Apple M1 testing with a Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) and llvmpipe on Arch Linux ARM via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208202-NE-BLOSCETCD91 blosc etcd apple m1 - Phoronix Test Suite blosc etcd apple m1 Apple M1 testing with a Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) and llvmpipe on Arch Linux ARM via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2208202-NE-BLOSCETCD91&rdt&gru .
blosc etcd apple m1 Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution A B C Apple M1 @ 2.06GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads) Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) 8GB 251GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q + 2 x 0GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q llvmpipe Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57762 PCIe + Broadcom BRCM4378 + Broadcom Device 5f69 Arch Linux ARM 5.19.0-rc7-asahi-2-1-ARCH (aarch64) KDE Plasma 5.25.4 X Server 1.21.1.4 4.5 Mesa 22.1.4 (LLVM 14.0.6 128 bits) GCC 12.1.0 + Clang 14.0.6 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-multilib --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch=armv8-a --with-linker-hash-style=gnu Processor Details - Scaling Governor: apple-cpufreq schedutil Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
blosc etcd apple m1 blosc: blosclz shuffle blosc: blosclz bitshuffle etcd: PUT - 50 - 100 etcd: PUT - 100 - 100 etcd: PUT - 50 - 1000 etcd: PUT - 500 - 100 etcd: PUT - 100 - 1000 etcd: PUT - 500 - 1000 etcd: RANGE - 50 - 100 etcd: RANGE - 100 - 100 etcd: RANGE - 50 - 1000 etcd: RANGE - 500 - 100 etcd: RANGE - 100 - 1000 etcd: RANGE - 500 - 1000 etcd: PUT - 50 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: PUT - 100 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: PUT - 50 - 1000 - Average Latency etcd: PUT - 500 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: PUT - 100 - 1000 - Average Latency etcd: PUT - 500 - 1000 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 50 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 100 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 50 - 1000 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 500 - 100 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 100 - 1000 - Average Latency etcd: RANGE - 500 - 1000 - Average Latency A B C 12730.7 3381.7 77098.1566 67473.1495 104710.9778 67649.2483 97330.5999 68099.4930 77528.6019 67265.8795 104472.7386 67582.6608 97175.4005 68200.6186 1.3 1.4 9.2 1.4 9.9 13.8 1.3 1.5 9.2 1.4 9.9 13.8 12559.8 3468.1 77375.1165 67437.7404 104643.0929 67678.4569 97442.4547 68129.861 77329.4293 67355.9702 104776.3414 67714.1992 97623.5649 68192.1319 1.3 1.4 9.2 1.4 9.9 13.8 1.3 1.5 9.2 1.4 9.9 13.8 12017 3414.3 77569.6555 67529.9845 104560.8191 67682.5112 97339.2274 68168.3076 77367.5571 67043.7444 104893.2932 67445.9396 97560.667 68173.6643 1.3 1.4 9.3 1.4 9.9 13.8 1.3 1.5 9.2 1.4 9.9 13.8 OpenBenchmarking.org
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle A B C 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 175.71, N = 3 12730.7 12559.8 12017.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle A B C 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 7.27, N = 3 3381.7 3468.1 3414.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 A B C 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K SE +/- 200.06, N = 3 77098.16 77375.12 77569.66
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 A B C 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 120.79, N = 3 67473.15 67437.74 67529.98
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 A B C 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 148.59, N = 3 104710.98 104643.09 104560.82
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 A B C 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 9.52, N = 3 67649.25 67678.46 67682.51
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 A B C 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 83.64, N = 3 97330.60 97442.45 97339.23
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 A B C 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 69.45, N = 3 68099.49 68129.86 68168.31
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 A B C 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K SE +/- 73.35, N = 3 77528.60 77329.43 77367.56
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 A B C 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 57.03, N = 3 67265.88 67355.97 67043.74
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 A B C 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 73.23, N = 3 104472.74 104776.34 104893.29
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 A B C 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 135.00, N = 3 67582.66 67714.20 67445.94
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 A B C 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 123.68, N = 3 97175.40 97623.56 97560.67
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 A B C 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 24.06, N = 3 68200.62 68192.13 68173.66
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.2925 0.585 0.8775 1.17 1.4625 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.3 1.3 1.3
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.315 0.63 0.945 1.26 1.575 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 1.4 1.4 1.4
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 9.2 9.2 9.3
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.315 0.63 0.945 1.26 1.575 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.4 1.4 1.4
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 9.9 9.9 9.9
etcd Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 13.8 13.8 13.8
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.2925 0.585 0.8775 1.17 1.4625 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.3 1.3 1.3
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.3375 0.675 1.0125 1.35 1.6875 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 1.5 1.5 1.5
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 9.2 9.2 9.2
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency A B C 0.315 0.63 0.945 1.26 1.575 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.4 1.4 1.4
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 9.9 9.9 9.9
etcd Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency A B C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 13.8 13.8 13.8
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4