win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06X96V, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB 2400MHz HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH, Disk: 477GB THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB + 932GB ASMT 2105 + 0GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable + 954GB Inateck ASM1153E + 224GB Inateck + 60GB Lexar USB Flash Drive USB Device + 58GB SanDisk Ultra Fit USB Device + 233GB Inateck + 7GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device, Graphics: Intel HD P630 + DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 4GB (1150/2505MHz), Network: TAP-Windows V9 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + USB
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.25 (23.20.16.4973), Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.32, N = 2 25.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.33, N = 2 33.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 2.55, N = 2 38.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 4.41, N = 2 49.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.47, N = 2 28.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 7.41, N = 2 59.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.88, N = 2 67.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 2.41, N = 2 49.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 2.00, N = 2 36.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.31, N = 2 77.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.23, N = 2 30.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.84, N = 2 25.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 5.18, N = 2 61.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.62, N = 2 69.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.84, N = 2 46.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.42, N = 2 40.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 3.11, N = 2 55.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 3.69, N = 2 34.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.64, N = 2 21.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 2.85, N = 2 31.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 3.32, N = 2 94.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.51, N = 2 21.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 2.79, N = 2 32.03
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 8.06, N = 2 40.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 4.03, N = 2 40.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 2.01, N = 2 58.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 10.11, N = 2 58.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.53, N = 2 27.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 15.88, N = 2 62.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.30, N = 2 30.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 4.82, N = 2 38.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 11.54, N = 2 58.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.44, N = 2 31.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.30, N = 2 27.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 5.55, N = 2 33.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.50, N = 2 62.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 2.13, N = 2 51.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 5.58, N = 2 51.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 15.28, N = 2 54.52
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 12.74, N = 2 43.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 9.38, N = 2 29.81
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.45, N = 2 36.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 2.11, N = 2 22.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 14.54, N = 2 45.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 2.68, N = 2 24.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 2.01, N = 2 20.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 6.26, N = 2 37.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 16.35, N = 2 68.62 MIN: 11 / MAX: 164
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 3.79, N = 2 70.78 MIN: 18 / MAX: 140
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 8.81, N = 2 87.66 MIN: 46 / MAX: 179
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 8.89, N = 2 94.40 MIN: 48 / MAX: 228
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.65, N = 2 93.16 MIN: 41 / MAX: 248
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.79, N = 2 107.34 MIN: 64 / MAX: 180
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 21.39, N = 2 107.08 MIN: 37 / MAX: 212
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.87, N = 2 125.86 MIN: 83 / MAX: 237
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.41, N = 2 130.31 MIN: 79 / MAX: 301
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.05, N = 2 131.75 MIN: 49 / MAX: 220
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.06, N = 2 150.00 MIN: 90 / MAX: 425
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.38, N = 2 155 MIN: 96 / MAX: 413
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.69, N = 2 165.77 MIN: 105 / MAX: 263
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.12, N = 2 172.65 MIN: 103 / MAX: 397
GpuTest GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3375.50, N = 2 9320
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 71.50, N = 2 1481
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 65.00, N = 2 1027
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 2048.50, N = 2 13351
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 38.50, N = 2 2782
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 724.00, N = 2 22558
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 15.00, N = 2 1746
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 477.50, N = 2 21644
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 3078.50, N = 2 42737
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 29.50, N = 2 3334
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 3.00, N = 2 672
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 2918.00, N = 2 29802
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 1092
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 6.50, N = 2 2398
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 4.00, N = 2 5010
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 17.00, N = 2 6302
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 178.50, N = 2 6395
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.50, N = 2 2079
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 159.50, N = 2 5214
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 74.00, N = 2 2559
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 1206.50, N = 2 18300
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1047.50, N = 2 12495
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 242.00, N = 2 1734
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 868.00, N = 2 15642
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 3738.00, N = 2 22445
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 2187.50, N = 2 17928
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.50, N = 2 1897
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 10.00, N = 2 1904
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 262.50, N = 2 13499
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 18.50, N = 2 1300
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 1417.00, N = 2 28334
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 66.50, N = 2 900
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 184.50, N = 2 8534
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 78.00, N = 2 3223
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 87.00, N = 2 1449
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 174.00, N = 2 11042
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 53.50, N = 2 5086
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 41.50, N = 2 1947
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 2611.50, N = 2 37200
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 184.50, N = 2 6262
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 91.50, N = 2 4980
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 84.50, N = 2 2591
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 28.00, N = 2 4727
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 28.00, N = 2 2901
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 50.00, N = 2 2345
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 17.50, N = 2 7042
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 198.00, N = 2 4486
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.00, N = 2 432
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 7.00, N = 2 430
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 17.00, N = 2 1346
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 94.00, N = 2 998
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 15.50, N = 2 1100
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 141.00, N = 2 2030
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.50, N = 2 1773
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 11.50, N = 2 667
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 58.00, N = 2 890
win10-pro_graphics-bench_30apr2019 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06X96V, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB 2400MHz HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH, Disk: 477GB THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB + 932GB ASMT 2105 + 0GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable + 954GB Inateck ASM1153E + 224GB Inateck + 60GB Lexar USB Flash Drive USB Device + 58GB SanDisk Ultra Fit USB Device + 233GB Inateck + 7GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device, Graphics: Intel HD P630 + DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 4GB (1150/2505MHz), Network: TAP-Windows V9 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + USB
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.25 (23.20.16.4973), Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Testing initiated at 30 April 2019 17:23 by user Chi.