wide Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1498606.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Socket Activity OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9538.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Mixed Scheduler OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler a 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K 34353.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Vector Shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle a 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 22868.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Memory Copying OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12458.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Matrix 3D Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math a 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2795.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11278.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: x86_64 RdRand OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand a 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4453.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Function Call OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call a 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 24195.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: AVX-512 VNNI OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1396743.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Vector Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math a 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 224058.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Matrix Math OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math a 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 199130.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Semaphores OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 107860946.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: CPU Stress OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 82381.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: CPU Cache OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1617463.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: SENDFILE OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE a 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K 530872.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: IO_uring OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring a 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K 442330.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: AVL Tree OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree a 80 160 240 320 400 373.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Pthread OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 128780.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Forking OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking a 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K 51559.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Cloning OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning a 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 3222.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Malloc OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 98198159.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Crypto OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto a 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 78148.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Atomic OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic a 100 200 300 400 500 479.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Mutex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex a 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M 18884754.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: MEMFD OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD a 90 180 270 360 450 393.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Futex OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex a 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K 4441035 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Zlib OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3502.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Poll OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll a 900K 1800K 2700K 3600K 4500K 4086609.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Pipe OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe a 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 13851265.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: NUMA OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA a 160 320 480 640 800 754.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: MMAP OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP a 100 200 300 400 500 446.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Stress-NG Test: Hash OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash a 1.6M 3.2M 4.8M 6.4M 8M 7624024.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lapparmor -latomic -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lEGL -lGLESv2 -ljpeg -lmpfr -lpthread -lrt -lsctp -lz
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2191452.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2127101.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2147272.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 a 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K 1943330.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 a 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K 2085593.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 a 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K 1962532.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 120 240 360 480 600 553.19
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 7 14 21 28 35 28.81
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 30 60 90 120 150 129.90
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 30 60 90 120 150 123.00
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 10 20 30 40 50 45.99
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 80 160 240 320 400 347.30
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 110 220 330 440 550 490.66
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 8 16 24 32 40 32.35
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 15 30 45 60 75 68.15
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 50 100 150 200 250 234.69
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 20 40 60 80 100 101.88
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 30 60 90 120 150 156.91
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 11 22 33 44 55 49.58
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 70 140 210 280 350 322.54
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 100 200 300 400 500 469.02
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 8 16 24 32 40 34.11
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 20 40 60 80 100 104.69
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 30 60 90 120 150 152.61
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 2 4 6 8 10 8.026
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1987.82
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 11 22 33 44 55 49.85
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 70 140 210 280 350 320.85
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 40 80 120 160 200 189.99
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 20 40 60 80 100 84.20
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 14 28 42 56 70 62.68
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Sentiment Analysis, 80% Pruned Quantized BERT Base Uncased - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 60 120 180 240 300 255.12
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 6 12 18 24 30 24.68
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 140 280 420 560 700 647.55
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 120 240 360 480 600 550.25
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.5 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream a 7 14 21 28 35 28.94
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 20 40 60 80 100 82.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write a 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12087 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 16 32 48 64 80 69.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11478 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 11 22 33 44 55 47.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10485 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 5 10 15 20 25 22.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11099 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.2219 0.4438 0.6657 0.8876 1.1095 0.986 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1014537 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 3 6 9 12 15 11.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9037 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 20 40 60 80 100 89.77 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11140 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1762 0.3524 0.5286 0.7048 0.881 0.783 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1022077 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1064 0.2128 0.3192 0.4256 0.532 0.473 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1056453 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0509 0.1018 0.1527 0.2036 0.2545 0.226 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1107736 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0218 0.0436 0.0654 0.0872 0.109 0.097 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1026569 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 16 32 48 64 80 72.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 11065 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 10 20 30 40 50 45.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10968 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 6 12 18 24 30 24.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10386 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1571 0.3142 0.4713 0.6284 0.7855 0.698 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1433045 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 3 6 9 12 15 12.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write a 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8284 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1247 0.2494 0.3741 0.4988 0.6235 0.554 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1443932 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0754 0.1508 0.2262 0.3016 0.377 0.335 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1493244 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.038 0.076 0.114 0.152 0.19 0.169 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1481168 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0153 0.0306 0.0459 0.0612 0.0765 0.068 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1466898 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3762.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write a 60 120 180 240 300 266 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2523.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write a 70 140 210 280 350 317 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 300 600 900 1200 1500 1517.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write a 70 140 210 280 350 329 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 140 280 420 560 700 630.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write a 90 180 270 360 450 396 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1476 0.2952 0.4428 0.5904 0.738 0.656 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1524497 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency a 40 80 120 160 200 175.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write a 120 240 360 480 600 568 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.1175 0.235 0.3525 0.47 0.5875 0.522 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1533021 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0718 0.1436 0.2154 0.2872 0.359 0.319 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1567522 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0358 0.0716 0.1074 0.1432 0.179 0.159 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1576869 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency a 0.0146 0.0292 0.0438 0.0584 0.073 0.065 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
PostgreSQL Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1540137 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 80 160 240 320 400 355.25 MAX: 36343.06
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 81231176
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 20 40 60 80 100 95.15 MAX: 24703.91
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 79844854
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 50 100 150 200 250 233.73 MAX: 29440.62
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 78451272
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 13 26 39 52 65 60.12 MAX: 25378.76
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 17M 34M 51M 68M 85M 77801658
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 30 60 90 120 150 130.54 MAX: 30310.14
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M 53828947
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 8 16 24 32 40 34.76 MAX: 26220.14
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M 53756801
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 70 140 210 280 350 339.42 MAX: 30587.68
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 17M 34M 51M 68M 85M 77131211
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 20 40 60 80 100 93.94 MAX: 10678
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 79688165
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 50 100 150 200 250 248.51 MAX: 29910.26
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M 66302152
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 15 30 45 60 75 65.93 MAX: 11163.91
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 15M 30M 45M 60M 75M 69052926
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 40 80 120 160 200 160.29 MAX: 30002.47
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M 41758329
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 10 20 30 40 50 42.19 MAX: 13129.29
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M 43282315
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 112.37 MAX: 24952.79
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M 60748076
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 20 40 60 80 100 98.48 MAX: 24817.64
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M 44916090
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 20 40 60 80 100 77.25 MAX: 25157.99
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M 22807204
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 157.62 MAX: 27019.65
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M 39801968
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 147.22 MAX: 26885.03
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M 27615777
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 128.15 MAX: 26464.6
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 12720025
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 20 40 60 80 100 87.3 MAX: 29090.52
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K 3333342
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 6 12 18 24 30 23.05 MAX: 24688.91
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K 3256331
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 20 40 60 80 100 78.33 MAX: 28777.24
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2292358
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 5 10 15 20 25 20.78 MAX: 24672.59
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2250548
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 16 32 48 64 80 73 MAX: 28730.9
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 953899
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 5 10 15 20 25 19.61 MAX: 24718.57
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 952128
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 30 60 90 120 150 120.74 MAX: 27670.84
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2307967
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 7 14 21 28 35 32.26 MAX: 13249.76
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2294842
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 30 60 90 120 150 115.25 MAX: 27893.69
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1520487
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 7 14 21 28 35 30.83 MAX: 11938.33
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1477700
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 20 40 60 80 100 109.8 MAX: 27389.67
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 631664
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 7 14 21 28 35 28.32 MAX: 13253.97
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 650057
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 15 30 45 60 75 69.25 MAX: 24498
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 1044528
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 15 30 45 60 75 65.67 MAX: 24490.15
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 675295
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 15 30 45 60 75 65.05 MAX: 24428.16
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 266795
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 122.28 MAX: 26411.88
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K 546770
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 115.63 MAX: 26551.59
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 344892
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 30 60 90 120 150 117.16 MAX: 26308.47
Apache IoTDB Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 139562
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 a 300 600 900 1200 1500 1252.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 a 90 180 270 360 450 405.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 a 200 400 600 800 1000 872.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 a 60 120 180 240 300 279.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 a 110 220 330 440 550 485.93 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Apache CouchDB Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 a 30 60 90 120 150 147.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lmozjs-91 -lm -lei -fPIC -MMD
Timed GCC Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile a 200 400 600 800 1000 984.35
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless a 1.0985 2.197 3.2955 4.394 5.4925 4.882 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless a 2 4 6 8 10 6.746 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6 a 0.7499 1.4998 2.2497 2.9996 3.7495 3.333 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 2 a 10 20 30 40 50 42.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 a 20 40 60 80 100 79.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster a 6 12 18 24 30 25.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -flto=auto
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast a 4 8 12 16 20 13.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -flto=auto
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster a 3 6 9 12 15 10.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -flto=auto
VVenC Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast a 1.2303 2.4606 3.6909 4.9212 6.1515 5.468 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -flto=auto
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p a 80 160 240 320 400 368.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p a 70 140 210 280 350 316.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p a 20 40 60 80 100 81.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p a 2 4 6 8 10 8.942 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K a 30 60 90 120 150 129.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K a 30 60 90 120 150 126.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K a 14 28 42 56 70 64.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K a 0.8573 1.7146 2.5719 3.4292 4.2865 3.81 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq
OpenRadioss Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container a 50 100 150 200 250 216.49
OpenRadioss Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation a 15 30 45 60 75 66.03
OpenRadioss Model: Bird Strike on Windshield OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield a 30 60 90 120 150 139.13
OpenRadioss Model: Cell Phone Drop Test OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test a 10 20 30 40 50 42.11
OpenRadioss Model: Chrysler Neon 1M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M a 120 240 360 480 600 547.81
OpenRadioss Model: Bumper Beam OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam a 20 40 60 80 100 94.37
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4